Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexual harassment of college students
Sexual harassment of college students
Sexual harassment college students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexual harassment of college students
An Analysis of the Thesis of Expanded Academic Liability for the Suspension of Male Dalhousie Students for Sexual Misconduct
In recent times, sexual assault and misogyny have been reported within the context of ethical practices within academic institutions. More particularly, a group of male dental students were accused of sexual making sexually offensive arguments about women in a Canadian University. It was announce by Dalhousie university that 13 male students in 4th year dentistry school posted violent and misogynistic comments about their female colleagues, a post on Facebook called “Class of DDS Gentlemen. (Toronto Star, 2015, para.4). The author also needs to watch for unclear and vague explanations that leave the reader assuming his
…show more content…
The author needs to give reasons for this theoretical question. Otherwise, he is assuming that Dalhousie is allowing the male students to continue in classes and clinics without a proper investigation. The next premise maintains an pathos style of rhetorical argument, which assumes a social threat or humiliation to women in the classroom: “Should female students at the small faculty have to sit next to male students who had joked about “hate f—king” and chloroforming women as they try to buckle down for their final semester of studies?” (Toronto Star, 2015). This premise is emotionally charged and it is a rhetorical question, similar to previous premise. At this point of the article, the author’s arguments are becoming a form of reactionary pathos, which is affecting the overall quality of the supporting argument that supports the conclusion. I don’t disagree with the author, but he needs to explain his reasons why Dalhousie should fully suspended the male students through the premise of logos as a foundation for the argument. For instance, it is presumptuous that male comments will make the female students more self-conscious, allowing them to focus less on their courses and assignments. More so, would it be logical to assume that male students would even speak to female students under the threat of being expelled? In this manner, the author is also not stating how severe this could be on female students because after
Moreover, education can also be halted due to ones gender. This is so in the case of Carrie Bishop. Because she is female, her father will not pay for nursing school. If not for Miles, Carrie's liberal brother and graduate of Berea College, she would have stayed at home and become the traditional homemaker. Another way her education was stunted is not due to anyone persons prevention but by her own personality and physical appearance.
She analyzed conversations among her students to find out what helped them in becoming engaged in the classroom discussion. The class she chose as her subject had eleven women and nine men. Tannen said that she observed the class for a good amount of time when she concluded that almost all the men talked in class occasionally. The student who talked the most in class was a woman, but then she mentions almost half of the women did not speak at all in class. Tannen decided to divide her class in ways where she could prove her thesis statement that having both genders in the same classroom is an issue. She analyzed the students, separated them into three groups that are relevant to each, from their degree, gender, and the conversation style that she observed from each student. Naturally, she focused on how the all-woman group became talkative once the men were gone. At this point of her essay, she focused too much on what she was trying to prove with her thesis statement rather than really giving the readers to consider the other side of the story. As Tannen goes on with explaining the experiment she conducted in class, she started to divert with including the ethnicity of some students. The foreign students tend to talk less despite what gender, therefore counting the validity of their contribution out. The information provided towards the end of the essay started to become irrelevant. This part of her essay was very weak, showing some obvious bias as she was sharing the information
Gerry Garibaldi, a high school teacher and Michael Kimmel, a professor of sociology both explain how the consequences of the feminism movement are harming boys in school and later in life. Kimmel and Garibaldi present their views on the gender education problems in their articles “How The Schools Shortchange Boys” and “A War Against Boys”. Both make passionate arguments and prove that boys are at a disadvantage in modern feminized classrooms. Kimmel’s arguments about the problems boys face in the American educational system are more convincing than Garibaldi’s, because his style of argumentation is more objective, supported by more statistics, and provides unbiased restatement of opposing views.
These cadet’s moral issues against women and them self’s steamed from the oppression that they suffered at the hands of the college’s relentless ego shattering and extreme hazing that would come from the seniors to the knobs. Right from the start of their schooling these men are subjected to horrendous prolonged unjust treat meant where they are told that masculinity is now a way of life. Treatment that was so unforgiving that these men could not even walk away with a clear really of who they were any more instead they would pay attention to the social cues around them and as a result they conform, and obey there male dominating leaders. Then with some hope of regaining some control in their lives they lash out to other class mates this motivational treatment affects any one around them regardless of gender as long as they were seen as weaker. These men were forced to not only play the role of the female, but also that of male causing gender confusion for many of these cadets. By forcing these young men to not only shower together in non-stalled showers and to relay on each other to dress each other with the proper shirt tuck and do all the domestic house work it at times even being dresses as women during etiquette-training, created a highly dysfunctional reality for these young men that they should
They allowed for the formation of interpersonal relationships that led to the developing community of scholars. However, the liberation is no longer front and center, and the even playing ground for professors and students is gone. Gallops repeatedly butts head with different factions of feminists for her continued affairs with students. The newer feminists fight against oppression rather than for liberation, and are troubled with Gallop’s display of sexuality. Here, Gallop’s argument begins to become problematic. She accuses such feminists as being against the open discussion of sexuality. There is some truth in this; as an academic, Gallop is of the right mind to defend the intellectual development of feminism. Unfortunately, such open discussions tend to lead her on a dangerous path. Gallop says early on that feminism makes her feel “smart and sexy” (6). She fetishizes the women’s liberation movement, and after seeing the lesbian couple, she begins to fetishize the teacher-student dynamic as well. This becomes especially troubling when she is a professor herself, and continues to do this. When she describes her encounter with a student that will eventually lead to sexual harassment claims, it is clear that the conversation is sexually stimulating to her. Fittingly, the conversation is about the “erotics of pedagogy” (89). Gallop’s description of her “highly charged” relationship with her student is noteworthy. This is the moment where it becomes clear that Gallop simply cannot separate sexuality and feminist academia. She is constantly seeking these sorts of relationships throughout her academic career, and her behavior becomes highly inappropriate. The fact that she choses to use her student to make a spectacle of their kiss, escalating the situation beyond any of the harmless, non-sexual good byes
She confirms that the college she works at is affected by gender discrimination with the data stating, “more than 55 percent of our applicants are female” (Britz). The facts in the article that tell the most about the college gender gap are, “ two-thirds of colleges and universities report that they get more female than male applicants” and “ more than 56 percent of undergraduates nationwide are women” (Britz). This evidence reinforces the claim the author makes earlier in the article, that the overflow of women in colleges makes it harder for them to get accepted. The statistics in this article provide logical proof to appeal to the
Professor Devane had written a male-bashing book entitled “Wolves and Sheep.” The book had created quite a controversy and Professor Devane had appeared on numerous talk shows. Dr. Delaware discovered that Professor Devane had set up a committee at the university where she was employed. This committee was established to assist students who claimed to have been sexually harassed by other students. There were only three cases handled by the committee before the head of the university dissolved it.
The authors, Jenna Johnson and John Wagner, seem to sympathize with the students. They include details like how a male student “openly
Sexual assault and rape on college campuses is a serious public issue. Before applying to these accredited institutions most students do not look up the school 's past records of sexual assault and rape on their campus.College campuses have failed to keep students safe the system they use has failed to protect and obtain justice for those that have been victims of sexual assault. Society plays a huge part in how young adults view sexual assault. From young age girls are told “if he’s bothering you it 's because he likes you”, and boys aren 't held accountable for their actions because “boys will be boys”. At what time does it stop being a game. At what age is it not acceptable for boys to mistreat girls, when is the line drawn and, what is the punishment for when this line is crossed.
...male students had no problem befriending me, as well as the female students. I did know of a lot more “emotional” male students that were bullied, mainly by other male students. The main point of this article was to show that femininity is still looked at, as a bad thing because of the traits it has been given. It also brings up the fact that people are treated; whether they are male or female different, if they tend to lean more towards the feminine gender side. A persons gender is how they act and how they are but it is not what they are and that is the overall argument of this article(Shaw, Lee 126).
When it comes to sexual assault on college campuses there is also the question of what can colleges do to decrease the amount of sexual assaults. Bradford Richardson and Jon A Shields wondered the same thing, so they conducted an ...
In Canadian society, the numbers of sexually violent incidents in universities continue to grow. Every year, approximately 58.7% of first-year female students experience forms of sexual violence, a growing concern for universities (Senn et. al. Results). Women constantly say they will never be victims of sexual violence, yet studies show that one in four women have been sexually assaulted (Senn et. al. 2). Although sexual violence will never completely be resolved, the policies created by universities across Canada have proven to be ineffective when compared to student efforts. Also, Canadian universities lack a sufficient number of policies that address sexual violence and have a high number of sexual assaults, which demonstrate the ineffectiveness
This of course caused extreme tension between the men and the women of this class. "Just because you can't take this course, why do you want to ruin it for the rest of us?" was one of the comments made by one of her male classmates. Subconsciously this man does not want this woman to succeed. Her classmates that are women and are not bothered by the sexism also shock her.
A number of the boys are still not in college. I agree with Fink that boys are automatically viewed as troublesome for not being able to conform to the rules of the class, but in reality the student should be approached with a different teaching strategy. This federal law prohibits discrimination based on a persons sexuality. She discussed how to equalize school sports considering the physical differences between males and females.
The first all female schools began in the early 1800’s. These academies favored more traditional gender roles, women being the home makers and the men being the bread winners. The first generation of educated women was the result of single-sex colleges in 1873. Wendy Kaminer, an investigative journalist, states that “single-sex education was not exactly a choice; it was a cultural mandate at a time when sexual segregation was considered only natural” (1). Women of this time were technically not allowed to attend school with males. Feminists of this time worked hard to integrate the school system and by the early 1900’s, single sex classrooms were a thing of the past. In 1910, twenty-seven percent of colleges were for men only, fifteen percent were for women only and the remainders were coed. Today, women outnumber men among college graduates (Kaminer 1). After all the hard work of early feminists, there are thousands of people today who advocate bringing back the single sex classroom.