Lord Of The Flies Rhetorical Analysis

803 Words2 Pages

LOTF Synthesis William Golding proves to us in his book, Lord of the Flies, through characterization and imagery that humans are inherently evil. In his book, the question arises if humans are naturally born with a compass for morality, or if it’s something that we learn to have throughout the course of our lives. Do humans only act evil if they are in a certain environment, or are they evil regardless of the setting? In Lord of the Flies, the boys question the existence of the beast, and what it is if it does exist. Simon brings up his own answer, saying, “Maybe there is a beast. Maybe it’s only us.” (Golding 89). Simon saw how the island was breaking down the walls of their civilization and even though he believed that there was a beast, …show more content…

Golding hinted in this quote about the issue of humans and their inherent flaws in a society.. In a research article by Dawid Bernard Juraszek, he makes the point that there is an inherent flaw in us that leads to the evil ways that the boys fall short too. Dawid says that the “LotF is often seen as revealing human darkness and evil (Gindin 18) through the boys’ inability to escape their essential nature of murderous savagery”. Dawid explains that even though the book itself has a main theme of inherent evil, the issue was that the boys would not have been able to escape their descent into savagery because humans have an “essential” nature of evil. At the end of LOTF, Golding paints an image of the aftermath of the situation. “And in the middle of them, with filthy body, matted hair, and unwiped nose, Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man’s heart,” (Golding page 202). Ralph weeps for the ordeal he experienced, and the new discovery of the nature of man’s heart. He watched as young boys lost their innocence and became savage, he saw the true nature of who humans are deep in their …show more content…

Everyone naturally has the deep desire to fit in, a need for power, and a want for control. We are reflections of the people we surround ourselves with and the community that we are in. We thrive in the feeling of safety. However, if that community falls apart, and that sense of security is lost, we never know if the vision of civility will keep us from being hurt or changed. In Lord of the Flies, Golding shows us how even after people are separated from their society, this far-off thought will linger and serve as a shield against the evil that overcomes others. He shows us this when the older boys interact with the younger ones. “Roger gathered a handful of stones and began to throw them. Yet there was a space round Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which he did not throw. Here, invisible yet strong, is the taboo of the old life. Rounding out the squatting child was the protection of parents, schools, policemen and the law” (Golding 62). Roger is unable to throw the stones at Henry because of that lingering idea of their old life. In society, we have the law and the law’s purpose is to protect us from the flaws of society. However, to what extent will the law keep us

Open Document