Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legalization of drugs
Topic legalization of drugs
Legalization of drugs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legalization of drugs
The topic of the legalization of illicit drugs is very controversial, inciting moral and conservative beliefs. Directly or indirectly, all Canadians have been affected by drugs, whether it be from the personal abuse of illicit substances, or merely the economic burden drugs have on society. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent through Canada's attempts to eradicate drugs, but the efforts fail, inducing social disturbance and political chaos. The Canadian government is wasting money and resources on drug prohibition. Canadians who do not use recreational drugs will not use them because of the health risks; people who do use drugs would continue to use them regardless if they are illegal. Unregulated drug use can promote violence and unsafe …show more content…
There were 28310 drug-related offences in Canada in 2016 (Canada: Rate of drug related offences, 2016). Prison overcrowding is a serious problem in Canada, mostly due to the number of drug offenders. This causes economic loss as this causes prisoners to be transferred between facilities. In 2010 to 2011, it cost $1.5 million to move 529 inmates. (Postmedia News, 2015). The government proceeds to build more prisons, using taxpayers' dollars, but the continuous surge of prisoners keeps exceeding the holding capacity (Postmedia News, 2015). Furthermore, studies show that the prison environment has become increasingly violent and inhumane due to the extensive number of inmates (Paperny, 2017). Legalizing drugs would appease the burden on the prison system, since drug offenders would no longer be incarcerated. The remaining prisoners would be left in a less cruel and a more reformative environment. To conclude, the legalization of drugs would aid the Canadian government in managing the prison …show more content…
This is exemplified by Portugal's success after legalizing drugs. In 2001, Portugal decriminalized small possession and use of all drugs. This change led to a decrease in drug use, drug overdoses and drug-related deaths, and criminal penalties dropped by sixty per cent (Sienkiewicz, 2017). Prohibition may diminish the market for drugs, but an underground market emerges in which production and use continue. Underground markets, also known as "black markets", increase violence because participants cannot resolve disputes in the court of law, thus they turn to violence instead. Black markets also obstruct quality control, which causes more accidental poisonings and overdoses (Drugs, n.d). Due to prohibition raising drug prices, users have more of a reason to inject because this offers a greater "worth". Plus, prohibition generates restrictions on the sale of clean needles, as a result, any drug users therefore share contaminated needles, which can transmit many blood-borne diseases (Drugs, n.d). In conclusion, legalizing drugs would promote the health and safety of drug users. If users are aware of potential drug hazards and precautions, they can measure their dosages to obtain the desired effect
Concerned authorities have focused essentially on criminalization and punishment, to find remedies to the ever-increasing prevalent drug problem. In the name of drug reducing policies, authorities endorse more corrective and expensive drug control methods and officials approve stricter new drug war policies, violating numerous human rights. Regardless of or perhaps because of these efforts, UN agencies estimate the annual revenue generated by the illegal drug industry at $US400 billion, or the equivalent of roughly eight per cent of total international trade (Riley 1998). This trade has increased organized/unorganized crime, corrupted authorities and police officials, raised violence, disrupted economic markets, increased risk of diseases an...
A “drug-free society” has never existed, and probably will never exist, regardless of the many drug laws in place. Over the past 100 years, the government has made numerous efforts to control access to certain drugs that are too dangerous or too likely to produce dependence. Many refer to the development of drug laws as a “war on drugs,” because of the vast growth of expenditures and wide range of drugs now controlled. The concept of a “war on drugs” reflects the perspective that some drugs are evil and war must be conducted against the substances
A big step in lowering incarceration rates is federally regulating marijuana. About 64% of inmates convicted of drug offenses have no history of violent crimes. These inmates need rehabilitation not incarceration. Possession of marijuana should be treated more like a traffic violation rather than a reason to send people to jail. The government would still collect their money and in turn not have to pay the costs of housing a prisoner.
Should marijuana be sold at corner stores to anyone? Recently, some of Canada¡'s politicians have claimed to introduce the legislation of legalizing marijuana. According to the policy, the possession of marijuana will not be considered as a criminal sanction. Indeed, marijuana will become a legal substance. People who are over 16 can buy it over the counter just as alcohol or tobacco. Although legalizing marijuana may be beneficial to those people with medical purposes, it will create more problems and dangers to the society. The problems that associated with legalizing marijuana are causing negative impacts on public health and increasing marijuana consumption among youths. Also, the misuse of marijuana may cause people to drive under the influence of the drug, and hence, more accidents may occur, causing more expenses on public health care. Clearly, the downsides of legalizing marijuana outweigh its benefits.
charges could lead to more time in jail and more cost to the government.This makesthe prison system less efficient than it already is. There are organizations that think that the legalization of marijuana would help both the economy and th...
Marijuana has long been the subject of many heated debates and political platforms. With lack of un-biased materials on marijuana, it quickly became victim to publications and political propaganda in the early 1900s. Richard Isralowits writes, “Publications from the period had such titles as Marijuana-Sex Crazy Drug Menace, Marijuana-The Weed of Madness, and Marijuana: Assassin of Youth”(Use of Marijuana,105). Surely in this modern age and heightened public awareness our marijuana laws, drafted in a time of extreme bias, have got to be obsolete. Although many people still have strong opinions against the legalisation of marijuana, after review of current un-biased studies and reports they will find that this is not the case. Marijuana should be legalised in Canada because of the cost, the justice system, and the health concerns.
Bruce K. Alexander’s essay “reframing Canada’s drug problem is about how the focus needs to be shifting from intervention to prevention
“The root cause is a vast, multi-layered incommensurability between the institutions of globalized, market driven society and the basic psychological, social and spiritual needs of human beings” (229). Something that is only briefly recognised in public discussion. The normal methods of intervention are enormously expensive with minimal effects. “Illegal drug business and legal pharmaceutical industries” (229) are financially benefiting from the damaging drugs people use. During a time that is almost complete “domination of Canadian thought by the logic of globalization, it is difficult” (229) to even to come up with a good way of improving dislocation. Dodging these tough realities has created a deadlock and caused us to infinitely endure feeble interventions and ridiculous “war on drugs”
The war on drugs and the violence that comes with it has always brought around a hot debate about drug legalization. The amount of violence that is associated with drugs is a result from harsher drug laws and prohibition.
Drug violators are a major cause of extreme overcrowding in US prisons. In 1992, 59,000 inmates were added to make a record setting 833,600 inmates nationwide (Rosenthal 1996). A high percentage of these prisoners were serving time because of drug related incidents.... ... middle of paper ... ...
The arguments that I have just laid out are not perfect and they have some apparent flaws that some philosophers would strongly disagree with, while there are other arguments that some of the great philosophers would agree with. I will critique the arguments that I have just laid out using the perspective of three different philosophers who all have their own ideas of how the state should function and the role of the citizen. The three philosophers that I will use in this critique will be Karl Marx, John Stewart Mill, and John Locke. The reason why I picked these three philosophers is because they all agree with some aspects of my writing, while disagreeing with others. One will disagree with the role of the state and the citizens, but agree with legalizing recreational drug use, while the other two will agree with the role of the state and citizens, but disagree with legalizing drug use.
Recreational drug use has been controversial for years. Government has deemed the use of certain drugs to be dangerous, addictive, costly, and fatal. Governmental agencies have passed laws to make drugs illegal and then have focused a great deal of attention and money trying to prohibit the use of these drugs, and many people support these sanctions because they view the illegality of drugs to be the main protection against the destruction of our society (Trebach, n.d.). Restricting behavior doesn’t generally stop people from engaging in that behavior; prohibition tends to result in people finding more creative ways to obtain and use drugs. However, just knowing that trying to control people’s behavior by criminalizing drug use does not work still leaves us looking for a solution, so what other options exist? This paper will discuss the pros and cons about one option: decriminalizing drugs.
...llegalized for a long time without any evidence of success. The drug has become purer, more available, and cheap in the recent past. Demand and supply for marijuana has increased despite the harsh policies and the war on drugs. Legalizing marijuana will reduce the boom in the black market and reduce crime, corruption, and violence associated with drug cartels. Millions of dollars used for incarceration will be redirected to rehabilitation, which will reduce dependence, especially among younger users. Legalization will allow users of marijuana to buy from legal and safe sources. The war on drugs has been ineffective in reducing drug use despite spending a lot of money on incarcerations. Mass incarceration in the drug war has had negative effects on the society because most imprisoned individuals are non-violent offenders who pose no legitimate threat to the community.
It is evident that marijuana has an audience in Canada, as it is used so frequently even though it is prohibited. The views of many Canadians on marijuana seems to be a lax one, and legalization is again seen as a great idea for many citizens. As it is illegal, possession has had costly effects on citizens, and how others perceive them. “in Canada, 60 000 people are arrested each year for possession, affecting employment opportunities, social stigma, and the ability to travel across borders” (Leyton 75). Minor drug charges have led to serious problems for many Canadians, and the development of thought has switched to legalization as they problems would disappear.
Leading to an increase in drug experimentation by the youth and an increase in crack houses, where most laced drugs are produced. There is a reason why these drugs are illegal and it 's because of their harmful effects and the damage they cause the human body. Drug users, are often recognized as people who commit crimes, murder, rape, and other violence including burglary. With drug laws, it creates a fear in people of getting in trouble with the law and is a major reason to not use drugs. The legalization of drugs would not lower crimes rates as there would be more and more addicts as well as large black markets for drugs. Although these drug users commit crimes to obtain these drugs, it is obvious to see they would still be committing these crimes to obtain the drug even if it is legalized. Either way, a crime is still being committed they just have an easier way to steal the drug from someone. Which means the crime rates would start to rise, leading to the population of prisoners increasing, which also leads to the government spending more money on organizing jail facilities to hold these prisoners. One state in particular where marijuana is now legal, has started to come to the realization that maybe it wasn’t a good idea to leaglize this drug. Kevin A. Sabet, Ph.D., an assistant professor at the University of Florida and President of SAM points out that,