Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pueblo ethnographic history
Pueblo ethnographic history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pueblo ethnographic history
was as though everyone was enjoying each other and not fixating on my underarms. Physically, I felt fine. Emotionally, I felt inadequate. I knew that I needed to shave. Scientifically, I cannot offer any explanation as to why I felt this way. In her article Making Up Is Hard to Do, Sheila Jeffreys contends that there is little research on the reasons why women engage in other forms of “grooming”. My guess would be that it provides a sense of beauty. Women that allow facial hair or underarm hair to grow in today’s standards may not be looked upon as being beautiful. However, in the earlier years the old-time Pueblo world former professor Leslie Marmo Silko points out the old-time people thought it was crazy to attach such importance to a person’s
Chris Crutcher, author of the short story “Fourth and Too Long”, demonstrates how important it is for players and coaches to have a mutual respect for each other on and off of the field. Over the course of the story, the main character, Benny struggles to find respect for himself as well as the coaches of his high school football team. Identically, the coaches lack respect for him as well. Benny woods is being penalized from playing football due to the length of his hair and his decision not to cut it. In the 1960’s long hair was said to have represented being a member of the hippie community. “It sends a message that the rest of the team can do any damn thing they want. First it’s the hair, then...who knows what”(160) is what Coach Greene
"Skin blemishes made it impossible for me to really enjoy myself. I was always worrying about the way I looked" (Brumberg, p. 87). Woman all around the world share the same problem, they feel unhappy and self-conscious with the appearance of their bodies. In The Body Project by Joan Jacobs Brumberg, she successfully illustrates the way adolescents begin to change focus from inner to outer beauty in the early 19th and 20th centuries. Through use of personal diaries and historical research, Brumberg shows her readers the physical differences between girls then and now. Brumberg talks about an array of topics in her book – periods, acne, dieting, piercing, virginity, and sexuality. From their roots in the 1800’s through the Victorian era and into modern society the reader gets a glimpse of the way young women evaluate their bodies and turn them into body projects, and is still to this day sweeping the nation more than ever.
In They Say/I Say, Chapter Eighteen is talking all about food, and the long term argument that has been going on forever: What should we eat? There are many good articles in the chapter written by many reliable authors, but there are two of the articles that really stood out. The first one “The Supermarket: Prime Real Estate” by Marion Nestle, and the second is “How Junk Food Can End Obesity” by David H. Freedman. Both of these authors talk about the food industry, one talks about how the supermarket effects the choices people make in their diets, and the other talks about how junk food and the fast food industries might just be the way to go to help Americans become healthier.
My mother was taught, as her mother before and so on, that these conversations are to be kept private and talked about quietly. In response to this, the power of men has an increasingly strong hold on the ideal physical beauty and how the changes of the body, such as menstruation, are in private and never spoken of. The Body Project gives a disturbing look at how women in the past few centuries and the present should act, look like, and keep hidden in response to what men think is most desirable. No matter how free women think they are, we are still under the control of men, even if it is not directly. This book opens the conversation on the problems that are still plaguing women and how society needs to change to have a healthier environment for women to be comfortable in their skin.
“Words Don’t Mean What They Mean” by Steven Pinker is an essay clarifies that people use vagueness and innuendo to deliver information instead of saying what they need to say directly. According to Eschholz, Rosa, and Clark (2013), Steven Pinker was born in Canada the city of Montreal in 1954. Later, Steven Pinker becomes a Professor in the Department of Psychology at Harvard University, he has also taught at Stanford and MIT. (Eschholz, Rosa, and Clark, 2013). According to Harvard university website (2017) “Words Don’t Mean What They Mean” was published in 2007. In fact, in 2007 his total publications were 15 publications in one year (Harvard University, 2017). Steven Pinker writes for publications such as the New York Times, Time and The Atlantic (Harvard University, 2017). In 1994 he published the first book that written for a general audience which is “The Language Instinct” (Harvard University, 2017). According to TED talk’s website (2017), Steven Pinker has done several TED talks videos.
The book Say What You Will is a moving story about two teenagers who are very different from everyone around them and their struggle to get through Senior year. Throughout this book review i’m going to start off by talking about the main characters.
Another very attractive aspect of a woman was long beautiful black hair. Hair on a woman was the key point that would attract men. “The hair streaming across ...
If one were to look at the Nacirema’s cultural practices and behaviors without any insight or context on the specific beliefs of that culture, they may appear to be radical and incomprehensible, as was the case of the reader reading this article. Another point of the article brought up by Miner is the Nacirema’s propensity to engage in seemingly masochistic practices in order to enhance the superficial body. These practices however, are done in our society on a daily basis, and include sticking hog hairs into the mouth, or better referred to as brushing the teeth, and “lacerating the surface of the face with a sharp instrument” (Miner 1956, 505), or shaving. This goes to show that we often make wrong assumptions about a culture just because what the other does isn’t homogeneous. The main point of Miner’s article is to emphasize the issue regarding society’s superficial tendencies as well as their ethnocentric approach when talking about other
The kids I went to school with, the boys I had romantic relationships with, and even my family members, all made negative comments about my body hair. As a young kid, I believed my body hair was a personal problem. Experimenting with different hair removal procedures, some even painful. I wasted hours removing the hair on my body, in attempts to feel better about myself. My low self esteem became linked with the hair on my body. I believed I had too much body hair for a girl but according to Mills (1959) and the social imagination, I had too much body hair for society. My peers, as well as my family, had been socialized to believe that women’s body hair was gross, and unfeminine. Women had been taught to remove their body hair for decades now in the western world, and it was showcased or the lack there of hair was showcased in all forms of media. As a young girl, my mom bought me my first razor and paid for the electrolysis for the hair on my arm. It was in these actions, where the idea that it was my own problem started to form because it felt like I needed treatment for this problem of mine. I was perceiving a deep seated public issue as my own personal trouble. I can’t blame my mother or my peers because by the time my peers and even my parents were born, the western world had already determined that women should not have body hair. Christina Hope (1982) explains that in 1914 in America magazine’s had just begun
In the 1930s, the Great Plains region, were given the name The Dust Bowl due to the droughts in the 1930s, as America was going into the Great depression. The droughts, dust storms and people doing the method of dryland farming caused the destruction of the environment, agriculture, and the people life’s living there. Timothy Egan in book, “The Worst Hard Time,” emphasizes on the stories of the people who chose to stay and survived the environmental disasters, destruction of their towns, battling through starvation and diseases by dust storms in America’s High Plains. Hazel Lucas Shaw is a particular individual highlighted by Timothy Egan throughout the book. Egan analyzes her journey as she arrived in the Great Plains and throughout the dirty
During this time, women were seen embracing their natural tresses with locks and twists, but that seemed to quickly change. In order to fit into this new European standard of beauty, women were required to alter their hair, thus stripping them of the little identity they possessed. The increased support for the natural hair movement alters the black woman’s perception of beauty while intentionally and unintentionally challenging the ideology of beauty within the western world. With more women wearing their hair natural, black women have begun to accept their unaltered appearances while redefining their perception of beauty.
Women in the 18th century are similar yet different from the women of today. In the time era of the 1800’s appearance was very essential to women as it is in the present times. Fashion, skin care, and mouth hygiene was and is the three most important forms of appearance and hygiene.
Each sex is treated differently for a naturally occurring body process. As discussed, body hair is viewed as masculine, leading to the assumption that women should be hairless and men should wear their body hair with pride. It is clear that society uses hair to label individuals as either male or female (Toerien and Wilkinson, 2003). In addition, male hair is associated with strength and power (Toerien and Wilkinson, 2003). So how come when women display body hair they are shamed, but men are encouraged to grow it? Hope (1982) elaborates that the term, “feminine, when applied to lack of body hair, implies a child-like status, as opposed to the adult status afforded men” (as cited in Toerien and Wilkinson, 2003). That being said, body hair is another way in which society ranks men as the superior gender by making women conform to the hairless normative. A study conducted by Tiggemann and Hodgson (2008), asked women why they practice hair removal. After completing a questionnaire with different statements to evaluate different factors such as normativity, sexual attractiveness, femininity and self-enhancement, they found significant support in all four types of factors for hair removal of the underarm, leg and pubic area. Additionally, they can found that one item pertaining to males preferring a hairless body, was the only one linked to two factors: normativity and sexual attractiveness. It is evident with their findings that women tend to follow the socially constructed normative for many reason, including to please men. The idea is that women have to change their bodies not only to be accepted by society, but they also do so to be accepted by men. Nonetheless, the must make is seem natural and effortless to uphold the beauty allure. In recent years, depletion of male body hair has become popular. In a study performed by Boroughs, et al. (2005), they found that men removed
In the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article, “I Cheated, but Only a Little”: Partial Confessions to Unethical Behavior, Eyal Peer, Alessandro Acquisti, and Shaul Shalvi study the “occurrence, antecedents, consequences, and everyday prevalence of partial confessions.” Human beings primarily confess to escape the guilt they may have from committing whatever wrongful deed. Partial confessions, intermediate between omission and full confession, might seem attractive as they are more believeable than complete omission, but at the same time do not reveal every little detail of the behavior. This article documents whether partial confessions actually help people feel better emotionally.
For years women have been waxing, plucking and beautifying themselves for one reason and one reason only; because they think that is beauty. A woman is only classified as a lady if she can walk, talk and dress the part. The way that society has viewed femininity has changed immensely over the past hundred years, but acting like a tomboy or, heaven forbid, being strong and independent is looked down upon in the eyes of men and other women. Certain standards of ladylike demeanor have become outdated in today’s society, and women should be looked at as beautiful when strong and independent. But what defines a woman to be ladylike, and can it be defined as a single type? I believe that standards of beauty have changed, and standing out is what will get you ahead in society today. Stereotypes of the ideal female must be brought down to work on achieving inner beauty and internal happiness.