Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cases of censorship in school texts
Cases of censorship in school texts
Cases of censorship in school texts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Looking For Alaska is a new, popular book that has been read and debated by many. Throughout the country, the novel has been put on many banned book lists. The book contains rebellion, drugs, tobacco, and sex, all of which are reasons why the book is banned. Looking For Alaska provides more to young readers than an idea of rebellion. In a world religions class, the main characters, Pudge and Alaska, are given a debatable essay question. They are asked “What is the meaning of life?” The heavy question affects the characters and their mindset throughout the book. Alaska answers the question by saying that “life is a labyrinth of suffering”; her mindset ends up coinciding with sudden death. Pudge uses the essay question to comfort himself through …show more content…
In Looking For Alaska, the character Alaska dies in a car accident midway through the book. All of the other characters suddenly are overwhelmed with grief, including Pudge. Pudge uses the question, “What is the meaning of life?” to mourn his loss of Alaska. Pudges meaning of life question detours him to the afterlife. Alaska’s death and the question both have him contemplating life after death. In the novel Pudge writes "But ultimately I do not believe that she was only matter. The rest of her must be recycled,too. I believe now that we are greater than the sum of our parts” ( Green 220).Pudge believes that Alaska carries on even after death. Although she was “only matter” he believes that a part of her is still with him. This is explained further in a quote that says: "When he talks about energy, he is talking about two different things. On the one hand, he means the energy of her body, which is essentially heat and the electromagnetic field created by her life processes. But when he talks about her personal energy, that is a metaphor for her liveliness and personality. Her physical energy in the scientific sense indeed did not cease “(Brown).Pudge uses his explanation of life and death to “prove” that Alaska really is not completely dead. This affects him by being able to mourn through this class
Who could possibly know that the story of one young man could turn the people of Alaska against him, and others from around the country to rally behind his almost majestic journey. Jon Krakauer set out to get Chris McCandless’s story written in greater depth after his article was ran in the magazine Outside and he received so much mail on that topic that inspired him to do more, more than just Chris’s journey itself. This essay will analyze Jon Krakauer’s book Into The Wild in order to show how well he used the rhetorical analysis concepts and rhetorical appeals.
Similarly, the book’s three leading protagonists ultimately possess a common objective, escaping their unjust circumstances in pursuit of seeking the “warmth of other suns.” For this reason, they abandon the laws of Jim Crow and the familiarity of their hometowns as they flee to a better life. In the process, they all assume a level of risk in their decisions to rebel against the system. For example, Ida decides to embark on a precarious journey while in the beginning stages of a clandestine pregnancy. Any number of unpredictable events could have resulted from this judgment, including fatality. All of the migrants shared an unspoken agreement that the rewards would far outweigh the dangers involved.
When Jon Krakauer published a story about the death of a young man trekking into the Alaskan frontier in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine, the audience’s response to Christopher McCandless’s story was overwhelming. Thousand of letters came flooding in as a response to the article. Despite the claims, especially from the native Alaskans, questioning McCandless’s mental stability and judgement, it soon becomes clear that McCandless was not just "another delusional visitor to the Alaskan frontier" (4). As Krakauer retells the life of Christopher McCandless and gives his own take on the controversy around McCandless’s death in Into The Wild, the reader also creates his own opinion on both McCandless and Krakauer’s argument. Krakauer
You can write novels, poems, and short stories about it, but you’ll never truly understand the beauty of life until you experience it for yourself, until you immerse yourself in it. Every person has their own set of wants, needs, and desires. But it isn’t until you go out and do the things that you’ve imagined, that you really discover what you love. Every person has a unique mind; every person has the capacity to share different views. If you asked every person in the entire world what they believe the meaning of life is, you would receive several answers. Many would be different, but most would say something to the effect of “living a happy, healthy life.” Because we’re all so different, our own definitions of happiness are bound to differ from the next person. Christopher Mccandless' definition of happiness would have been simple. He wanted to find himself, who he really was deep down. In Into the Wild(1997) by Jon Krakauer, Mccandless didn't want to be the person his parents or society expected him to be, he instead wanted the rawness of life itself; and in order to achieve this, he left everything behind and ventured from place to place, eventually ending in Alaska. In chapter 17, Mccandless is compared to naval officer Sir John Franklin because some claim McCandless "lacked a requisite humility" and "possessed insufficient respect for the land." With these claims in consideration, McCandless is a young man who is arrogant because he is reckless and stubborn; however, he is also humble because he is gentle and kind.
One of the most important literary devices Jon Krakauer use in his novel is irony. By using this device, he depicts the breathtaking and heart-wrenching story of Christopher McCandless. On the first page of the authors note, Krakauer gives a synopsis of his novel. He writes, “In April 1992, a young man from a well-to-do East Coast family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wilderness north of Mt. McKinley. Four months later his decomposed body was found by a party of moose hunters” (Krakauer, ANI). However, McCandless himself is unaware that the fate of his excursion will prove to be abominable. He believes that his own physical competence and superior intellect will guarantee his survival in the Alaskan taiga. The fact that the reader knows Chris is dead within the first few sentences of the book but the character is portrayed as believing he is going to live is an example of situational irony. . This gripping introduction entrances the reader adding ...
If my life had no purpose, no individuality, and no happiness, I would not want to live. This book teaches the importance of self expression and independence. If we did not have these necessities, then life would be like those in this novel. Empty, redundant, and fearful. The quotes above show how different life can be without our basic freedoms. This novel was very interesting and it shows, no matter how dismal a situation is, there is always a way out if you never give up, even if you have to do it alone.
His yearning, in sense, was too powerful to be quenched by human contact. The succor offered by women may have tempted McCandless, but it paled beside the prospect of rough congress with nature, with the cosmos itself. And thus was he drawn north, to Alaska” (66). These clear and intelligent principles of McCandless’s achievable attitude maintained his decision to endeavor into the wilderness because it displays that he was allured to it because of the gratification it would deliver him, one that could not be satisfied by a mere human. Krakauer shifts to his comparisons of other travelers before McCandless. “Reading of the monks, one is moved by their courage, their reckless innocence and their urgency of desire. And with that one can’t help but think of Everett Russ and Chris McCandless,” (Krakauer 97). The author declares this in order to exemplify a similarity of individuals who were in comparable situations like Chris and took the same
Because the Government removed the ability to question, the people in Fahrenheit 451 have deceived themselves into believing that they are happy. Guy Montag had been harbouring books for quite a long time, but only recently made it known to his wife. She had friends over, and he took out a poem book and read from it, in front of his wife’s dumbfounded friends. “Then he began to read...Mrs. Phelps was crying. The others...watched her crying grow very loud as her face squeezed itself out of shape....She sobbed uncontrollably... "Sh, sh," said Mildred. "You're all right, Clara,... Clara, what's wrong?" "I-I,", sobbed Mrs. Phelps, "don't know, don't know, I just don't know, oh oh...””. The poem book caused Mrs. Phelps to actually think about her life for the first time ever. Government censorship prevented the people from ever being exposed to material that would make them question. For the first time, she thought about her l...
There is always going to be a ‘what if’ in Krakauer’s book Into the Wild Chris lead himself in a direction no one else could but himself. Unfortunately, the route he decided to take took him to his death but he was more alive than he ever was. His dreams were, in fact, wise and risky but with the knowledge Chris had, he knew best he could have read more or go more into detail of the Alaskan wild but instead, he just read the book Tanaina Plantlore: An Ethnobotany of the Dena 'ina Indians of Southcentral Alaska, by Priscilla Russell Kari. Also, with the skill he experiences while hitchhiking, he could of acknowledge the difference in the environments. Lastly, with the independence he closer himself with could of help finding him into safety. The fact he didn’t let his family know of his odyssey lead him to a death he is only responsible
Have you ever had the urge to go to an unknown adventure into the wilderness? A young man once did his name was Chris McCandless also known as Alex Supertramp he was a free spirited man who had this urge to go off on a life changing conquest. His journey to the Alaskan wilderness changed his life, his need to search for spiritual liberation caused him his life as well as harming his loved ones. Many people question the motives of why this miraculous young man with an extraordinary future ahead of him would take such risk to the rugged Alaskan wilderness. Although some would argue that McCandless’ actions were based off of his relationship with his dysfunctional family, however his real motives were influenced by the literary influences and
In today’s world, there is an abundance of social problems relating to those from the novel Fahrenheit 451. In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the protagonist Montag exhibits drastic character development throughout the course of the novel. Montag lives in a world where books are banned from society and no one is able to read them. Furthermore, Montag has to find a way to survive and not be like the rest of society. This society that Montag lives has became so use to how they live that it has affected them in many ways. Bradbury’s purpose of Fahrenheit 451 was to leave a powerful message for readers today to see how our world and the novel’s world connect through texting while driving, censorship and addiction.
...ak free from societal mores and empathetically understand others as they truly are, particularly the runaway slave Jim, with whom he travels. Huck’s eventual understanding that he can never exist in this diseased society causes him to “light out” for the western frontier. Although Huck’s world may seem alien to modern readers, the “sivilized” society of today still grapples with injustice, intolerance, and hypocrisy. It is one’s responsibility as an ethical citizen to examine the mores of the society in which they live and to break with those mores should they conflict with one’s moral understanding. Whether the year is 1820 or 2014, one must do one’s utmost to treat others with the respect that they deserve, and thus must follow Huck’s example of breaking from a diseased society by any means possible, even if there are no available frontiers towards which to flee.
John Green’s book, Looking for Alaska, is a thrilling and heartening novel that will keep you engrossed in the book and will never let you put the book down. It is a book about an righteous and a wonderful tale of how teens survive despite having difficult issues in their own lives and relate to other people. The book is on the story of Miles Halter, a teen who has a great passion with people’s famous last words. He is a teen who does not have many friends, so he makes a decision to go to a boarding school named Culver Creek in Alabama. He makes many friends, rivals and most of all he realizes who he is. In Culver Creek, he meets his roommate Chip Martin and Chip’s friends Takumi Hikohito, Lara Buterskaya, and Alaska Young. All of them including Miles, become close friends. While Miles is building friendship with everyone, he starts to develop a huge crush on Alaska, though Alaska has a boyfriend who is Jake. In the book, situations become different, tensions rise and everyone gets to learn themselves in a variety of ways in the end.The use of language by Green makes the book more re...
In April of 1992 a young man named Chris McCandless, from a prosperous and loving family, hitchhiked across the country to Alaska. He gave $25,000 of his savings to charity, left his car and nearly all of his possessions. He burned all the cash he had in his wallet, and created a new life. Four months later, his body was found in an abandoned bus. Jon Krakauer constructed a journalistic account of McCandless’s story. Bordering on obsession, Krakauer looks for the clues to the mystery that is Chris McCandless. What he finds is the intense pull of the wilderness on our imagination, the appeal of high-risk activities to young men. When McCandless's mistakes turn out to be fatal he is dismissed for his naiveté. He was said by some to have a death wish, but wanting to die and wanting to see what one is capable of are too very different things. I began to ask myself if Chris really wasn’t as crazy as some people thought. Then I realized it was quite possible that the reason people thought he was crazy was because he had died trying to fulfill his dream. If he had walked away from his adventure like Krakauer, people would have praised him rather than ridicule. So I asked the question, “How does Krakauer’s life parallel Chris McCandlesses?”
The novel Looking For Alaska, by John Green, is a story of joy, love and sorrow through the relationship between the two protagonists, the style of writing the author uses, and finally the scene of how Dr.Hyde teaches the inevitable. Pudge, the protagonist is the new kid at Culver Creek boarding school and through his new roommate ‘The Colonel’(Chip) he is introduced to Alaska Young. Ms. Young is no ordinary person to Pudge, in fact to him she is extraordinary, and like no one he has ever met. Pudge fantasizes a relationship with Alaska but is torn apart when she tells him she has a boyfriend. The friendship between Pudge and Alaska grows as they are in several of the same academic classes, and are in the same trouble-maker group of friends.