Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies character theory essay
Symbolism used in Lord of the Flies
Analysis of Lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies character theory essay
Humans & Savages While reading chapters seven through nine of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, I noticed a certain theme within the text. This theme revolves around the idea that there is a certain savagery that appears in humans when the borders of society crumble. The boys are currently embracing this mindset now, and are willing to do whatever it takes to survive. The “government” they have created is dissolving and combined with the pressures of the beast, the boys are ticking bombs ready to explode. They do, in the most brutal and abrupt way they can, and it is beast-like. The savagery the boys have within them represent what the beast really is. This theme begins to reveal itself when one specific character uncovers what …show more content…
That character is Simon, who becomes a catalyst for the theme presented above. There are two parts to Simon’s one man investigation; a hallucination and a dead body. Simon has a meeting with the beast after witnessing Jack and his tribe brutally killing the sow. He has a conversation within his mind with the head of the dead pig, and he addresses it as the Lord of the Flies, which is a direct connection to the title, and titles are usually a big part of a book’s central meaning. The mental battle represented in this pivotal scene, is a clear depiction of the savagery that lives in all of us, and that reveals itself when we need to survive. Simon’s mind berates him when it states, “ ‘Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill.’ said the head… ‘You knew didn’t you? I’m part of you?...I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are the way they are?’ ”(Golding 143). This shows that the troubles of the boys are happening because they are relying on their animalistic instincts, and Golding practically screams through his writing that the beast is not an animal, but human nature itself. This is the base of a very realistic, complex theme. Additionally, this theme is only proved by the scene where Simon uncovers
This quote expands your comprehension of the beast not being an actual person nor animal but instead as the representation I explained of the beast being the boys themselves. Golding clearly Portrays that through Simon in this quote.
In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Simon and Piggy are among a group of boys who become stranded on a deserted island. Left without any adults, the boys attempt to create an orderly society. However, as the novel progresses, the boys struggle to sustain civility. Slowly, Jack and his hunters begin to lose sight of being rescued and start to act more savagely, especially as fears about a beast on the island spread. As the conflict progresses, Jack and Ralph battle for power. The boys’ struggle with the physical obstacles of the island leads them to face a new unexpected challenge: human nature. One of the boys, Simon, soon discovers that the “beast” appears not to be something physical, but a flaw within all humans
...hat the beast is not real and that all the boys are living in fear of something that does not exist. The boys have no reason to be afraid, however, when he goes to tell them this, they brutally murder him because they think that he is, in fact, the beast, thus preventing Simon from delivering his message. Even though Simon does not get to deliver his message to the boys, he serves a “symbolic function in the novel as the agent who provides the text’s fibular message – that ‘mankind is both heroic and sick’”. Although Simon did not get to release the boys from their overwhelming fear of the beast, he helps the readers grasp the novel’s overarching message by exemplifying both heroic and sick qualities. This apparent switch between two opposing traits functions as his message to the reader and makes Simon an extraordinarily important character. TRANSITION. TRANSITION.
As Simon was trying to tell the boys that the beast did not exist, his death symbolises that mankind can’t face the truth about their inner desires. Part of Golding’s intent was to demonstrate that the evil is not recognised in specific populations or situations. On the island, the beast is manifest in the deadly tribal dances, war paint and manhunt; in the outside world, the same lust for power and control plays out as a nuclear war. Throughout ‘The Lord of the Flies’ Golding has managed to show that evil is present in everyone.
The beast in the story symbolizes the gradation of the morality among the boys. The compete each other becoming in the last survivor and the commander of group. The beast is not a real object which they believe if exists. They don’t realize the internal beast inside of them. Only Simon understands what the real beast is, but is killed when he tries to tell them about that. The beast mind and soul of the boys lead them to the collapse of the society. They begin killing each other and the trustworthy has lost.
“There are too many people, and too few human beings.” (Robert Zend) Even though there are many people on this planet, there are very few civilized people. Most of them are naturally savaged. In the book, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, boys are stranded on an island far away, with no connections to the adult world. These children, having no rules, or civilization, have their true nature exposed. Not surprisingly, these children’s nature happens to be savagery. Savagery can clearly be identified in humans when there are no rules, when the right situation arouses, and finally when there is no civilization around us.
Throughout the novel, Lord of the Flies the major theme shown throughout is innocence. For the duration of the novel the young boys progress from innocent, well behaved children longing fir rescue to bloodthirsty savages who eventually lose desire to return to civilisation. The painted bloodthirsty savages towards the end of the novel, who have tortured and killed animals and even their friends are a far cry from the sincere children portrayed at the beginning of the novel. Golding portrays this loss of innocence as a result of their naturally increasing opened to the innate evil that exists within all human beings. “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill! . . . You knew, didn’t you? I’m par...
Can savagery drive someone to murder? The book Lord of the Flies by William Golding displays this situation. A group of children containing only males are trapped on an island and many turn towards savagery after being isolated. Jack is the main leader of the savage children while Ralph is still humane and civilized and is trying to restore order. The boys were driven towards savagery but still had the right and conscious mind to make a reasonable choice not to commit murder.
Would you be able to resist savagery from being away from society? Could you resist the urging power to kill? How about being able to find food without killing or not to go full savage on other people, could you still do it? A normal person could say no to all of these. In the novel, “Lord of The Flies”, William Golding shows that without civilization, a person can turn into a savage by showing progressively how they went through the seven steps of savagery.
All in all, the acts of murder, the boys acting in an uncivilized manner, and most importantly, the lack of obeying the rules, all act upon savagery in all different ways.
Furthermore, Simon’s gifted power of true inner visionary to look beneath the souls is revealed, “..Simon thought of the beast, there rose before his inward sight the picture of a human at once heroic and sick” (112). As the boys continue to indignantly quarrel and give the beast a form and figure, Simon visualizes the beast in man himself. Thus, he loses his former innocence when he realizes the ‘darker’ side of mankind, which the boys named as the beast and understands that evil is inherent in all humans. Furthermore, his eyes represent mystical wisdom and knowledge as well as magnifying lenses to see clear pictures of the obnoxious happenings such as, “The tangle of the lines showed him the mechanics of this parody; he examined the white nasal bones, the teeth, the colours of corruption” (162). Out of all the boys present, he is the only one who receives the opportunity to see the true illusion of the beast, adding more comprehension to his understanding of the beast that the more the bitter acts of violence are committed, the more the beast will come alive on the island. This also shows his ‘superego’ personality, consisting of a fully developed mind of social and parental values. With these values, he understands the difference between the right and wrong; savage and civility and is also both naturally good willed and civilized. His identity of a keen observer appears when he comprehends that on the surface, the island is extremely peaceful and calming, but the inside is where the roots of brutality grow which slyly evoke the inner savage present in all humans. Moreover, Simon’s character also has a touch of spirituality which is revealed when he hallucinates his conversation with the Lord of the Flies, where Lord of the Flies is symbolized as the devil and Simon as Jesus. He also has a
... middle of paper ... ... The frenzied state they are in is being caused by the beast, a symbol of fear. The barbaric way the boys attacked Simon without a moment of restraint shows that the beast had summoned their inner evil, primal, and savage minds.
Another of the most important symbols used to present the theme of the novel is the beast. In the imaginations of many of the boys, the beast is a tangible source of evil on the island. However, in reality, it represents the evil naturally present within everyone, which is causing life on the island to deteriorate. Simon begins to realize this even before his encounter with the Lord of the Flies, and during one argument over the existence of a beast, he attempts to share his insight with the others.
Man’s inhumanity to man literally means human’s cruelty towards other humans. This is a major theme of the story and is seen throughout it. Golding himself even states that “man produces evil as a bee produces honey.” A review of the book states how Golding portrays this “because the boys are suffering from the terrible disease of being human.” Piggy, Ralph, and Simon are the “rational good of mankind” portrayed in the book, and Jack and his hunters are the “evil savagery of mankind.” “The beast” is a symbol for the evil in all humans, and Simon and Piggy, or rationality, are almost helpless in his presence. Simon, though, in a book filled with evil, is a symbol of vision and salvation. He is the one to see the evil as it truly exists, in the hearts of all humanity. When he tries to tell the others of this truth, however, he is killed, much like Christ was trying to bring salvation to the ignorant. Simon being there gives us hope; the truth is available to those who seek it. In the book, Jack and his hunters become so evil that they end up killing two boys while on the island. Man’s tendencies towards evil in The Lord of the Flies are also compared to the book of Genesis in the Bible. Nature, beauty, and childhood can all be corrupted by the darkness within humankind. The ending of this truly dark and evil story tells readers how Golding feels about evil within society and where he thinks humanity is headed. Evil will triumph over the intellect and good, unless some force intercedes. In th...
This theme is shown throughout the novel and his highlighted especially in chapter eight when Simon, a boy who symbolizes goodness, is having a hallucination and begins talking to a severed pig's head. The head calls itself the Lord of the Flies which translates to Beelzebub which translates to the Devil or Satan. It begins to tell Simon that all of the other boys are evil and are only out for themselves. Golding writes “Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill,” (Golding 143). The Lord of the Flies is explaining to Simon that the evil inside of each of the boys is the beast and the evil can not be killed.