Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Natural history of hiv
Importance of medical ethics
Importance of medical ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Natural history of hiv
I’m confident in saying that of society’s accomplishments, our medicinal evolution is unleveled. To take into perspective this miracle, think about the effect the Human Immunodeficiency Virus or HIV had on the world in the 20th century. It seemed as if one was plagued with this heinous disease, death was inevitable. Of course, there were treatments to curb the effects and prolong the hosts already shortened life; however, none guaranteed a normal life. Nowadays, this issue has changed. Yes, contracting HIV is still very unfortunate and life-changing but today’s medicine ensures that one can live to expectancy. Magic Johnson is a perfect example of this phenomenon. Having contracted the virus at age 31, Johnson now 57, is living a healthy and prosperous life all thanks to modern medicine. This week’s readings were particularly intriguing because of the advancements we have made and continue to make in the matter of years. However, I focused my attention on the ethical aspects of our medical …show more content…
That it’s no big deal if someone who tests a drug dies in the process because it's for a “good cause”. In the case of Henrietta Lack’s, it's almost as if the doctors and researchers completely forgot about her state because they were so fascinated with her profound cells. There has always been that saying that you cannot place a monetary amount on the life of a human. I’m afraid that now this is the case and money is the most sought after remedy. Unethical testing and the globalization of harmful drugs only exists because there is poor regulation. Our government inadvertently supports the pharmaceutical industry by allowing them to act immoral without any repercussions. If some individual dies as a result of consuming a faulty drug, their life should not be written off as study for science… it's just not
For anyone who has ever worked in healthcare, or simply for someone who has watched a popular hit television show such as Grey’s Anatomy, General Hospital, House or ER know that there can be times when a doctor or health care provider is placed in extremely difficult situations. Often times, those situations are something that we watch from the sidelines and hope for the best in the patient’s interest. However, what happens when you place yourself inside the doctors, nurses, or any other of the medical provider’s shoes? What if you were placed in charge of a patient who had an ethically challenging situation? What you would you do then? That is precisely what Lisa Belkin accomplishes in her book “First Do No Harm”. Belkin takes the reader on
“Ah, the creative process is the same secret in science as it is in art,” said Josef Mengele, comparing science to an art. He was less of an artist and more of a curious, debatably crazy, doctor. He was a scientist in Nazi Germany. In general, there was a history of injustice in the world targeting a certain race. When Mengele was around, there were very few medical regulations, so no consent had to be given for doctors to take patients’ cells and other tests done on the patients’ bodies without their consent. This was the same time that Henrietta Lacks lived. Henrietta Lacks was an African American woman who went to the doctor because she had cervical cancer. Her cells were taken and are still alive in culture today (Skloot 41). Hence, her cells were nicknamed Immortal (Skloot 41). Although many, at the time, saw no issue with using a patient without consent issue with what?, on numerous occasions since then courts have determined that having consent is necessary for taking any cells. The story of Henrietta lacks is has similarities to an episode of Law and Order titled Immortal, which is an ethical conundrum. Despite this, the shows are not exactly the same and show differences between them. Both of these stories, one supposedly fictional, can also be compared to the injustices performed by Josef Mengele in Nazi Germany.
One of the most complex, ever-changing careers is the medical field. Physicians are not only faced with medical challenges, but also with ethical ones. In “Respect for Patients, Physicians, and the Truth”, by Susan Cullen and Margaret Klein, they discuss to great extent the complicated dilemmas physicians encounter during their practice. In their publication, Cullen and Klein discuss the pros and cons of disclosing the medical diagnosis (identifying the nature or cause of the disease), and the prognosis (the end result after treating the condition). But this subject is not easily regulated nor are there guidelines to follow. One example that clearly illustrates the ambiguity of the subject is when a patient is diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening
Gedge, E., & Waluchow, W. (2012). Readings in health care ethics (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario: Broadview Press.
This essay argues against Hanlon’s stance on that scientific animal testing and poultry farming violates animal rights, and vivisection is a not moral necessary to allow humans to discover cures for disease and to make drugs.
A divergent set of issues and opinions involving medical care for the very seriously ill patient have dogged the bioethics community for decades. While sophisticated medical technology has allowed people to live longer, it has also caused protracted death, most often to the severe detriment of individuals and their families. Ira Byock, director of palliative medicine at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, believes too many Americans are “dying badly.” In discussing this issue, he stated, “Families cannot imagine there could be anything worse than their loved one dying, but in fact, there are things worse.” “It’s having someone you love…suffering, dying connected to machines” (CBS News, 2014). In the not distant past, the knowledge, skills, and technology were simply not available to cure, much less prolong the deaths of gravely ill people. In addition to the ethical and moral dilemmas this presents, the costs of intensive treatment often do not realize appreciable benefits. However, cost alone should not determine when care becomes “futile” as this veers medicine into an even more dangerous ethical quagmire. While preserving life with the best possible care is always good medicine, the suffering and protracted deaths caused from the continued use of futile measures benefits no one. For this reason, the determination of futility should be a joint decision between the physician, the patient, and his or her surrogate.
Patients should have the ability in all situations to decide what happens to their bodies. This should be accompanied by the knowledge of risks associated with any particular procedure. Some physicians may attempt to circumvent this right for personal gain by omitting important information or simply utilizing force. This is where the debate over human experimentation arises. In a more civil setting, some patients don’t have the cognitive capacity to choose what is done with their tissues. In this case, the line of ethics becomes obscure.
Throughout time, mankind has persistently been seeking ways to maintain their health and to cure those that had not been so fortunate in that task. Just about everything has been experimented with as a cure for some type of illness whether physical, spiritual or mental. There has always been evidence of spiritual healing and it will continue to be an important part of any healing process, large or small. In particular, the roots of Native American Medicine men (often a woman in some cultures) may be traced back to ancient times referred to as Shaman. A special type of healer used by the Indians is referred to as a medicine man (comes from the French word medecin, meaning doctor).
Attention getter- There are numerous ethical issues within this movie including but not limited to Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Justice, Veracity, Fidelity, Communitarian, Egalitarian, and Utilitarianism. The violation of all these principles, as well as ethical codes and conduct that should take place within the medical profession. Expanding to the Doctors, Medical Scientist, and foundation leaders ascending to the needs of these Experts.
Steinbock, Bonnie, Alex J. London, and John D. Arras. "The Principles Approach." Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine. Contemporary Readings in Bioethics. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013. 36-37. Print.
Medicine and technology as so far advanced, that many many patients that contract ailments that were once considered a death penalty, now face new hope. While such things as AIDS, and paralysis are not curable, people can be assured a longer, and possibly happier life than they would have a few decades ago; but...
Since ancient history societies have practiced medicine. Professor Albert Jonsen describes the personification of doctors in American literature as great moral heroes (97). In last century the medical practices have significantly evolved. Clinics designed to practice abortions, stem cell research companies and even facilities which accommodate to brain dead patients have opened. As a result debates regard the right to an abortion and pulling the plug on brain dead patients have arisen. Eric Schulzke claims many compromises must be made in order to strike a balance between the differences of opinions regarding abortion (564). As a result of these debates medical professionals find themselves in between their moral obligations
McGee, Glenn and Arthur L. Caplan. "Medical Ethics." Microsoft® Encarta® 98 Encyclopedia. © 1993-1997: Microsoft Corporation. CD-ROM.
For the past year I have been volunteering on a surgical ward undertaking various tasks from cleaning blood to handling bedpans. At times this was unforgiving, but I saw doctors make brave decisions where they had to employ their medical expertise and ethics. On one occasion I observed doctors discuss the best possible treatment for a man with Down’s Syndrome, severe heart problems and mild deme...
In this book, a collection of ten stories about the medicine drama in real life are presented. The stories are filled with extremely agonizing decisions that patients and their family members confront. In contrast to the wooden and rigid cases found in text-book scenarios representing the literature of medical ethics, the individuals who are involved in these crucial moments of ethically charged decisions come to life. The characters and the settings they encounter are enriched and vivid. These compelling stories bring up ethical issues that range from parents faced with donating the organs of their daughter, who had traumatic brain damage; to a young woman's decision to refuse her last therapy (Munson, 2009).