Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on human rights
Reflection on human rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on human rights
Juan Gurrola Summary of “Lifeboat Ethics” by Garrett Hardin 6/14/2015 In the article, “Lifeboat Ethics” by Garret Hardin, Garret argues that the only way we will be able to have a foreseeable future is to adapt our actions to those of his lifeboat ethics idea. First he states his ideas on the spaceship metaphor. Garret states that the only way that the spaceship metaphor would work was if someone was leading us and since no one can lead all of us then it isn’t a good one to follow. The metaphor is only good for telling us what our commons are and what our duty is to the ship and to maintain it. He states that it is detrimental for us obtain our rights before carrying on our duties. When our lives are on the line we should do our duties first before obtaining our rights. He then explains what he believes is a better metaphor. The Lifeboat ethic as he calls it deals with two boats, one that is filled with rich that is not so crowded and the other that is overcrowded. How some from the poor boat want to swim toward the richer boat and hopefully either get in or just take was is handed to them out of pity. Even though if some of the rich get out because they feel sad for the poor ones it still wouldn’t change how the lifeboat is. This is what he feels is a better representation instead of a spaceship. …show more content…
Garret amplifies the trouble of that the lifeboat faces by talking about reproduction and the different ways both lifeboats passenger reproduce.
To summarize the ones that are on the rich boat reproduce much a slower than those that are not in the rich boat and so if we the rich shared their resources with the poor than it would bring an even worse outcome. With this in mind he brings up the tragedy of the commons and how bad it is for the rich to share. How the idea of a system only works if it doesn’t have selfish people. If everything was equal all it would take to ruin it is just one and the only way for it to succeed is if everyone keeps themselves from getting too
greedy. To further illustrate his lifeboat ethic idea is by explaining about the world food bank and its ratchet effect it has on our society. Garrett explains how the world food bank is a resource to underdeveloped countries to use it as crutch when they can’t provide for their own country so they never grow by themselves so if they don’t grow and keep on using that crutch they will keep on getting the same problem over and over again hence the name ratchet effect. The problem he uses is overpopulation of the country and the temporary solution is feeding them with the food from somewhere else, once they are fed they produce more offspring and with more offspring they are going to need the extra food again and the problem will never be solved. Next he talks about the Green Revolution and ecological destruction it causes. In summary this green revolution deals with saving people gives an environmental load to the ecosystem. The more we save the greater the impact there will be in the future due to the increment of population thanks to the rich community. Lastly Garrett talks about immigration and how it creates a commons. How do to an influx of people we are having an even greater role of harm to ourselves. He concludes that if we don’t keep in check how much we help out the poor and the number of immigrants coming in we will have bigger problems so we must follow the lifeboat ethics.
The first mate, the owner of the Sally Anne, dominated his life with his boat to the point of never being able to sleep right without the hum of its motors. This artificial connection made between mate and boat can have major complications. From the text we discover that this first mate has dedicated his life to sailing, ever since grade 10. At the finding of the Sally Anne, it becomes an unhealthy obsession of creating, but later not maintaining, the perfect boat. The text shows paragraphs of the first mate going on about the boat, and how he could not leave it for a day. The irony in this situation is that he spent so much recreating this boat, yet rejected the fact the eventual flaws that accompanied the years of use. It was always just another water pump and coat of perfect white paint away from sailing again. At this point it is clear that the boat has become a symbol for him and his insecurities. At the flooding of the boat and at the initial loss of life upon the Sally Anne's wreck the denial towards the destruction shows how he was using the boat as his only life line, now literally as he clings to last of his dream. At this point of the text, there is no survival, and no acceptance of the truth he must
At this time, Vanderbilt had emerged as a top leader in the railroad industry during the 19th century and eventually became the richest man in America. Vanderbilt is making it abundantly clear to Americans that his only objective is to acquire as much wealth as possible even if it is at the expense of every day citizens. Another man who echoed such sentiments is Andrew Carnegie. In an excerpt from the North American Review, Carnegie takes Vanderbilt’s ideas even further and advocates for the concentration of business and wealth into the hands of a few (Document 3). Carnegie suggests that such a separation between the rich and the poor “insures survival of the fittest in every department” and encourages competition, thus, benefiting society as a whole. Carnegie, a steel tycoon and one of the wealthiest businessmen to date, continuously voiced his approval of an ideology known as Social Darwinism which essentially models the “survival of the fittest” sentiment expressed by Carnegie and others. In essence, he believed in widening inequalities in society for the sole purpose of placing power in the hands of only the most wealthy and most
On the other hand, Carnegie understands that there exists inequality, but he believes that the superior can cooperate with the inferior to gain equality. In fact, it the document he clarifies, “There remains…only one mode of using great fortunes…in this we have the true antidote for the temporary unequal distribution of wealth, the reconciliation of the rich and the poor−a reign of harmony” (Carnegie, 54). Carnegie does not particularly consider inequality a problem. He understands that in order for wealthy to facilitate the lives of the poor, there must be inequality to establish status, but he also discerns that by helping the poor they are given a chance to reach equality. In fact, Carnegie says, “Individualism will
One issue that we discussed in “Lifeboat Ethics” and in “A Modest Proposal” is whether or not the rich should help the poor and if the poor can contribute anything to society. Garrett Hardin and Jonathan Swift have different views on whether or not people should help the impecunious. Hardin, who has only been rich and never been poor, believes the starving don’t deserve help because it’s their fault that they are poor and that they are a waste rather than view them as assets. Swift, who has been rich and poor, believes that the poor can be salvageable and that the poor have a better chance at improving themselves.
The author juxtaposes the rich and poor with those in between in order to convince the audience, the middle class, that they should follow in the footsteps of both those richer and poorer than them in order to cease their materialistic attitudes. Near the end of the essay, Eighner states, “I think this is an attitude I share with the very wealthy—we both know there is plenty more where what we have came from. Between us are the rat-race millions who have confounded their selves with the objects they grasp and who nightly scavenge the cable channels looking for they know not what.” The author is stating that the wealthy and the homeless are both aware that there are things more important in life than tangible objects. Everyone else, however, has not made this connection yet and still searches, meaninglessly, for something of value. The middle class is often known to aspire to...
Scott Fitzgerald respectively) and applying both the Marxist and Psychoanalytic critical theories, it’s clear to see that the race to get to the highest crest of the metaphorical food chain affects the people on the top, on the bottom, and everyone in between, which causes a divide in society and consequently forces people to adopt the mindset of “get rich or die trying,” or else their lives will amount to nothing.
In the “Gospel of wealth”, Andrew Carnegie argues that it is the duty of the wealthy entrepreneur who has amassed a great fortune during their lifetime, to give back to those less fortunate. Greed and selfishness may force some readers to see these arguments as preposterous; however, greed is a key ingredient in successful competition. It forces competitors to perform at a higher level than their peers in hopes of obtaining more money and individual wealth. A capitalist society that allows this wealth to accumulate in the hands of the few might be beneficial to the human race because it could promote competition between companies; it might ensure health care for everyone no matter their social standing, and parks and recreation could be built for the enjoyment of society.
In Carnegie’s later life, I believe he had realized his selfishness with his wealth and felt the need to give it away. In the excerpt, I feel he was assessing his own situation of wealth and was trying to encourage the rest of mankind to not live the type of life he had experienced. He stated, “it is a nobler ideal that man should labor, not for himself alone, but in and for a brotherhood of his fellows, and share with them all in common…” I sense that the reason he made this statement was to encourage mankind to give away their wealth and not hold it for their own possession. Carnegie felt that society should work together instead of individually.
He uses this simile to point out that Takers don't naturally form a community and look for how to take care of each other. In a society centered around capitalism, it is more natural to think of everyone as individuals and work for what's best for themselves and their own situations. As I had mentioned previously, the economy has made it so there is always constant competition creating a situation where if some people are greatly successful profit-wise, others will be struggling with making ends
The article “Living on a Lifeboat” by Garrett Hardin entails the ecologist’s dramatic feelings on immigration. According to Hardin, people are disregarding the future of the United States by expecting all the rights and none of the responsibilities that are associated with an increasing population.
Ethical dilemmas create a challenge between two or more equally alternative problems requiring moral judgment. This creates both an obligation and dilemma for those involved. Living in such a globalized world with cross-cultural borders, races, and ideas; negotiating what is considered morally “right” can sometimes be very difficult. Both religion and laws have a major impact in ethical duties. What an individual may presume as right cannot be guaranteed by the government or political party. The Overcrowded Lifeboat is just one example in which all the ideas above come to play in ethical decisions.
He shows us that every privilege, and attitude that the middle class have, is a direct result, of the exploitation of the working class; and their deplorable
The human voyage into life is basically feeble, vulnerable, uncontrollable. Since the crew on a dangerous sea without hope are depicted as "the babes of the sea", it can be inferred that we are likely to be ignorant strangers in the universe. In addition to the danger we face, we have to also overcome the new challenges of the waves in the daily life. These waves are "most wrongfully and barbarously abrupt and tall", requiring "a new leap, and a leap." Therefore, the incessant troubles arising from human conditions often bring about unpredictable crises as "shipwrecks are apropos of nothing." The tiny "open boat", which characters desperately cling to, signifies the weak, helpless, and vulnerable conditions of human life since it is deprived of other protection due to the shipwreck. The "open boat" also accentuates the "open suggestion of hopelessness" amid the wild waves of life. The crew of the boat perceive their precarious fate as "preposterous" and "absurd" so much so that they can feel the "tragic" aspect and "coldness of the water." At this point, the question of why they are forced to be "dragged away" and to "nibble the sacred cheese of life" raises a meaningful issue over life itself. This pessimistic view of life reflects the helpless human condition as well as the limitation of human life.
In spite of the privileged getting anything money can buy, an underprivileged person gets the important things money cant buy. Many people have heard the expression “if you give a man a fish you can feed them a day, if you teach a man to fish you can feed them a lifetime.” Well I believe privileged people are given fish and the underprivileged taught to fish.
Money is an essential part of life where every people can satisfy whatever they need and every person in America has a chance to find a job. However, some of the people in the country wanted to go on with their life freely by being a part of a welfare. Furthermore, distribution of wealth is a huge demand of every citizen. Everyone today is trying to look down for every people in the lower class, as they did not give any benefit to the country, waiting for the benefits that they will receive from the government. For instance, when most lower class people have gone through a financial crisis due to overspending, insufficient fund or pay for their work to support themselves and/or their family. The example shows that lower class people made the economy of the country unstable, however, the middle class and the higher class is at fault as well. Furthermore, even though the benefit of that the lower class received is from the middle class, the middle class as well benefits from the higher class. To sum up, every class is at fault towards giving the country’s economy a positive