Liberalism Theory In International Relations

1092 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Conclusion of liberalism in international relations

During cold war period, realistic scholarship has been dominating the stage in international policy making, which providing the guide and reason for American politician to start a military race with the Soviet Union. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union led the world into a new global stage of corporation in international relationship, so the liberalism theory that demonstrates corporation may seem more a appropriate theory in guiding policy making than realism theory. However, the essential in international relationship between states remains unchanged because the fundamental of human nature is the same. Hence, realism theory should be still considered the most important factor to formulate foreign policy in contemporary international …show more content…

Liberalism emphasizes democracy on making international corporation available. The democratic peace theory also highlights democratic states are less likely to have war with each others. Secondly, non state actors, such as red cross and human right watch, have the same important role in the international stage than government-state actor. Finally, international organizations and global civil can nonetheless generate spaces for cooperation and create the conditions for meaningful joint action.(Ikenberry) Liberalism and realism focus on different sides of human nature(Neusiedi). Realism bases on the assumption of human nature is evil. For example, human is selfish and greedy, and these emphasizes it is nature for human to seek power for domination. Therefore, the reason states have conflict with each other is not just because of lack of communication, but it is more based on states naturally trying to seek power and domination position. On the other sides, liberalism bases on the assumption of human nature is good such that human is able to help and trust each …show more content…

Realism explain military and security issue enough but underestimate the influence of global connection to peace and stable; It also ignore the influence of non-state actors. Liberalism, on the other hands, focus on the global corporation on economic and culture, but it is still not sufficient to explain the problems of terrorism, ethical conflict, sexism, and international conflict. Indeed, each international theory only focus on one perspective so there are won 't be one international theory that can use to explain all international phenomenons. In other words, there will not be a single theory able to provide the best compass for formulating foreign policy in every

Show More
Related

  • Moral Idealism In Foreign Policy

    1758 Words  | 4 Pages

    Foreign policy is a very common topic today. Foreign policy is the strategy or process when dealing with other nations. There are two different types of foreign policy used, which are Moral Idealism and Political Realism. They both have their own way of running external things from their country, the best one being Moral Idealism. Moral Idealism takes into consideration the Moral of the citizens of the country or countries that are affected by the policy, another way to put it is “The greatest goods for the greatest numbers.”

    Read More

  • Understanding International Relations

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    To understand the international relations of contemporary society and how and why historically states has acted in such a way in regarding international relations, the scholars developed numerous theories. Among these numerous theories, the two theories that are considered as mainstream are liberalism and realism because the most actors in stage of international relations are favouring either theories as a framework and these theories explains why the most actors are taking such actions regarding foreign politics. The realism was theorized in earlier writings by numerous historical figures, however it didn't become main approach to understand international relations until it replaced idealist approach following the Great Debate and the outbreak of Second World War. Not all realists agrees on the issues and ways to interpret international relations and realism is divided into several types. As realism became the dominant theory, idealistic approach to understand international relations quickly sparked out with failure of the League of Nation, however idealism helped draw another theory to understand international relations. The liberalism is the historical alternative to the realism and like realism, liberalism has numerous branches of thoughts such as neo-liberalism and institutional liberalism. This essay will compare and contrast the two major international relations theories known as realism and liberalism and its branches of thoughts and argue in favour for one of the two theories.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Leadership And Foreign Policy

    2218 Words  | 5 Pages

    From all that has been mentioned above, one has to conclude that personality does have an effect on a countries foreign policy. A leader will have an impact on how his or her country relates with other nations. Liberals and realists also have different views when it comes to foreign policy. However both views agree that peace has to establish though they may not agree on the means. Today, most of the conflict in the world is as a result of leaders failing to agree on certain decisions for example whether intervention is justified. There is no doubt half of the problems would be solved if there was only one ideology followed by all statesmen. However this cannot happen and therefore conflict is and will continue to be inevitable.

    Read More

  • Realism Theory Of Polarism

    1068 Words  | 3 Pages

    The theory of Realism key actor is the state. The view of the state in Realism is power seeking and to make judgments based on the significant of national interests. Each state acts in a unitary way to increase its power by war, balance of powers, or through economy. The International System believes in anarchy. The distribution of power among states can be judged by its economy and military capabilities. However, the Realist theory does take in consideration that change can occur in the International System.

    Read More

  • Neo-Realism and Liberalism: Comparing These Two Different Frameworks Used in International Relations

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order for countries to cohesively overcome international barriers, frameworks of ideal political standards must be established. Two of these frameworks constantly discussed in international relations are the theories of Neo-realism and Liberalism; two theories with their own outlook at the way politicians should govern their country as well as how they should deal with others. Neo-realism lies on the structural level, emphasizing on anarchy and the balance of power as a dominant factor in order to maintain hierarchy in international affairs. In contrast, Liberalism's beliefs are more permissive, focusing on the establishments of international organizations, democracy, and trade as links to strengthen the chain of peace amongst countries. Liberalism provides a theory that predominantly explains how states can collaborate in order to promote global peace; however, as wars have been analyzed, for example World War II, the causes of them are better explained by Neo-realist beliefs on the balance of power and states acting as unitary actors. Thus, looking out for their own self interest and security.

    Read More

  • The Strengths Of Classical Realism In International Relations

    1600 Words  | 4 Pages

    Classical realism originates from the ancient times of the Greek empires. This theory in international relations has dominated the sphere and the conception of world politics for centuries. Classical realists such as Morgenthau and Thucydides outline different factors in explaining politics at all levels and emphasize that politics is described throughout the theory of classical realism. Like every theory in international relations, classical realism has strengths and weaknesses that define its impact in the international level. In our current age of diplomacy, classical realism is not a common theory in current international politics. Although it is not as relevant as it has been in the past, there is potential for classical

    Read More

  • Structural Realism after the Cold War

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    The prominent scholar of Political Science, Kenneth N. Waltz, founder of neorealism, has proposed controversial realist theories in his work. Publications such as "Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis", "Theory of International Politics” and “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate,” demonstrate how Waltz's approach was motivated by the American military power. In acquaintance of this fact, the purpose of this paper is to critically analyze Waltz theoretical argument from the journal "Structural Realism after the Cold War". Firstly, this paper will indicate the author's thesis and the arguments supporting it. Secondly, limitations found in theoretical arguments will be illustrated and thirdly, synergies between the author's thesis and this analysis will be exposed.

    Read More

  • Political Realism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    People’s ideas and assumptions about world politics shape and construct the theories that help explain world conflicts and events. These assumptions can be classified into various known theoretical perspectives; the most dominant is political realism. Political realism is the most common theoretical approach when it is in means of foreign policy and international issues. It is known as “realpolitik” and emphasis that the most important actor in global politics is the state, which pursues self-interests, security, and growing power (Ray and Kaarbo 3). Realists generally suggest that interstate cooperation is severely limited by each state’s need to guarantee its own security in a global condition of anarchy. Political realist view international politics as a struggle for power dominated by organized violence, “All history shows that nations active in international politics are continuously preparing for, actively involved in, or recovering from organized violence in the form of war” (Kegley 94). The downside of the political realist perspective is that their emphasis on power and self-interest is their skepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations among states.

    Read More

  • International Relations: Liberalism and Realism

    2270 Words  | 5 Pages

    To define any perspective in International Relations, one must understand its’ origin and primary authors, including the context in which they were writing in. Liberalism is one of the more loosely defined perspectives as it has had a number of authors throughout history. Primarily, liberalism relies on the positive aspects of human nature. One of the most prominent liberal authors was Kant- who often wrote of the anarchical nature of international relations- referring to it as “the lawless state of savagery.” He also wrote of three primary routes to obtaining peace within this system, namely treating all aspects of human life with humanity, allowing for a federation of states and most importantly republican constitutionalism.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Brexit

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    Regarding Brexit, realism and liberalism have different viewpoints. Particularly, since realism claims that a state’s ultimate goal is power, realism suggests that

    Read More

  • The Realist Approach to International Relations

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    Realism is one of the important perspectives on global politics, it is a notion about the conservative society and political philosophy (Heywood 2011: 54; Shimko 2013: 36). Besides, Gilpin (1996) claims that “realism…, it is not a scientific theory that is subject to the test of falsifiability, therefore, cannot be proved and disproved.” (Frankel 1996: xiii). The components of the realist approach to international relations will be discussed.

    Read More

  • The Democratic Peace Theory

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    The democratic peace theory stems from the generally optimistic liberal tradition which advocates that something can be done rectify the effects of an anarchical system, especially when it comes to war or conflict. For democratic peace theorists, the international system should be one in which there is cooperation and mutual benefits of the states are taken into consideration. The theory depends on liberal ideologies of civil liberties, democratic institutions and fairly elected governments and claims that liberal democracies are different from other systems of government as they do not conflict with other democracies due to the very nature of the liberal thinking and the pacifying role that democracy itself plays. According to the theory, the thought process behind democracies abstaining from war is that...

    Read More

  • The Impact of Liberalism on International Relations

    2018 Words  | 5 Pages

    To start, Liberalism traces its roots back to the Enlightenment period (Mingst, 2008) where many philosophers and thinkers of the time began to question the established status quo. Such as the prevailing belief in religious superstition and began to replace it with a more rational mode of thinking and a belief in the intrinsic goodness of mankind. The Enlightenment period influenced Liberalism’s belief that human beings are thinkers who are able to naturally understand the laws governing human social conduct and by understanding these laws, humans can better their condition and live in harmony with others (Mingst, 2008). Two of the most prominent Liberal Internationalists of the Enlightenment period were Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham who both thought that international relations were conducted in a brutal fashion. It was Kant who compared international relations as “the lawless state of savagery” (Baylis and Smith, 2001, pp 165). It was also Kant who believed nations could form themselves into a sort of united states and overcome international anarchy through this (Mingst, 2008). This was probably the beginning of a coherent belief in a sort of union of sovereign states. Toward the end of the seventeenth century William Penn believed a ‘diet’ (parliament) could be set up in Europe, like the European Union of today (Baylis and Smith, 2001). We can see much of this liberal thinking today in organizations such as the United Nations.

    Read More

  • Liberalism In International Relations Essay

    1846 Words  | 4 Pages

    Liberalism assumes that the war and can be policed by the institutional reforms that empower the international organizations and law.

    Read More

  • Essay On Liberalism

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have

    Read More

More about Liberalism Theory In International Relations

Open Document