Liberty Of Self-Government In Colonial America

777 Words2 Pages

John Winthrop, a passenger of the Arbella, and the ten other ships carrying over a thousand Puritans to Massachusetts, in 1630, left England with a great vision in mind. Puritans believed in Predestination. A doctrine in Christian theology, which states God is all-knowing and powerful; thus, the fate of each individual soul is known to God at birth. Winthrop and many Puritans colonized and planned to become “a city upon a hill,” to model Christian charity in the New England Colonies, in colonial America; the land of opportunity, liberty, and ordeal. However, the determination of the extent of opportunity, liberty, and ordeal depended, mainly, on the social status of the person. Puritans and colonist who emigrated from England to the New England …show more content…

Liberty of self-government was one of the biggest and most important liberties that the Puritans and colonist gained. Self-government allowed people to vote and elect their leaders and have a say on laws. The foundation of government authority based off the people’s free consent. The reason why self-government was a privilege was because the people could choose the leaders they felt were trustworthy. Colonial America really was a land of liberty, however, there was an extent to certain liberties, especially religious liberty. There was a separation between non-religious and religious people. Non-religious people were “ungodly citizens” who caused chaos and disorder. Thus, the Dorchester Bylaws were set to have more control and order in towns. As a consequence, non-religious people faced discrimination and accusations for anything bad that occurred. Overall liberty granted self-government to all the colonist, however not everyone received religious liberty unless they worshipped the same religion as the Puritans. In fact, for non-religious people, not having religious liberty was one of the many ordeals they faced, just like other colonist and Puritans faced their

Open Document