Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exergesis on Luke 11:9-13
Analysis of jesus healings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exergesis on Luke 11:9-13
Karon Singleton
In Luke 11:14-23, Luke is once again highlighting and exploring the healing power of Jesus, but placing more emphasis on the work of the Holy Spirit and how He is solely responsible for the works of Christ, particularly the casting out of demons.
According to the McArthur Study Bible, which was written by John McArthur, the book of Luke was written by Luke, following the same pattern as the other 3 gospels which are named after the actual author. McArthur also continues to explain how Luke is a frequent companion of the Apostle Paul. Although very little is known about Luke, due to Luke almost never including personal details about himself, the Apostle Paul referred to him as a physician. Due to Luke’s interest and familiarity with medical phenomena, he truly takes a keener
…show more content…
It doesn’t specify the length of time this man had to endure the agony of not being able to speak, but one could imagine that it definitely caused a lot of strain on his life. We can also assume that this man sought medical attention for his dilemma and no one was able to help from a medical perspective. Now, here comes Jesus, and in a moment’s time, the man is able to speak. This passage is also shared in the gospel of Matthew, where Matthew says that the man was unable to see and speak (Matt 12:22). Clearly, with the varying statements of this man’s specific ailment and limitations, the emphasis is not on these elements, but on the fact that a spirit, which had no place in his body, was cast out of his body by Jesus, by the power of the Holy Spirit, thus returning to him the ability to speak. Even after seeing Jesus cast out this demon, thus allowing this man to speak, there were some who claimed that it was the power of Beelzebub, ruler of the demons, that allowed Jesus to cast the demon out. In Matthew 12:24, these people were identified as the
Gerhard Lohfink, in his book, “Jesus of Nazareth” believes that Jesus’ person and ministry are intertwined, or actually one and of the same. After Lohfink clarifies the difference between the "reign of God" as distinct from the “Kingdom of God,” he asserts that in Jesus, there is this active, ongoing reign which is not only revealed, but is manifested in all He says and does. Lohfink states, that Jesus is “not just preaching about the reign of God, but He is announcing it,” going on to indicating that Jesus is manifesting this reign in His own self disclosure and the actions of His ministry. Jesus ways of teaching and interactions with others, is shown as compassionate, gentle, direct and personal, as well as definitive and bold. As we also find in Ch. 3, “All that is happening before everyone’s eyes. The reign of God is breaking forth in the midst of the world and not only within people.” (51) And for Lohfink, this is taking place in the actual preaching, actions and life of Jesus Christ. Simply, we are personally and collectively and actively a part of establishing this “reign” right here, right now. A “reign” of mercy, compassion, forgiveness, self-giving, sacrificial love, as well as of justice and peace.
Luke was a Roman catholic before he converted over to Christianity. Luke was an eyewitness of the ministry, teaching, and life of Jesus. He made it his mission to teach the knowledge of Jesus and spread the religion Christianity. He wanted to reach the people in his communities and beyond. The Evangelist Luke wanted to tell the goods news that Jesus would return for his people. Luke’s concern was whether or not Christians could be good citizens of the Roman Empire, seeing that Jesus their founder had been killed for being a “political criminal”. Many people would have preceded them as revolutionaries (“From Jesus to Christ”). Christianity became a dominant way of life and worship in Europe many years after Luke wrote his gospel. In Medieval Europe, Luke’s gospel had greatly influenced the creators of many arts and dramas such as the Everyman play. Luke’s gospel opened many doors to help spread Christianity in Medieval Europe.
The historical cultural situation of the writer and his audience is that in this time Paul is preaching to Ephesus, and that the audience are mostly gentiles. Pauls original name was Saul, and he was an apostle who spoke the Gospel of God, to the 1st century audience/world. The author is much undeinfed, but most have found that it can be paul, and little say it was a follower of paul. His background was personally chosen by God. Gods best messeng...
The central teachings of traditional Christianity teachings were created to assure that man could work out his salvation. Therefore, making man responsible for finding his way to God, so that he could have a personal relationship with his Savior through Jesus the Son of God, the Father, and the Holy Spirit (The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 2017). Jesus Christ attracted followers who eventually took his teachings throughout the Roman world and beyond. Jesus, who was born to Mary and Joseph in Judea teaching methods placed him in conflict with prevailing Jewish beliefs and authorities; nevertheless, Jesus message inspired a small group of followers, who believed he was the Messiah (Matthews et al., 2014). However, the meaning of Jesus’s
He makes the point that Acts develops the themes of the gospel, one reason for this is because Luke is the first to extend the story of Jesus to the apostles. Luke seems to extend on Marks gospel but in a different way then what Mathew does. Luke seems to focus on Jesus’s disciples, his calling of them, and his teachings to them. It seems that the reason Luke did this was to set up for the new church. However the most convincing reason that shows Luke believed his books ought to be read together is his writings in Luke 1:1-4 and in Acts 1:1-3. This is when in both books Luke gives us an intro stating that Acts is his second book to
Exodus 21-24 was definitely quite an instructive piece of literature. It was almost raw in its nature as a text or “book” but more of reading an excerpt from a piece of non-fiction most similar to an instruction manual of some sort that you get when you buy a dissembled bike or desk. Something like being enrolled in a police academy there was definite sense of a master-slave relationship in the air. It is like something never before seen in the Torah, these chapters showed a whole new YHWH. The YHWH who is feared like the school principal in an elementary school, not even mom and dad has come on so strong as to the dos and donts of living life. It seems as if YHWH was pushed to such a point where YHWH has no choice but intervene into the lives of his children, and set the rules for the pl...
Kodell, Jerome. "Luke." In The Collegeville Bible Commentary. Edited by Dianne Bergant and Robert J. Karris. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1988.
scripture prove that Luke was a doctor. Some even think that Luke was the first medical missionary.
The passage in Luke starts mid-story as Jesus has overcome Satan in the desert and started his ministry. He has so far performed a miracle of catching fish, and healed a man with leprosy. His reputation was spreading quickly and many came to hear Jesus speak and be healed of their diseases. The passage Luke 5:17-26 is an introduction to the continued conflict Jesus has with the Pharisees and Scribes. It is the first time mentioned in Luke that they come to listen to him speak and they don’t approve of his message. Faithful friends of a paralyzed man bring him to be healed by Jesus. They finally get the man to the feet of Jesus and expect a healing miracle but instead he does the unpredictable; He forgives the man of his sins. This infuriates the religious leaders but Jesus does not stop there. He also heals the man’s physical ailment and immediately the man can walk. Jesus healing the paralyzed man not only displays Jesus’ power over the physical realm, but also affirms his authority to forgive the sins of those who have faith in him.
Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand,
The New Testament is primarily about Jesus’ ministries and teachings. As Jesus traveled from country to country during his last three years on earth, He performed many miracles and healings of sick, lame, and demon-possessed people. As a student, I can relate to this tremendously, since I am studying pre-physical therapy. "A physical therapist can help injured or ill people improve their movement and manage their pain. These therapists are often an important part of rehabilitation and treatment of patients with chronic conditions or injuries (Occupational Outlook Handbook-Physical Therapists, 2014)." Similarly to Jesus, I can help people and maybe even help heal their injuries as a physical therapist. However, Jesus is the ultimate healer that can work through me to make this possible.
Luke was a doctor and a co-worker with Paul (Colossians 4:14; Philemon v24). Because some spurious stories about Jesus were circulating, Luke decided to interview local eye-witnesses and people who had followed Jesus closely. Luke collated all the interviews into a single account, recording details not mentioned elsewhere, for example regarding the conception and birth of Jesus and Mary's extended family, as you might expect of a doctor.
Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father
See me stand, I can hardly walk. I believe you can make me whole. See my tongue, I can hardly talk” and Jesus screams out that there are too many requests and for everyone to just stop. I actually find this scene very disturbing. The bible states multiple times how we need to cast our cares unto Him and be fully dependent on him. Just as John 15:5 states, “I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.” We need to latch onto Him because without him we are nothing. He is so powerful and can handle all things. The Gospels portray Jesus as a selfless God who can take on anything and is always ready to help. He is a healer, a teacher, and a listener. He does not get overwhelmed as portrayed in the movie.
This provides a weighty argument which ois further inforced by Martin Dibelius. He points out that because of the address to Theophilus there must have been a desire to circulate the book among the educated and for such readers the name of the author would have certainly been included. So it is extremley unlikely for tradition to attribute to Luke a book which was known from its oublication to be written by someone else. In Acts there are four passages in which the writer uses the pronoun "we" (16:10-17; 20:5-10;21:1-18;27:1-28:16). These would appear to have been taken from the diary of one of Paul's companions.