Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role Trotsky played in the Bolsheviks' victory during the Civil War
Consolidation of bolshevik power
Consolidation of bolshevik power
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leon Trotsky, to a large extent, made a meaningful impact in the early stages of his life, through to the Bolshevik consolidation period. However, after Stalin’s rise to power, Trotsky’s failed to continue to have a meaningful impact on his time. Trotsky was instrumental with the engagement and spread of socialist ideas prior to and in 1917 which had the most meaningful impact on his time due to the establishment of the first socialist state in the world. During the Bolshevik consolidation period, Trotsky continued to have a meaningful impact on his time as Commissar of Foreign affairs and Commissar of War, as it sustained the first socialist revolution. Although, upon his exile, despite continuing revolutionary activities Trotsky did not …show more content…
Trotsky impact on his time after the revolution began when he was instated as Commissar of Foreign affairs in the Bolshevik party. It was his duty to implement the peace decree, essential for the Bolshevik’s to consolidate their power. However, Trotsky had adopted the policy, ‘no peace no war’, in relation to the peace negotiations with Germany. This led to more punitive conditions after his initial refusal to sign the decree. This had a significant impact for Russia at the time as it saw the loss of large amounts of territory including Latvia, Estonia and the Ukraine. The Bolsheviks faced resistance to the conditions of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk due to Trotsky’s actions, which had a meaningful, although negative, impact on the times as it led to the outbreak of the Civil war. However, Trotsky continued to have a meaningful impact on his time during the civil war as he was appointed. This had an impact as he transformed the Red Militia into an effective army re-appointing Tsarist officers to provide training and organisation, re-introducing conscription, salutes and ranks within the army. Trotsky had transformed the militia of 300 000 in 1918 into an effective army of 5 million in 1920. This army was used to swiftly combat the revolt at Kronstadt naval base, ending the civil war. This suggests Trotsky’s leadership allowed for Bolshevik victory which eliminated internal oppositions allowing the consolidation of Bolshevik power. This had a very meaningful impact on the time as it allowed for the continuation of the first socialist state in the world. Therefore, Trotsky’s contribution as commissar of foreign affairs, and commissar of war to a large extent made a meaningful impact on his
As relations changed between Russia and the rest of the world, so did the main historical schools of thought. Following Stalins death, hostilities between the capitalist powers and the USSR, along with an increased awareness of the atrocities that were previously hidden and ignored, led to a split in the opinions of Soviet and Western Liberal historians. In Russia, he was seen, as Trotsky had always maintained, as a betrayer of the revolution, therefore as much distance as possible was placed between himself and Lenin in the schoolbooks of the 50s and early 60s in the USSR. These historians point to Stalin’s killing of fellow communists as a marked difference between himself and his predecessor. Trotsky himself remarked that ‘The present purge draws between Bolshevism and Stalinism… a whole river of blood’[1].
Trotsky's Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up to 1922 1.a) Trotsky’s contribution to the success of the Bolsheviks up to 1922 was mainly through the military; Trotsky was a close friend of Lenin which helped Trotsky get the place at the head of the Military Revolution committee of the Petrograd soviet. Under Trotsky’s leadership, the military revolutionary committee was actually planning to seize power of the government in 1917. Trotsky was placed in a very powerful position in the Military and he desperately wanted to take power of the government. Trotsky then helped the Bolsheviks take power, and then an anti-communist group known as the whites had formed an army to fight against Trotsky.
The accumulation of these factors centred on Lenin's leadership helped stamp Bolshevik power across the Soviet Union. Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology, which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government.
There are many people who have lived through and within the Bolshevik Revolution, so there are a multitudinous variety of perspectives, thoughts, and insights about the revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution is known for many things; some say that the revolution helped women become free of control, and others proclaim that it did nothing but continue to hold women captive of their desired rights. The Bolshevik Revolution article states the side of a history professor Richard Stites, who argues yes the revolution benefited the women whilst the other side is declared no the revolution did no justice for women at all, which was argued by a Russian scholar, Lesly A. Rimmel. The opposing arguments both create an effective view on the revolution, and
The outbreak of revolution in Russia lured Trotsky back into action, but he was soon arrested. While in jail, Trotsky joined the Bolsheviks (“Leon Trotsky”). After his release, Trotsky allied with Vladimir Lenin as he gained control of the Russian government. Trotsky was made commissar of war and was charged with the formation of the Red Army to defend communism (“Leon Trotsky”). Although the Red Army proved successful in its endeavor, its Red Terror campaign caused “thousands of people, many of whom were only suspected of being anti-communist, [to be] slaughtered in unthinkably cruel ways” (Asnes, Tania. Kissel, Adam ed). Soon after, Lenin's death left Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky to battle to be Russia's leader. Although Trotsky had the skills and the intellect that should have made him the clear choice, jealousy among his colleagues prompted them to side with Stalin (“Leon Trotsky”). Soon after Stalin gained power, he exiled Trotsky. His role in Russian history had come to an abrupt
a sort of victim of his own success with the Red Army. In spite of the
In 1902, Lenin wrote a pamphlet entitled What is to be Done? In it he
To decide on Lenin’s importance, regarding Bolsheviks success in the November Revolution of 1917 we need to identify the factors that we can take into account. These include: Lenin’s April Thesis, His effective use of “Peace, Land, Bread” and his ability to convince the Bolshevik central committee for an immediate revolution. However over the course of the essay we will see that it’s not just Lenin’s leadership that was the reason for Bolshevik success, we also have the mistakes of the Provisional Government and its overall weakness.
...ove Russian people's lives by giving them the vision through his “April Thesis” stating his ideas on taking over the intermediate government. He provided the leadership that was necessary during the revolution he knew that democratic centralism was necessary, which would be leading the revolution for the people. In 1917 the followers of Lenin called the Bolsheviks took control of the government ending the war with Germany. Later in 1920 after the civil war broke out between the White army and the Red Army, The Red army wins and Lenin seizes the opportunity and implemented his New Economic Policy. Lenin believing that a socialist revolution would be successful if there were multiple revolutions happening together all at once in Europe. Later after Karl Marx died his work was brought back by a man named Joseph Stalin. Stalin incorporated both Lenin and Marx's ideals by
This success was really a collective result of all of Trotsky’s successes and contributions to the Bolshevik party, and emphasises the enormity of his importance to their success. As a conclusion, it is apparent that Trotsky made an enormous and critical contribution to the successes of the Bolsheviks. In particular was the way in which he devoted himself so well to supporting and organising the Red Army. By doing so, Trotsky was able to defeat the huge number of opponents, who challenged the Bolsheviks in the coming years to 1922.
Trotsky himself, is arguably the most influential factor in determining the result of the power struggle between with Stalin. Despite having had great potential, Trotsky failed to utilise his assets and as a result was soon out of the race to succeed Lenin. In 1924, it was seen that Trotsky would almost certainly be the next leader of the Bolshevik Party however this prophecy wasn’t fulfilled for a number of reasons; Trotsky’s personality, his nativity to the workings of the political world, and the accumulation of past mistakes which could be used against him– all of which were under his control. However other external influences also played a role in Trotsky’s fall from prominence within the Bolshevik Party after Lenin’s death to 1928, the most significant of these being Stalin’s power of manipulation. Trotsky’s failure in the period after 1924 is predominantly a result of his own mistakes, Trotsky was widely considered to have been a “naïve idealist who refused to play the political game” thus allowing him to adopt the title as “the architect of his own downfall”.
After the death of Lenin, his chief lieutenant Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin fought for control of the country. Stalin was able to win out over Trotsky and gain control of the Russian government. He felt that Lenin and Trotsky’s socialistic ideas were flawed in that they were to wait for other countries to revolt and become socialistic as well. Staling believed that a single country could make socialism .
Stalin was determined to go ahead with this radicalism through economic and social change. His totalitarian leadership however was far from perfect, it was in fact a political system that was defectively flawed. The main issue was the lack of control the administration and party h...
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.
time up to 1917 he was not even in Russia, he did what he could and