Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Machiavelli's political theory
Machiavelli's political theory
Pros and cons of the roman republic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Machiavelli's political theory
Machiavelli's philosophy described in his writings The Prince had a pragmatic approach to politics. Machiavelli, born in 1469 during the Italian Renaissance, was a political philosopher, along with military experience as a defense secretary of the Florentine republic. He believed that a strong leader would provide security. In medieval times kings were appointed by God ruled men. The provided law and were scared individuals. Machiavelli, during the Renaissance period had an idealized view of leadership.
Machiavelli believed that the rulers should be those willing to defy, betray, deceive and kill in order to maintain their power. This was a radical approach to politics than ever before. Catholics had no interest in his radical ideas; however he did give them a dose of realpolitik into their political beliefs. As he states in The Prince, the way a prince should keep their word "in actions of men, especially princes, where there is no recourse to justice, the end is all that counts. A prince should only be concerned with conquering or maintaining a state, for the means will always be judged to be honorable and brave worthy by each and every person, because the masses always follow appearances and the outcomes of affairs, and the world is nothing than the masses."
…show more content…
He believed that "it is necessary for a ruler, if he wants to hold on to power, to lean how not to be good, and to know when it is and when it is not necessary to use his knowledge". Which brings up a good point about politics at the time? Machiavelli delivered idea of a monarchy, where leaders hold all the power verses a mix of constitutions; monarch, aristocracy and democracy. Democracy was what Machiavelli leaves out in his writings of The Prince that was the major force for the establishment of monarchy during the renaissance
Machiavelli’s, “The Prince” is the ideal book for individuals intending to both govern and maintain a strong nation. Filled with practical advice, he includes numerous religious references to support his claims. He devotes a chapter within the book to speak about the ancient founders of states. In the chapter called, “On new principalities that are acquired by one’s own arms and by virtue”, Machiavelli discussed the importance of a prince to have their own talent in governing a nation, rather than having relied on fortune to rule. The latter is a risk no leader should take and he cited past leaders as a guide for both the current and future princes.
Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.
Machiavelli’s views were drastically different from other humanists at his time. He strongly promoted a secular society and felt morality was not necessary but stood in the way of a successfully governed state. He stated that people generally tended to work for their own best interests and gave little thought to the well being of the state. He distrusted citizens saying, “In time of adversity, when a state is in need of its citizens, there are few to be found.” In his writings in The Prince, he constantly questioned the citizens’ loyalty and warned for the leaders to be wary in trusting citizens. His radical and distrusting thoughts on human nature were derived out of concern for Italy’s then unstable government. Machiavelli also had a s...
Machiavelli understood the importance of keeping the good will of the governed populace, and with this as its backbone, The Prince provides historically supported advice on how to rule. Because of this, the Machiavellian doctrine has been accepted and followed, knowingly or unknowingly, by multitudes of princes, kings, prime ministers and presidents since his time.
“Machiavelli wanted to return to his longtime dream and understanding of politics. One of his goals in writing The Prince was to win the favor of Lorenzo de’ Medici, then-governor of Florence and the person
Machiavelli?s model for his ideal prince was Cesare Borgia, also known as Duke Valentino and son of Pope Alexander VI. He believed Cesare Borgia possessed all the qualities of a prince destined to rule and maintain power in his state. He believed that politics has a morality of its own. There is no regard of justness or unjustness, of cruelty or mercy, of approval or humiliation, which should interfere with the decision of defending the state and preserving its freedom. Therefore, the ruler/prince's single responsibilit...
Niccolo Machiavelli lived in Florence, Italy in the 1400’s. The country of Italy was divided into city-states that had their own leaders, but all pledged alliance to their king. In time in which great leaders were needed in order to help the development of a city-state and country, Machiavelli had a theory that man needed a leader to control them. In his book The Prince, he speaks of the perfect leader.
Machiavelli is undisputedly one of the most influential political philosophers of all time. In The Prince, his most well-known work, he relates clearly and precisely how a decisive, intelligent man can gain and maintain power in a region. This work is revolutionary because it flies in the face of the Christian morality which let the Roman Catholic Church hold onto Europe for centuries. Machiavelli's work not only ignores the medieval world's ethics: The Prince suggests actions which oppose the four most basic of Christianity's Ten Commandments.
Niccolo Machiavelli was a political philosopher from Florence, Italy. The period that Machiavelli lived in was the "rebirth" of art in Italy and rediscovery of ancient philosophy, literature and science. He wrote The Prince, in which he discusses the proper way of living as a prince. His ideas, which were not viewed as beneficial at the time, were incredibly cynical and took time for the rest of the population to really catch onto the ideas. Machiavelli’s view of human nature was that humans are born evil, and while they can show good traits, and the common man is not to be trusted. Unlike Confucius, Machiavelli believes that human nature cannot be changed, and unlike Plato, where Plato believes in humans as social beings. Each respected view
(Deveaux 38). Machiavelli, The Prince demonstrates how to become better rulers and how to maintain their power over his men. He underlines that princes ought to know about the art of ruling and to sustain his position regardless of what it takes. For an example, violence would be the answer if men were to disobey any obligations upon him. The Prince was believed to be the start of the new modern way of political thought.
When Machiavelli generalizes humanity qualities we consider to be human, such as empathy, compassion, and even free-will aren't even mentioned by him. Machiavelli strongly promoted a secular society and felt morality was not necessary. But he stood in fact, in the way of an effectively governed principality. Machiavelli believes the ruling Prince is an individual authority who can control every aspect of the state and can effect a policy according to his best interests. These interests were gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power.
1. In The Prince, by Machiavelli, he describes how it is expected that a prince with integrity is the best kind, however, his experience has taught him that this is not necessarily the case. A prince is usually expected to be an honorable, honest and a man who sticks to his word. However, it is not always good for a prince to do so and there are many reasons to proves this point. Honesty and righteousness are not the only two important aspects, a prince should not be too innocent or gullible so people are not able to take advantage of him.
Niccolò Machiavelli wrote, in his novel The Prince, that strong central political leadership was more important than anything else, including religion and moral behavior. Machiavelli, writing during a period of dramatic change known as the Italian Renaissance, displayed attitudes towards many issues, mostly political, which supported his belief that strong government was the most important element in society. These attitudes and ideas were very appropriate for the time because they stressed strong, centralized power, the only kind of leadership that seemed to be working throughout Europe, and which was the element Italy was lacking. Machiavelli understood that obtaining such a government could not be done without separating political conduct and personal morality, and suggested that the separation be made. The Prince, written to the Medici family over five hundred years ago contained many truths, so universal and accurate that they still influence politics today.
These are just some of the virtues of a prince. Some are good, some are evil and there are many in between but to be worthy of praise the prince would be required to have all of the above qualities. To have all of qualities would be almost impossible because human nature would not allow it to happen. To strive to be perfect is a good goal as prince but the stress and difficulty for that to happen would ultimately ruin that prince and his
Machiavelli’s views are realistic but pessimistic on what makes the ideal leader. He states that the ruler must appear to have strong virtues, but cannot rely on them. The Prince must always do what is best for the state, even if it is unethical. In Plato’s The Republic, his ideal state includes a class system. Working class people are on the bottom, the military is in the middle, and the top class is reserved for the leaders.