hard on her to lose another son after the death of Willie (another son of hers). This is where she utters a memorable line “All everyone will remember of me was that I was crazy and that I ruined your happiness.” She also tells Lincoln that he should institutionalize her again if he can’t stand the grief. This is what struck me the most about Mrs. Lincoln, was she really out into an insane asylum. “In 1875, more than a decade after her husband was assassinated, Mary Todd Lincoln found two men outside her room in Chicago. They had papers ordering her arrest. Taken immediately to a local courthouse, Lincoln found an all-male jury already waiting for her, set to determine if she should be institutionalized for insanity. ” The marriage between …show more content…
Mary Todd and Abraham Lincoln was very much dysfunctional to the point where Lincoln was very much regretful of his marriage . This is not the biggest point of emphasis in them movie, nevertheless, it is still a big point and Mrs. Lincoln “insanity” may be the very cause to their issues. Many questions revolve around the namesake of the movie himself, President Abraham Lincoln.
A trivial question I had was that of Lincoln’s voice. After thinking about my question for a second, I realized that there is no exact way to determine Lincoln’s voice, as there are no such recordings of him speaking. In Lincoln, Daniel Day-Lewis speaks as President Lincoln with a high tenor voice. While digging for records of his voice I found most people agree on Lincoln’s calming voice “…but his voice calm and clear, his bearing frank and sure. ” Another quality of Lincoln displayed in the movie that had me wondering, was Lincoln storytelling and humor. Among the humorous anecdotes Lincoln tells his staff during the film, include the Ethan Allen story, and the story of a 70-year-old woman whom he aided to escape from law. According to Team of Rivals, both of these anecdotes were among Lincoln’s favorite stories and the content of the story is almost verbatim to historical accounts of these stories . Lincoln was noted to tell stories and humorous anecdotes to prove a point obliquely or to ease tensions during a difficult situation just as the way Lincoln uses his storytelling skill during the film . Again, the movie is incredibly accurate on one of Lincoln’s most unique attributes that helped shape him to be one of our most memorable …show more content…
presidents. The character of Thaddeus Stevens is one of the more fascinating characters in the film. Stevens is a Radical Republican Congressman who fought extremely hard for abolition and black suffrage. In the film, Stevens is portrayed as a cantankerous individual with a knack for blistering insults and putdowns in the House. This unpleasant attribute made him both a respected and hated individual in the House. During a pivotal scene in the film, Stevens decides to compromise his own beliefs for the betterment of the passage of the Amendment. He proclaims to the House that he recognizes the equality of African-Americans in reference to the law as something other than property instead of stating they are equal to whites, in which he truly believes to be true. As I was watching the movie, I was forced to doubt the extreme raunchiness exhibited in the House of Representatives and the insults flung from Congressman to Congressman. While most of the insults are of the invention of screenwriter, it was common at the time for Stevens to launch witty insults to his opponents . Yet still, “The same rules that governed the House then govern it today: Members are not allowed to directly address each other during debate. They have to address the Speaker, who would have surely ruled the radical Republican out of line if he called someone a nincompoop. “ While the House may have been looser in the mid 1800s, this can be considered a minor inaccuracy of the film, as Congressman did not address the Speaker before launching insults at their adversaries. While Thaddeus Stevens was controversial throughout the entire movie, arguably the most controversial scene of the movie involved Thaddeus Stevens.
After the Amendment to abolish slavery passes, Stevens asked the Speaker of the House if he can borrow the Bill and return it tomorrow. Stevens receives permission to take the Bill and returns home to his assumed African-American lover. He gives her the Bill as a present and asks her to read the Bill to him as they are lying down in bed. It is then when Stevens says a famous quote that comes to define politics as a whole, "The greatest measure of the nineteenth century. Passed by corruption, aided and abetted by the purest man in America." This quote of Stevens is also historically accurate as it appears as the exact same quote in Abraham Lincoln: Redeemer President . The expression on my face after watching this scene was one of complete disbelief. While there is no concrete evidence that the affair was true, it is a widely circulated rumor that is thought of as fact among historians. “And his “housekeeper” indeed doubled as his common law wife—perhaps the worst kept secret in Washington. ” Again, despite my disbelief, Lincoln proves to be historically accurate on one of the most controversial scenes in the
film. Despite the fact that Lincoln is a serious movie with emphasis on high moral purpose, there is still room for a comedic storyline involving three corrupt lobbyists. In the film, Lincoln’s Secretary of State, William Seward, pays a visit to three men, William N. Bilboe, Robert Latham, and Richard Schell, and asks for their help to persuade lame-duck Democrats to vote for the passage of the Amendment. The group of sleazy lobbyists use bribery and job to get these sway these Democrats to support the Amendment. Seward makes sure to tell them they cannot mention Lincoln during their “persuasion” efforts. Nevertheless, despite the fact that movie uses the real names of these men, yet it succumbs to fictionalizing the events that occur in the film.
The book Chasing Lincoln’s Killer is about the world famous story of assassinating President Abraham Lincoln. This book takes the reader into the lives and minds of the four main conspirators responsible for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the attempted assassination of the Vice President, Andrew Johnson , and the Secretary of State, William H. Seaward. Not only will the reader learn about the details of the planned assassinations but the background of all conspirators involved, each one of their motives for committing the crimes, and all the differences between the actual killings and what was supposed to happen if everything went according to plan. In this gripping novel the writer, James Swanson, takes the reader through a key point in American history in order to learn the truth of what must have happened while chasing Lincoln’s killer.
“Chasing Lincoln’s Killer” was a true story about the assassination attempts of Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth president of the United States. Lincoln was president during the Civil War, which was a war between the Union and Confederate. Most everybody got to choose a side to root for either the Northern policies or the Southern cause. Although John Wilkes Booth worked in the north, Booth was an unyielding supporter of the Confederate cause. Booth execrated President Lincoln and what he stood for. John Wilkes Booth was a famous actor, and could have had many assassination chances, including Lincoln’s second inauguration. Wanting the south to win the war, he never wanted the punishment of assassinating the president of the United States. Being
The Lincoln-Douglas debates were part of a larger campaign to achieve political adjectives from the two. Lincoln was running for Douglas’ seat in the senate as a republican. Douglas had been a member of congress since 1843, a national figure for the Democratic Party, who was running for re-election. The debates attracted national attentions, mostly due to Douglas’ persona. Lincoln took advantage and made a name for himself as a prominent contender in national politics. At the time, the Democratic Party was going through a sectional riff, at the time of the debates. Douglas had recently gone against president Buchanan and the southern democrats when he apposed the admission of Kansas as a slave state. Douglass was against the Lecompton constitution; the stand was popular among republicans. The outcome, would have maintained the unity between the Nor and south sections of the Democratic Party. Buchanan, along with the southern democrats, were in favor of Lincolns candidacy, they feared Douglas’ going interest, and for his lack of support to the Democratic leaders. With Douglas receiving support from republicans, Lincoln would have to keep Illinois republicans from supporting Douglas. Lincoln would use the morality of slavery to wedge support away from Douglas’ famous popular sovereignty, while winning support of abolitionist. The house divided quote Lincoln used in his speech was taken from Mark 3:25.
give the reader insight about anything relating to President Abraham Lincoln in his final days as
The movie Bernie is true story of a murder committed in Carthage, Texas in 1996. What set this crime apart from other murders was the reaction of the citizens. Bernie Tiede shot and killed Marjorie Nugent in November 1996. The people of Carthage were more worried about Bernie’s fate than his act of murdering Marjorie.
“The greatest measure of the 19th century was passed by corruption, aided and abetted by the purest man in the world.” This quote, by Thaddeus Stevens, served to announce the corruption and dismay found within the presidency of Lincoln, as he attempted to pass the infamous 13th amendment. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States of America, set forth ideas that were unknown at the time. As a major opponent of slavery towards the end of his term, Lincoln voiced his plans to abolish slavery, along with ending the Civil War. Although these plans seemed far-fetched at the time, Lincoln used his power and popularity to achieve both goals, paving the way for equality throughout the States. Despite the fact that the Civil War began merely as a fight to preserve the union, Lincoln soon
Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.
Lincoln was a very smart lawyer and politician. During his “House Divided” speech he asked the question, “Can we, as a nation, continue together permanently, forever, half slave, and half free?" When he first asked this question, America was slowly gaining the knowledge and realizing that as a nation, it could not possibly exist as half-slave and half-free. It was either one way or the other. “Slavery was unconstitutional and immoral, but not simply on a practical level.” (Greenfield, 2009) Slave states and free states had significantly different and incompatible interests. In 1858, when Lincoln made his “House Divided” speech, he made people think about this question with views if what the end result in America must be.
Reading Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address, one wouldn’t think he would be the president to end slavery.Speaking on outlawing slavery, he says,“I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” At the time, Lincoln wasn’t worried about slavery,
Lincoln is a riveting movie on the true events leading up to the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment and the end of the Civil War. Lincoln is directed by Steven Spielberg and Daniel Day-Lewis starred in the movie as Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln is based on the book Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln by Doris Kearns Goodwin. Lincoln was nominated for twelve Academy Awards. Daniel Day-Lewis won Best Actor in a Motion Picture at the Golden Globe Awards. Despite all the good praise for Lincoln, there was still some criticisms about the Lincoln by movie critics. The movie critics claimed the movie was not completely accurate and was exaggerated. However, even historians agreed Lincoln was a thought provoking movie that would make people look for more information on the life of Abraham Lincoln.
‘Our interest in the parallels between the adaptation inter-texts is further enhanced by consideration of their marked differences in textual form,’
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.
It is really hard for me to choose only three films out of my favorites. After a thorough selection, the three winners of my favorite films are Forrest Gump (1994), Memento (2000) and Shutter Island (2010).
“Mama always said life was like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get” (Zemeckis, Forrest Gump). The Academy Award Winner for Best Picture star Tom Hanks portrays the good-hearted but everlasting challenged man that deals with vast life changing dramatic problems, Forrest Gump. The drama-filled romantic comedy was directed by Robert Zemeckis and screenplay written by Eric Roth. In the film, Zemeckis illustrates Forrest as a guy that describes several messages from life lessons on love to the responsibility of ethics. A portion of the viewers may find Forrest Gump as a trivial movie while others pose a question as such: What makes Forrest Gump such a memorable human? From the moment Forrest Gump arrived on the scene of the
Racism has taken its place in our society for a long time. It didn’t just take place in the United States of America but in other regions of the world as well, including South Africa. One of the leaders that has brought peace to his society is a man named Nelson Mandela. A black man who became the president of South Africa in a period when racism existed. Nelson has faced a lot of problems because he was a black man. Invectus shows and explains the events that happened during his time. The movie has succeeded in almost every way, the scenes, the characters, the actors, the stetting etc.