Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Machiavelli view religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Machiavelli view religion
In “The Prince”, Machiavelli suggests that a prince should have five qualities which include; merciful, faithful, humane, upright, and religious. Machiavelli specifies that it is not a must to have those five qualities, but that it is necessary to appear to have them in order to be an accomplished leader. The first quality Machiavelli suggests that a prince should appear to have is mercy. It is a courageous act of a prince to give up the temptation to take revenge on those who oppose his rise to power. Appearing to give forgiveness is a merciful act in which allows the prince to show true remorse and commitment to those who were wronged and restore the trust that has been compromised. The aspect of learning from past mistakes makes his followers …show more content…
have more support as they know that they can be forgiven. The second quality Machiavelli suggests that a prince should appear to have is faith. Machiavelli acknowledges that a prince who honours his word is usually praised by others.
However, a prince who uses deception to appear loyal achieves far more success as a leader. Machiavelli points out the importance of using laws and arms to secure one’s position as a leader. While fighting by the law is natural to mankind and fighting by force is natural to beasts, Machiavelli argues that a prince must appear to act like a beast in order to be sufficient, which shows his dedication to his followers. The third quality Machiavelli suggests that a prince should appear to have is humanity. A prince must have a mind that is ready to act accordingly to any sort of unfortunate events that may put the country in danger. Doing so makes the prince appear considerate since the prince must always take care of his people and the state. The fourth quality Machiavelli suggests that a prince should appear to have is honesty. A prince must learn to use both the natures of a lion and a fox. Machiavelli uses a metaphor that explains how the lion is defenseless against traps, but can easily frighten off wolves, whereas, the fox is defenseless against wolves but is able to recognize …show more content…
traps. Machiavelli uses the metaphor to argue that a prince must be crafty and keep his word only when it benefits his own interests or else he will be tricked.
For this reason, in order for a prince to be a successful leader, he must be a skilled liar because, in the service of the state, dishonesty becomes a virtue. The fifth quality Machiavelli suggests that a prince should appear to have is religion. According to Machiavelli, the importance of religion is necessary to maintain power. Men judge based on appearance and the facade you put on and not by the true nature of an individual. Machiavelli provides an example of a prince named Alexander the Sixth who is seen going into the church as part of his role. Alexander deceives men into believing he practices religion to provide a sense of a common purpose between him and his people. The idea of mutual religious beliefs with his people allows him to create uniformity, making them support him. In conclusion, the five qualities Machiavelli suggests that a prince should appear to have in order to be a successful leader are merciful, faithful, humane, upright, and
religious. In the film “Elizabeth”, Queen Elizabeth I demonstrates the five qualities that Machiavelli suggests a prince should appear to have which include; merciful, faithful, humane, upright, and religious. The first quality Elizabeth acquires is mercy, which allows her to become a successful leader. Elizabeth has a romantic relationship with Sir Robert Dudley, who attempts to persuade her to marry him. Despite Elizabeth being unaware that Robert is already married, he still fails to convince her to marry him. Once Elizabeth finds out that Robert is married to her cousin, Elizabeth banishes her cousin, but forgives Robert and does not kill him. Elizabeth forgives Robert because she has a genuine affection for him as he is the only man she had ever truly loved. The second quality Elizabeth acquires is faith, which allows her to become a successful leader. Sir Francis Walsingham lets Elizabeth know that there is a priest aboard carrying letters from Rome to those who mean to harm her. He continues by telling her that Norfolk’s power in court is growing and that the priest and his foreign allies are raising an army that will outnumber hers. Elizabeth decides to take on a ruthless act by killing them all to show how loyal she is as she safeguards her country and her people from their enemies. The third quality Elizabeth acquires is humanity, which allows her to become a successful leader. Elizabeth arranges a meeting with the Roman Catholic bishops at the House of Lords in order to propose the Act of Uniformity. Elizabeth believes it is better to have a single Church of England with a common prayer book and a common purpose. The Roman Catholic bishops are quick to believe that it is for her own intentions as a leader, but Elizabeth guarantees them that it is purely for the welfare of her people. Elizabeth shows how compassionate she is by settling religious conflicts to provide protection and peace for her people. The fourth quality Elizabeth acquires is upright, which allows her to become a successful leader. After Elizabeth decides to act upon the priest and his foreign allies by killing them, she has their head put on a spike and left out in public as a warning. Elizabeth is being honest with her people by showing them that whoever betrays her country will not follow their religion and will have no afterlife. The fifth quality Elizabeth acquires is religion, which allows her to become a successful leader. Elizabeth believes that there is one thing higher than royalty and that is religion. That there is one god and if there would be no uniformity of religious beliefs, there would only be fragmentation, dispute, and quarrel. For this reason, she proposes the Act of Uniformity to the House of Lords which unites English Christians under the Church of England and severs their connection to the Vatican. Doing so allows the lords to continue to perform their religious practices and allows Elizabeth to protect her people from the danger of religious conflicts. In conclusion, Queen Elizabeth I is a successful leader because she acquires the five qualities Machiavelli suggests a prince should appear to have which are merciful, faithful, humane, upright, and religious. Elizabeth shows her success through her forty-four years on the throne as she provides stability and forms a sense of national identity for the kingdom.
Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.
Niccolò Machiavelli was a man who lived during the fourteen and fifteen hundreds in Florence, Italy, and spent part of his life imprisoned after the Medici princes returned to power. He believed that he should express his feelings on how a prince should be through writing and became the author of “The Qualities of a Prince.” In his essay, he discusses many points on how a prince should act based on military matters, reputation, giving back to the people, punishment, and keeping promises. When writing his essay, he follows his points with examples to back up his beliefs. In summary, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of a Prince,” provides us with what actions and behaviors that a prince should have in order to maintain power and respect.
The bravery and strength of the lion will not be enough to empower the ruler to escape the snares set by his enemies for and the slyness of the fox is also needed. “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” (The Prince) It is not possible for the citizens to love and fear a prince, but being feared is much safer than being loved.“Since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved” (The Prince) Everything a prince says must be filled with these five qualities: being merciful,being trustworthy, religious,kind, honest. Machiavelli defines virtues as qualities that are praised by others, such as generosity, compassion, and piety. He argues that a prince should always try to appear virtuous, but it is more important for the prince to be practical than it is for him to be morally good. The government that is built of this foundation it
Machiavelli believes a prince should know how to be a fox. A fox has been known to be deceptive, sly, cunning, sneaky, crafty, and many other adjectives. These are attributes that Machiavelli believes that a good prince would hold within himself to be able to rule, and in addition to, keeping his reigning power. Machiavelli explains within the text of, The Prince, that rulers have to seem as if they have the best intentions for the people, but secretly the highest priority is to keep himself in power and to protect his dominion. This being the priority of the prince, he has to deceive his subjects into believing he is best fit to rule. To keep up with this deception that the prince uses, morality cannot be a priority that the prince carries.
Machiavelli writes in The Qualities of the Prince, that it is better to be a miser and slightly disliked for a while than to be generous and be liked for a while than hated. If you’re a generous prince you can only be so for a short time before having to raise taxes and having people realize that you’re not that generous in all reality. Once a prince gets a reputation for being hated he will feel any slight unrest of his people. On the other hand if a prince is miserly from the get go he will be received gratefully when he decides to be generous. Using this quality of miserliness he has the ability to expand and defend his kingdom and be ready for any unforeseen events without having to burden his people, which, in turn leads to economic growth.
Niccolo Machiavelli lived in Florence, Italy in the 1400’s. The country of Italy was divided into city-states that had their own leaders, but all pledged alliance to their king. In time in which great leaders were needed in order to help the development of a city-state and country, Machiavelli had a theory that man needed a leader to control them. In his book The Prince, he speaks of the perfect leader.
The most astounding aspect of The Prince is Machiavelli’s view that princes may indeed, be cruel and dishonest if their ultimate aim is for the good of the state. It is not only acceptable but necessary to lie, to use torture, and to walk over other states and cities. Machiavellianism is defined as “A political doctrine of Machiavelli, which denies the relevance of morality in political affairs and holds that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power (Def.)” This implies that in the conquest for power, the ends justify the means. This is the basis of Machiavellianism. The priority for the power holder is to keep the security of the state regardless of the morality of the means. He accepts that these things are in and of themselves morally wrong, but he points out that the consequences of failure, the ruin of states and the destruction of cities, can be far worse. Machiavelli strongly emphasizes that princes should not hesitate to use immoral methods to achieve power, if power is necessary for security and survival.
Machiavelli believed that, ethics and morality were considered in other categories than those generally known. He does not deny the existence of, but did not see how they can be useful in its traditional sense as in politics and in the government of the people. According to Machiavelli, a man is by nature a political angry and fearful. Machiavelli had no high opinion of the people. It is assumed that a person is forced to be good and can get into the number of positive features, such as prudence and courage. The prince can only proceed gently and with love, because that would undermine the naivety of his rule, and hence and the well-being of the state. He thought that, the Lord must act morally as far as possible, immorally to the extent to
Additionally, The Prince states that secular forms of government are more realistic than pious ones because a pious government would be bound by morals. In the Prince, Machiavelli tries to convey that the end justifies the means, which means any thing goes. He claims that it would be ideal for a prince to possess all the qualities that are deemed good by other men, but states that no leader can accomplish that. He also states that the security of the state should be the prince’s first priority and it must be protected by any means necessary. Although, this can be true in certain cases, Machiavelli uses it as an excuse to use evil and cruel tactics.
Machiavelli’s advice to princes directly correlated to his view on human nature. He believed that every common man was born evil and selfish. That did not stop him, however, from saying that humans many show instances when they exhibit generosity and wholeheartedness. He does tell princes, however, not to count on the few occurrences that may happen, and he says, “It is necessary to be a prince to know thoroughly the nature of the people, and one of the populace to know the nature of princes”. He is saying is that it is imperative that a prince knows the natural human nature, that each and every human will become more self-interested than interested in the good of the state. If he is ignorant to that fact, his kingdom/area of rule will deteriorate simply because he believes in the citizens that occupy it. He does believe, however, that with the right training, a human being can be molded (with the help of the state, of course) and he says, “Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many.” Although he believes that people cannot change themselves for the good, he does think that the state and military can shape humans for the better, but there will always be
In The Prince, Machiavelli attempts to completely decouple the actions of a good ruler from personal ethics. Machiavelli begins to do this by first establishing what he believes human nature to be Machiavelli argues that numerous traits that are innate among humans. Among these, Machiavelli argues that people are generally self-interested, but that their affections for others can be won and lost. They tend to remain happy so long they avoid affliction or oppression. He also argues that they might be trustworthy in prosperous times, but they can turn selfish, deceitful, and profit-driven in adverse times. They admire honor, generosity, courage, and piety in others, but most do not pursue these virtues in their own life. Finally, Machiavelli argues that ambition is found in those who have achieved some power, but most common people are satisfied with the way things are and therefore do not yearn to improve on the status quo. People will naturally feel obligated after receiving a favor or service, and this bond is usually not broken capriciously. Nevertheless, loyalties are won and lost, and goodwil...
Through his many years of experience with Italian politics Machiavelli wrote “The Prince”; a how-to guide for new rulers. We are given descriptions of what a leader should do to effectively lead his country. A leader should be the only authority determining every aspect of the state and put in effect a policy to serve his best interests. These interests are gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power. Machiavelli’s idea is that a ruler should use a variety of strategies (virtues) to secure his power. Machiavelli lists five virtues that a ruler should appear to have; being compassionate, trustworthy, generous, honest and religious. A ruler should possess all the qualities considered good by other people.
Machiavelli's views have been misinterpreted since his book was first written, people take him in the wrong way, and are offended by what he says. Careless readers take him in a completely wrong way, such as they think that he believes that the end justifies the means, that a leader should lie to the people, and that a ruler has to rule with force. In actuality, Machiavelli means no such thing, he says that there are times when the common good outweighs the means, and the morality of a rulers actions. He also says that you cannot be loved by everyone, so try to be loved and feared at the same time, but of the two, choose to be feared. The Prince is considered to be one of the most important of nonfiction literature written in the history of mankind. It gave an accurate and truthful description of the method of governing.
Niccoló Machiavelli claims in “The Qualities of the Prince” that a prince must have certain qualities that will allow him to seize and maintain his power as a ruler. Machiavelli asserts that these qualities will guarantee the ruler to be able to govern his subjects effectively. According to him, a prince must study the art of war, must understand generosity and to what extent he must be generous to be effective, must choose to either be loved or feared, and be able to keep his word to his citizens according to the situation. These qualities can still apply in today’s politics, and will be useful for a modern time politician as long as they are used carefully.
Also in section 18 of The Prince, Machiavelli says this: “So, as a prince is forced to know how to act like a beast, he must learn from the fox and the lion; because the lion is defenseless against traps and a fox is defenseless against wolves” (Pg. 56). Prior to this statement, Machiavelli explains that fighting can be done by law and force, the former by man and the latter by beasts. However, Machiavelli states that, for a prince, fighting solely by law is not always adequate; therefore he must fight with force. Machiavelli chooses two beasts to illustrate this, the lion and the fox. The lion ...