Lucius Annaeus Seneca was a roman philosopher that lived from 4 B.C. to 65 A.D., offered some of the most influentially inspiring writings that argue the very purpose of life and the inward reflection of oneself. Seneca was a confidant of the Roman Emperor Nero and towards the end of his life procured many letters and writings of his beliefs to mentees. He is considered a major influence on the Christian theology because of the comparison between the morality expressed in his philosophy and verses in the Christian bible; specifically those concerning money and wealth as a path to evil and the treatment of man to one another. His philosophy expanded the traditional views of stoicism; a Hellenistic ideology that addresses the ways in which one …show more content…
should endure the hardships of life using virtue, as well. Seneca’s point of view that the search for knowledge and friendship is a necessity in life was transcribed in his writings “Letters from a Stoic” as a response to the questions of man that have withstood the hands of time. These questions inquire about the purpose of life and how we understand nature as it pertains to human existence. This paper will examine and assess some of these teachings offered by Seneca to Lucilius in the collection of documents““Letters from a Stoic” translated by: Robin Campbell” and how they relate to the modern day and age. In his letters, Seneca addresses one of his former students Lucilius, and instructs him on the important questions that all philosophies consider about the nature of man and how to deal with difficult times and similar topics. In his teachings, Seneca concludes a number of rational solutions to those questions by dissecting them with applicable intuition and arrives at a simple solution; Happiness. Although many philosophies agree that the nature of any man is his pursuit happiness, Seneca’s perspective is not complete enough for the nature of wise men.(Letter III) In order to understand this more, one must be consistent on reading and gaining knowledgeable information. In Letter II, Seneca focuses some attention on the importance for Lucilius to be well-read. It can be assumed that he felt knowledge is universally important and that it can be passed on by written word. This is evident because in his numerous recorded teachings on how one should live their life he practiced the ability to write as well as read. This in part portrays what he believed, and he was counseling it to his pupil. This leads the reader to assume why Seneca’s position on matters was so high in the Roman Empire. However, pertaining to the importance of reading, Seneca felt that it is although it was a powerful tool and strength, it could be a hindrance. He exclaims, “you should be extending your stay among authors whose genius is unquestionable, deriving constant nourishment from them if you wish to gain anything from your reading that will find a lasting place in your mind.” This statement summarizes his analysis on the importance of not just reading, but reading educated and “genius” authors in order to learn lasting lessons. He implores the reader to be mindful of what is read, because not all information is useful and the dangers involved if the task is approached with zeal. Over 2015 years ago, an individual was contemplating the theory of corruption with misinformation. To this day, this is a major concern amongst people. The idea that not all authors are credible in their beliefs is still a very real issue in modern day mass media. The fact that some authors are published does not necessarily make them knowledgeable scholars in any regard. Furthermore, Seneca believes that the acquisition of knowledge is a part of exploring life’s possibilities by making new friends and acquaintances. This raises a rational answer to the previous question about the purpose of life. The purpose of life is a daunting subject that has been examined, debated, and researched by every daring canvasser since the beginning of time, but Seneca is perhaps the first (philosopher) to examine it as an opportunity to begin a process of transformation.
Seneca references in Letter VI, the importance of intimacy as an opportunity for growth. This is to say the intimate friendships between individuals cultivate a stimulus of affection, thus alleviating the feeling of isolation or the need for self-content. However in letter IX, Seneca warns of the dangers of wrongful intentions of friends. He felt that the company you entertain will either strengthen you or hinder your virtue, i.e. character. I believe Seneca’s letter to Lucilius was a reminder to always be conscience of your character and not to jeopardize ones virtue for friendship. The people you consult with should be like you and you should look specifically for “individuals who will improve you.”(pg.43) He feels that the people are consistently selfish in their actions. In that, we as people should initiate a trade of information that promotes mutual benefits. I believe what he is intending to convey is that our ability to influence one another in an intimate relationship whether it be friend or spouse should polish one another. The value of information and knowledge increases as it is shared. He uses the example of being in the presence of people that can offer differing perspective and influence to a subject as one might already have a fixed opinion of. He suggests these interactions more preferable in comparison to entertaining friends that sit around and do nothing all day. Their contribution is limited and often times not thought provoking. This is a familiar fixed idea that most western civilizations recognize as two heads is always better than one and one hand washes the other. By networking in unity, the possibility for efficacy rises. The benefit of exchanging thoughts and ideas between
individuals is enlightenment and this notion is a purposeful venture in one’s life. Seneca was not too far from modern day teachings in terms of this philosophy. He also confessed that a teacher learns as they teach, just as the student has potential to teach as they learn. Seneca believes that the purpose of life was to better ourselves in some capacity. (pg.36) As mentioned previously, Seneca’s letter IX argues the responsibilities of wise men are to feel his troubles but to overcome them. For him, Seneca addresses this figure of a wise man as a progressive state of man capable of self-content. His use of the term “wise man” can be assumed to mean the nature of man, or man in society and whose responsibilities are to acquire knowledge and one way to do that is by generating friendships. It is through friendships that people are able to teach a subject as well as learn a subject. Another example of this Seneca displays in his letters would be by way of rhetoric and literature; by this we are able to pass knowledge and information from one place to another across large distances including time. This leads the author to believe Seneca is arguing that the nature of man is to progress and pursue wisdom and to do so whilst existing within the parameters of divine authority. Seneca concludes in some letters the criterion and restrictions for a wise man. He suggests to Lucilius that wise men must acquire knowledge, i.e. become wiser men, by relaying self-content with the events and environment around them. They must not worry about what they do not possess or the possessions once had but then lost because of their self content. It is a virtue and should be exercised just as beginning new friendships. It is not easy to get along with everyone right away but as time proceeds the task becomes easier. He mentions that friendships for the sake of having them and reading scholarly authors are ways in which people can acquire wisdom and happiness. He warns about the nature of excessive ambition of these tools and how crippling it can be to pursue many relationships and many authors. This ambition can lead to exhaustion and an inability to retain the mass amounts of information for long periods of time. As a member in modern society inclusive of higher education learning, I believe this subject of stoicism is still quite relevant to today’s modernity. It provides qualitative information pertinent to the high placement value on the ability for civilized peoples to network and cultivate relationships. Furthermore, the corrupted intentions behind some friendships that camouflages the ulterior motives such as to gain information or financial advantages. Consider for instance, the job market in any field of expertise, a new employee would have it in their best interest to seek out the help and assistance of an experienced employee to better understand how to perform that specific job. The same can be understood about performing simple tasks. The ability to do something well begins the knowledge of knowing how to do that specific thing. Basically, Seneca requires a wise man to understand and decipher what is to be expected of them; Seneca was successful in observing the mannerisms by which people learn new information. In conclusion, Seneca’s ideology towards the dated stoic philosophy renders a rather remarkable relationship to modern day society’s unwritten requirements for success. These requirements are essential for college graduates and business executives. Essentially, any functioning organ in society that depends on human participation is subject to Seneca’s reference of wise men. Furthermore, modern day educational institutions have adopted the notion that philosophical practice is essential in order to master critical thought process as well as to transform. His letters go on to explain that the progression of our mental and physical aptitude is dependent upon our transformation. By this measure, it can be concluded that the status of an individual is determined by their job and wealth. However, on the other hand it is also consisted of the ability to gain and spread knowledge with friends in order to promote one simple notion; happiness. Seneca believes that humans will be the happiest when we are self-sufficient and self-complacent with what we have, but that reaching for more by way of learning, reading, and by cultivating friendships we can be transform and progress our current state. I argue in agreement with his belief that all who teach and seek to be taught are stoics and in that pursuit they will find happiness according to the findings in Seneca’s letters to Lucilius.
By saying this he means that companionship is the environment in which friendships comes to be. Lewis believes that friendships are made possible by companionship, but when the friendship comes into play, there is a revolutionary break from the matrix of companionship. Lewis provides a schematic for the formation of friendship proper, but he does not provide characteristics related to the time in life when the best type of bond is formed, the time length of the bond, or the time necessary to form the bond as Aristotle does. Aristotle’s description of Virtue Friendship’s long formation period also has within it a notion that Virtue friendships may have formed from preexisting Use or Pleasure Friendships; similar to Lewis’ idea that companionship is the matrix of friendship.
Seneca has a strong opinion on the liberal arts and the liberal study’s in general. He thinks students are only focused on the worldly skills, and not the skills of life. Students are lacking the common knowledge on how to treat others and losing sight in what it takes to become a decent human being. In “Liberal Studies and Education” by Seneca, the path to virtue is through self-awareness. Throughout Seneca’s letter he states his views on liberal education and how important it is in life, students can’t just focus on worldly things, they need to focus on the things we take with us after death. The mind is important, but in Seneca’s letter, he feels the soul should get the most attention in the education field, virtue being his main idea. The effects of virtue are illustrated through the characteristics of, kindness, love for the common man, and inner strength.
What I noticed when comparing the two readings, Cicero refers to the virtue of the friendship more than
Late one evening, curled up in her nest, Harriet lay thoughtfully reading the last of Aristotle’s model of friendships: the perfect friendship. Though no secret to Harriet, Aristotle presents the idea that it is the most desirable and genuine of the three forms. The foundation of this friendship is not trivial, but instead the relationship is built on a common good and virtuous nature. As Aristotle explains, “those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves, and those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves.” Aristotle continues, “Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for those wish well alike to each other qua good, and they are good in themselves.” (concluding sentence or two...)
II In Books VIII and IX, Aristotle discusses the role of friendship in the good life.
Aristotle believes that everyone is in need of some type of friend, he states that “for rich people and those who rule and have power, there seems to be the greatest need for friends.”(page. 144, book VIII) Aristotle believes that we as humans benefit greatly from having friends, no matter who we are or what position we are in wealthy or poor. There are three distinct types of friendship that Aristotle directs his beliefs towards. These three types of friendships include: Utility, pleasure, and Goodness or virtuous friendship. Aristotle believes that friendship is something that is extremely important to have and should be held above many things. Friendship Utility is unlike the friendships of pleasure or goodness because as Aristotle puts it is “for the old” he explains that friendship Utility is a friendship that two people may have where they only communicate with one another for self-benefit or to gain something for one’s self. These two people are not likely to live with each other and at times may not even be nice to th...
Cicero believes all about the good in friendship whereas Aristotle believes friendship should be placed in categories. He also believes the old cliché that with friendship “you scratch my back, ill scratch yours.” I think that these two men are very knowledgeable on what friendship really is. Aristotle sounds like an opportunist to me. He would not be considered a loyal friend in my eyes and I would not scratch his back for a million bucks. Through both of their differences, you can clearly see who the “jerk” is, and who the sincere one is. You can see the “sharing out of the goodness of one’s heart” form of friendship as described by Cicero. Meanwhile, Aristotle claims that a friend gives only because he or she expects something in return. I refuse to allow myself or my views on friendship to be manipulated by Aristotle’s arrogance. Everyone in life deserves a friend that does not look for a reward. I personally like the saying “it’s better to have loved than to have never loved at all”. I believe that you should be someone’s friend whole heartedly and if you cannot be that person’s friend whole heartedly then don’t be their friend at all. There is a saying that I have formed from my own personal experience and it is “If you can’t exist in peace, don’t exist in pieces”. Although, some may not agree with Cicero and may even prefer Aristotle’s views that he has about friendship; if what he says is true then why on earth would you want someone to do something for you just because they can get something in return? It’s wrong! It simply amoral from my own point of view. I believe in doing well without looking for a reward in return. Life is much better that way. If there were more Cicero’s in the world, I believe this world would be a better
In the writings of Aristotle, seen in Nicomachean Ethics, it is evident that Aristotle believes that friendship is necessary for a virtuous and therefore happy life. I believe that this is accurate due to the similar conditions necessary for a complete friendship and a happy life. It is also evident that friendship is useful in achieving a happy life because friendship can make performing virtuous actions easier. His interpretation can be misunderstood and mistakes in practice can be made, so we will need to discuss these follies as well, in order to understand all the effects of friendship on achieving a happy life.
philosophical temperament and affluence. Yet at times these two forces within Cicero clash and contradict with the early stoic teachings. Cicero gradually adopted the stoic lifestyle but not altogether entirely, and this is somewhat due to the fact of what it was like to be a roman of the time. The morals of everyday Rome conflicted with some of the stoic ideals that were set by early stoicism. Thus, Cicero changed the face of stoicism by romanizing it; redefining stoicism into the middle phase.
First, the article introduces the audience to friendships described by Aristotle, and Todd May. In the text it states, “It is threatened when we are encouraged to look up on those
Marcus Aurelius was a stoic. In the book Archetypes of Wisdom, Soccio defines stoicism as a philosophy that, “counsel’s self-control, detachment, and acceptance of one’s fate as identified by the objective use of reason. Stoics believed that everything is about your attitude and that happiness comes only through the detachment from all external things. In book two of The Meditations Aurelius writes that nothing can injure him because no one can implicate him in what is degrading. This would be considered a stoic thought because Marcus is not letting external factors influence his happiness. Another example would be that when he speaks of his brother. His stepbrother Verus was very incompetent, but Aurelius could not turn his back on him, because it would go against Nature. Nature is the same thing as Logos. Logos is a force that governs the universe. It is also known as World Reason, Cosmic Mind, God, Zeus, Nature, Providence, Cosmic Meaning, and Fate. He mentions several of these throughout the document.
Stoicism was a group of philosophers in the First Century who made laws that they thought should be followed by the citizens of Rome. Two of these laws were the concepts of rationality and nature. Marcus Aurelius was the Emperor of Rome at the time and he also the most known Stoic. His concepts were vital to the survival of the Stoics.
Aristotle wrote on many subjects in his lifetime but one of the virtues that he examines more extensively is friendship. Aristotle believes that there are three different kinds of friendship: utility, pleasure, and virtuous friendships. He also argues that a real friendship should be highly valued because it is a complete virtue and he believes it to be greater than honor and justice. Aristotle suggests that human’s love of utility and pleasure is the only reason why the first two types of friendships exist. Aristotle also argues that humans only set up these types of relationships for personal gain. But when he speaks of the virtuous friendships, Aristotle states that it is one of the greatest attainments one can achieve.
Seneca Illustrates this through various essential examples found throughout On Liberal and Vocations Studies. When speaking of the musician, Seneca asks, “what good is there for me in knowing how to parcel out a piece of land if I know not how to share it with my brother?” This quote reminds the reader of the importance of giving back to the community or society rather than being petty with the belongings. Seneca emphasizes that rather than being selfish with belongings and bragging, society should share with each other like the brothers and sisters we were intended to be. “There is one thing that brings the soul to perfection – the unalterable knowledge of good and evil.” Seneca understands that true knowledge is hard to obtain because it’s not being taught. However, when one’s soul is in harmony or when one learns how to keep from uttering doleful notes, knowledge will be instilled deep within one’s heart. Seneca continued to show how virtue is caused by stating, “it counts no evil as another solely.” It’s important to understand that knowledge is power. When one knows that something is wrong, turning the other way makes the person observing just as bad. As a society, there must be a sense of protection and community, looking out for each
Ralph Waldo Emerson stated that, “The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, and to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.” It is right to have a heart that would continually give to others, because not only are you helping changing someone lives but, you are also helping yourself in doing such a genuine act. Helping others brings good feelings to the giver and the receiver of the good deeds. Using your special gifts to help others can be a gift to yourself as you enjoy a self-esteem boost for making others' lives better, and make the world a better place. You feel more worthy of good deeds yourself, your trust in the decency of people is reinforced, and you feel more connected to yourself and to others.