Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Clothing and society
Fashion in society
Stereotypes of gender in today's society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Clothing and society
When a person hears the word lookism, they might think it is a way of describing how we look at someone or something in order to describe them. Although that is a good assumption, the Merriam-Webster dictionary tells us that lookism is actually prejudice or discrimination based on physical appearance and especially physical appearance believed to fall short of societal notions of beauty. This may seem like a relatively new word to add to your vocabulary, however it has actually been around since the 1970s. The word was first used when describing a person who was heavier set. (Lookism) While it is somewhat of an automatic response to assume that this prejudice is isolated to those less desirable in society, it can actually be transcended across …show more content…
That passing of judgment is considered lookism. Some might go as far as to say that lookism has taken the place of racism in our society (Salkeld). It is known all across the world that different races of people are known for having distinctive characteristics such as tiny figures, long legs, larger noses, or big lips. Similarly, different races or nationalities might also have a distinctive way of dressing or choice of fashion. A study published in the journal Psychological Science found that when we are asked to describe a group we belong to, we tend to attribute our own features to that description (Salkeld). When we see that others do not fit into our group it is a human tendency to want to reject them. Equally thought provoking is the fact that there is a cross-cultural agreement about attractiveness and the belief that good-looking people are judged more positively than those less attractive (Furnham). If this is the case, then that feeling of judgment upon introduction to an employer is more impactful than ever imagined. It is our duty to accept those different from us and see diversity as strength not a weakness and not judge others through the eyes of lookism. Although race is a front running defining factor in our society for lookism, gender is also a defining …show more content…
If so, does this advantage female workers more than males or vice versa? It is a well-studied fact that attractive individuals are judged to be more intellectually competent, emotionally adjusted, and socially appealing. (Furnham) The answer to the questions is this; it is mostly dependent on the career field of topic. Certain jobs such as sales, theatre, fashion, or media are dependent upon physical attractiveness. In most instances humans are naturally attracted to the opposite sex, so having men marketing sales to women might be to a company’s advantage or having a woman covering the media for Monday night football rather than an equally qualified male coworker. The fact is both male and females alike are subjected to lookism in the work place. So much so that those with “above average” appearance earn approximately 5% more than their coworkers and those with “below average” appearance earn another 7-9% less than those with “average” looks.
Today’s job seeker has tough competition. In the textbook reading “Judging by the Cover” by Bonny Gainley, she argues that job seekers ought to be careful when they make personal choices that initially will affect their chances of entering the workplace. People have a need to be accepted by others just the way they are, but many of us were taught as adolescence that we should not judge a book by its cover, yet people judge others solely on their personal appearances. That goes for businesses as well, “[t]he bottom line is that businesses exist to make money. Whether it seems fair or not, generally employers do care about the personal appearances of the people they hire because those people represent the business to its customers” (5). Maybe
In today’s job market, there are many reasons an individual could be turned down for employment. According to Deborah Rhodes, author of “Why looks are the last bastion of discrimination”, appearance should not be one of them. Rhodes is a law professor at Stanford and holder of numerous titles for her outstanding work in legal matters. She is also the author and co-author of over 250 articles (Directory). In this article, she addresses an issue with profound impact on today’s society. She proposes that appearance discrimination should be included in anti-discrimination laws in addition to what is already accepted and legalized in today’s workplace. While it is a seemingly “silly” concern, it is actually quite valid. There has been many a concern over discrimination. That is, discrimination based on race, color, gender, and others of a similar nature in the work environment.
Many companies are using new techniques to attract modern day society. One of these techniques is revising their hiring practices. Instead of hiring based on intelligence, or skill sets, they desire employees with “the look”. Companies want people that represent their product or brand. In the article, “Going for the Look, But Risking Discrimination” by Steven Greenhouse, the store Abercrombie and Fitch hire people with a “classic American” look. However, there are many problems that can arise with this. Marshall Cohen, a senior industry analyst, claims that companies are forced to do what is necessary. I disagree with this statement. Companies that hire based on looks are risking more they assume.
on a scale from 1 to 3, the importance men gave to good looks rose from 1.50 to 2.11. But for women, the importance of good looks in men rose from 0.94 to 1.67. In other words, women in 1989 considered a man look’s more important than men considered women’s looks 50 years earlier
All human beings are conscious of their appearance. Society conditions the individual to meet distinct appearance criteria and sets forth an image that is deemed “attractive”. This struggle to fit norms, known as lookism, is discriminatory in its nature. Defined in 2000 by the oxford dictionary as “’prejudice or discrimination on the grounds of appearance’”, this new “ism” has risen to the surface in recent years (Ambrosetti 52), showing the prominence of its affects. Human beings construct circumstances that rule their realities. Gender, ethnicity and culture are all cultural constructions that have no true meaning once removed from society. That being said, lookism is biases of identification that influence one’s
The idea that people from majority groups think that they are not prejudiced is a concept known as colorblind ideology. This means that people who claim they are color-blind do not see “color” or race in any way. Many people in hiring positions or college admission claim to take on a color-blindness approach (Richeson and Nussbaum 2003). However, social psychologists would say that implementing the idea of colorblindness is not an effective approach. In order to help in eliminating prejudices actions and thoughts, people need to be aware about their thoughts and actions, even the ones in the subconscious. Adopting the color-blindness thought processes hinders from this progress being made. Especially since, much of the racism that occurs today is known as implicit racism or aversive racism. People from the dominant groups, when given notions about racism, think about it in an overt kind of manner. Overt racism is the idea that
The first impression you have when meeting someone is their appearance, which makes it easy to judge people based on how they
Discrimination is very old in its origins. From the earliest periods of human existence, groups developed prejudices toward others and then discriminated against those whom they regarded as different or inferior. Many attempts were taken to maintain or increase power, prestige, or even wealth; groups found it easy to invent or accept the idea that others were somehow inferior to them and thus not deserving of equal treatment. Among the many differences that could be used as a basis for discrimination, people quickly discovered that physical appearance was the easiest to identify. It required no subtle analysis, no careful contemplation, but only a superficial glance at those visual features that would later be used to identify "race". The shape of one's nose, color of one's hair, or even the color of one's skin describes the universal nature of what we now call racial consciousness. Slavery is a perfect example. Racial animosity grew in both the North and South, and in many instances led to physical violence.
In conclusion, discrimination by appearances and stereotyping is applied everywhere. People judge of what is outside and not what is inside of the person. Many people would be astonished, if they saw what was inside the human beings, they discriminated. No matter what, people will always
If employers began to discriminate on the basis of looks, society could start categorizing fat, unattractive, or unusual looking people as failures and avoid encouraging these people to reach for their goals. Self esteem would be at an all time low.
This essay elaborates on the importance of physical appearance of an individual as a criterion for personal development and success in a career.
And, let's be real here, how often will you come across someone and judge them based, not on their looks, but on their mind? You don't know how much “brains” someone has, but as soon as you lay eyes on someone you immediately make a first impression, usually by judging solely their looks. “While a book should not be judged by its cover, many people are unlikely to read it if the cover is not inviting”. What is on the outside draws people to you, like a book cover or blurb on the back, and if you do not have beauty chances are people will walk right past you. No matter how nice, how smart, you are, no one will
...th their appearance but when it comes to having and keeping the job, it is the employers basis on who and how you are as a person. A person’s physical appearance reflects oneself, how he or she carries himself or herself. It shows how confident the person is. With professional appearance, it could higher your chances of getting hired, keeping your job, good customer service, and most importantly a positive outlook on yourself.
Employment discrimination legislation has evolved to include race, disabilities, sexual harassment of either gender, and age. In lieu of this evolution and an increasing trend toward equality for all individuals in the workplace, the time has come for the protective reach of employment discrimination law to cover ugliness. While the proposal may cause titters at first, evidence exists that discrimination based on looks (or physical appearance) occurs in the workplace. An investigation was conducted by ABC’s 20/20 news program in 1994 that sent two men and two women into the workplace to secure the same jobs (Sessions 1). The individuals were coached to act in a similar manner during the interviews and took with them resumes with matching education and experience. The only difference was that one of the men and one of the women was superior in physical attraction to their counterpart. The results demonstrate whether intentional or not, looks discrimination does play a role in the employment process “In five cases out of five, the more attractive woman got the job; in three chances out of three, the more attractive man was hired” (Sessions 1).
I would like to begin with the fact that women have always been known to dedicate their time to beauty. Those who are devoted to their appearance most often believe that beauty brings power, popularity, and success. Women believe this, because they grow up reading magazines that picture beautiful women in successful environments; not to mention they are popular models and world famous individuals. Beautiful women are no longer just a priority for most advertising, but we have become a walking target for the working class employers. It is documented that better-looking attorneys earn more than others after five years of practice, which was an effect that grew with experience (Biddle, 172). We cannot overlook the fact that it is always the most popular and most beautiful girl who becomes homecoming-queen or prom-queen. While these are possible positive effects of the "beauty myth," the negative results of female devotion to beauty undercut this value. These effects are that it costs a lot of money, it costs a lot of time, and in the long run, it costs a lot of pain.