Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Henry the 8th and the catholic church
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Henry the 8th and the catholic church
Set in the 16th Century, “A Man of All Seasons” is a true story about a well-known judge, Sir Thomas Moore, whose silence lead him to his execution. Sir Thomas was a man who followed his convictions and the teachings of the Catholic Church. When King Henry VIII decided to create his own religion in order to divorce his wife, he had an oath created that acknowledged him as leader to the new church. Sir Thomas did not sign it and was eventually executed for high treason. Because of the creative costumes and inspiring acting, “A Man of All Seasons” is a fantastic movie to watch despite its arduous vocabulary. The costumes in “A Man of All Seasons” were incredibly detailed due to the fact that the clothing a person wore in the 16th century showed …show more content…
their role in society. Every person had a different costume that showed their position in the kingdom. Every part of the costume had a significant meaning to the plot of the movie. You could watch Sir Thomas’s costumes get less and less extravagant as he lost his positions in the government. I believe that the costumes were extremely accurate and satisfying. However this movie is not without fault.
He story required the use of old English vocabulary that many people do not completely understand. These strange words caused some confusion during the major plot points in the story. When Sir Thomas was attempting the make his friend, the Duke, get upset with him, he talked fast and used several words that I have never even heard of before. This was a key point in the film that I missed due to confusion that could have been avoided with simpler vocabulary. For the most part, the acting was fabulous. I was able to connect with the characters and feel the pain that they were going though. I felt as if I was part of the story. One of the parts with the worst acting was towards the end when Sir Thomas’s family came to visit him one last time in prison. His wife said a few lines that were not exactly convincing, but for the most part I believe that the acting was superb. I can see why this film won so many different various awards. Overall, “A Man of All Seasons” is a well-executed movie. The plot made sense and was relatable to today. It was extremely realistic and I would have to recommend it to anyone with the ability to process larger vocabulary words and who has an understanding of old fashioned language. The difficult vocabulary is not enough to keep me from giving this film a big thumbs up. I really enjoyed this film and I would definitely watch it
again.
Overall, I enjoyed this play. Even with the dull ending, I found it to be entertaining and a good use of my time. The cast was great and they made good use of a decent
Their acting chops were very impressive whether it was comedic, emotional, or just stunning overall. Yet, on the other hand, some minor characters weren’t as well heard as others. I feel as the play could be better if some of the minor characters had projected their voice more, allowing their character to be known. However, although some voices were much stronger than others, all actors were full of talent, capable of dealing with script’s requirements, and did a good job
All characters in the movie were played well by the actors in my opinion. They
ideas. A reader of A Man for All Seasons, by Robert Bolt, may not be accustomed
Transformations inherently contain traces of the author’s social and cultural context. Much of the same can be applied to “Much ado about nothing”. It incorporates comical features, yet retains the sense of tragedy which is attached to almost all of Shakespeare’s plays. Brain Percival’s role as a director, was determining, understanding and distinguishing the social norms and the social structure of the society, and how the themes represented in the play can be transformed into a modern text. The Elizabethan society was typically a patriarchal society. Percival has used as well as transformed certain themes and textual features to ensure, that the film is more appealing and assessable to the critical modern audience.
The first thing I will go over is the actors. Overall, they did a fantastic job and portrayed the characters well. Zachery Schaftlein, who played Father Brenden Flynn, and Abigail Elmore, Sister Aloysius Beauvier, both did a fantastic job in their roles. I loved the
More: “And what would you do with a water spaniel that was afraid of water? You’d hang it! Well, as a spaniel is to water, so is a man to his own self.”
Kenneth Branagh creates his own individualistic adaptation of this classic through the use of visual imagery, characterization, and setting. Branagh cut many lines and speeches from the text to better support his interpretation of a more open and informal society of warm-hearted, affectionate characters. Though Shakespeare's mood is more formal, Branagh remains true to the essence of the play as all of the same characters and most of the dialogue are justly included in the film. Although distinct differences can be made between Branagh’s film and Shakespeare’s written work, they both share a common denominator of good old-fashioned entertainment; and in the world of theater, nothing else really matters.
The purpose of A Man for All Seasons by Robert Bolt is to inform its readers the one should not conform to the ideologies and the pressures placed upon individuals by the society. The play portrays that discordance with the society may occur when standing by one’s conscience, but embracing one’s beliefs will lead to moral satisfaction. In the play, Thomas More does not assert against his beliefs in the favour of King Henry VIII which eventually leads to him being granted a death penalty by decapitation. It is the idealistic nature of More that leads him on to the path of annihilation. It is important that a person stands up for their beliefs, but it is more important to mould one according to the situation to ensure one’s safety. More dies because he firmly stands by his beliefs, but this only caused pain to his family and lead to no permanent solution to the issue he was standing up against. King Henry VIII still married Ann Boleyn, whether be it with or without More’s agreement. Instead, More could have just accepted King’s decision of going against the church, even if he did not truly believe in his decision, and saved his family of the pain that was caused due to his death. After the Jailer locks More in the jail, he
For a college production, the acting was outstanding. I really felt the emotions. The lead Wendla, who was played by KyLeigh Zimmerer, was amazing. I have also seen bits and pieces of the Broadway version which starred Lea Michelle, and obviously if I were to compare the acting, the Broadway version would be victorious. However, for a college production, these actors have limited past experience, but their acting was professional. Also, when they sang the song "Those You've Known," I felt chills and had goose bumps because that was such an emotional song. You could feel all the emotions and guilt Melchior, played by Ryan Ramirez, was feeling because both his best friend, Moritz, played by Justin Noblitt, and the girl he impregnated, Wendla, died and he believed he was to blame. Moritz committed suicide while Wendla died from a botch abortion her mom for...
For a truly Christian man, nothing is more important than preparing the immortal soul for the next life. In the play, “A Man For All Seasons,” Sir Thomas Moore is a devout Christian–apparent due to his unceasing prayers, vast humbleness, devotion to his family, and his ardency in maintaining the truth. His refusal to obey King Henry VIII shows that he believes strongly in life after death, for going against the King of England in Renaissance Era ensured swift, lethal retribution. The only way that Sir Thomas might have remained alive was to swear to the Act of Succession, which violated his deepest convictions about religion. Being a Christian, Sir Thomas decided to let God be the judge of those who endorsed the oath to avoid the wrath of King Henry and remain on earth for an amount of time that would surely pass. Fearing not for his life but for the verdict on his immortal soul, Sir Thomas Moore decided to defend the truth.
In the beginning of A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More is introduced as a profoundly religious man focused on adhering to the laws of his country and faith. As the play progresses the audience sees More putting further faith into his belief that by abiding to the present laws and withholding his opinion about King Henry VIII’s divorce he will be protected from prosecution. The issue starts when the King wishes to divorce his brother’s wife, who initially he had taken as his own through a special papal dispensation, in order to wed Queen Anne and produce a male heir. More, being a devoutly religious man, realizes this goes against the laws of the Church. He refuses to give his willing approval based on the fact it is not morally or lawfully just.
Beliefs are a core aspect of life, but a true test of one’s principles is how far one is willing to go to defend and preserve those beliefs. In A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More exemplifies just how strong his ethics are. A Man for All Seasons is a historical play, written in 1960 by Robert Bolt, which recounts the events of the 16th century surrounding Sir Thomas More, leading up to his death. In A Man for All Seasons, Sir Thomas More becomes Lord Chancellor of England during the time that King Henry VIII divorced his wife, remarried, and declared himself head of the Church of England by the Oath of Supremacy. Since More is a sincerely devout Catholic, he could neither, in good faith, bless the king’s remarriage nor swear to the Oath of Supremacy. As a result, Sir Thomas More is charged with High Treason and is executed, making him a martyr in real life and a tragic hero in the play. Throughout the play, Sir Thomas More proves to be a tragic hero because he possesses a tragic flaw and is a man of great noble stature.
Overall the whole play was good, not great. I was more impressed with how well they were able to bring a bit more comedic side on the whole play of Wolf Hall. There could have been a brought a bit more effort
As far as fairy tales go, this was a decent one. It had a storyline rocky enough to keep the audience on their toes without straying to far from its predictable happy ending profile. The same could be said about the acting. They manage to portray their character to the full extent without arriving too overdone. This is not an insult, however, because ,when playing the role of a character in a fairytale, it is very easy to step over the line that signifies that one is trying too hard to be a character from a fairytale. It is very difficult for one not to be too ditsy, or eccentric when playing a character that is defined as ditsy and eccentric. This cast managed to walk along the tightrope that runs between the two, and I was impressed. One character I am going to put the magnifying glass on is the character of Pantalone, played by Lyndalia.