Lisa Coppola LLC Vs. Higbee Case

599 Words2 Pages

Introduction The Lisa Coppola LLC v. Higbee case revolves around intellectual property rights and their enforcement on the Internet, particularly concerning the use of images that were allegedly offered for free but later became the subject of copyright infringement claims (Coppola v. Higbee, No. 1:19-CV-00678-CCR, 2020). Discussion Points 1. What is the difference between a '' and a ''? Background of the Case Lisa Coppola LLC, a law firm, used images they believed were free to use, only to receive a demand letter from the defendants (Higbee & Associates) for payment due to lack of proper licensing. The firm filed a lawsuit alleging a fraudulent scheme to extract payments from users of these "free" images (Coppola v. Higbee, No. 1:19-CV-00678-CCR, 2020). …show more content…

What is the difference between a '' and a ''? Key Legal and Ethical Concerns The case raised questions about the clarity of licensing terms for online content and the ethical implications of enforcing copyright infringement in a potentially misleading manner. The court found that the website's licensing language was clear and unambiguous, requiring attribution, which Lisa Coppola LLC failed to provide (CC Legal Database, 2020). 3. What is the difference between a '' and a ''? Significance to E-commerce This case is significant to the e-commerce industry as it highlights the importance of understanding and complying with intellectual property laws when using online content. It also underscores the potential risks involved in using images or other content without thorough verification of the terms of use. (4). The's' of the's'. Protection of Merchants E-commerce merchants are protected by intellectual property laws that safeguard their products, services, and content from unauthorized use. This includes patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets that can be enforced to maintain a competitive edge and prevent unfair competition (WIPO,

Open Document