Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical aspects of the US court system
The history of usa courts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical aspects of the US court system
The litigious society of America is everywhere in the news today and throughout the past, a person suing a large company for wrongdoing and getting awarded a large sum of money. A.H. Hermann stated in his article Why is the United States of America so Litigious? For the Business Law Review of 1991 stated (Hermann 1991) “There is no need to start this article by showing that the citizens of the United States are the most litigious race on earth: the number and prosperity of their lawyers, the proliferation of courts which keep busy are notorious. When one inquires why it should be so, the answer usually points strongly to the rugged individualism of the population to the constitution which provides a frim basis for the defense of the rights of the individual, and also to the history to the history in which lawyers, rather than aristocrats, played a leading role.” The American litigious society will have to change in order for the justice system to fulfill its purpose of upholding the rights of the citizens.
According to Webster dictionary “litigious: too ready or eager to sue someone or something in a court of law, tending or likely to engage in
…show more content…
lawsuits”. Meaning that people are ready to take advantage of any situation that might could have been easily solved in an obvious way. People and corporations feel the need to protect themselves from this so they may put wording in bold print or make you sign a document so that they are no longer liable for the situation. "Is there a doctor in the house?" was the famous cry in London's West End if a theatergoer suddenly collapsed. If that happened on Broadway today, an off-duty physician would probably burrow deeper into his seat. Where doctors of old saw patients in distress, today they see potential plaintiffs. No wonder the slightest bruise might prompt your doctor to order an MRI rather than an ice pack. The Quarterly Journal of Economics estimated recently that the practice of "defensive medicine"--doctors prescribing treatments, X-rays and life-support principally to pre-empt legal action--costs some $50 billion a year ("Litigious America", 2001). Americans have placed the litigious society on themselves. This has come about as the outcome from decades of Americas using their rights as consumers and individuals ("Litigious America", 2001). The rights of the consumer are “the right to be sold reliable and safe products, the right not be abused by people in position of authority, the right to be compensated for any harm done to them by the actions (or inaction) of others” ("Litigious America", 2001). As a consequence, Congress and many of the states have made new rules and laws that hold people more accountable for “sins of omission” and commission ("Litigious America", 2001). If Americans would own up to their own mistakes perhaps American society would not be so litigious. Other countries around the world are not the same as America, these countries are not so quick to sue. As they find their own courts are not quick to bring the charges to court to be effective in a timely manner ("Litigious America", 2001). These court make sure that the people are positive that they want to sue because their court systems could take decades to rule on the suit ("Litigious America", 2001). In civil cases, many European countries adopted a "loser pays" rule ("Why We Sue", 2016). If someone sue and lose, then that party has to pay the other side's costs ("Why We Sue", 2016). This obviously makes people think a lot harder before they decide to file a suit ("Why We Sue", 2016). In America, the abundance of lawyers (Americas most popular profession) and a strong, well up-held judicial structure means that no one has a reason not to pursue something that they think they can win in court ("Litigious America", 2001). In fact, the tendency of juries to award incredible amounts in damages encourages lawsuits to become more popular ("Litigious America", 2001). It is popular in America since it is easy to make money for the client. Americas litigious society has caused many companies and private parties to go bankrupted or suffer a major financial loss ("The Last Week ", 2016).
Blitz USA a major producer of portable gas cans was forced to declare bankruptcy and close their doors after product liability lawyers got involved ("The Last Week ", 2016). The lawyers got hold of a hand full of injuries involved with the portable gas cans produced ("The Last Week ", 2016). In the end the Blitz USA lost and was forced to pay more than $30 million in defense and damage fees which was enough to take the company under ad declare bankruptcy after more than 50 years of business ("The Last Week ", 2016). The extremely popular American fast food McDonald’s was required to pay an outstanding amount of money over a hot coffee incident ("Litigious America",
2001). Everyone knows the case of the elderly coffee drinker who collected a fortune ($2.9 million, later reduced to $640,000) from McDonald's after spilling coffee on herself that she said was too hot. The company paid, and McDonald's coffee cups now bear the legend “caution: this cup contains an extremely hot beverage” ("Litigious America", 2001). Americas litigious society stems from there rights as a nation and the large court system that is willing to support their right to be litigious. This has caused the nations large companies to become very protective of themselves so the company will not have to pay a large fine or go bankrupt. Yet this is very different form many European countries that have made if very difficult for the party to purse the suit very far.
Pagan writes a captivating story mingled with the challenges of the Eastern Shore legal system. This book gives a complete explanation backed up by research and similar cases as evidence of the ever-changing legal system. It should be a required reading for a history or law student.
Abadinsky, Howard. Law and Justice: An Introduction to the American Legal System. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.
people in these 21st century society wonder, “When is Justice to be done?” For district attorneys,
...f-regulate? A reasonable case for increased regulation can be made given the massive cost of recent financial turmoil and attorneys’ ostensible role in these crises. Moreover, as lawyers effectively operate as gatekeepers and rubberstamps for much of business decsionmaking, they may serve as the most efficient risk bearer to reduce externalized costs, whether through a division of ethical responsibilities between in-house attorneys and independent firms or simply staying the drastic course of Lawson. This modification of the role of attorneys does present a difficult contradiction as the exact value added by lawyers is leveraged into a social duty and it’s not obvious whether the two can co-exist. Given the relative lack of traction and progress, however, it seems the stickiness of established behavior may present too much value, for attorneys and clients alike.
Rehnquist, William H., Brennan, William J. "A Casebook on the Law and Society: What Rights
In 2003 as a response to communities with a large amount and growing number of youth gangs the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice, initiated the Gang Reduction Program (GRP) (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). The formation of gangs is seen as a response to system failures and community dysfunction. As a result, one of OJJPD’s anti-gang initiatives is to make communities safer and have a pro-social environment (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). Furthermore, OJJDP plans to provide economic and social opportunities that gangs often promise to new recruits which are often obtained in an illegal and dangerous fashion (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). OJJDP believes that the GRP is capable of addressing the underlying issues for the increasing popularity and intensity of gang activity in specific suburban and rural neighborhoods (U.S. Department of Justice 2008). The program takes an integrative approach to dealing with the issue of increasing membership and participation with gangs. The following will discuss the program’s goal, theoretical basis, methods of operation, and overall effectiveness. After reviewing these major aspects of the GRP I will personally assess the value of this program and conclude whether or not the evidence supporting the program’s efficiency is strong enough for me to recommend it for implementation.
The laundry list of crimes Americans have suffered at the hands of their own criminal justice system is because they don’t have the right tools to fight back against those that have the ability to sway litigation.
In my world the parks are full of obstacle course, but there is also a chocolate fountain to gain or lose calories. The way that my people have to act are happy things. No one else is going to have more power than I would. The consequences are harsh, but that because the laws are what people should actually follow. If I want to take a vacation Kalyn would be in charge, and other people do the killing part. I feel that my people should learn anything they would want to, that is not inappropriate.
Oct 1993. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Vol. 79. 134 pages (Document ID: 0747-0088) Published by American Bar Association
Smith, C. E. (2004). Public defenders. In T. Hall, U.S. Legal System (pp. 567-572-). [Ebscohost]. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook
In this essay we will discuss the process of legal research, writing, and analysis. The subject matter will be presented in a clear, concise and objective manner. The textbook that we will be referencing is "Gilbert Law Summaries: Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis" 10th ed, BarBri Group, 2006.
Intentional torts result when the tortfeasor act intentionally with the intend that the consequences of his/her action would be harmful. Negligent torts result when the breach of the duty of all persons, as established by start tort law, to act reasonably and to exercise a reasonable amount of care in their dealings and interactions with others occurs. Strict liability tort is without any fault, but causes danger or serious harm to the society or person involved (Lau, T. & Johnson, L.
In order to analyze our “sue happy” society one must first find out, what actually is a lawsuit? A lawsuit is a legal action brought by a plaintiff, a person who claims to have been wronged, against a defendant, the person being sued. If a judge decides that a case has enough evidence to go to trial then the verdict may be decided by either a judge or a jury. Yet, 90 percent of cases reach a settlement out of court. (Cannell)
The media often portrays a negative image of lawyers and judges. The way that lawyers and judges act in media can be described as selfish justice. The meaning of selfish justice refers to the lack of concern that lawyers and judges can have regarding the fairness of a trial and the consequences that a ruling can have on another human life. To clarify, in most crime television shows and even in reality, an innocent person can easily be found guilty in court if the district attorney has enough evidence to prove the defendant crime and if the defense lawyer is not able to counter the evidence. However, many district attorneys as represented on television do not exhibit honesty when it comes to presenting evidence. For example, many episodes showcase
The U.S court system has numerous cases in it, they range from multi million dollar cases (including the bank crisis, or the car business for example) to less severe cases called torts. A tort is a legal term defined as “ A wrongful act that does not include breach of contract. This offense damages the injured parties property or reputation, leaving that party able to gain compensation.” (Dictionary.com) The book The King of Torts is about a man named Clay Carter. He has a stable job, it doesn’t pay as much as he wishes. He in the scheme of one week goes from making $100,000 a year to making $5,000,000 in one case. This is all because he filed something called a mass tort (also known as a class tort).