Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to deal with ethical issues in psychology
Ethical issues in mental health counseling
Ethical issues in mental health counseling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to deal with ethical issues in psychology
a.Define what malpractice is. Malpractice is failing to meet the standard of care listed in the APA Code of Ethics (Fisher,2017). Malpractice can cause injury to a client which is direct violation of ethical code 3.04 Avoiding Harm. Examples of malpractice include abandonment of a client, failing to follow the medical model, and practicing techniques without the proper training (Caudill,n.d). b. Using the assigned readings, describe the areas that are more likely to lead to malpractice and how psychologists can avoid or minimize their liability risk in these different areas. Some areas that are more likely to lead to malpractice include: client/patient suicidality, inappropriate or excessive self disclosure, therapists using treatment techniques …show more content…
Lightfoot’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify the ethical theory guiding your decision? Dr.Lightfoot ethical alternatives for resolving this case are accepting Allison as a client or declining Allison as a client. The best alternative is to decline Allison as a client but refer her to another psychologist because of the possible dual relationship. Utilitarian theory guided me in my decision. 7.What steps should Dr. Lightfoot take to implement his ethical decision and monitor its effect? Dr. Lightfoot should ask Allison to come in so he can speak to her. One Allison come in and he realizes that she is an actual person. He should allow her to know that he cannot see her for ethical reasons and then he should refer her out. Dr. Lightfoot also has to ensure that the psychologist that he refers her to is open and competent. Texas stance on this type of case is that Dr. Lightfoot cannot see Allison. 465.13. Personal Problems, Conflicts and Dual Relationships of Texas state law apply to this case. APA also does not allow this, 3.05 Multiple Relationships of the ethics code prohibits the
Medical malpractice cases are difficult for the families who have lost their loved one or have suffered from severe injuries. No one truly wins in complicated court hearings that consist of a team of litigation attorneys for both the defendant and plaintiff(s). During the trial, evidence supporting malpractice allegations have to be presented so that the court can make a decision if the physician was negligent resulting in malpractice, or if the injury was unavoidable due to the circumstances. In these types of tort cases, the physician is usually a defendant on trial trying to prove that he or she is innocent of the medical error, delay of treatment or procedure that caused the injury. The perfect example of being at fault for medical malpractice as a result of delaying a procedure is the case of Waverly family versus John Hopkins Health System Corporation. The victims were not compensated enough for the loss of their child’s normal life. Pozgar (2012) explained….
The method of ethical decision making which was developed by Dr. Cathryn A. Baird presented two components contained in all ethical decisions which are; The Four ethical Lenses and the 4+1 Decision process. The Four Ethical Lenses issue claims that different ethical theories and the means in which we tend to approach the situations which form part of our ethical traditions are looked at in four different perspectives. From each perspective there are different values on which to decide whether the action taken is either ethical or not and each lens also lays emphasis on determining whether the decision made is of ethical requirement. In the 4+1 Decision Process, people who are responsible for making final decisions in an organization do it using four specific decision making steps and eventually will end up with one extra decision which gives a chance to reflect. The 4+1 decision process allows the decision makers to give solutions when faced with complicated ethical issues (John Muir Institute for Environmental Studies, 2000).
This case study is an interpretation of a problem or situation that has occurred within a LPC’s (License Professional Counselor) care. As information is gathered, the depiction to this specific problem in this case study may also include additional information that may deem so to be necessary, in order to place possible solutions or actions that could have or will arise from the situation. This document will consist of a step by step analysis of the factors which impact the case, mostly in the order of what appears to be the most ethically sound decision. This document involves Stephanie’s (therapist) treatment of Martha Rose (client). The therapist, Stephanie, has been given a case through referral from an unknown source; Stephanie is working with this new case in SC (South Carolina).
Over the course of their therapeutic relationship, Dr. Davenport violates client confidentiality as it is described by the American Counseling
An ethical dilemma occurs when moral obligations clash, and may pose a challenge when faced to define which course of action is right or wrong. In the current case, Ashley, an advanced doctoral student is faced with a challenging ethical dilemma at her current practicum site. The ethical dilemma became complex and multi-layered, prompting Ashley to seek peer consultation in efforts to make sound and professional decision making when faced to determine the course of action. Specifically, Ashley who is treating two teenage adolescents (patient A, patient B) from the same H.S. is made aware of private information concerning patient B, from patient A. Patient A is considered to be more “high-risk” due to the recent tragic death of her parents, suicide attempts, and chronic suicidal ideation with plan. Ashley fears that the information she holds may trigger patient A into depression and suicidal ideation. In addition, Ashley is conflicted that withholding the information from her patient may do equal damage, and sever their relat...
Day by day medical technology is improving, unfortunately so are cases of nursing malpractice. By understanding the laws that governs nursing practice, it will help the nurse protect client’s rights and reduce the risk of nursing liability (Sommer, 2013, p. 23). It’s usually necessary to prove that the nurse was negligent to prove nursing malpractice. The Joint Commission defines negligence as a “failure to use such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would under similar circumstances” and malpractice as “improper or unethical conduct or unreasonable lack of skill by a holder of a professional or official position. Sommer defines professional negligence as the failure of a person who has a professional training to act in a reasonable and prudent manner (p. 24).
...f dual relationship there was also a possibility of the client becoming dependant on the therapist which could be seen as unethical by the BACP (2010).
Formulating boundaries, while not always easy to do, is often necessary in order to protect the practitioner from allegations of malpractice, negligence, or any other type of ethical violations for that matter, including breaches in confidentiality. Unfortunately, since ethics are not clearly defined in terms of simply black-or-white or right-or-wrong, it becomes that much more difficult to determine where one line of the professional boundaries starts and another begins. The result of these inconsistencies tends to be somewhat
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1068.
Each situation discussed in this paper provides opportunities for a counselor to explore how a dual relationship would impact the therapeutic relationship with clients and the overall well being of clients. Each ethical dilemma should be handled individually and with the support of a counselor’s supervisor while also taking into account laws or guidelines set forth by employers as decisions are made. As a new counselor I look forward to this decision making process and the personal growth I will experience and the clients I will benefit as a result of my ethical actions.
Making good ethical decisions requires a trained sensitivity to ethical issues and a practiced method for exploring the ethical aspects of a decision and weighing the considerations that should impact our choice of a course of action. Having a method for ethical decision making is absolutely essential. When practiced regularly, the method becomes so familiar that we work through it automatically without consulting the specific steps.
Step 4: Seek a Resolution – What should happen to resolve the ethical issues identified in Step 3? Give reasons or arguments to justify your resolution by using theories or principles of ethics. (250 words or
Life is all about the decisions we make. In fact, the average individual makes 35,000 decision each and every day (Hoomans, 2015). For the healthcare professional, decisions are founded on ethical theories with the pillars of beneficence, non-maleficence and justice as the tools for decision making (Morrison & Furlong, 2014). The ability of health care professionals to apply these theories determines whether or not an appropriate response is achieved in healthcare situations. Unfortunately, at times a professional who has consistently violated the policy for ethical conduct through poor decisions must be disciplined.
There are eight steps in this model, and each step frames and focuses the ethical dilemma in a meaningful way and there are many factors involved in the process. These steps are outlined as follows: (1) Identify the problem or dilemma, (2) Identify the potential issues involved, (3) Review the relevant ethics codes, (4) Know the applicable laws and regulations, (5) Obtain consultation, (6) Consider possible courses of action, (7) Enumerate the consequences of various decisions, and (8) Choose what appears to be the best course of action (Corey, Corey, Corey, & Callaman, 2015). I will apply this model to the case study above as well as expand on the finer points involved in the process in the following
...relationship with the client in future time. Younggren & Gottlieb (2004), mentioned there are dual relationship that unavoidable and yet not unethical. Indeed, there is argument debate that in some circumstances evasion a dual relationship possible to harm the professional relationship with the client (Campbell & Gordon, 2003). The involvement and disputation regards nonsexual multiple relationships may direct the therapists’ flag in engage a careful, reasoned ethical decision-making process.