Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To kill a mockingbird examples of symbolism
To kill a mockingbird examples of symbolism
To kill a mockingbird examples of symbolism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What if You Were a Lobster? The story of lobster night is reflecting the transitioning process of Stacy from love for Noonan into killing him. In the first phase of the story, before talking about being struck by lightning, Stacy views the world from an optimistic side, she finds Noonan attractive. In the second part of the story, after talking about the incident of being struck by lightning, she starts to change and identifies the world from the animals’ point of views. She contends that talking about lightning strike makes her remember death, and being close to death makes her vulnerable and scared, which makes her merciful to the animal world. Especially in the moment when she looks into the tank and tries to understand the lobster, …show more content…
and how it feels like to be in that position, she sees that lobsters are pure, unaware animals, which cannot protect themselves and unaware of their surroundings. In these two phases, Stacy becomes the guardian of the animals, and her realization of their lives makes the guardian to protect and take revenge for them. In the story, there are two phases that Stacy is experiencing. The first one is her before talking about the incident to Noonan and after sharing it. Her remembering of the past changes her ideas about Noonan, and even makes her think about him in negative manners. First of all, Stacy is “seriously attracted to him,” even though he is married and 20 years older than Stacy. After talking about the incident “a glass wall between her and other people, especially Noonan” appears again. As a result, Stacy explicitly expresses her negative ideas about Noonan which shows that she becomes scared, isolated again. The moment of remembering being struck by lightning, creates the idea of viewing the world from other creatures’ point. That makes Stacy merciful and as a result, she basically takes revenge from Noonan because of his cruel actions against animals. For example, Noonan shows Stacy how to cook a lobster in the lobster night, and he also cooks the lobster, the final one left in the tank, alive. Right before that, Stacy looks at the tank and tries to view the world from basic animal view: staying alive, not being eaten by other creatures. On the other hand, Noonan’s approach to cooking the lobster is enjoying how the lobster would struggle to come up and try to save its life. This particular part of the story initiates the guardian side of Stacy. Moreover, her realization of unawareness of animals, and their friendly intentions make her the guardian to protect them. She becomes different in an emotional way, too since she becomes more sensible about treatment to the animals. For example, in the beginning of the story, “it oddly attracts her, this cruelty of Noonan”, after she speaks about her incident, “somehow everything changes” without Stacy knowing the reason why. This shows the emotional effect of her experience, because emotions control people in a way that they cannot understand. In addition to that, Stacy develops her opposition against Noonan more and more even to the level where she wants to kill him.
At the end of the lobster night, when Noonan gets ready to eat the last lobster left in the tank, the bear that reminds him his revenge appears. This is the very important moment that persuades Stacy, as the guardian, to kill Noonan. Noonan’s extreme anger and his persistence of shooting the bear again and again right after the intention of cooking the lobster in a cruel manner makes Stacy more furious and full of revenge, even hatred. She is also affected by the idea that the bear just looks for food to feed its family and “stay alive.” Conversely, Noonan wants to kill the bear in the very first time to sell its skin and for fun even though he contends that he wants to protect himself. Bear just wants food from the pot, it does not attack Noonan. Moreover, when Noonan shoots the bear, and it looks for the source of the pain, which shows that animals are not smart enough to fight people, they are pure because of their dumbness compared to human beings. Stacy’s realization of pureness and good intent of animals makes her to take action, and kill the person fighting against the weak sides of …show more content…
animals. After Noonan kills the bear, Stacy is also affected by her colleague, Gail, who says “That is it for me” for the actions of Noonan, which has an emotional effect on Stacy.
Right after Gail’s expression, Stacy acts under the control of her emotions besides the guardian duty, shoots Noonan. After shooting Noonan “Never, never in her life had Stacy known the relief she felt at that moment.” Relief shows her emotional side. In addition, after killing him, she leaves the rifle next to the “broken remains of the lobster” which demonstrates that Noonan was guilty of making a pure animal suffer for no legitimate purpose and Stacy was aware of
that. All in all, the story is about the change of Stacy through the realization of death, and what it means by remembering it again and again. She always wants to prevent talking about how it feels like to be struck by lightning because she believes; this would make her more vulnerable to death as she expresses “The only people who say lightning never strikes twice in the same place have never been struck once.” This also implies her isolation from the outer world. In the story, she tells what happened to her when she gets struck by lightning, and her life becomes miserable and isolated again. The reason behind that, when she speaks, she remembers and that makes her suffer again. She views people in a judgmental way; her view about death makes her more merciful to animals. In the end she shoots Noonan due to the differentiation process she goes through in her life, which is an unexpected end for a story that includes love for a person in the very beginning.
I thought it would be a good idea to revisit the training styles of my first interview with general manager Terrel from West Virginia 's Red Lobster. We began the interview with the recap of our first interview, which mainly focused on the training and development of future managers of Red Lobster restaurants. For this interview, I wanted to focus on the entire training process from a new employee to the general manager position.
Jan de Heem painting, “Still Life with Lobster” is an oil painting with a bright red lobster that catches the viewer gaze into this beautiful dinner from the late 1640s.The color scheme used in this painting is analogous since it uses relatively close hues. In the painting, the lobster is on a silver platter but it has been left untouched. Surrounding the focal point of the painting is luxurious fruits including grapes, cherries, peaches, berries, oranges, and a half peeled lemon. To the left of the lobster is an overturned silver goblet. This particular style of painting is known as a vanitas form of painting. The artist is using a luxurious left over meal to show even the most expensive desires of the world doesn’t last for eternity. The
Wallace uses Pathos as an persuasive device in his article as he describes the catching and cooking process of the lobster. Using his words, he gives the audience the idea that the lobster is not just an item for consumption, but also a live creature. “They come up alive in the traps, are placed in containers of seawater, and can, so long as the water’s aerated and the animals’ claws are pegged or banded to keep them from tearing one another up under the stresses of captivity, survive right up until they’re boiled (Wallace, 60). He mentions that the lobster is in fact boiled alive to maintain it’s freshness and describes the boiling process. “[The lobster] comes alarmingly to life when placed in boiling water. The lobster will sometimes try to cling to the container’s sides or even hook its claws over the kettle’s rim like a person trying to keep from going over the edge of a roof” (Wallace 62). He compares the lobster during the cooking process to a human in terror of falling to their death. This gives the audience something to relate to on an emotional level based on the simile he presents to us. Based on this evidence and the words the author chooses to present to the reader, it is suggested that
As “Consider the Lobster” investigates the ethics of how one cooks lobster, it employs pathos while explaining the actions and reciprocations of cooking a lobster. As Wallace addresses the steps in which one cooks
The documentary Blackfish directed by Gabriela Cowperthwaite, leaves the viewer with many different emotions. This documentary follows the life of Tilikum, a captured killer whale who is forced to preform for SeaLand. The director uses different interviews from people who have worked with Tilikum or have seen him attack people during the shows. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, has said that swimming with and training killer whales is not safe at all and should not be done. They believe it is a very high risk to the human working with the whale.
When settlers first came to America, lobster was considered a poor man’s food. The lobsters were so abundant at that time that many people felt that they were competing with them for space on the shore. The settlers felt that the lobster had no nutritional value. At that time both Native Americans and settlers used the lobster as fertilizer for their fields and as bait to catch other fish. Lobster was so disdained that it was given to prisoners, indentured servants, and children. This was such a common practice that in Massachusetts many servants and prisoners had it put into their contract that they could not be fed lobster more than two times a week.
"Consider the Lobster" an issue of Gourmet magazine, this reviews the 2003 Maine Lobster Festival. The essay is concerned with the ethics of boiling a creature alive in order to enhance the consumer's pleasure. The author David Foster Wallace of "Consider the Lobster” was an award-winning American novelist. Wallace wrote "Consider the Lobster” but not for the intended audience of gourmet readers .The purpose of the article to informal reader of the good thing Maine Lobster Festival had to offer. However, he turn it into question moral aspects of boiling lobsters.
I believe David Foster Wallace’s aim for writing this piece was to explain his reasoning for killing and eating animals and to understand other people’s views on the issue as well. This is apparent throughout the writing. Wallace starts out by giving his personal description of the Maine Lobster Festival. He describes how it takes place July 30th through August 3rd, thousands of people come to the festival every year, its broadcasted on live television by CNN, and about 25,000 fresh lobsters are eaten over the course of the festival. Additionally, he goes into the biology of the lobster such as the scientific name and evolution. Leading up to this, he states the question for writing this piece, “Is it alright to boil a sentient creature alive for our gustatory pleasure” (p.9 Wallace)?
In a crucial scene in Jaws, chief Martin Brody must use his mistake as guide for to him complete his goal of saving the town from the antagonistic shark. After catching a tiger shark, the local town fishermen all celebrate their victory together with Brody and the mayor believing they have solved Amity Island’s problem. Soon the mother of the deceased child who was killed by the great shark appears on the boardwalk. Her costume, a solid black dress appropriate for a funeral, contrasts with the bright sunny day on the beach that is represented with high-key lighting. The dress also symbolizes the mother’s multiple feelings of mourning for her child and her anger towards Brody, which again juxtaposes the feelings of success among Brody and the fishermen. Her conversation with the police chief is executed through a shot-reverse shot sequence but she catches Brody’s attention with a smack to his face. She goes on how Brod...
Service Article (revised) T'S MARDI GRAS - YES! Yes, New Orleans' famous Carnival season is this years' never-ending party and you're invited. Mardi Gras, famous for its colorful and cultural parades, is an experience you can't go any longer without!
“For one thing, it’s not just that the lobsters get boiled alive, it’s that you do it yourself—or at least it’s done specifically for you, on-site” (Wallace 703). Beauty is absent in the process of boiling the crustacean alive. With the absence of beauty, Wallace maximizes his focus on justice, hoping the end product will be fair and beautiful. He tries to defend the boiling of lobsters with scientific data; however, it is not extremely reliable information. “The nervous system of a lobster is very simple… It is decentralized with no brain. There is no cerebral cortex, which in humans is the area of the brain that gives the experience of pain” (Wallace 702). This evidence would imply the moral justice in cooking lobsters, because they do not feel pain the same way humans do. Scarry’s definition of beauty is fair and morally righteous (491). If a lobster does not feel pain, cooking it by whatever means available would be considered morally righteous. Scarry states “when we study and learn how to appreciate beautiful objects, we train ourselves to think about the world in terms that will lead us to greater justice” (491). We can appreciate lobsters and the beauty in their nutrition, which provides justice for eating
The lobsters are complex creatures, as David Foster Wallace explains in the essay, and the people that are going to the festival are making this complex creature so easy to kill. Wallace is able to validate this argument by using their complexity of life and the simplicity of their death to show the paradox that the festival has created explaining, “Taxonomically speaking, a lobster is a marine crustacean of the family Homaridae, characterized by five pairs of jointed legs, the first pair terminating in large pincerish claws used for subduing prey” (Wallace 55). Then later explaining, “Be apprised, though, that the Main Eating Tent’s suppers come in Styrofoam trays, and the soft drinks are iceless and flat” (Wallace 55). This paradox that Wallace brings to the attention to his audience show that these articulate and graceful creatures are being disgraced by the festival goers by being served on Styrofoam trays and served with unappealing beverages. It is no coincidence that two things that are really explained is the anatomy of the lobster and how complex the makeup of the lifeform is and the simplicity of the death of the lobster. By explaining these two things in depth, he is able to show how ridiculous and unfair he feels that killing and eating the lobster is. Wallace also humanizes the lobster to bring the situation into a perspective that
The night before Easter I couldn’t sleep knowing what a great day it going to be with delicious food. I had a dream of all the great food we were going to bar-b-que with sides and desserts. My dad and I woke up early Easter Sunday to get everything ready and I knew it was going to be perfect. We started bar-b-queing and I just love the way it smells when I just barely put it on the bar-b-que pit. Especially after the meat cooks for a while, and I open the lid and a white cloud of smoke emerges into my face like when a car burns out and I just inhale then exhale the aroma of the meat. My family and I love to bar-b-que for Easter, so we invite our friends and family to come to our house to have fun and to have a memorable time. My dad, my tio, and I are the ones who love to bar-b-que while my mom, my tia’s, and my girlfriend are making all the sides and desserts. My dad, my tio, and I are in the back of the house by the fence to the left of the house with three bar-b-que pits while my mom, my tia, and girlfriend are setting up the tables under the patio to place the scrumptious food an...
...nizes the fish because, just like the fish, people fight daily battles to survive in life. This humanization of the fish enables the speaker to relate and respect him, and therefore, ultimately leads to his release.
Jeremy knew he was being used and lied to, so he went home to grab the lobster, and the lobster began to question what he was doing. Jeremy then tells the lobster, "I'm throwing you back where you belong. You're no magic lobster." This is the point where the main character realizes the lobster is a liar, and is getting ready to break free from the thing that is causing him problems such as let downs. During the process of Jeremy throwing the lobster back in the ocean, the lobster tries to convince Jeremy not to throw him back in the ocean by saying, "Aw, don't do that, kid.