Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of rule of law
Citizenship have a positive role in the 21st century
The rule of law and its importance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of rule of law
The concept of the good society has over the years been that one supreme and ideal picture many have tried to paint. The countless number of routes to complete this picture seems to be the yardstick that has drawn the line between who is getting there and who is not. In taking strategic steps and following paths, some have taken paths that have drawn them closer to achieving a good society. Others seem to have taken a wrong turn at some point hence placing them miles away from getting their picture to look slightly like the good society.
Several pieces are considered by different people as the vital units of a good society including justice, equity, rule of law, economic opportunity, prosperity, ethical standards and good citizenship just to mention a few (Ethics Forum, 2010). Meanwhile all these units have been broken down and linked together by James O’toole in his book “The executive compass”. O’toole represents the idea of the good society utilizing the four cardinal points of a compass with points expressing community, efficiency, equality and liberty as the key constituents of a good society. For the purpose of a constructive analysis of this philosophy of the good society O’toole’s executive compass will be used as a base line and a primary reference point. O’toole agrees that there is indeed a tension between these four ideas and goes on to examine why they are the major elements out of which a well-functioning democracy might create the good society.
Liberty is considered as the prime element of a good society. The philosophy of liberty is often explained as a state of being free within society from tyrannical restrictions imposed by authority on one's actions, thought and views (Oxford Dictionaries).Thomas Hobbes, a 1...
... middle of paper ...
...wiki?JohnLocke http://mises.org/page/1425 http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/aristotle.html http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/ http://philanthropy2012.hubpages.com/hub/Famous-Philosophers-what-did-Aristotle-believe http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/socialcontract/section6.rhtml http://ozgurzan.com/management/management-theories/adam-smith/ http://www.victorianweb.org/economics/division.html http://channelingreality.com/UN/Documents/Etzioni.pdfhttp://www.adamsmith.org/quotes http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/country_information/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communitarianism http://channelingreality.com/UN/Documents/Etzioni.pdf http://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/entertainment-articles/the-10-largest-economies-in-the-world/ http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/education
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/10/16/quotes-on-leadership/
Thomas Paine begins his article by first exploring the differences between society and government. He explains that, “society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil.” (Frohnen 179) What he means by this is that to have society and community is a privilege, because we as humans are designed to have a need for human interaction, while government on the other hand is only a necessary evil, simply because we as humans are also designed to be inherently evil, and therefore government is a necessary evil to have in order to monitor wrongdoing, or to keep us from our own vices in other words. This emphasizes the Classical Christian Anthropological principle of duality, which is the inner struggle that we as humans have between amor sui, the love of self, and amor dei, the love of God. This struggle springs from the fact that evil is found within man, and we must mak...
... ideal governing system, citizens must face the difficulty in removing an unsuitable leader from power. Indeed, all governing systems are ultimately flawed in one way or another, but the well-being of a society can vary depending on the potential of its constituents and leaders.
Societies such as Greece, Nazi Germany, and the society in Maze Runner fell due to a Corrupt government, a failing social structure, and sickness. Although not all societies fall because of these reasons they are main contributors to a society's downfall.Mostly societies fall due to whoever is leading them, like in Athens they were told to retreat inside of the walls which lead to an outbreak that killed ⅓ of the city’s population.Although trying to make a “perfect” society never ends up working out, we can learn from our mistakes and always try to make ours better. As I once said, “It is not possible to create a perfect society for imperfect beings.”
The society is a whole world of beauty and offers a lot for those who are open to ripe the succulent fruits in it. Good governance and the values, mold an individual; therefore, these are those who would look at the society with a positive lens and influence the society positively. There are those who would view with a negative lens but then, with time, some may be transformed and they will used their bad experiences to rescue those suffering the same or similar issues like them. These people work tirelessly to assist a suffering
The nature of a good life and its relation to political legitimacy is a subject which both Thomas Hobbes and Emma Goldman examine in their writings. Hobbes claims that only basic survival is necessary to live a good life because ultimately life is more valuable than comfort. Goldman on the other hand claims that freedom is far more important than simply living and a good life can only be lived by someone who is free to do as they please. In order for a political theorist to understand how legitimate governments and communities aught treat their citizens these theories are essential. For example, if a community holds a Hobbesian view than they will have a strong authoritarian leadership, whereas in a Goldman inspired community would have no coercive government except in times of crisis. Of the two views of a good life Goldman presents a more compelling answer to the question of what makes a good life and her theories regarding political legitimacy are sounder than those of Hobbes.
John Mill’s On Liberty seeks to expound on how individuals and the society can exist as liberal entities without infringing on each other’s rights. Liberty is the condition of being free within the society, that is free from any form of restriction inflicted by authority. He argues that individual freedom is the basis of democracy where people exercise their own free will (Mill 2005). He also rejects the idea of social contract where individuals comply with society for them to gain social benefit (Mill 2005). It is generally thought that social development can only occur if certain constraints are placed on individual liberty. But the contrary is also true, if restriction are placed on people’s freedom, it becomes difficult for them to thrive
Hobbes may have been the first to present an unequivocally negative concept of freedom. Hobbes defined liberty as the absence of external impediments to motion, and as 'a silence of the laws.’ However, the classic formulation of the doctrine may be found in Berlin’s ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’. Berlin defined negative freedom as ‘an area within which a man can act unobstructed by others.’ In Berlins words ‘Liberty in the negative sense involves an answer to the question: ‘What is the area in which the subject – a person or groups of persons – should be left to do or be what he is able to do or be?’ . For Berlin, the answer to this question is that there should be a private zone that is marked out or set aside, and in which a person can exercise personal liberty and individual autonomy. The individual is to be left alone to exercise his own desires and choices without external coercion. Thus, in Berlin’s conception, freedom is a property of individuals and consists of a realm of unimpeded action. A person is free to the extent that he is able to do things as he wishes – speak, worship, travel, marry – without these activities being blocked by other people. For Berlin, an individual is unfree if he ‘is prevented by others from doing what he would otherwise do.’
Since it was believed that human beings reach their highest levels of morality and virtue by participating in government, (pg. 6) it would only make sense to create a government for the people by the people. But in order to limit the government and protect the rights of citizens, the new government would have to consist of checks and balances type of system. This is the reason for the three...
From the Age of Exploration to the Revolutionary period, many factors shaped the connotation of the word liberty. Liberty is defined as, “the quality or state of being free” (Merriam-Webster). This means religious freedoms, political freedoms, social freedoms, and many freedoms we may not think of on a daily basis. Throughout history, the word liberty has developed into a word with a positive connotation as well as a word used to describe the freedom we have today. The idea of liberty developed because of, religious persecutions, restrictions, and maltreatment during the fifteenth century through the seventeenth century.
Due to Paine’s thought, liberty is one kind of human freedom in their lifestyle, gestures, thoughts, and act under the power of authority. In order of the creation, everybody
Plato, having defined his perfect society, now seeks to compare contemporary 'imperfect' societies with his ideal standard. He initially criticises the imperfect society as a whole, before leading onto a criticism of any given individual within that society; the imperfect character. He has already dealt with the Oligarchic society and character and now moves onto Democracy and the democratic character.
Many individuals provide different perspectives on the subject of ideally just society. Throughout the book “The Republic” by Plato, Socrates states descriptions of how a just society must be and how it must be enforced by the individuals living in the society. In addition, Elizabeth Anderson’s book “The Imperative of Segregation,” she provides a different outlook from Socrates perspectives. She describes a society under non-ideal or ideal theory. Furthemore, Elizabeth Anderson believes that people does not necessarily have to understand the concept of an ideal just society in order to make the society better or more just. On the other hand, in response to Anderson’s belief, Socrates may state that knowledge and understanding of the concept
If humans are naturally so good, then how could society be so evil? Hobbes would argue that society is what keeps human nature stable through the use of sovereign power, laws, and the authority to regulate people’s actions. Without society, corruption would continue and people would have absolute freedom to do what they please, which would cause more fear. According to Hobbes, "The notions of right and wrong, justice and injustice, have no place. Where there is no common power, there is no law; where there is no law, no injustice" (Hobbes-79).
But the good men did not remain good: they began to make money out of that which was the common property of all. And to some such development we may plausibly ascribe the origin of oligarchies, since men made wealth a thing of honour. The next change was to tyrannies, and from tyrannies to democracy. For the struggle to get rich at all costs tended to reduce numbers, and so increased the power of the multitude, who rose up and formed democracies. And now that there has been a further increase in the size of states, one might say that it is hard to avoid having a democratic constitution”
In Plato’s “Republic”, Socrates creates an ideal society in his perspective. He contemplates what his idea of ‘justice’ is. According to Socrates, justice is the “…having and doing what is a man’s own, and belongs to him”. (Book 4 pg. 12) Justice is giving to everyone what they deserve. Socrates uses the ‘myth of the metals’ as an example to show how justice can prosper in a society, while also showing a way that democracy can be unjust.