Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare the health care systems of developing and developed countries
Health care in developed countries
Health care in the third world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Low wages have been a problem for a while in third world countries. For many years, because of low wages, workers from these nations do not have enough to support their families, children under eighteen are forced to work instead of learn, and health care is almost nonexistent. Although the work hard daily, the workers are paid with barely enough to get anything for themselves, let alone their families. These people are still human; they need a good amount of money to buy food, clothes, and medication. Instead of being in school, children are working in sweatshops to support parents. Here in the US, with permission to do so, one need to be at least sixteen to work. Children are accepted to work and some are being bought off their own parents' …show more content…
Although there are more jobs available for the people living in the rural areas, it does not mean they are moving to a better place. As of 1999, Nike claims that they have the Micro Enterprise Loan Program in Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, and Pakistan for families that are in need of money (Wisley and Lichtig n. pag.). However, the latest analysis of workers’ debt as of 2010 shows that the number of workers in debt to their companies has increased; because of that, more workers are working without pay to pay off their loans (Roggero et al 272). Also, since wages are too low, the employees take loans that eventually lead to their children into doing labor and stop attending school to help with the family’s debt. Since most debts are unable for the workers to pay off, after they pass away, their children have to take their parents’ workplace, leading to child labor (Ballinger 36). Much data have been collected proving that companies with factories in the third world countries are nowhere helping with improving incomes of their …show more content…
In 2002, Nike claims that “an expansion of education programs in the factories, including middle and high school equivalency course available for all workers in Nike footwear factories” (Wilsey and Lichtig n. pag.). Such education is provided for the workers that want to have more education such as young children. Even though that was being put out to the public, Global Exchange, an organization which fight for the rights of workers, asserts that “Nike’s programs are more geared towards office workers in the factory and not the factory workers themselves” (Wilsey and Lichtig n. pag.). Only office workers are being aimed to get extra education because the workers are being put to work and office workers are mainly people from the company itself. Besides that, low paid workers have no such thing as non-working hours to be able to attend class, study, and pass exams. In reality, the employees that are working under minimum age do not have enough time to go to school because they are too tired and too hungry to learn after their work hours (Reddy 210). All in all children are not anywhere near getting their education and adults are not getting them either because of time issues and the harsh after
In today’s world, increasing big companies open factories in developing countries but many people said it is unethical and the factories are sweatshops. Most of the sweatshops were opened in east Asia and third-world countries and regions. The companies open the sweatshops in order to get more benefits is a kind of very irresponsible behavior. For example, Apple's factories in China are not good and unethical. Audit finds
Large corporations such as Nike, Gap, and Reebok and many others from the United States have moved their factories to undeveloped nations; barely pay their employees enough to live on. Countries such as China, Indonesia, and Haiti have readily abundant cheap labor. There should be labor laws or an obligation of respecting workers to provide decent working conditions, fair wages, and safety standards.
Poverty and low wages have been a problem ever since money became the only thing that people began to care about. In Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America by Barbara Ehrenreich, she presents the question, “How does anyone live on the wages available to the unskilled?” This question is what started her experiment of living like a low wage worker in America. Ehrenreich ends up going to Key West, Portland, and Minneapolis to see how low wage work was dealt with in different states. With this experiment she developed her main argument which was that people working at low wages can’t live life in comfort because of how little they make monthly and that the economic system is to blame.
Linda Lim, a professor at the University of Michigan Business School, visited Vietnam and Indonesia in the summer of 2000 to obtain first-hand research on the impact of foreign-owned export factories (sweatshops) on the local economies. Lim found that in general, sweatshops pay above-average wages and conditions are no worse than the general alternatives: subsistence farming, domestic services, casual manual labor, prostitution, or unemployment. In the case of Vietnam in 1999, the minimum annual salary was 134 U.S. dollars while Nike workers in that country earned 670 U.S. dollars, the case is also the similar in Indonesia. Many times people in these countries are very surprised when they hear that American's boycott buying clothes that they make in the sweatshops. The simplest way to help many of these poor people that have to work in the sweatshops to support themselves and their families, would be to buy more products produced in the very sweatshops they detest.
This article looks at the impact that minimum wages has had on levels of poverty in...
The lives of people in some third world countries such as Honduras and Indonesia are completely different than ours hear in a much more prosperous nation. So when citizens of this great nation hear about people working for thirty to fifty cents an hour they think it’s absolutely absurd. But what they don’t realize is that this amount of profit is acceptable to these people. David R. Henderson backs this up by stating, “Take the 31 cents an hour some 13-year-old Honduran girls allegedly earn at 70-hour-a-week jobs. Assuming a 50-week year, that works out to over $1,000 a year. This sounds absurdly low to Americans but when you consider that Honduras’s GDP per person in 1994 was the equivalent of about $600.” You can also see proof of this in Cathy Young’s article when she writes, “I have also wondered why, when we are shocked by reports of 50-cent-an-hour wages, we never think of those Save the Children ads reminding us that a contribution of $15 can feed and clothe a Third World child for a whole month.” Also, Young brings up another good point by stressing the fact that to many Third World country families having children is one more financial burden, “…in poor societies, a family cannot afford to support a child for 18 years. For virtually all of human history, most children worked…”
In order to sustain a vibrant economy, the government needs to help the poor with their resources. The poor are poor not because they don’t work, but because government has failed to provide wages that American families can survive on. Cost can be an issue but the cost to subsidize the workers with low-wage jobs are higher (Kukathus 49). Acknowledging ethical and reli...
Nike, as many other companies do, facilitates production in other countries to help grow sales in those particular regions. The main difference between Nike and some of the other companies is that other companies do not support the exploitation of labourers or human rights. Not to suggest that Nike promotes labour exploitation, but they are less strict about these rules than other companies in foreign markets. Impacts on health and safety are a major factor for employees in sweatshops. However, physical and sexual abuse is another serious concern of many of the sweatshop workers. Most of the sweatshops run by Nike contractors are factories located in relatively small spaces to save on real estate costs. They are often soiled with dirt and kept unheated to save on expenses. Broken glass and dangerous equipment is left on the floors causing potential dangers to any people scattered within the factory. Employees are subject to harassment and violent punishments if work is not being completed as thoroughly and efficiently as the contractors would like. Workers slave under unfavourable conditions for up to 14-hour days often with no breaks. These employees are paid less than $100 US and work on average over 250 hours per month. "Substandard wages keep factory workers in poverty and force them to work excessi...
“The minimum employment age for employment in industrial, agricultural, or commercial companies is 15. The minimum age for apprenticeships is 14. There is no minimum age restriction for work in domestic service and there are no legal penalties for employing children in domestic labor unless the nature or condition of domestic service harms their health, safety, or morals.”
Pakistan has a per-capita income of $1,900 per year, so in essence, a typical person survives barely on $5 per day, and with the high rate of inflation it becomes difficult for a low-income population to survive. Nike’s child labor is spread all over Pakistan but has the greatest impact in the northwest of punjab province, that is Sialkot. Pakistan has a population of approximately 1 million and is an important center for the production of Nike’s goods for export to international markets, particularly sporting goods and shoes. Sialkot is one of the world’s most important centers for production of Nike’s sporting goods.
With the increasing awareness and publicity of poor working conditions in subcontracted factories in East Asia, Nike has stimulated an uprising of activist and watchdog groups working toward seeing these conditions changed. With Nike in the negative spotlight, various organizations have revolved around generating a negative outlook on Nike’s practices of social irresponsibility. Certain campaigns such as the “National Days of Consciousness” and “International Day of Protest” were organized to educate people on the deplorable working conditions in Nike’s Asian manufacturing plants, and were designed to get more people involved in global employment issues.
A team of researchers interviewed some of these migrant workers, “One in four-22 of the 86 workers interviewed- reported that they were paid less than the federally mandated minimum wage of $7.25 per hour” (Conditions in Fields”). With that hourly wage, “the average income for a crop worker is between $10,000 and $12,500” (“Conditions in Fields”). That income makes it extremely difficult, especially for families, to live a comfortable
Poverty, also know as the “silent killer” (Causes of Poverty), exists in every corner of the world. The death rate of poor children is a staggering number; about 9 million die each year. Some view poverty as people not being able to afford an occupational meal or having to skip a meal to save money. This isn’t true poverty; poverty is where people live on $1.25 or less a day. According to Causes of Poverty, 1.4 billion people live like this. Even more shocking than the last statistic is that half of the world’s population lives on $2.50 per day.
Nike decided to make the conditions safer to children by the text says “... it would raise the minimum for new workers at show factories to 18 and the minimum workers at other plants to 16” and “... the company said, it would tighten air-quality controls to insure that the air breathed by the workers meets the same standards enforced by the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration” (lines 17-19 John H. Cushman Jr.) (lines 24-28 John H. Cushman). This evidence shows that Nike is doing many things to stop the child labor from occurring and that we should support the company, because of how much they put in their time saving lives of children from child labor. We should help support Nike by boycotting other companies products that use child labor because they don’t like child labor as much as we do. Nike not only wants to make conditions safer, but also the text says “Nike, in a statement today, cited a report it commissioned in 1997, which said that its factories in Indonesia and Vietnam pay legal minimum wages and more” (lines 38-40 John H. Cushman). This evidence is another reason why Nike wants to stop child labor because the children aren’t getting paid
For teenagers typically the best employment is during the summer months due to the fact that they are out of school and thus have an increased amount of leisure time and many places require an extra source labor in order to accommodate for the rush which typically occurs during the summer months (Hall, 2013). In the year 1999 just above fifty-two percent of teenagers from the age of sixteen to the age of nineteen were employed for a summer job, however; the current employment rate for the same age group was around 32.25 percent in the past June and July an extremely low number especially considering that this was the peak teenage employment season (Hall, 2013). This has been compared to the great depression by some due to the fact that the numbers are somewhat similar to those seen during the great depression, in fact An...