Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of the voting age
When it comes to lowering or keeping the voting age at 18, I am usually neutral about it. if I had to choose I don't see the harm in lowering the voting age. In America the people who usually vote are the elderly, lowering the voting age may help to balance it out because many young people don't have a say in certian outcomes with voting. There were a lot of predictions about lowering the age to 18 that all turned out to be untrue. While there are only 38% of voter aged from 18 to 24 that voted in 2012 and many can say that lowering the age would only lower those numbers, take a look at Austria whom has the highest voter participation and their age is set to 16! There is nothing special about the age being 18, with a low amount of young people voting it can bring America to the top with participation rate.
First off, the elderly are some of the highest people who vote in America, I say lowering the voting age may encourage people who are younger to start voting more. I stand by this because from experience and seeing many young people who are not satisified with some voting outcomes, they barely have a say in the matter because they cannot vote.
…show more content…
People can argue that the only reason people do not vote is because it's not as accessible, mobile voting booths or voting from home would increase our already low percentages, I believe this a false to an extent. I say if we lower the the age of voting and allow people to vote from home, that would increase our voting participation and give young people a say in some polls. Although, there is already a low amount of people, aged 18-24, who barely vote, some argue that lowering it would only decrease numbers, I agree to a certain extent. People who are that age usually don't dwell into politics. Lowering it may encourage more people to vote because certain outcomes can happen. Only if we have people that want the change that is. Now this is a controversial topic that i remain nuetral on, look at the recent election, there were two sides of the coin who wanted Mrs. Clinton to be president and the other side who wanted Mr. Trump. A lot of people were unsatisfied with how the election ended, this is were my arguement comes into play, if we lowered the voting age to 16 it would've given a lot of young men and women a say in the matter, maybe the outcome would've changed. Furthermore, I don't think there is anything special about the number being 18, from personal experience most people who are 18 are in school and who are usually busy to not be able to vote, or they don't care.
16, 17, all the way 24 are the people who are usually interested in politics, lowering the age can bring new and interesting changes if they vote. We are the lowest when it comes to participation in voting, Austria has their age set at 16 and they have the a phenomenal rate, capping at 98%! There are people who think that young people shouldn't be added to the electorate, I say those people are Elitists. You shouldn't be close minded about this because if it works for other countries, it can work for America too! This is the land of the free, we should be able to give young adults a say in the matter
too! In conclusion, this is how I feel about lowering the voting age, many won't agree with me, but it's still an insight on why lowering it could help. All these countries have set the trend about their voting ages, why can't America follow too? There is nothing good that come from keeping people who can make a change by voting. The middle aged and the middle aged if they already have something they voted that can't be changed by a lesser few, then are we really free? Can we say that we are a better country without more people having a say? America is a great country, but we can make it better! If we lower the voting age we can truly have a democracy by giving a voice to the lesser few. Outcomes can end differently and we can have higher participation rates! I believe this is why we should lower it, not because it can hurt us, but because we can benifit from it!
In chapter one, Wattenberg discusses the declining trends of Americans who regularly read newspapers between the 1960’s and present day. This can be attributed the aging patterns among generations who frequently read newspapers as well as with the use of technology rising. Reading the newspaper is a habit that either is or is not developed by the time one reaches voting age. With this, newspapers have become an older generation’s primary source of information, however, are still the best source for political matters. Younger generations tend to be more computer literate and have grown up with television and media more accessible to them than the previous generation. These trends not only reflect in American culture, but in other countries worldwide such as Italy, and Germany. Quoting a 2003 fox news interview of President Bush, Wattenberg illustrates the vast decline of newspaper consumption; even the U.S. President isn’t reading newspapers (11). Using tables throughout chapter one to illustrate the drastic differences within the last 50 years, the author exemplifies a 35% point decrease from 1957 to 2004. He speculates that perhaps young adults don’t like to read, but proves that is not the case as surveys have shown that education levels have risen overall, and access to books and reading has also increased over the years; thereby concluding that young people read, but do not typically read the newspaper. While there are several newspaper websites available, young adults do not frequently read those websites either. Although TV news information is not as detailed as it is in newspapers, young people have an ability to make up for their disinterest in newspapers by watching the news headlines (30). Chapter one makes a strong case...
There are a number of various ways that can be used in order to address the ever-growing problem of democratic deficit in the UK, which is based around factors such as the low participation rates and general apathy towards politics in the wider public.
... equal system. The lower age could also encourage and interest youth much more in political processes and parties as now they would actually be able to impact the way they are governed and who is governing them. Politics would be much more noticeable in schools and the general knowledge of politics and the political process would drastically increase. The youth would also be more likely to develop earlier the skills and potentials needed in later life politically and even socially. In conclusion when all is said and done I, personally would like to say the voting age lowered to sixteen for many of the reasons above. There will be many people opposing this movement but I think it is time for the youth of Canada to be heard and if they wish they should have the opportunity to vote and express their opinions and choices.
To enforce voting to be mandatory , this will prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices for their representatives. Mandating would stimulate the demand side, motivating voters to understand and acknowledge who they are voting for. Therefore , voting is to be a responsibility than a option.
In “You’re 16, You’re Beautiful and You’re a Voter,” author Anya Kamenetz states her belief that the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. Kamenetz gives several premises to her argument.
Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make a lot of sense in the world. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make more sense. It would be better for the teens that drink on college campus. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because you can vote at eighteen, buy tobacco, it’ll reduce the thrill of breaking the law, evidence supports that early introduction of drinking is the safest way to reduce juvenile alcohol abuse, and college people that are not 21 drink also.
Considering the delegates that are currently running for office, a voter should have a vast level of understanding regarding the intentions of each and every candidate. Arguing whether to raise or lower the age limit for the right to vote has raised many speculations as to how it would affect the economy. There are pros and cons within both sides of the argument, but any decisions made by the powers that be will have an adverse effect on today’s society if it is placed in the hands of the younger generation. Therefore, raising the voting age to twenty-one is a better way of making sure that voters are more aware and would be more equipped to making a more sound decision rather than lowering
Should America Lower the Legal Drinking Age to 18? When it comes to the discussion over lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen, people express various different ideas and beliefs concerning the issue. Some believe that the drinking age for alcohol should be lowered and others believe that it should stay the same. Those that do believe lowering the drinking age is the best route to take, do have valid points. However, there are others who argue that changing the law will not change things for the better.
The legal age limit to drink in the U.S. is 21 years old currently. Even though the legal age limit is 21 to drink, there are many people who are abusing this law and drinking illegally. I believe that the legal age limit should be lowered to 18. In order for this to happen other U.S. citizens will have to vote to lower the age limit. I am interested in this because if it was lowered it would make it legal for my age group. Although there will possibly be more alcohol related incidents resulting in injury and possibly death. Lowering the legal age limit will allow people who do it illegally now to be able to do it in a safer environment. This will result in less alcohol related incidents. The age limit to drink alcohol should be lowered because the benefits overtime will out way the harm it will cause.
If, as adults, people have the right to serve on juries and make major decisions that can influence a whole nation, then at 18 people should be able to consume alcohol without having to worry about breaking the law. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would encourage people to drink responsibly and it would reduce traffic accidents that are caused by people driving under the influence. The Minimum Legal Drinking Age 21 is proving its ineffectiveness day after day and it is causing people more harm than good.
The Voting Age Must be Lowered for Democracy to Exist in America. Imagine for a moment that senior citizens were denied the right to vote. Imagine senior citizens being thought of as too incompetent to vote because some senior citizens are senile. Can you imagine such a large percentage of the American public being denied the right to vote – simply on account of their age? It doesn't happen in America, right?
One must have a purpose in life in order to live. Moira Young, author of the Dustlands series, wrote Rebel Heart which prominently showed the theme of finding a reason to live. The novel shows the significance of friends and family on one’s life. The book also shows how love and desire for happiness can become someone’s life goal. Lastly, the story shows how to accept the inevitable, and have the strength to choose your own decisions.
When lowering the drinking the age to 18, there will be less tragic accidents in the United States in my opinion. Drinking age has been a huge talked topic in the United States for many years. There have been many opinions thrown out there, for example, some want to lower the drinking age and some want to raise it. Lowering the drinking age would be a great and permanent solution.
Have you ever been persuaded into voting? Well, you should have your own say on where your opinion goes. Voting is a right that every citizen in America over the age of 18 can do. Many people have become aware of the fact that the number of voters had reached its all time low. But as the newest voting season comes closer, we should still have a voice and the freedom to decide what we do. Which is, take a step against making America a compulsory voting country, because it proves unnecessary and there are other alternatives than mandatory voting.
There has been much debate about the legalisation of compulsory voting throughout political history and more importantly its place in a democratic society. Compulsory voting at a Commonwealth level was recognised in Australia in 1924 under section 245(1) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act as stated: “It shall be the duty of every elector to vote at each election” (Australian Electoral Commission, 2011). Since the introduction of compulsory voting there has been both strong advocacy and opposition in terms of its legitimacy in society, which this essay will highlight through the concept of its consistency with representative democracy and its ability to ensure parties reflect the will of all people. On the contrary, opponents argue that it increases the number of safe seat electorates as well as forcing the ill informed to vote.