Now comes the other necessary component to the story. Scapegoating. The scapegoating in the story comes from the suspicion that is first formed at the beginning of the story which put together, creates the chaos and destruction found in the story. On page 7, the people of Maple Street just watched Les Goodman try to turn on his car and saw him fail to do so. But then, his car turns on without him doing anything which leaves everyone on Maple Street suspicious, wondering why his car turned on and the reader can see that everyone on. Maple Street is starting to form ideas in their heads about Les Goodman. Don ponders "’Well, maybe you better tell us. There's nothing working working on this street. Nothing. No lights, no power, no radio. (And …show more content…
then meaningfully) Nothing except one car - yours!’” (Serling, page 7). This evidence from the text is the first accusation that was made. This accusation basically gave everyone on Maple Street the idea that it was okay to start accusing people and that they had to. It also sent a message to everyone.
That message was that anything out of the ordinary or anything weird that happens on Maple Street, is proof that that person is the monster. This may seem like a crazy thing to do, but it’s really not crazy. Humans in general just seem to have the need to know the answer to everything. And if they don’t know what the answer is or can’t find an answer, then they’ll automatically resort to scapegoating and will use that as their answer. So it may seem that what the people of Maple Street are doing is ridiculous, but it really is just human nature. On page 10, everyone on Maple Street has tried to incriminate Les Goodman, but he defends himself by saying that he has insomnia. His fellow neighbors walk away, except some stay and are still on edge. Charlie says “‘Any guy who’d spend his time lookin’ up at the sky early in the morning- there’s something that’s wrong with that kind of person...Under normal circumstances, we’d let it go by, but these aren’t normal circumstances...It’s like going back into the dark ages,’” (Serling, page 10). This quote shows that any little weird thing people do is considered evidence that they’re a …show more content…
monster. It also shows that they’re scapegoating because the circumstances are different, when they’re not all that different.
They are just in a power outage where someone told them a story about aliens coming to Earth. The only thing different is that some items are gaining and losing power. But that’s still not very different because lights flicker during power outages. It’s the story that made them act this way with the scapegoating and suspicion. And the part about the dark ages is foreshadowing how the situation will get much worse because in the dark ages, there was lots of persecution. This story also seems to be telling the readers that humans form ideas in their heads about a situation based off of minor differences. In the situation happening in the story, they have a power outage with items turning on and off. Not much of a difference from a normal power outage, but yet they consider it a a special circumstance. On page 11, Steve goes to talk to Les Goodman about what’s going on and Charlie remind him that he’s not eliminated from the list of suspects yet, and them Steve reminds him that none of them are above suspicion. Then Steve says “‘...Lets pick out every idiosyncrasy of every man, woman, and child on this whole street...to get rid of all the suspects. Narrow them down for
you. Make it easier,’” (Serling, page 11). This line shows that Steve can see what everyone is trying to do. They're picking out every weird and unusual thing that each person does to try and find out who the monsters are. This also seems like the people on Maple Street take this as almost an order because they do exactly what Steve said in the quote. This only proves that people perceive situations and information differently. Everyone on Maple Street seems to be taking this whole situation seriously except for Steve who seems to be taking the situation as a joke. Steve also seems to believe that everyone understands the situation they’re in as a joke, when they really don’t think it is. This is making some of his statements understood differently than expected, which happens with everyone in all situations. So now that the readers know about some of the early types of scapegoating happening in the story, let’s see how more types of scapegoating lead to the disastrous fallout found in “Monsters are Due on Maple Street”. On page 13, a dark figure starts walking towards all the neighbors gathered on Maple Street. Everyone thinks that this dark figure is the monster coming and they all get ready to defend themselves. The stage directions say "’We see a CLOSE SHOT of a hammer on the hip of the walking figure. Charlie pulls the trigger...The figure stumbles forward onto his knees and then falls forward on his face,’" (Serling, page 13). In this quote, a dark figure is coming up to the people gathered on Maple Street and Charlie, without any thought, shots a gun at him and kills him. Since he immediately killed the dark figure who the reader knows isn't a monster, it tells the readers that everyone on Maple Street is overcome with fear and that they are blaming everything and anything for what’s happening. This also tells the reader that in situations where there is lots of scapegoating, suspicion, and uncertainty because people are trying to find an answer to something that when their believed answer arrives, then they will not act rationally and will do the first thing that comes to their head. In this situation, it was to shoot at the figure but this could be different in other situations. On page 15, the people of Maple Street are certain that Charlie is the alien, but then Charlie accuses Tommy. So everyone goes after Tommy. But then lights start going on and off in other peoples’ houses and everyone is different people and sheer mayhem breaks out. Charlie, Man One, Woman One, Don and Les Goodman say “‘It isn’t the kid...It’s Bob Weaver’s house.’ ‘It’s the Williams’ house!’ ‘It’s the kid, I tell ya!’ ‘It’s Charlie. He’s the one,’“ (Serling, page 15). This quote shows the reader how the people aren’t even asking anymore. They’re just firing accusations at people. This quote also shows that the mob the people were in is now breaking apart into chaos because no one is agreeing on who the monster is. They are no longer thinking as one, but they are still not thinking normally. They are still trained to the topic of monsters, but since no one is agreeing anymore, this situation can officially be labeled as chaos. Chaos can only happen when humans fully give in to what is happening and when they are so consumed in fear, suspicion, and uncertainty that they are just using anything to explain what is happening. This chaos can happen to everyone because it is simply another flaw in human nature. Also on page 15, the author gives a description of what this chaos is like. The stage directions tell the reader this by saying "’...we see panic stricken neighbors with lights coming off and on their faces...people shout, accuse, and scream at one another. Sheer mayhem breaks out, neighbor battling neighbor, grabbing for rifles, bricks, even the hammer from Van Horn's body,’” (Serling, page 15). This shows the fallout of what all the scapegoating led to. It led to all of them just accusing, attacking, and frightening others through sheer chaos! This shows the effects of scapegoating. And even though these effects of scapegoating seem like something that’s terrible when reading this story, they are found as inevitable when faced with these circumstances in real life because they are human nature, which makes the thought even scarier. The “Twilight Zone”, the several stories encompassing the fear in humans told by the mysterious Rod Serling. In “Monsters are Due on Maple Street” by Rod Serling, the author shows the reader that suspicion and scapegoating can lead to chaos and destruction. At one point in the story, Tommy tells everyone a story of aliens coming to Earth who seem like humans, but who are really aliens which causes the mood to turn into a suspicious mood which later turns into chaos (Serling page 6). Later in the story, Steve claims that no one is above suspicion and jokes around saying that they should pick out every flaw everyone has and use it to accuse them. His neighbors then seem to take this as an order and start accusing each other which starts them on the road leading to their destruction. Then finally, towards the end of the story, everyone ends up just accusing different people and sheer mayhem or chaos breaks out and soon after, destruction occurs. Sounds crazy right? Well, imagine that everyone around you was so overcome with fear that they began running around screaming, accusing, and picking up weapons that were pointing at everyone including you.
Eden Robinson’s short story “Terminal Avenue” presents readers with the dystopian near-future of Canada where Indigenous people are subjugated and placed under heavy surveillance. The story’s narrator, Wil, is a young Aboriginal man who struggles with his own inner-turmoil after the suicide of his father and his brother’s subsequent decision to join the ranks of the Peace Officers responsible for “adjusting” the First Nations people. Though “Terminal Avenue” takes place in Vancouver there are clear parallels drawn between the Peace Officers of Robinson’s imagination and the Canadian military sent to enforce the peace during the stand-off at Oka, Quebec in 1990. In writing “Terminal Avenue” Robinson addresses the armed conflict and proposes
I am reading Rough Country by John Sandford and I am on page 396. This book is about Virgil Flowers a detective working a murder case in northern Minnesota . He has narrowed down his suspect list to two people and is starting to realize why the killer did what he did and how he did it. Virgil discovered that some people have been withholding information from him and it helps clear up who his number one suspect should be. In this paper I will be questioning and connecting.
Her description is full of emotional words and phrases which enable the reader to feel indignant about the case’s verdict-Nelson is convicted of vehicular homicide following the death of her son. Malchik emphasizes that “[T]he driver who had two previous hit-and-run convictions pleaded guilty,” but the mother who lost her son is forced to be jailed for a longer time. This part of description shapes a poor image of a mother who in order to feed her tired and hungry children, has no choice but to jaywalk. The author explains to the reader that Nelson chooses to jaywalk not because she is crazy, but because of her mother’s identity as well as lack of safer road for them. The purpose of the author is touching readers to sympathize with the mother, assuaging the mother’s guilt, and proving that walking should be human beings’ freedom and liberty. Adding to this idea are words and phrases such as, “instinctive,” “injustice,” “the narrowest,” “lost right,” “Orwellian fashion,” “more treacherous,” “laziness,” and “scorn” (Malchik). All of these emotional words are awkward for Americans. As the author indicates, “[T]he ability to walk is a struggle, a fight, a risk”, which can help to arouse readers’ awareness of protecting their lost opportunities and rights. Apart from these, at the end of the article, Malchik uses several imperative sentences like: “Open your door; go for a walk; feel the spring”, to strengthen the tone. It is also an effective way to attract readers and create strong emotional
The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street? is a story about the paranoia of regular people. When the power and phone lines stop working on Maple Street, the residents become hostile. One boy puts an idea into their heads that aliens impersonating humans have done it. This single thought catalysts and soon all of the neighbors are ready to hurt each other for answers.
The criminal justice system of the 1950’s can be described as very impartial and flawed, the story doesn’t tell the reader what crime was committed, but it does imply that the misfit may have hurt his father.... ... middle of paper ... ... Although readers can assume so many symbolic coincidences throughout the story, we must face reality, symbolism doesn’t prove the existence of supernatural powers among us.
The struggle going on inside of Goodman Brown's head is really between remaining innocent and having blind faith i...
...rs and situations to help explain the societal issues surrounding the time period. The dreadfulness comes from the controversial issues and feelings these characters experience. These characters must overcome these dreadful experiences in order to change what society deems as acceptable in the future.
...ther serves to excite and stimulate our senses as we travel into the deranged mind of a killer ? offering us a unique perspective through the first person point of view. Similarly, the ending of ?Young Goodman Brown? offers a moral, but leaves the main character in a state of discord and callousness towards his wife, and his religion. The story is didactic, because the main character is punished for his transgressions. Symbolism, evident especially in Hawthorne?s allegory, and the repetition of Poe?s suspenseful tale serve to further the goals of each writer. Ultimately, Hawthorne?s Goodman Brown becomes isolated from humanity, an issue of the head and the heart, and Poe?s narrator withdraws inside himself, an issue purely of the mind. Recognizing this discord from the self and humanity is essential to understanding the behavior of these troublesome characters.
The boy begins the panic by saying there are aliens and that they have been living on maple street disguised as humans. He says he has read this kind of story in his comic books and this gets into the adults minds. They start getting paranoid. Nothing gets any better once the character charlie begins leading a witch hunt and starts to blame people on anyone doing anything “suspicious”. Everyone is to blame for the violence that occurs on the street. Everyone allowed their fear and paranoia get the best of them and they went along with what the boy said and even along with randomly accusing people. The one character that tried to calm the situation and could tell what would happen with leading a witch hunt and having this go any further is steve. Throughout the story he tries to lessons people 's fear and show how outrageous they all were being. But even he by the end of it fell to the fear of the unknown and his paranoia.
Taking this path that closes behind him represents Young Goodman’s decent into the unconscious and his loss of innocence. On this journey he soon meets a man who is a condensation of several different factors. The man represents the devil, as well as Brown unconscious
...g our way through life. Some people choose to go the other direction and are trying to ruin our society by becoming criminals and lead a life of violence. In the outsider Meursault and his friend got caught in a fight with a bunch of Arabs who wanted to kill Meursaults' friend and Meursault himself for being there, the best solution Meursault and his friend had was to come back another day and try to do the same to those Arabs. Unluckily Meursault got caught and had to pay for his crime which according to society was also not showing any remorse to his moms death (and other things that are described in the book). In the case of the book of mice and men Lenny gets picked on by the husband of the bosses daughter because the guy was clearly jealous of Lenny and needed to make an excuse for wanting to fight with him, but this happened simply because the guy disliked Lenny, also for the reason that Lenny was retarded.
Regarding the theme, the clues increase when Goodman, having left his wife, Faith, all alone and melancholy, enters the woods and encounters a sinister type with whom he has previously made an appointment for this particular evening:
Moses Milstein ``Memories of Montreal – and Richness`` and Rohinton Mistry ``Lend Me Your Light`` are two essays written to explore cultural identity. Moses was born in Austria; however grew up and was educated in Canada. Rohinton was born in India; went to school in India and then immigrated to Canada when he was 27. Milstein and Mistry both explore cultural identity through the different experiences that they had throughout childhood. Both essays explore the why cultural identity is important in how we grow up.
It is surprising, in a way, to discover how few of the many critics who have discussed "Young Goodman Brown'' agree on any aspect of the work except that it is an excellent short story. D. M. McKeithan says that its theme is "sin and its blighting effects." Richard H. Fogle observes, "Hawthorne the artist refuses to limit himself to a single and doctrinaire conclusion, proceeding instead by indirection,'' implying, presumably, that it is inartistic to say something which can be clearly understood by the readers. Gordon and Tate assert, "Hawthorne is dealing with his favorite theme: the unhappiness which the human heart suffers as a result of its innate depravity." Austin Warren says, ''His point is the devastating effect of moral scepticism." Almost all critics agree, however, that Young Goodman Brown lost his faith. Their conclusions are based, perhaps, upon the statement, "My Faith is gone!" made by Brown when he recognizes his wife's voice and ribbon. I should like to examine the story once more to show that Young Goodman Brown did not lose his faith at all. In fact, not only did he retain his faith, but during his horrible experience he actually discovered the full and frightening significance of his faith.
If an individual is familiar with their surrounding “they are more likely to help” (Altruism and Helping Behavior. Print). In the essay, the authors state “the scene of the crime, the streets, in middle class society “represents all the vulgar and perilous in life” (Milgram, Stanley, and Paul Hollander. Paralyzed Witnesses: The Murder They Heard. Print.). In society, the streets, especially at night, represents the dangerous and negative sides of society due to the crimes and chaos that occur on the streets (gangs, drive-by shootings, robberies, murders, large crowds walking, etc.). The crimes and dangers of the streets cause many people to fear being on the streets alone which leads to external conflicts. When the murder was occurring, the witnesses’ attitudes of the streets prevented them from calling the police due to the fear of the streets and since the witnesses were middle-class, they believed that Genovese was poor, a criminal, or someone who has nothing else to do and was expecting for the=is to eventually