Malcolm Miles A Green And Pleasant Land

1636 Words4 Pages

INTRO « In the 1970’s… the concept of site-specific work began to be applied to gallery installations and landscape sculpture. For public art it had a special relevance since it acknowledged and integrated the site as part of the content. Theoretically, a work was created for a specific site and thereby became part of it ». Critical issues in Public Art p 288 Public art and particularly its site-specificity has come a long way since the 1970s, and is now committing more than ever before to embody the city’s design. The attitude towards public art and its environment has shifted from an artwork placed in the public realm, but that essentially was no different from a bigger version found in museums and galleries, to one that is created as an …show more content…

As we have considered the social function of public art, some artists decide to focus on this characteristic as the main reason for their works to be considered as public art. As named by Malcolm Miles in his article « A green and Pleasant Land? » this type of public art is « issue specific » rather than site-specific. (Miles, 1998) Such public art includes works by Different approaches to this kind of work can be seen in the New York bus shelters of Dennis Adams and the numerous light projects of Krzysztof Wodiczko. Nonetheless this statement raises the question of the publicness of public art. As we have seen thus far, public art is not just considered as « Public Art » only because it stands in the common sphere. And it is not considered as such only because an artist as made it, and hence, will be comprehensively recognised as art. What makes a « Public Art », public art is the combinations of these characteristics along with an awareness of >>> Social Function Issue Specific

More about Malcolm Miles A Green And Pleasant Land

Open Document