Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Industrial revolution impact on art
Essay on impressionism
American impressionism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Industrial revolution impact on art
When the art critic Louis Leroy saw an impressionist painting for the first time, impressionism was new and unnamed. He published a review, and in the review, he mocked the painting, saying it didn’t even look like a real painting, only a sketch, or an impression. The term stuck. Impressionism was an art movement during the mid to late 1800s to early 1900s that fell after the Realist Art Movement. This art style was first used towards the end of the Industrial Revolution and during the birth and growth of Liberal, Conservative, Socialist, and Marxist ideas in Europe. Many Impressionist painters were French, but the movement quickly spread to the Netherlands, Italy, Russia, Norway, and later, other European countries. What was the main cause …show more content…
He recalls a moment at the World Fair where he was suddenly struck and in awe of the beautiful use of, “complete color value,” and, “harmony of color,” that he had not seen before. He was so amazed by this new phenomenon that he wrote, “My eyes were dazzled by the diffused light coming and surrounding me from all sides… I have found in nearly every case where impressionism is mentioned, that the word conveys an idea meaning color vibration.” This use of intense hues was new to the art world because of the addition and creation of new pigments and portable tubes of paint. “The manufacture of paints is a business that has grown from very small beginnings to its present immense proportions,” said author W. R. Bradshaw in 1890 to begin a section of his book detailing all of the advanced ways pigments, paint, and paint tubes were made using new materials and resources from the Industrial Revolution. He also spoke about the key role of machinery and factories, saying, “A glance into the oil mixing room discloses a range of ponderous machinery replete with every modern improvement for mixing oil colors.” Plein air painting was a crucial characteristic of of …show more content…
The impressionist movement was about just that, movement. Change and progress in the technical, economic, and social worlds inspired change and progress in the art world. One doesn’t have to be an art critic or an artist themselves to look at realist and impressionist art and notice a significant difference. Realist art uses darker tones and depressing scenes, whereas impressionist art is filled with vivid colors and (when including people, which wasn’t as common in impressionism) joyous, busy, or bright scenes. For the upper-middle class and the upper class, both of which the majority of impressionist painters rose from, the Industrial Revolution was greatly beneficial. Consumerism and modernization prospered, which lead to a strong desire for lavish and glamorous lives. Because of this, upper class painters didn’t want to focus on the bland and uniform lives of the lower classes, as realism had done. Instead, they painted fine arts and exquisite and high class activities. One significant example of European modernization brought forth by industrialization that impacted the mindset of impressionist artists was the rebuilding of Paris by Napoleon III and George-Eugéne Haussmann. Although Impressionist art was created all throughout Europe, a large proportion of the art movement’s major artists and influencers were French. The renovation of Paris included many additions of gardens
During Vincent Van Gogh’s childhood years, and even before he was born, impressionism was the most common form of art. Impressionism was a very limiting type of art, with certain colors and scenes one must paint with. A few artists had grown tired of impressionism, however, and wanted to create their own genre of art. These artists, including Paul Gaugin, Vincent Van Gogh, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, and Paul Cezanne, hoped to better express themselves by painting ...
The things that characterized his work and his creativity, ties in with the mediums he used. In art, medium refers to the substance the artists uses to create their artwork. Both he and his brother painted in oil based paint, even when watercolors in fresco and tempera were still the favorite materials in Italy. (Munro 65) Fresco is a painting done rapidly in watercolor on wet plaster on a wall or ceiling, so that the colors penetrate the plaster and become fixed as it dries, and tempera is painting with pigments dispersed in an emulsion miscible with water or typically egg yolk. Although Jan didn’t discover the oil technique in painting, he perfected the art of this medium, that created artwork that holds an intensity and unparalleled richness of color. (DeWeerd 223) Part of the unique characteristics came when he changed the usual flat, more dull surface of the usual paintings, by mixi...
The visual appeal of the renovated city, along with other factors such as the high quality of the art schools, caused Impressionism to take off in Paris around this time (Thomson 2000: 19-20). Impressionist painters wanted to capture the present, not historical or idealistic scenes. For this reason, they painted boulevards, parks, train stations, and other places that were important to modern Paris life. Human figures were important subjects in their paintings, since one of the most effective ways to depict modern life is to show the people living in it.
... artists of Impressionism were Renoir, Morisot, Sisley, Monet, Pissarro and Seurat. Seurat once said that the colors of the Impressionist artists were “mixed by viewer’s eyes rather than artist’s palette” (Usborne 90), meaning that all the colors in the painting were mixed together in the viewers eyes to create what they saw. Also consisting of sudden poses and unusual points of view, the Impressionist period was one of the most famous periods of the arts.
Artistic styles are easily as vast and as diverse as the cultures and philosophies that influenced them. Many of these differing art styles have an even wider array of defining characteristics. Of course, none of these techniques or styles came about all at once. As time rolled on, most of them had appeared during or as a result of major, pivotal events throughout history. Abstract impressionism, in particular, had emerged towards the end of World War Two. Abstraction as a whole was mostly born from existential philosophies as well as the political climate leading up to the second world war. With Fascist and Communist ideologies picking apart the democratic foundations of Europe (as well as stirring up conflict between the two ideologies themselves)
Claude Monet made the art community address a revolutionary type of art called impressionism. In a style not previously before painted, impressionism captured a scene by using bright colors with lots of light and different shades to create the illusion of a glance. The traditional method of working in a studio was discarded and the impressionist artists carried any needed supplies with them into the countryside and painted the complete work outside. The manufacture of portable tin tubes of oil paints as well as the discovery of ways to produce a wider range of chemical pigments allowed artists to paint in a way unimaginable before this period in time (Stuckey 12). Monet and others, such as Pierre Auguste Renior, Paul Cezanne, Edgar Degas, Berthe Morisot, Edouard Manet, Camille Pissarro, and Alfred Sisley, took this style of art to a new level never seen before.
...and even insult. Ironically, the term Impressionism was meant to disparage the new technique, but the term stuck and consequently gave rise to some of the most well-known artists to this day whose works are some of the most replicated. Lionello Venturi worded it perfectly when he said, “Impressionism, in effect, has changed the vision of the world. In spite of all the natural and artificial obstacles, it has triumphed by its intrinsic value because it represents the moral vision of its epoch. The last of the privileged classes, the “notables,” were about to disappear. From a new stratum in society the Impressionists brought their force and sincerity and integrity, their tremendous faith in their ideal, their elan of liberty (Blunden & Blunden, 1980, p. 55). Impressionism caught on and paved the way for innovative thinkers and ingenious individuals worldwide.
The impressionist movement is often considered to mark the beginning of the modern period of art. It was developed in France during the late 19th century. The impressionist movement arose out of dissatisfaction with the classical, dull subjects and clean cut precise techniques of painting. They preferred to paint outdoors concentrating more on landscapes and street scenes, and began to paint ordinary everyday people and liked to show the effects in natural light.
In the 1880’s the movement known as Impressionism was coming to an end. The eight and last Impressionist exhibition was held in Paris during 1886 (Time). Although Impressionism was coming to an end new forms of art arose to take its place. Some famous artists producing during this time include, Van Gogh, Georges Seurat, and Odilon Redon (Georges). Odilon Redon started his own movement known as Symbolism, which strives to give form to ideas and emotions (Odilon). Another painter responsible for creating a new style is Georges Seurat. Seurat was a French painter who popularized and developed his own style called pointillism.
The French Revolution, indeed, changed the structure of economics and social sphere of the old regime, and also the ideology of that time. In the years that followed the Revolution, the always increasing senses of both freedom and individuality were evident, not only in French society, but also in art. As stated by Dowd, “leaders of the French Revolution consciously employed all forms of art to mobilize public sentiment in favor of the New France and French nationalism.” In between all the artistic areas, the art of painting had a special emphasis. After the Revolution, the French art academies and also schools were now less hierarchical and there was, now, more freedom of engaging into new themes, not being the apprentices so tied up to their masters footsteps, not being so forced to follow them.
Conclusion The French Revolution dramatically changed many aspects of French art. By altering the makeup of French society, it became impossible for the nobility to retain a monopoly on the artistic scene. In addition, the aesthetic styles changed from the ornate Rococo to the patriotic Neoclassicism, to the emphasized individuality of Romanticism, finally to the genuine Realism. These styles, along with the changes in subject matter, reflected the transformation of the purpose of art.
In conclusion, the art of the 19th century was composed of a sequence of competing artistic movements that sought to establish its superiority, ideologies and style within the artistic community of Europe. These movements, being Romanticism, Realism, Impressionism and Post-Impressionism, ultimately spread far beyond the confines of Europe and made modern art an international entity which can still be felt in today’s artistic world.
Pierre-Auguste Renoir, a famous Impressionist painter, once said that a “…work of art must seize upon you, wrap you up in itself, and carry you away…”(Kleiner). It 's the late 19th century and all of France is stirring due to the chaotic transformations caused by the Industrial Revolution (Kleiner). France became the central place for radical thinking and innovation of not only machinery, but also of thought and creation. The atmosphere of art and the culture shifted away from religion during the revolution and focused on science and personal thought, almost a glance back at humanism. This shift in focus supported new ideologies, such as Marxism and Darwinism, and encouraged the new painting style called Impressionism.
In order to explore new venues of creativity Modernists tinkered with the perception of reality. During the Renaissance, the depiction of a subject was very straight forward. A painting had to look like what it represented. The truth was absolute and right and wrong were clearly defined. For Modernists, the world is much more obscure. In Impressionist paintings, lines are not definite and things tend to blur together. Faces usually do not differentiate one person from another.
There were several changes of government during this period in France, birth place of Impressionism and Post-Impressionism. Where Impressionism broke away from the traditions and traditional style of painting, post-Impressionism did not. Post-Impressionism just added another dimension to their paintings. Post-Impressionist added their thoughts and emotions to it. To better explain, Impressionism was a revolutionary style of painting whereas Post-Impressionism style of painting was more Evolutionary. Post Impressionist crossed the proverbial line, when it came to style of painting. By pushing the line of what art was, they redefined what art should be. This laid the foundation for what we call modern art. The Post-Impressionism style evolved from the Impressionist techniques where as Impressionist style did not morph from an earlier style. This is not to say one is better than other, they are both equally influential and impressive. Without these two periods in art history, it is suffice to say our culture would not have been as rich as it is