Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exergesis on Luke 11:9-13
Analysis of jesus healings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exergesis on Luke 11:9-13
Karon Singleton
In Luke 11:14-23, Luke is once again highlighting and exploring the healing power of Jesus, but placing more emphasis on the work of the Holy Spirit and how He is solely responsible for the works of Christ, particularly the casting out of demons.
According to the McArthur Study Bible, which was written by John McArthur, the book of Luke was written by Luke, following the same pattern as the other 3 gospels which are named after the actual author. McArthur also continues to explain how Luke is a frequent companion of the Apostle Paul. Although very little is known about Luke, due to Luke almost never including personal details about himself, the Apostle Paul referred to him as a physician. Due to Luke’s interest and familiarity with medical phenomena, he truly takes a keener
…show more content…
attentiveness to Jesus’ healing ministry. This supposition of Luke being associated with the medical field is particularly interesting when exploring the passage, Luke 11:14-23, because it starts off with Jesus healing a man who cannot speak. The most interesting part is that this man is not healed in the natural sense through medical phenomena, but by the Spirit, wherein Jesus cast out a mute demonic spirit by the power of the Holy Spirit. This puts the emphasis on the power of God and not on the works of man. It is also important to know that the gospel of Luke was written in a way that focused more on Jesus the man, thus placing more prominence on the power of God, by the way of His Spirit. As we take a look at the scripture, we have a mute demon who has prevented this man from being able to speak.
It doesn’t specify the length of time this man had to endure the agony of not being able to speak, but one could imagine that it definitely caused a lot of strain on his life. We can also assume that this man sought medical attention for his dilemma and no one was able to help from a medical perspective. Now, here comes Jesus, and in a moment’s time, the man is able to speak. This passage is also shared in the gospel of Matthew, where Matthew says that the man was unable to see and speak (Matt 12:22). Clearly, with the varying statements of this man’s specific ailment and limitations, the emphasis is not on these elements, but on the fact that a spirit, which had no place in his body, was cast out of his body by Jesus, by the power of the Holy Spirit, thus returning to him the ability to speak. Even after seeing Jesus cast out this demon, thus allowing this man to speak, there were some who claimed that it was the power of Beelzebub, ruler of the demons, that allowed Jesus to cast the demon out. In Matthew 12:24, these people were identified as the
Pharisees. Now we have people who are looking to test Jesus and have Him prove Himself. Even after experiencing and witnessing the miracle that he just performed, they are still looking for another sign from Heaven. First, we see that Jesus already know the thoughts and, should we say, the intentions of these people who were testing Him. Therefore, when he responds with his statement, “Every kingdom divided…,” his response is based on their intentions versus the actual questions and statements they present. The whole intention of this group of people, who didn’t believe it was the power of the Holy Spirit that cast out the mute demon, or perhaps knew that it was indeed the Holy Spirit, but just didn’t not want to give Jesus any credit, was to try and expose Jesus and make him look bad. In regards to Jesus’ statement and response, He is simply saying that people who are divided and against each other, under the same kingdom, will simply lead to the destruction and demise of said kingdom. In verses 18-23, Jesus is making it clear that there are only two sides of the spectrum, the enemy, in the form of satan, and God, in the form of Jesus, by way of the Holy Spirit. There is no way that satan would cast out his own spirit, and likewise, there is no way God would cast out His own spirit. Jesus is making a point to identify key elements that can be used to determine which side someone is on. Verse 23 clearly states that, “He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who does not gather with Me scatters.” So, it is perfectly clear that you are either with Jesus or against Him. And if you are against Him, then you are against God. The fact that the Pharisees did not give credit to the Holy Spirit, and in fact, disrespected the Holy Spirit by giving credit to the ruler of the demons, Beelzebub, for such a miracle. This was the ultimate offense to God, which Jesus speaks about in the gospel of Matthew 12:31-32. In this verse, Jesus tells the Pharisees that they can be forgiven of every sin and every blasphemy, all except the blasphemy against the Spirit. This really shows the immense importance that God places on ones treatment of the Holy Spirit. One key principle that this text provides on evangelism and spiritual warfare is that a person, particularly someone that is evangelizing, should never let the adverse, negative reaction from their audience deter or discourage them from the ultimate goal of spreading the gospel and winning souls. In 2 Timothy 4:5, it says that we ought to endure afflictions and do the work of an evangelist. It is not by accident that the enduring afflictions falls before the work that we must do as an evangelist. Right here in Luke 11:14-23, Jesus is faced with adversity even though he has just performed a miracle right before the eyes of the people. They even go as far as accusing Jesus of working for the enemy in casting out the demons. However, even in the midst of persecution, Jesus stands firm on His beliefs and begins to teach the people the truth about God. If Jesus would have gotten discouraged after they first questioned Him, then the people would not have heard the Word from the Lord, the truth that will set them free and make their path in life straight. Another key principle which is displayed in this verse is the act of proclaiming and demonstrating the gospel. Jesus began with the demonstration, which drew the people’s attention, and set Him up for the proclamation. In Matthew 5:14-16, the Word says that we ought to let our light shine for all men to see so that they will begin to glorify God. Jesus is clearly placing Himself in a position where His light will be seen by the masses. What better way is there to have your light shining from a lampstand than by demonstrating something that will cause people jaws to drop in astonishment? This was clearly an act designed by God that most likely caused those who did not believe in God, to actually believe in Him wholeheartedly. The first principle is a very crucial one for me in which I find myself not as Jesus did by overcoming the adversity, but more so being discouraged, and not even attempting to evangelize because of the delusional, foreseen persecution that I will have to endure. I sometimes psyche myself out before I am even in the game. The importance of overcoming adversity is so vital to the spreading of the gospel because the enemy is always going to try and stop me by any means necessary. If I am not able to push forward, through the adverse walls of suffering and afflictions, then those who God is sending me to will not get what God is trying to give them. We must bear our cross just as Jesus did and allow the power of the Holy Spirit to have full reign in our lives. I have definitely made some significant strides in this area, but completely understand that there is still a lot of work to be done because there is still a lot of people who need to witness the power and glory of God. In regard to the second principle of both demonstrating and proclaiming the gospel, I am definitely more of a demonstrator then a proclaimer. I am one to try and show someone how it is done as opposed to verbally communicating and expressing the gospel. However, through this class and especially with my new roll in our local church as the Pastoral Care Director, my ability to verbally express myself is vital, and just as important as demonstrating through good works. Communication is very crucial when caring for the man of God, as I had come to find out through various situation, and I have had to evolve into a better speaker and verbal communicator. However, in working on these elements, I have found a new confidence in Christ where I can speak boldly regarding the gospel. This new found confidence has allowed me to witness to more and more people with each moment that is presented to me. Now, I am in no way an evangelizing machine, but I can surely say that I have improved vastly in the evangelizing area.
Kodell, Jerome. "Luke." In The Collegeville Bible Commentary. Edited by Dianne Bergant and Robert J. Karris. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1988.
Gerhard Lohfink, in his book, “Jesus of Nazareth” believes that Jesus’ person and ministry are intertwined, or actually one and of the same. After Lohfink clarifies the difference between the "reign of God" as distinct from the “Kingdom of God,” he asserts that in Jesus, there is this active, ongoing reign which is not only revealed, but is manifested in all He says and does. Lohfink states, that Jesus is “not just preaching about the reign of God, but He is announcing it,” going on to indicating that Jesus is manifesting this reign in His own self disclosure and the actions of His ministry. Jesus ways of teaching and interactions with others, is shown as compassionate, gentle, direct and personal, as well as definitive and bold. As we also find in Ch. 3, “All that is happening before everyone’s eyes. The reign of God is breaking forth in the midst of the world and not only within people.” (51) And for Lohfink, this is taking place in the actual preaching, actions and life of Jesus Christ. Simply, we are personally and collectively and actively a part of establishing this “reign” right here, right now. A “reign” of mercy, compassion, forgiveness, self-giving, sacrificial love, as well as of justice and peace.
Luke was a Roman catholic before he converted over to Christianity. Luke was an eyewitness of the ministry, teaching, and life of Jesus. He made it his mission to teach the knowledge of Jesus and spread the religion Christianity. He wanted to reach the people in his communities and beyond. The Evangelist Luke wanted to tell the goods news that Jesus would return for his people. Luke’s concern was whether or not Christians could be good citizens of the Roman Empire, seeing that Jesus their founder had been killed for being a “political criminal”. Many people would have preceded them as revolutionaries (“From Jesus to Christ”). Christianity became a dominant way of life and worship in Europe many years after Luke wrote his gospel. In Medieval Europe, Luke’s gospel had greatly influenced the creators of many arts and dramas such as the Everyman play. Luke’s gospel opened many doors to help spread Christianity in Medieval Europe.
scripture prove that Luke was a doctor. Some even think that Luke was the first medical missionary.
The New Testament is primarily about Jesus’ ministries and teachings. As Jesus traveled from country to country during his last three years on earth, He performed many miracles and healings of sick, lame, and demon-possessed people. As a student, I can relate to this tremendously, since I am studying pre-physical therapy. "A physical therapist can help injured or ill people improve their movement and manage their pain. These therapists are often an important part of rehabilitation and treatment of patients with chronic conditions or injuries (Occupational Outlook Handbook-Physical Therapists, 2014)." Similarly to Jesus, I can help people and maybe even help heal their injuries as a physical therapist. However, Jesus is the ultimate healer that can work through me to make this possible.
The central teachings of traditional Christianity teachings were created to assure that man could work out his salvation. Therefore, making man responsible for finding his way to God, so that he could have a personal relationship with his Savior through Jesus the Son of God, the Father, and the Holy Spirit (The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 2017). Jesus Christ attracted followers who eventually took his teachings throughout the Roman world and beyond. Jesus, who was born to Mary and Joseph in Judea teaching methods placed him in conflict with prevailing Jewish beliefs and authorities; nevertheless, Jesus message inspired a small group of followers, who believed he was the Messiah (Matthews et al., 2014). However, the meaning of Jesus’s
The historical cultural situation of the writer and his audience is that in this time Paul is preaching to Ephesus, and that the audience are mostly gentiles. Pauls original name was Saul, and he was an apostle who spoke the Gospel of God, to the 1st century audience/world. The author is much undeinfed, but most have found that it can be paul, and little say it was a follower of paul. His background was personally chosen by God. Gods best messeng...
Exodus 21-24 was definitely quite an instructive piece of literature. It was almost raw in its nature as a text or “book” but more of reading an excerpt from a piece of non-fiction most similar to an instruction manual of some sort that you get when you buy a dissembled bike or desk. Something like being enrolled in a police academy there was definite sense of a master-slave relationship in the air. It is like something never before seen in the Torah, these chapters showed a whole new YHWH. The YHWH who is feared like the school principal in an elementary school, not even mom and dad has come on so strong as to the dos and donts of living life. It seems as if YHWH was pushed to such a point where YHWH has no choice but intervene into the lives of his children, and set the rules for the pl...
He makes the point that Acts develops the themes of the gospel, one reason for this is because Luke is the first to extend the story of Jesus to the apostles. Luke seems to extend on Marks gospel but in a different way then what Mathew does. Luke seems to focus on Jesus’s disciples, his calling of them, and his teachings to them. It seems that the reason Luke did this was to set up for the new church. However the most convincing reason that shows Luke believed his books ought to be read together is his writings in Luke 1:1-4 and in Acts 1:1-3. This is when in both books Luke gives us an intro stating that Acts is his second book to
The passage in Luke starts mid-story as Jesus has overcome Satan in the desert and started his ministry. He has so far performed a miracle of catching fish, and healed a man with leprosy. His reputation was spreading quickly and many came to hear Jesus speak and be healed of their diseases. The passage Luke 5:17-26 is an introduction to the continued conflict Jesus has with the Pharisees and Scribes. It is the first time mentioned in Luke that they come to listen to him speak and they don’t approve of his message. Faithful friends of a paralyzed man bring him to be healed by Jesus. They finally get the man to the feet of Jesus and expect a healing miracle but instead he does the unpredictable; He forgives the man of his sins. This infuriates the religious leaders but Jesus does not stop there. He also heals the man’s physical ailment and immediately the man can walk. Jesus healing the paralyzed man not only displays Jesus’ power over the physical realm, but also affirms his authority to forgive the sins of those who have faith in him.
Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand,
Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father
Luke was a doctor and a co-worker with Paul (Colossians 4:14; Philemon v24). Because some spurious stories about Jesus were circulating, Luke decided to interview local eye-witnesses and people who had followed Jesus closely. Luke collated all the interviews into a single account, recording details not mentioned elsewhere, for example regarding the conception and birth of Jesus and Mary's extended family, as you might expect of a doctor.
This provides a weighty argument which ois further inforced by Martin Dibelius. He points out that because of the address to Theophilus there must have been a desire to circulate the book among the educated and for such readers the name of the author would have certainly been included. So it is extremley unlikely for tradition to attribute to Luke a book which was known from its oublication to be written by someone else. In Acts there are four passages in which the writer uses the pronoun "we" (16:10-17; 20:5-10;21:1-18;27:1-28:16). These would appear to have been taken from the diary of one of Paul's companions.
Matthew 8 is filled with stories of Jesus healing others. Matthew 8:1 tells the story of when Jesus heals the leper. It says that “When Jesus came down from the mountainside, large crowds followed him. A man with leprosy came and knelt before him and said, “Lord, if you are willing, you can make me clean.” Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!” Immediately he was cleansed of his leprosy.” Matthew 8:14 states that “When Jesus came into Peter’s house, he saw Peter’s mother-in-law lying in bed with a fever. He