During the course of The Family Romanov by Candace Fleming, Fleming using elements of fiction that are woven into the narrative nonfiction story. Although the story of the Family Romanov is true, the author added small elements of fiction to make the story more engaging and better. The main elements of fiction in “The Family Romanov” is expressed through dialogue and descriptions of objects.
In The Family Romanov, the author used elements of fiction to enhance the story. The reader can pick out the fiction because the author will add in the dialogue of exactly what characters in a random point in their lives. In time, the only way that the conversation would have been documented word for word would be if someone was constantly writing down everything that each character said. Even though this is possible, it is highly unlikely
…show more content…
Candace Fleming described the various thing in so much detail that it led you to think that it was somewhat fiction. “Alexandra was wearing a gold brocade gown shimmering with the thousands of diamonds and pearls that had been sewn onto it … Her elaborate headdress glittered with diamonds and emeralds, and her pearl earrings were so heavy it was hard for her to hold up her head” (4). This quote from the beginning of the book during one of the many balls that the royal family hosted and what Alexandra happened to be wearing on that particular night. At first, the description of the dress sounded reasonable, but once it started to say how she could hold her head up from the weight of the earrings, it sounds more like fiction. I find it very hard to believe that the author knew exactly that she couldn't hold her head up because of the weight of the earrings. Thought this is a narrative nonfiction book and it is true, Candace Fleming used elements of fiction in her book The Family
Misunderstandings happen in our everyday lives, but when is one misunderstanding one too many that can ultimately leave a country in ruins? The Family Romanov written by Candace Fleming is a nonfiction piece set in the time span of 1903 to 1918 filled with the experience of life in the Russian autocracy under the Romanov rule as a peasant, royal and rebel. This story tells us about the downfall of the once greatly praised Russian autocracy, Fleming takes the reader on a journey featuring the rise, but more so the downfall of their rule. After centuries of reign, the Romanov line has a final ruler, Nicholas II, decisions are made and blood is spilled. But, how far would the people of Russia go for a fair government and how oblivious is not
In a written story, the details are permanent. One can not will the words to change in every copy of the same story. The author’s words are fixed and how the author created the story is how the story will always go. While it is true a reader -- or even the author -- could create an alternate reality where the story divulges from the original plot, the people in the story are typically the same.
After learning and reading about Kate Chopin and Nathaniel Hawthorne, one can recognize how their life experiences and era shape the message of their literary works. These two writers, born almost fifty years apart, had a completely different family setting, thus their writings differ and so does their morals. In literature, personal experiences in the writers’ lives have a great significance in their writing style, theme, and symbolism.
... story are just a vehicle that makes the process that turns the feelings of these women into actions whether they were intellectual actions or a physical action such as those taken by Mrs. Mallard and Calixta respectively. When we think realistically we can see that both Mrs. Mallard and Calixta both love their husbands. Mrs. Mallard nearly fainted after hearing the news of her husband premature demise, and Calixta certainly did welcome and was quite pleased with the safe return of her husband and child bearing the shrimps after the storm. These women were thinking and feeling like individuals. One was acting it out as in Calixta's case and our Mrs. Mallard was starting to think about it. It is people like these two, that are hidden in the throngs of humanity to start a ripple in the water and it is the Kate Chopin's that write about these ripples that make the waves.
Both the princess and Natalya know that they lost their loves and know that they cannot change that outcome. However, the authors both have different manners of showing the pain of each women, with Stockton’s being more effective in feeling the pain, fury, and passion of the princess. Although Chekhov’s version does not contain that similar intensity in his story, the reader can still acknowledge the despondence Natalya has when she realizes her mistake. As stated before, these two stories revolve around the theme of lost love, even if the lessons that are expressed through these themes are distinct. The manner in which these authors wrote their stories affected how compelling they were, showing two different perspectives with different tones, all while sharing a theme that can easily be related to, no matter the time period or
...and how we perceive ideas about what writers are trying to get across. This story is a clear representation of family values and true inheritance.
The “Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin and ‘”The Hand” by Sidonie-Gabrielle Colette are similar in theme and setting. Sidonie-Gabrielle Colette and Kate Chopin create the theme of obligatory love and the unhappiness it entails. Both stories illustrate the concealed emotions many women feel in their marriage yet fail to express them. The two stories take place in a sacred room of the house and both transpire in a brief amount of time. The differences between the two stories are seen through the author’s choice of characters in each story. In “The story of an Hour” Kate Chopin involves other characters in Mrs. Mallard’s life, whereas, “The Hand” deals with marriage and togetherness and only involves the husband and wife. Symbolism is seen all throughout “The Hand” not so in ‘The Story of an Hour.” The similarities in “The Story of an Hour” and “The Hand” is portrayed in theme and setting. The differences are illustrated in the choice of characters involved in each story and the amount of symbolism depicted in the different stories.
Historically, women have been treated as second class citizens. The Napoleonic Code stated that women were controlled by their husbands and cannot freely do their own will without the authority of their husband. This paper shows how this is evident in the "Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin and " A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner. In both stories, the use of literary elements such as foreshadowing, symbolism, and significant meaning of the titles are essential in bringing the reader to an unexpected and ironic conclusion.
In the story “Two Kinds”, the author, Amy Tan, intends to make reader think of the meaning behind the story. She doesn’t speak out as an analyzer to illustrate what is the real problem between her and her mother. Instead, she uses her own point of view as a narrator to state what she has experienced and what she feels in her mind all along the story. She has not judged what is right or wrong based on her opinion. Instead of giving instruction of how to solve a family issue, the author chooses to write a narrative diary containing her true feeling toward events during her childhood, which offers reader not only a clear account, but insight on how the narrator feels frustrated due to failing her mother’s expectations which leads to a large conflict between the narrator and her mother.
Storytelling has been a common pastime for centuries. Over the years it has evolved into different styles containing different themes. Kate Chopin, a well-known author of the 20th century, wrote stories about the secrets in women’s lives that no one dared to speak of. Her work was not always appreciated and even considered scandalous, but it opened up a world that others were too afraid to touch. In Chopin’s story “The Storm,” a woman has an affair that causes an unlikely effect. The story’s two themes are portrayed greatly through an abundance of imagery and symbolism, along with the two main characters themselves.
Frank Norris comments that realism is the “smaller details of every-day life, things that are likely to happen between lunch and supper, small passions, restricted emotions.” (1741). “A Story of an Hour” tells the tale of an unhappy married woman, which is not an unrealistic or extreme occurrence. Chopin conveys in her short story the feeling of marriage as an undesired bondage to some married women in the nineteenth century. Mrs. Mallard is an ill woman who is “afflicted with heart trouble” and had to be told very carefully by her sister and husband’s friend that her husband had died (1609).
A common literary device, symbolism is used in this story. Symbolism is when something has a greater meaning within itself. The example of this in the story is the necklace. When looking at necklaces at Madame Forestier she finds one that just jumps out at her. She believes it is everything she wants in life. This is symbolic because it was only a necklace it could not fulfill all of her dreams of a rich high-class life. “She wasn’t at all convinced “No… There’s nothing more humiliating than to look poor among a lot of rich woman”. This quote is said before borrowing the necklace, but it is the reason she borrows it from Madame. The necklace is not really going to change who she is in reality. The necklace ...
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
From beginning to end, the story of the Romanov family is a wild ride. How can a family go from being one of the most beloved families in all of Russia, to being murdered in the middle of the night, to having multiple impostors? To understand the full story of this Russian “sitcom,” one must analyse every detail in depth. The Romanov family consisted of Russian Tsar Nikolai, German princess Tsarina Aleksandra, and their five children: Grand Duchesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria, and Anastasia, and Tsarevich Alexei.
“The Story of an Hour” expresses the difficulties of being a women in the late 1800’s in South America due to the issues of gender inequalities. This story, written by Kate Chopin, who was a married woman in late 1800’s, provides the perspective of a young married women who has limited freedom and is largely controlled by her husband. Throughout this story gender norms are clearly displayed in different ways. One clear example is when Mrs. Mallard, the protagonist, is expected to act a specific way when she hears the news of her dead husband, yet she feels the extreme opposite. The narrator then does a great job of expressing the reality of how Mrs. Mallard is truly feeling and uses that as a way to express the control as a conflict. The outcome of this story is the blatant reality of this life that so many women have lived during the late 1800’s. With additional research and knowledge on the history of gender inequalities, it is easier to connect Mrs. Mallard to her restricted life throughout this