Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1974
American Civil Rights Act of 1964
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American Civil Rights Act of 1964
In the case of Lisa Anne Varner versus National Super Market Inc. , I find in favor of the Plaintiff, Ms. Varner. The burden of proof is upon Ms. Varner to show evidence, and prove that National Super Market Inc. (NSMI), allowed the conduct, and behavior of Robert Edmiston (employee of NSMI) intimidate and isolate Ms. Varner. Ms. Varner being a part of the protected class characteristic, which violates the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, NSMI allowed Mr. Edmiston’ conduct, and behavior to drastically alter Ms. Varner’s working conditions that created such a stressful environment that Ms. Varner could no longer function properly on the job nor thrive/survive within it. The burden of proof is upon Ms. Varner to provide evidence, and …show more content…
Varner continued to work for NSMI after the report, and arrest of Mr. Edmiston. While doing so, Ms. Varner would emotion status was affected, and damaged. Moreover, Ms. Varner sought out psychological help, and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress syndrome. Furthermore, the refusal, and reject by the NSMI official to protect Ms. Varner within the workplace provided for the continuously of the assaults which now pledges Ms. Varner. It is the finding of this court, that Ms. Varner has presented evidence, and shown adequate proof of National Super Markets Inc. via the inability their official to provide a safe workplace for an employee. The inability, and refusal to report the several incidents of attacks to upper management due to the fact that Ms. Varner spoke through her finance and not formally to him, is a mute case. Moreover, after the NSMI’s response upon being made aware showed and gave proof that Ms. Varner’s reporting the incident to the official would have received the same reaction. The plaintiff-Ms. Varner has proven that she suffer from harassment from Mr. Edmiston due to his conduct and/or behavior upon her person, and with no formal recourse from the company, Ms. Varner suffered from a hostile work environment that allowed the assaults to
Facts of the Case: Darleen Suggs started working and helped maintain the produce business with the decedent, Junior Earl Norris, from 1973 until his death in 1983. During this time and according to several witnesses, the plaintiff did most of the farm work, as well as drive to markets 60 miles away, without aid of the decedent. She also handled all finances and deposited them into their joint bank account, giving her the reason to believe they had an implied contract that she was a partner and would receive one-half of the profits. In
Cynthia Adae was taken to Clinton Memorial Hospital on June 28, 2006. She was taken to the hospital with back and chest pain. A doctor concluded that she was at high risk for acute coronary syndrome. She was transferred to the Clinton Memorial hospital emergency room. She reported to have pain for two or three weeks and that the pain started in her back or her chest. The pain sometimes increased with heavy breathing and sometimes radiated down her left arm. Cynthia said she had a high fever of 103 to 104 degrees. When she was in the emergency room her temperature was 99.3, she had a heart rate of 140, but her blood
A well-nourished, well-developed Hispanic female named Anna Garcia standing at 65 inches, 165 pounds and in her late thirties was found dead in her house after her concerned neighbor Doug Greene was suspicions as to why she didn't take her dog out like she did normally, and why the dog was barking constantly for two hours. The police received a call from Greene on August 31st at 9:45 am and arrived at the crime scene at 9:56am.The police found Anna lying face down in the hallway. Authorities observed a pool of blood around her head and some vomit beside her. It was 73 degrees inside Anna’s house, while it was 92 degrees outside. Anna was last seen alive by her former husband, Alex Garcia the night before her death. Investigators measured her rectal temperature, and came to a conclusion that she died at 7:00 am in that same morning. A medical examiner was also called to perform an autopsy to see what really caused Anna's death.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier of 1987-1988 Background: At Hazel East High School, the school has a sponsored newspaper called “The Spectrum” that is written and edited by the students. In May of 1983, the high school principal, Robert E. Reynolds, received the edited version of the May 13th edition. Upon inspecting the paper, he found two articles that he found “inappropriate.” The two articles contained stories about divorce and teen pregnancy. An article on divorce featured a student who blamed her father’s actions for her parents’ divorce.
One of the issues in the case EEOC v. Target Corp. is that the EEOC alleged that Target violated the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by engaging in race discrimination against African-American applicants who were interested in management positions. It is argued that Target did not give the opportunity to schedule an interview to plaintiffs, Kalisha White, Ralpheal Edgeston and Cherise Brown-Easley, because of racial discrimination. On the other hand, it argues that Target is in violation of the Act because the company failed to retain and present records that would determine if there was reason to believe that an unlawful practice had been committed.
The court’s decision based on the treatment of young people in this case emphasizes on the concept of social justice, which means the fair allocation of wealth, resources and opportunity between members in a society. The appellant in this case, Louise Gosselin, was unemployed and under the age of 30. She challenged the Quebec Social Aid Act of 1984 on the basis that it violated section 7 of her security rights, section 15 of her equality rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and section 45 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. For the purpose of this essay, we shall explore the jurisprudence analysis of section 7 and section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 7 states that everyone has the
Milwaukee teacher Katherine Gonzalez had a twisted way of helping her 11-year-old "chronically depressed" student cheer up.
Ellen Farber is a 35-year-old single female who lives alone. She has come to treatment to get help with her complaints of depression and thoughts of suicide. The client reported six months of dyphoria and lack of energy and pleasure. Additionally, the client has long-standing problems with eating and spending. The client declared bankruptcy at age 27. The client was fired from her job two weeks before coming to treatment. She owes $100,000.00 to various local banks and $150,000.00 to her former employer. When the banks discovered her fraudulent practices two weeks ago, they contacted Ms. Farber's employers, who promptly fired her, which led to her current desperate state. Furthermore, the client’s financial problems are the result attempting
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and traditional litigation are different types of ways to resolve legal matters. Traditional litigation can prove very costly and often times drawn out for lengthy periods. ADR affords companies the opportunity to resolve a legal matter in a reasonable amount of time and at times without the exorbitant cost of a trail. The case detailed in this paper is Kovalchick v. South Baldwin Hospital, which used traditional litigation, but reversed on appeal the hospital may want to examine the benefits of ADR.
Maetta Vance was picked on by some coworkers, and eventually, one of them got a position acting like a supervisor, while she was working for the Ball State University Banquet and Catering Division of University Dining. These coworkers were Saundra Davis and Connie McVicker. Vance and one of her co-workers, Saundra Davis, had some oral argument that ended with Davis’s slapping Vance in the head (Cornell University Law). Vance’s matter with Connie McVicker was that “Vance was told that co-worker Connie McVicker had bragged about McVicker’s family ties to the Ku Klux Klan and referred to Vance using a racial slur” (Cornell University Law). Davis complained the Ball State University about both co-workers. But, the Ball State University did not solve the problems, and did not fire Davis and/or McVicker that the university gave a written warning to McVicker and formally warned Davis, too (Cornell University Law). Then, Vance sued the Ball State University at the district court, but The district court did not satisfy Vance’s desires about the court outcomes that the university was not able to “be liable for Davis’s actions as a supervisor under Title VII because Davis did not have the power to hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or disciple Vance” (Cornell University Law).
In today’s world, the American still has barriers to overcome in the matter of racial equality. Whether it is being passed over for a promotion at the job or being underpaid, some people have to deal with unfair practice that would prevent someone of color or the opposite sex from having equal opportunity at the job. In 2004, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporation was a civil rights class-action suite that ruled in favor of the women who worked and did not received promotions, pay and certain job assignments. This proves that some corporations ignore the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects workers from discrimination based on sex, race, religion or national origin.
Over the course of this reporting year Janine’s performance has been outstanding. Janine continues to handle three of the Unit’s largest active federal criminal cases. The USAO continues to allow Janine wide discretion to set the investigative direction of her cases with little oversight. This minimal oversight is a testament to the USAO’s confidence in Janine’s professionalism and ability to deliver outstanding results.
You have asked me to research, analyze, and prepare a memorandum predicting whether Rose can establish a prima facie case of retaliation against Pickering. As you instructed, I have limited my research to federal law and have not addressed other aspects of a Title VII claim including exhausting administrative remedies, quid pro quo relationships, and sexually hostile working
Discrimination can be commonly found in social environments, but it is not limited to just that. Cases of discrimination can also be found, and are more common than they should be, in employment situations. An employee can be discriminated against for a variety of reasons by another employee, or sometimes a manager or supervisor, both of which are absolutely unacceptable and unprofessional from both a civil rights and a business standpoint. To protect workers’ rights, laws have been passed and enacted for the past fifty years to attempt to abolish discrimination in one of the more necessary areas of an individual’s life, the workplace. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act is seen as the most important law in combating employment discrimination in the United States (Mallor, 1359), and is the law that kick started various anti-discriminatory agencies to help victims of workplace discrimination nationwide.
The US Constitution protects citizens against discrimination at the workplace, it might be racial or other form of discrimination. Discrimination is the way people are treated differently based on unauthorized classification (Varone, 2012). Employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, and so on is illegal, and it can be the cause of lawsuit by the victims. It has been always difficult to prove that a person is victim of discrimination because the incriminated acts are most of the time subtle (Varone, 2012). In 1992, in Atlanta, Texas, a black fire chief who was terminated, claimed that he was victim of racial discrimination (Open Jurist, 1996). The facts in the case, the issues, the rulings of the justices, the justification, my opinion on the court’s decisions, and any emergency situation in which this decision can be cited are the subjects of this essay.