Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of literature on urinary tract infection
Review of literature on urinary tract infection
Review of literature on urinary tract infection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of literature on urinary tract infection
Running Header: Literature Evaluation
Literature Review
Literature Evaluation
Christy Armes
American Sentinel University
?
Literature Evaluation
A 2002 estimate by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that urinary tract infections were the most common health care associated infections (HAI?s). These infections account for >30% of HAI?s (CDC, 2009). The CDC further estimated the number of attributable mortalities at >13,000. CAUTI rates have increased from three percent between 2009 to 2012, to six percent between 2009-2013 (CDC, 2009). While at times urinary catheter may be a necessary intervention, studies have confirmed over half the patients who receive a urinary catheter do not have a valid indication
…show more content…
The campaign included integrative education and training based on evidence based practices and applicable process revisions to address those practices (Gray, et al., 2016). Strategies incorporated applying tightly defined indications for indwelling catheterization into the electronic health record. Electronic alerts requiring daily review and orders for continued catheterization. Comprehensive training was required for nursing staff to include substitutions for indwelling foley catheters. Daily assessment of continued need for the urinary catheter while doing multidisciplinary rounds. Observation of maintenance bundle elements with real time education and case review of each CAUTI to identify opportunities for improvement.
The study was done using pre intervention CAUTI rate data from January 2010 to December 2012, and post intervention from January 2013 to December 2014. Staff members were also surveyed during the September 2014 to February 2015 to determine their perceptions on CAUTI and preventative methods before and after the
…show more content…
Using evidenced based practices have shown decrease in infections. These articles indicated nurse driven protocols impressively decrease the duration of catheterization and CAUTI rate. Using the CDC evidenced based guidelines reduction in duration of catheterization and CAUTI rate. Multidisciplinary campaigns increase health care worker perspective toward prevention as a priority in the health care system.
?
References
Barbadoro, P., Labricciosa, F., Recanatini, C., Gori, G., Tirabassi, F., Martini, E., . . . Propero, E. (2015). Catheter associated urinary tract infection: Role of the setting of catheter insertion. American Journal of Infection Control, 707-710.
CDC. (2009). Guideline for prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from Centers for Disease Control:
Gray, D., Nussle, R., Cruz, A., Kane, G., Toomey, M., Bay, C., & Ostovar, G. A. (2016). Effects of a catheter associated urinary tract infection prevention campaign on infection rate, catheter utilization, and health care workers perspective at a community safety net hospital. American Journal of Infection Control, 115-116.
Mori, C. (2014). A-Voiding Catastrophe: Implementing a Nurse-Driven Protocol. MEDSURG Nursing,
BioPatch, and alternatives like Tegaderm CHG, are an important first step in helping prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CBIs). As CBIs rank among the most frequent and potentially lethal nosocomial infections, the need for a device to cut down infections at the insertion site has increased. The growing numbers of infections has driven companies to consider a three-tiered approach: a maximal aseptic barrier at insertion, proper site maintenance, and hub protection. With BioPatch and alternative products catheter sites receive that maximal aseptic barrier to prevent bacteria growth.
Pinkerton, C. (2009). New technology enhances expertise of vascular access team. Canadian Nurse, 105(2), 21-22.
5), many hospitals in conjunction with the Joint Commission's 2012 National Patient Safety Goals has been rallying for hospitals to use evidenced-based practices (EBP) to the prevention of CAUTIs because evidence is growing showing that many are avoidable. Such practices such as utilizing a nurse-driven protocol to assess and evaluate the appropriateness and use of urethral catheter to determine how long a patient should have an indwelling catheter and when to discontinue it. Several factors have been identified that pose as risk factors to CAUTI which include but not limited to drainage bag not being below the level of the bladder, healthcare personnel not practicing standard precautions and utilizing aseptic techniques during insertion of catheters, unsterile equipment, and unnecessary placement of urinary
2013). Inappropriate use of urinary catheter in patients as stated by the CDC includes patients with incontinence, obtaining urine for culture, or other diagnostic tests when the patient can voluntarily void, and prolonged use after surgery without proper indications. Strategies used focused on initiating restrictions on catheter placement. Development of protocols that restrict catheter placement can serve as a constant reminder for providers about the correct use of catheters and provide alternatives to indwelling catheter use (Meddings et al. 2013). Alternatives to indwelling catheter includes condom catheter, or intermittent straight catheterization. One of the protocols used in this study are urinary retention protocols. This protocol integrates the use of a portable bladder ultrasound to verify urinary retention prior to catheterization. In addition, it recommends using intermittent catheterization to solve temporary issues rather than using indwelling catheters. Indwelling catheters are usually in for a longer period. As a result of that, patients are more at risk of developing infections. Use of portable bladder ultrasound will help to prevent unnecessary use of indwelling catheters; therefore, preventing
Central lines (CL) are used frequently in hospitals throughout the world. They are placed by trained health care providers, many times nurses, using sterile technique but nosocomial central line catheter associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) have been a dangerous issue. This is a problem that nurses need to pay particular attention to, and is a quality assurance issue, because CLABSI’s “are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs” (The Joint Commission, 2012). There have been numerous studies conducted, with the objective to determine steps to take to decrease CLABSI infection rate, and research continues to be ongoing today. The problem is prevalent on many nursing units, with some patients at great risk than others, but some studies have shown if health care providers follow the current literature, or evidence based guidelines, CLABSIs can be prevented (The Joint Commission, 2012). The purpose of this paper is to summarize current findings related to this topic, and establish a quality assurance (QA) change plan nurses can implement for CL placement and maintenance, leading to decreased risk of nosocomial CLABSIs.
Nosocomial or healthcare-associated infection (HAI) occurs when a patient receiving treatment in a health care setting develops an infection secondary to their original condition. These infections are serious and costly adverse outcomes of medical care that affect nearly two million people in the United States annually and lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. With increased days of hospitalization and direct medical costs, HAIs account for an estimated $20 billion per year in national health care expenditure every year. As such, they present one of the major threats to patient safety and remain a critical challenge to public health. On any given day, approximately [one in 25 patients] contracts at least one infection while receiving
As such techniques were not used in this study, I defined a recurrent urinary tract infection as the presence of 2 10,000 col/ml of a single bacteria and one or more urinary symptoms occurring at least two weeks after the initial infection. This may lead to some misclassification of outcome; however, as long as the classification is not associated with the exposure(s) of interest the resulting measures of association should be biased toward the null hypothesis of no difference. The associations between hypothesized risk factors and repeat UTI were studied using multilevel contingency tables, with both stratification and multivariate techniques to control for confounding.3 I calculated six-month cumulative incidences of UTI, risk ratios (RR), and Mantel-Haenszel summary RRs. Exact 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) were calculated around each RR using the method of Gart.4 A three-level symptoms scale, (0 = no hematuria or urgency, 1 = urgency alone, 2 = hematuria and urgency) was developed and used both as a dependent and
It has also developed numerous courses that are intended to provide information and tools that may be needed to approach both significant nursing care and patient care issues. Given the scale of the population suffering with chronic kidney disease and the diversity of backgrounds in which patients are found, this curriculum may be of benefit to nurses caring for nephrology patients in many settings (ANNA, 2015). It supports, promotes among its members, and sponsors nursing research intended to develop evidence-based practice and to advance nursing science (ANNA, 2015). It strives to provide nurses with leadership opportunities, and encourages nurses to seize opportunities to advance and refine their leadership abilities (ANNA, 2015).
Scott II, D. R. (2009). The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/hai/Scott_CostPaper.pdf
...s and measurement to decrease healthcare- associated infections. American Journal Of Infection Control, pp. S19-S25. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.008.
Patient safety must be the first priority in the health care system, and it is widely accepta-ble that unnecessary harm to a patient must be controlled.Two million babies and mother die due to preventable medical errors annually worldwide due to pregnancy related complications and there is worldwide increase in nosocomial infections, which is almost equal to 5-10% of total admissions occurring in the hospitals. (WHO Patient Safety Research, 2009). Total 1.4 million patients are victims of hospital-acquired infection. (WHO Patient Safety Research, 2009). Unsafe infection practice leads to 1.3 million death word wide and loss of 26 millions of life while ad-verse drug events are increasing in health care and 10% of total admitted patients are facing ad-verse drug events. (WHO Patient Safety Re...
Dougherty, L. & Lister, s. (2006) ‘The Royal Marsden Hospital manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures: Communication 6th Edition Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: review of non-pharmacological interventions. Journal of Hospital Infection, 69(3), 204-219. Revised 01/20 Haugen, N., Galura, S., & Ulrich, S. P. (2011). Ulrich & Canale's nursing care planning guides: Prioritization, delegation, and critical thinking. Maryland Heights, Mo. : Saunders/Elsevier.
...d procedures are now being monitored to improve clinical processes. Ensuring that these processes are implemented in a timely, effective manner can also improve the quality of care given to patients. Management of the processes ensures accountability of the effectiveness of care, which, as mentioned earlier, improves outcomes. Lastly, providing reimbursements based on the quality of care and not the quantity also decreases the “wasting” and overuse of supplies. Providers previously felt the need to do more than necessary to meet a certain quota based on a quantity of supplies or other interventions used. Changing this goal can significantly decrease the cost of care due to using on the supplies necessary to provide effective, high-quality care. I look forward to this implementation of change and hope to see others encouraging an increase in high-quality healthcare.
The Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Program is an essential force maximizing quality, patient centered care, and safety throughout the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System (VANTHCS). The VANTHCS “... is a progressive health care provider in the heart of Texas ... we serve more than 117,000 Veterans and deliver 1.4 million outpatient episodes of care each year to Veterans in 38 Texas counties and two counties in southern Oklahoma” (“VA North Texas,” 2016, para. 1). The purpose of the IPC Program is to guide a facility-wide approach toward identifying, preventing, controlling, and eliminating healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). This approach is facilitated through infection control (IC) practitioner’s role-modeling behaviors of assessing, supporting, guiding, and/or directing healthcare providers (HCPs) in the application of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to prevent HAIs. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), HAIs are often preventable adverse events that pose a major threat to patient safety (“Centers for Disease,” 2016). As a result, IC practitioners recognize the importance of preparing nurse faculty to engage clinical staff in the application of EBPs to prevent infections.