Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cause effect
Studs Terkel published a nonfiction Working which consists many interviews among different people’s descriptions of their jobs. Through this book, Terkel demonstrates the meaning of work to different people and how their work experiences shape their attitudes about their lives. Among these interviewers, Maggie Holmes is a domestic while Dave Bender is a factory owner. Although their wages are different, Maggie Holmes and Dave Bender’s attitudes about their works are contradictory. People who love their works are passionate and happy about their lives and express less complain than those people who do not like their jobs. People’s attitudes about their works can influence their views of lives. In Maggie Holmes’s interview, she keeps …show more content…
Holmes describes, “If you work in one of them houses eight hours, you gotta come home do the same thing over… you don’t feel like… (sighs softly)… tired. You gotta come home, take care of your kids, you gotta cook, you gotta wash” (Terkel 115). By using the word “gotta” repeatedly, Holmes conveys her helplessness about the inescapable housework. She feels pessimistic as a domestic because she has to do housework not only for her host but also for her family. But the only difference is that she can get pay by cleaning for her host while doing housework at her house is a responsibility for her family. Therefore, she becomes indifference and even painful about her life. In contract, Dave Bender views himself as an engineer who has new thoughts and creates inventions. Bender keeps emphasizing “I love my work” in his interview and he works from six to five thirty per day. Sometimes, he works on Sunday and he says that vacation “is the worst …show more content…
For example, a person usually has a negative point of view about the people who treat him or her unjustly when he or she works for them. Consequently, this person would feel dissatisfied with his or her work or even hate it. Maggie Holmes reveals that when she worked at her host’s house, her host says she does not have a mop. But the true is that she hides the mop in the clothes closet. This is the reason “why many black women here got rheumatism in their legs, knees” when they use their knee to mop the cold floor many times (Terkel 113). Holmes’s host not only lie to her but also try to call Holmes “nigger”. As a result, Holmes indicates that “most time I don’t call her” (Terkel 115). Through a series of unjust treatments on Holmes, she begins to feel unfair about being a domestic, especially when she talks about her kids. She illustrates “I don’t want my kids to come up and do domestic work… You can’t see no tomorrow there” (Terkel 116). From Holmes’s description about her work experience, audiences can feel that Holmes’s depression, but she needs this job in order to survive. On the other hand, Dave Bender would like to be called Dave instead of Mr. Bender. “When they called me Mr. Bender, I think they’re being sarcastic. I don’t feel like a boss to them. I feel like a chum-buddy” (Terkel 396). Perhaps some people might say the Bender is phony because he doesn’t
Ehrenreich adopted the sociologist's tool of an ethnography for her research. She became a covert participant observer while at the jobs she worked. As such, she did not expose herself as a journalist to her coworkers until the conclusion of each job. She did this in order to not experience the Hawthorne Effect; the effect that happens when people knowingly are observed and therefore change their normal habits to please the observer. While the book was an interesting read and her personal experiences enlightening to many of the low wage worker's dilemmas and alienating jobs, her pitfalls in research outweigh her strengths.
We all know that most people hate their jobs. Work is seen as something we have to do, and very lucky few seem to find a job that we enjoy. How we feel about work, and what we do for a living, in many ways helps to define who we are and who we are going to become. Having seen actual people share their perspectives and view points on “working for a living” helps us see ourselves and rethink our future. Overall, Studs Terkel helps flash- back into America's history and see the changes that America ans it’s people have gone through.
The inability to achieve “work-life balance” has become a major focus for workplace equality activists. When this topic is brought about it is primarily used to describe how woman cannot have a work and home life but instead are forced to choose. Richard Dorment took on this point of interest from a different perspective in his article “Why Men Still Can’t Have It All” published with esquire. Going against the normal trend he describes how women are not the only ones put into the same sacrificial situations, but instead that men and women alike struggle to balance work and home. Dorment opens up by saying “And the truth is as shocking as it is obvious: No one can have it all.” In doing so Richard Dorment throws out the notion that one
Curry agrees that work is a job that takes over a person’s life and claims, “The job penetrates every aspect of life. Americans don’t exercise they work out” (15). In his perspective, a job has created this sense of “working out”, in which not the actual going to the gym to workout is being used, but jobs are the place of working out. In his mind working out at the gym has been replaced with typical long houred jobs. This is the case for many people, including the life of Ehrenreich in which the juggling of two jobs, consists of her whole day. She proclaims:
In the line, “I know some very great writers, writers you love who write beautifully and have made a great deal of money, and not one of them sits down routinely feeling wildly enthusiastic and confident,” Anne is explaining how she knows writers who are successful in the field in order to validate that what she is going to say about writing is true even for professional writers. Another instance ethos is used in this article is in the lines, “I used to write food reviews for California magazine… Even after I 'd been doing this for years, panic would set in.” Telling the audience that she used to write food reviews for the California magazine gives her a status of a published writer which can give her credibility. Also the fact that she had been doing it for many years shows that she has experience in the field of writing and knows the struggles that come with
One does not need a great deal of dedication to maintain their job. O’Keefe mentions in her essay that the only requirement for maintaining a job is to able to take a pay cut, proven by her statement, “Americans who have lost their jobs…are having to adjust to the idea that the next [job] they find is likely to involve a pay cut” (O’Keefe 207). This shows the reader that it is not necessary to devote large amounts of their time or energy to maintaining or getting a job. O’Keefe also talks about how she tried to maintain her career as an author, and how much she had to dedicate to maintain her career. O’Keefe states that, “I sought to adjust to my shrinking income by progressively relocating to areas of the country with cheaper…costs of living” (O’Keefe 207).
In fact, the author Jack Finney shows this in the beginning by having his wife Clare says “you work too much though Tom—and too hard” by using this quote he makes it automatically seen by the reader that Tom works a lot (1). Shortly after this quote is said, Tom is leading his wife out of the apartment and as the door closes it blows his work out of the window. Tom makes the decision to go and get it, this also shows his work obsessed tendencies. Now, as Tom is out on the ledge he discovers his mistakes and makes the transition from work obsessed to identifying his
Currently, human beings are thinking more on the line of they need work in order to make a living. For that reason, work has become meaningless, disagreeable, and unnatural. Many view work as a way to obtain money and not a meaningful human activity that one does for themselves. The author states that there are two reactions of the alienated and profoundly unsatisfactory character of the modern industrial work. One being the ideal of complete laziness and the other, hostility towards work. Fromm believes the reason why people have animosity regarding work is due to their unconscious mind. Subconsciously, a person has “a deep-seated, hostility towards work and all that is connected to it” says Fromm. I believe what Fromm is saying to be true, after all I witness it everyday. Millions of people each day goes to a work which they are dissatisfied with and that can negatively impact their attitude
Daniel Orozco tells a short story of a regular orientation day by using elements of literary criticism to make fun at the workplace experience that we can relate to. “ Orientation” is like about five to ten minutes reading time, but with
"The company man" written by author Ellen Goodman, gives us a story about a man and how work has consumed him and his life. The story shows us the reader an inside look at the effect of work culture and the impact it has on one's self, family, and livelihood. Throughout the text, we see the journey our main character undergoes and towards the end gives us a self -reflection on the way we see ourselves and how much work we are putting ourselves through.
The poem, “What Work Is” by Philip Levine is an intricate and thought-provoking selection. Levine uses a slightly confusing method of describing what work actually is. He gives the idea that work is very tedious, however necessary. It is miserable, however, it is a sacrifice that is essentially made by many, if not all able-bodied members of society. Many have to sacrifice going to a concert or a movie, but instead works jobs with hardly a manageable salary. This poem seems to have a focus on members of the lower-class or middle-class who live paycheck to paycheck and are unable to put money away for a future for their children or for a vacation and how difficult life can be made to be while living under this type of circumstance. Levine
In the oral history “Just a Housewife” Therese Carter tells her life experiences of being a housewife in Downer Grove Estates, West Chicago. What strikes me about this oral history is the importance that Therese places on knowing that she is just a housewife. She says that she has no special talents and is content with doing duties for her family because that is how she wishes to spend her life. The common pattern in this history is Therese’s acknowledgement that being a housewife is low on the totem pole, but she feels that the work she provides is necessary. Her feelings toward the work she provides is rewarding because she enjoy pleasing people and wishes to raise her kids right. Terkel gives voice to Therese by allowing her to not seem
In her essay “The Company Man,” Ellen Goodman searches beyond the surface of a death of a business professional and sees his life in review as told by the obituary, and how his life was different from how it was written. “He worked himself to death” was not a suitabl...
Johnson, Spencer. Who moved my cheese?: an amazing way to deal with change in your work and in your life. New York: Putnam, 1998. Print.
Distinctively from others, I don’t bear a single quality or aptitude that defines me, but instead a collection of traits and skills that make up fractions of my character. In fact, I have somewhat of a list of values and principles that I try to live by. My first and most prominent strength is having a strong work ethic. In fact, I believe this is the most essential trait to have in life, for even though one may not naturally be at an advantage in a particular field of study or in a peculiar task, one may gain the capability and expertise in that subject through hard work and sharp determination. A strong work ethic is what embodies some of the most distinguished figures in today’s society, and is what some of the people in the past have found