Lord Of The Flies Wrongness

1150 Words3 Pages

Although most humans are not evil, all humans have the aptitude to do so under the right circumstances. This idea is demonstrated in “The Lord of the Flies” by William Golding, which portrays a group of young boys stranded on an isolated island following their descent into chaos and savagery. Analyzing the changes in power dynamics and the decline of civilized behavior, the events in this book can be paralleled to Nazi Germany, as well as the Rwandan Genocide. Golding's work and analogy to history suggest that while people have the capacity for innate goodness, they have a more substantial capacity for evil, amplified by fear and lack of order. Ralph, Piggy, and Simon embody goodness as they try to create a civilized society, maintaining morals …show more content…

Where the conch is, that’s a meeting. The same up here as down there’” (Golding 51). Initially, the boys attempt to model civilization by creating rules, demonstrating that humans can produce an ethical system where rationality and cooperation are feasible. The conch shell symbolizes civilized behavior, calls assemblies, ensures all opinions are heard, and enforces democratic order. Despite the situation, acts of goodness are also shown by Piggy (letting his glasses be used for fire, guiding Ralph) and Simon (picking fruit for the little ones, trying to tell the truth about the beast). These moments exhibit their desire to benefit the group. Similarly, that same initial choice of social harmony and desire to help others in times of need were shown during the Rwandan Genocide, a period between April 7th, 1994, and July 19th, 1994, when the Tutsi were being mass murdered. Before the bloodshed, there was social order. The locals were split into two groups: Tutsi and Hutu; nevertheless, there was interdependence, social integration, and a traditional government system. During the genocide, many people risked their safety to help the hunted by refusing to sell out, hiding Tutsis and moderate Hutus, conveying humanity and bravery amid the …show more content…

However, it later represents the boy's capacity for savagery and evil as every horrible act is done to confront or appease the beast. No one but Simon realized this, alternatively viewing it as a tangible threat that could cause physical harm. Jack manipulates and nurtures this fear, instilling dependency among the boys. By positioning himself as their protector, he attains the means to become a dictator because standing up to him means being kicked out or violently hurt. This corresponding use of a “beast” is seen in Nazi Germany by Adolf Hitler when during times of distress, he rallies support for his regime by utilizing propaganda and scapegoating to paint the Jews as an internalized threat responsible for all of Germany's problems, labeling them as “parasites” and “subhuman,” (Mein Kampf). Exploiting the issues of economic hardship, political extremism, and the aftermath of WWI, Hitler promised to protect the citizens of Germany from these problems. By amplifying these fears using social disorder, Hitler was supported by the German masses in his draconian actions to progress toward his authoritarian goal. These increasingly brutal measures that ultimately ended in the deaths of millions of Jews were done with either the participation or acceptance of virtually all of the German population. This subservience shows how alarmingly easy it is for tyrannical dictators to come into power. Most people would sway with the group rather

Open Document