Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Application of managerial economics
Application of managerial economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Application of managerial economics
Managerial economics is based upon how to gain the most benefit from one’s company depending on the market and decisions made to help compensate the changes within the market. This form of economics dives into applying economic ideas and analyzing the economic world to make rational and critical managerial decisions. However, starting with managerial economics, one has to create a system of organization to build a foundation for one’s company. Many successful businesses have this systematic framework that can be applied consistently in addressing organizational problems to structure more effective organizations.
The book suggests creating an “organizational architecture” which describes a framework identifying three critical aspects of a corporation.
…show more content…
The economic model used by most managers is ranking their choices in terms of preference, then choosing their most preferred alternatives. This procedure is of selecting the most valuable option is completed by marginal analysis. Marginal analysis is calculating marginal costs and marginal benefit, ensuring that marginal benefit exceeds marginal costs. Marginal costs and benefits are the incremental costs and benefits that are associated with making a decision. Within marginal costs, one must also compute opportunity cost, which means that individuals make decisions on what can maximize their personal happiness, both financially and emotionally, by choosing the best alterative when dealing with infinite wants and limited resources. There are various types of economic models made to increase productivity and maximize benefit of employees used by managers. These models are listed as Only-Money-Matters model, Happy-Is-Productive, model, Good-Citizen model, and Product-of-the-Environment model. Managers using the behavior model of Only-Money-Matters, believe the only important component of the job is a level of monetary compensation. The Happy-Is-Productive behavior model assumes that happy employees are more productive than unhappy employees, meaning their goal is designing work environments to satisfy employees …show more content…
These types of uncertain circumstances arise when the individual does not know the precise trade-off, such as purchasing stocks and bonds. Key concepts used to mitigate risk are titled Expected Value, Variability, Risk Aversion, Certainty Equivalent and Risk Premium, and Risk Aversion and Compensation. The first concept, Expected Value, is defined as the weighted average of all the possible outcomes, where the probability of each outcome is used as the weights. The expected value is used to soften risk by measuring the average payoff that will occur. An example of this would be turning a paper with three questions on it. The concept of expected value is calculated by multiplying the probability of each outcome (1/4) by each possibility (0, 33, 66, and 100), then adding them all together, to find the average (50), or expected value. Once Expected Value is calculated, it is important to follow up with the next concept, Variability, because the expected value is not certain. Variance, meaning the measure of variability, can be found by multiplying the probability of each outcome (1/4) by the difference between each possible payoff and the expected value (0-50, 33-50, 66-50, and 100-50), squaring each individual calculation, then adding each calculation together (619). However, the
Sachs, A. (2010). Management, Plain and Simple. Time, 175(15), Global 4. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Prahalad, C. & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard business Review [Online Edition] Retrieved from https://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~charlesw/s591/willstuff/oldstuff/PhD_2007-2008/Papers/C08/Prahalad_Hamel_1990.pdf
(2014) is “the way in which leaders interact, make decisions, and influence others in the organization” (p 237). The culture needs to foster cooperation from all areas of an organization, while providing the ability for adaptation and growth. Not all organizations culture will be the same, there is not a correct one that can blanket all organizations to cozy success. (3) Talent Systems. Human capital drives all organizations, the right people need to be in the right jobs with the correct opportunities for growth and advancement. There must be a constant search for strategic thinkers and leaders able to step up with called upon. The authors mention “Talent Sustainability” (p. 248), there must be enough qualified employees ready to move up so the organization will not stall while searching for others to replace others due to attrition, or other opportunists. (4) Organizational Design, must take a number of variables into account while providing structure to an organization. Hughes et al. (2014) state “the design of the organization is a trade-off between options, each with advantages and disadvantages” (p 253). The correct design can help clear the hierarchy of an organization and the proper channels for
In order for one to evaluate and identify with the diverse business structures, he/she must be aware of the meaning and standards that makes that structure. Various businesses functions in different ways as the world is full of technology and new structures, company cultures and new ways in which companies are run. In order to fully grasp the concepts of Organizational structure and culture in the movies, I will use the Movie Up in the Air and The Devil Wear Prada movies to analyze a business scenario from them.
Companies. Retrieved July 4, 2008, from University of Phoenix, MMPBL-501 Web site. University of Phoenix . ( 2008). Economics for Managerial Decision Making
Contemporary management of the business. 7 ed. of the book. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. McComb, S., Schroeder, A., Kennedy, D., & Vozdolska, R. (2012).
This paper provides a critical assessment of the performance of organizations which could be linked to economic theories and concepts. Through a review of various literature, research and conclusions of economists such as Friedman (1970), Coase (1937), Williamson (1981, 1998, 1975), Sloman et al. (2013), Powell (1990), Taylor (2011, 2012) and so on, the researcher presents a critical assessment of the microeconomic and macroeconomic concepts which were found to affect performance of a typical organizations. The concepts were also linked to other aspects of economics ...
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.
The purpose of this paper is to briefly analyze why burrs and rough spots suddenly started to appear on quarter panel parts at an automotive company. Three out of four production lines at an automotive plant facility experienced defects of manufactured panel parts. Also, an analysis of how the panel problem is related to organizational sub-culture, organizational politics and job stress. Although there are several implications of various issues related to organizational culture, organizational politics and job stress is important because it determines how human capital within an organization will demonstrate the capacity to cope with working for the organization, thus determining the success of the organization. “To illustrate, studies have shown that job stress results from the interaction of the worker and the conditions of the workplace, i.e., the culture (Vigoda, 2002).” “Likewise, there are studies conducted that found organizational politics to have an adverse effect on psychological issues such as job stress (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt,1989).” Therefore, an organizations most valued asset is its employees.
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
The manager should be able to select and know these factors. As organization is created systems by people, the internal factors are mainly the result of management decisions. Not all of the internal factors are completely controlled by the management. Organization is influenced by many environmental factors. In the new millennium we have to learn how to live in a market economy. And the most important condition for this is a highly skilled managers. Ability to identify and analyze the internal elements of the organization and external factors is the key to the success of the business. The main factors in the organization that require management attention are objectives, structure, tasks, technology and people. An organization can be seen as a means to achieve the objectives that allows people to perform collectively what they could not carry out individually. Goals are desired outcome, which aims to achieve a group working together. The main objective of most organizations is profit. Income is a key indicator of the organization. People are the basis of any organization. Without people there is no organization. They shape the culture of the organization and its internal climate. They determine what the organization is. Manager generates frames, establishes a system of relations between people and include them in the process of
“It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw para. Therefore, the individual can still attain high job productivity without having the satisfaction in their field of work. This happens when money is just their motivation, or if they’re trying to receive a promotion. Others try to increase their productivity due to just the satisfaction they obtain from their work.
META Group considers enterprise architecture as a process as opposed to an object, thereby referring to it as enterprise architecture process. Its enterprise architecture describes the systematic linkages between the enterprise business, technical architectures, information and enterprise solution architecture. It has modified the traditional enterprise architecture in a manner that extends from the level of business strate...
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.
Job satisfaction represents one of the most complex areas facing today’s managers when it comes to managing their employees. Many studies have demonstrated an unusually large impact on the job satisfaction on the motivation of workers, while the level of motivation has an impact on productivity, and hence also on performance of business organizations. There is a considerable impact of the employees’ perceptions for the nature of his work and the level of overall job satisfaction. Financial compensation