Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of healthcare accreditation
Importance of healthcare accreditation
Importance of healthcare accreditation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of healthcare accreditation
Margaret E. O’Kane is the founder and president of the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). NCQA is one of the nation’s leading advocates for improving healthcare through measurement, reporting, and accountability. NCQA is the foremost accrediting organization for health plans including HMOs, PPOs, and consumer directed plans. (Margaret) “Our goal is to increase the value of NCQA accreditation both to organizations pursuing accreditation and to the audiences who seek help in assessing the quality of health care provided by those organizations”. NCQA has developed, maintained, and expanded the nation’s most widely used health care quality tool, which is known as the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). HEDIS is responsible for evaluating whether and how well …show more content…
O’Kane explained that there was a general anger about managed care because it has changed physician’s incomes, it’s changed their autonomy, and its changed their relationship with their patients. She also explained the anger more specifically regarding the NCQA relating to accountability and evidence-based practice, and that they are very controversial in the physician community. O’Kane also explains to Managed Care how the fact that the plan to hold physicians accountable for quality is offensive to a profession that is not used to being accountable to others. O’Kane tells in her interview that she understands that the nature of this work is inherently controversial. “What we have to do is choose a sort of balance posture where we weigh scientific imperfection, which is the reality here, against creating potential damage in the marketplace because of scientific imperfection”.
Theresa Campana, CEO of the Buckeye Group, is a manufacturer’s agent for three companies that sells different types of software. As a sales agent for Accto Co., Saleco Inc., and Invo Inc., the Buckeye Group is responsible for calling business customers to sell accounting software, sales management software, as well as inventory management software out of Columbus, Ohio. With regards to logistics, according to the case, the Buckeye Group has sold $550,000 of total software, with Campana earning a 10 percent commission from Accto and Saleco, as well as a 7 percent commission from Invo per her dollar value of her final sales. Evidently, Campana’s initial ease of making sales come from her high knowledge of the products, background in business,
Klein, E. (2014). A health industry expert on ‘the fundamental problem with Obamacare.’ The Washington Post. Retrieved on 2/8/14 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/09/a-health-industry-expert-on-the-fundamental-problem-with-obamacare
The standards of the Joint Commission are a foundation for an objective evaluation process the may help healthcare organizations measure, assess and improve performance. These standards are focused on organizational functions that are key for providing safe high quality care services. The Joint Commission’s standards set goal expectations of reasonable, achievable and surveyable performance of an organization. Only new standards that are relative to patient safety or care quality, have positive impact on healthcare outcomes, and can be accurately measured are added. Input from healthcare professionals, providers, experts, consumers and government agencies develop these standards.
...e adopting some form of contract that encourages population management and cost minimization (Muhlestein, 2013). ACO continues to only represent a small minority of care delivered in the United States. ACOs are still a work in process and their eventual success or failure is still to be determined, but the Accountable Care Organization’s influence on the American health care system continues. Many ACOs will complete a risk-based ACO contract, and their early results will influence how payers, providers and policymakers experiment with future iterations of Accountable Care. If the results are good, then the ACO model may become the dominant form of health care in the United States over the next decade (Muhlestein, 2013). If the results are negative, Accountable Care Organizations may never gain a permanent place in the United States healthcare delivery system.
Ghosh, C. (2013). Affordable Care Act: Strategies to Tame the Future. Physician Executive, 39(6), 68-70.
Wise, N., & Taylor, F. (n.d.) Moving Forward With Reform: The Health Plan Pulse for 2012 and Beyond. Retrieved January 16, 2012 from
As I began watching Reinventing Healthcare-A Fred Friendly Seminar (2008), I thought to myself, “man, things have changed since 2008.” And as the discussion progressed, I started to become irritated by how little had changed. The issues discussed were far-reaching, and the necessity for urgent change was a repeated theme. And yet, eight years later, health care has made changes, but many of its crucial problems still exist.
It is essential to conduct continuous evaluation of the health care systems with regards to the quality of care. Health care is a very sensitive sector as it is mandated to provide quality care as well as ensuring patient safety. For these reasons, it is essential to have an organized body that will ensure the standards of quality are the same throughout all health care facilities. This crucial service is provided by the Joint Commission (JCAHO). The body provides standards that are then used to accredit health care facilities.
The Joint Commission provides one single authority on all official evaluation and measurement of patient care in both acute and ambulatory facilities. This is a big advantage for the facilities that must continuously meet their rigorous requirements to maintain accreditation. They learn what the Joint Commission specifically wants and works hard to set plans to achieve or exceed their standard. In “2014, the Joint Commission’s Annual Report, which documents health care quality improvement in U.S. hospitals, shows significant gains in hospital quality performance” (The Joint Commission, 2015, p. C4).
... is an abstract model that proposes an exploratory plan for health services and evaluating quality of health care. In accordance with the model, information about quality of care can be obtained from three categories: structure, process, and outcomes. In addition, not long ago The Joint Commission include outcomes in its accreditation valuations (Sultz, & Young, 2011, p. 378).
Having a quality assurance program is required by most state licensing programs and accrediting organizations. The Department of Health and Human Services considers high quality health care for Medicare patients a high priority, so since 2010, home health agencies have been required to collect data and evidence showing this type of care. Having quality assurance care promotes the best practices across the home health industry and results in better patient care. It also results in effectiveness, efficiency, patient centeredness, safety and
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
Integral to a successful quality improvement is the integration of all the organization’s processes and procedures with its quality improvement efforts, identification and prioritization of potential areas for improvement using its patient population, practice operations or even established quality improvement measures as guide, data gathering and analysis to help understand how the its system works, set measurable goals, and monitor the effectiveness of change as well as communicating results. And because quality improvement is an on-going process, the organization must commit itself to ongoing evaluation and this is where accreditation might be used as a tool. Central to accreditation is a systematic quality improvement
Quality measurement can be used to progress our nation’s health care by many ways. It’s avoiding the overuse, underuse, and waste of health care services and guaranteeing patient safety; also, it helps categorizing what works in health care and what doesn’t work to drive development. In addition, Quality measurement helps with holding health insurance plans and health care providers responsible for providing high-quality care. determining and addressing disparities in how care is distributed and in health outcomes; and helping clients make knowledgeable choices about their car. There are many practical techniques and methods of quality measurement used by a healthcare organization. The two important methods commonly used is
Ransom, E. R., Joshi, M. S., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (2008). The healthcare quality book. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.