Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The evolution of parental investment essay
The evolution of parental investment essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The evolution of parental investment essay
Parental care can be defined as parents’ investment in the offspring post egg laying or birth of the young ones. Hence, it does not count the initial investment involved in gamete production (Ridley, 1978; Wells, 2008). In many animals belonging to diverse taxa, neither male nor female offer parental care in which the offspring are left at the mercy of nature whereas, in others only one parent, either male or female, cares for the offspring. In still others both the parents jointly take the responsibility of caring their progeny (Reynolds et al., 2012). Evolution of this diversity in parental care can be explained with the help of cost/benefit ratio of providing the parental care. Lack (1954) proposed a principle to explain the evolution of parental care and the relative investment by the …show more content…
Female parental care (maternal care) seems to be logical and prevalent in animals than the male parental care (paternal care) and these differences in parental investments by male and female are associated to the differences in their reproductive investments (Trivers, 1972). However, there are many vertebrate species in which males contribute significantly towards parental care (Nunes et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2007). Male parental care seems to be rare in animals having internal fertilisation (Duellman and Trueb, 1994) and is most likely to evolve in species with external fertilisation (Gross and Shine, 1981; Beck, 1998). But there another school of thoughts predicts that evolution of parental care is more dependent on the costs and benefits ration than the mode of fertilisation (Beck, 1998). Apparently, evolution of paternal care depends on a) the mode of fertilization, b) territoriality and c) female mate choice or female fecundity (Ridley, 1978; Gross and Shine,
The concepts that Kathleen Genson discusses reinforces the analysis Kramer presented in Chapter 4 “The Family and Intimate Relationships” of The Sociology of Gender. First and foremost, both authors would agree that family is a structure that institutionalizes and maintains gender norms. Both authors would also agree that “families tend to be organized around factors that the individual members cannot control.” In Genson’s chapter “Dilemmas of Involved Fatherhood,” the most prominent forces are the economy and social expectations, both listed and explained by Kramer. Genson’s explanation of how it is unfeasible for men to withdraw from the workforce and focus more time and energy on being involved fathers is an example of the economic factors.
Fortunately, the assumptions made about maternal care in insects do not have to be accepted or rejected based only on faith or an educated guess; today it is possible for these predictions to be empirically tested so that the data may be recorded and analyzed. The following experiment is just one example of the various ways in which ideas regarding insects and maternal care may be effectively evaluated.
...socially directed hormonal instructions which specify that females will want to have children and will therefore find themselves relatively helpless and dependent on males for support and protection. The schema claims that males are innately aggressive and competitive and therefore will dominate over females. The social hegemony of this ideology ensures that we are all raised to practice gender roles which will confirm this vision of the nature of the sexes. Fortunately, our training to gender roles is neither complete nor uniform. As a result, it is possible to point to multitudinous exceptions to, and variations on, these themes. Biological evidence is equivocal about the source of gender roles; psychological androgyny is a widely accepted concept. It seems most likely that gender roles are the result of systematic power imbalances based on gender discrimination.9
How society views family roles, women, and sex, speaks to the idea of the time. Late Medieval Europe viewed these topics through the lens of the Catholic Church. These views began to a transition toward the lens of the law through events like the Reformation and voyages to the New World. Advances in science changed these ideas for it opened gateways of intellectual discourse. The French Revolution demonstrates the changes to understanding of family roles, women, and sex had changed; from a marriage which was wholesome where sex was sacred and a woman was to rear children to a marriage which was broken where sex was open to public scrutiny.
The three bases of Darwinian evolutionary thought state: all animals struggle for existence, inherited traits from parent organisms are passed to offspring, and natural selection provides an advantageous environment for adaptive genes to thrive and usurp the presence of less adaptive genes within the gene pool, in terms of expression (Shoemake). Evolutionary psychologists propose that this theory holds significant influence within the realm of mate selection in humans. Based on these Darwinian principles, successful mate behaviors led to the continued existence of humanity; historically, humans mate preference reflected the best suited pairings that would further the species evolutionarily. Another key component of the evolutionary model comes from the contribution of Robert L. Trivers, an American evolutionary biologist and sociobiologist: the parental investment theory. In short, Trivers’s theory states that individuals facing higher levels of involvement during child-rearing become highly selective when choosing a potential mate. Following Trivers’s research, females are choosier when it comes to mate selection because their minimum risk regarding parental investment is higher than that of male counterparts. Agreement with the model is revealed in Harvard biologist Edward Wilson’s work, On Human Nature. On the topic of sex and mate selection, Wilson affirms that it is to the advantage of
The structure of this essay is based on animals and humans mate choice strategies and gender differences and similarities. These factors are intertwined with males and females reproduction success for choosing the right mate and bearing the parental cost involved in the offspring upbringing. (Trivers, 1972, 1985).Animal males from the evolutionary perspectives seek fertile, strong, females as a security for their offspring reproduction. These males’ strategize for their mate choice by advertising their masculinity as men ready for a mate. (Buss & Barnes, 1986; Buss, 1987).The female animals chooses mate base on their sense of security so they prefer males capable to protect and bear the cost of parenting with them.(Trivers,1972).In humans, females prefer wealthy men with high status as mate (Bjorklund & shackleford, 1999; Buss, 1992) whereas males prefer to date young attractive females who considers as fertile with the ability for genes reproduction.
· My main aim in this project is to find out whether the 'new man'
Child rearing practices altered as a result of the economic shift as well as intellectual shift. Child rearing had shifted from breaking the will of children by means of corporal punishment to mending behavior through psychology and emotional discipline. Different theories and methods of child rearing were disseminated through advice books. This was directed particularly at immigrant families as a way to assimilate them into the American society. Children fiction books became another method implemented to conform immigrant families. Scholars had proposed other theories describing children as not being with original sin but rather, a blank slate or born innocent.
In 1994 Kenrick introduced “Parental Investment Theory”. He claimed society is organised so that women are protected and remain faithful, ensuring men are able to impart their genes to future generations. This also allows for women to be selective to ensure their partner provides food, shelter and other basic human necessities.
The answer to the question of whether parents invest more resources in their male or female offspring is a topic that is likely to vary from one culture to another. It is very common for adults (parent or caregivers) to have a favorite child in the family. Often, the favorite child may be less effective at school and have no extraordinary skills to be proud of for parents. Good parenting requires all children to be loved to the same extent (Lee & Lee, 2011). However, parents tend to love and favor certain children because of their school performances, their social activities, or even their gender. Parents seem to favor the boy child and, in most cases, he gets all the best things as compared to what the girl gets (Barber, 2008). Some are even taken to better schools, while girls always come as the second choice (Deaton, 1989). At the same time, the fact that allocation of commodities in the household may be gender-oriented in some ethnic groups makes girls less favored (Deaton, 1989, p. 1). Categorically, a study on parental investment with a balance between male and female offsprings conducted in a different location would have different results. Research hypothesis of the current research focuses on whether parents tend to invest more resources in offspring of male gender; whether parents favor boys over girls; and whether favoritism results in gender-oriented allocation of commodities in the household or not.
This standard model is known as the seual strategies theory ( Buss & Schmitt, 1993). Buss argues that any species in which differences exist, there will be corresponding sex differences in mating behaviors. The biological reality in humans is that males need minimal investment, a single ejaculation, to reproduce their genes. The cost of female reproduction is traditionally years of investment including gestation, lactation and offspring care. In theory, such one sided investment has resulted in sex-specific selection strategies for reproductive success (Beckes et al. 2009). Human males ‘naturally’ track down opportunities to copulate with as many female partners as possible, specifically those who display signs of fertility. By ‘nature’ human females are more sexually cautious and prefer one male partner who can provide resources to be shared with their offspring. Though emphasis is on sex differences, sexual strategies theorists state that mating behavior--under specific circumstances--can be similar between men and women. The inevitable conclusion from their work is the differences between the sexes regarding mating preferences. The main focus of the sexual strategies theory is that all human mating is inherently strategic. Mating behavior is guided by psychological mechanisms that compel both males and females to desire certain qualities in a mate based
Humans have been shown to be the only animals that systematically share food and other essential resources. Sustained cooperative sharing of food influenced the brain size of early members of the genus Homo. Because the brain takes up so much energy, development rates decrease as the size of the brain increases. Because of this, reproductive rate is reduced because the mother has to spend more of her time and
Patriarchy is a form of social organization in which a male is the head of the family and has all the power to control and be a dominant individual. Male dominance is an ever present concept in society but women found a way to challenge this notion and overcome the hardships of male elitism. In “Nervous Conditions” by Tsitsi Dangarembga is focused on the colonized African clan called the Sigauke clan. The novel examines unequal power relations between men and women in the Sigauke clan which is largely steeped in tradition. The women in the story challenge the practices of male dominance; usually unsuccessful but each of these women make an effort to question some of decisions that were righteous of the patriarch. The women also break out of the role of domesticity and servility to the surprise of the men. “The Awakening” by Kate Chopin and “Things fall apart” by Chinua Achebe are very similar to the notion of woman challenging male elitism.
The demonstrated benefit to the female is “sequential female choice;” that is, the ability (on the part of the female) to allow the fertilization of her egg clutch with more viable offspring. However, this presents an inherent conflict of interest in that sperm competition may lower the fertilization success rates of the species.
Gender roles are extremely important to the functioning of families. The family is one of the most important institutions. It can be nurturing, empowering, and strong. Some families are still very traditional. The woman or mother of the family stays at home to take care of the children and household duties. The man or father figure goes to work so that he can provide for his family. Many people believe that this is the way that things should be. Gender determines the expectations for the family. This review will explain those expectations and how it affects the family.