Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Communication skills
Leadership self evalution
Communication skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Communication skills
Self-Assessment 7-1 At my previous organization, I maintained a close and trustful relationship with my manager, and I was able to communicate more frequently with her. Sometimes, I was able to discuss with my manager about subjects that had no relationship to the work. My manager provided me with resources in order to grow on the job, and she motivated me with her past experiences. This implies that, I have in-group dyadic relationship with my manager. Manager’s behavior towards in-group & out-group: • Leaders develop close relationships with in-group members and assign considerable responsibility to perform tasks. Whereas, leaders develop distant or formal relations with out-group members. These low quality interactions and formal supervisions lead to dissatisfaction among the group. • Leaders provide in-group members with more opportunities to participate in decision-making process. In contrast, leaders exhibit low levels of interest in considering out-group members …show more content…
She encouraged me in working on new projects, which further enhanced my overall job satisfaction, commitment, and performance. It indicates that I have High quality LMX relationship with my manager. LMX relationships and consequences: High quality LMX relationships offer greater career advancement opportunities, enhances influence in decision-making and promote positive outcomes for the organization. Low quality LMX relationships are associated with less workplace participation, identification, and personal assessments. Followers can improve relationships with their managers through: • Meet individually with the leader to evaluate motives, attitudes, establish mutual role expectations. • Make a mutual commitment towards vision and objectives of the work unit. • Improve the level of trust by following on through commitments and achieving
Managers and leaders are essential in creating a work environment that is collaborative and productive. Although both managers and leaders can have similar traits, there are usually differences between the two. The purpose of this discussion is to examine the differences of manager and leader behaviors.
The first category,” the emotional bank account”, is a foundational habit, in which I scored sixteen. My results indicate that I am a relational leader and place great emphasis on the well-being of my team and coworkers. Through relationships I am able to gain insight and understanding into the needs of my team and peers. This insight enables me to guide, motivate, and support each individual in the achievement of organizational goals and objectives. I am a leader who manages relationships effectively so that goals may be achieved successfully.
Mullen, Brian, Cynthia Symons, Li-Tze Hu and Eduardo Salas. "Group Size, Leadership Behavior, and Subordinate Satisfaction." The Journal of General Psychology. v116 i2 p155, Apr. 1989.
Northouse, Peter G. Leaderhip Theory and Practice. Ed. Fifth Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 2010.
The role of leadership has become increasing valuable for organizations to be successful. According to Huber (2014), Leadership can best be defined as method utilized to ensure that an objective is completed. There are many different types of leaderships that can be found within each organization. In this paper I will highlight an example of a specific leadership style that we come across in healthcare settings. I will review my leadership self-assessment results and discuss the impact of leadership on staff and groups.
The authors, Nelson and Quick describe that relationship oriented leader’s do well in situations of intermediate favorableness by determining the “degree of fit between the leader and the situation” (Nelson & Quick, 2013). Relations...
Leader-member Relations: This element discussions the extent to which the followers have conviction, confidence, and faithfulness in their manager. (Business Jargons, n.d.)
Lord, R. (2000). Leadership. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, vol. 4. (pp. 499-505). Doi:10.1037/10519-216
The assignment for week four is to assess and review results from the Authentic Leadership Self Assessment Questionnaire. The ALQ was created to provide a means to assess the parameters of authentic leadership and to allow for opinion on the behaviors that encompass Authentic Leadership Style (Northouse, 2013). Basically, the questionnaire and the model allows and individual to understand how followers or people perceive leadership authenticity.
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
Gils, S. v., Quaquebeke, N. v., & Knippenberg, D. v. (2009). The X-Factor: On the Relevance of Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories for Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Agreement European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
Leaders will often separate in-group and out-group members based on similarities of the group member and the leader. Other characteristics that can play into it are age, gender, or even a member’s personality. A member can be granted in-group status if the leader thinks the member is competent and is going above and beyond to perform the job functions. As mentioned the two groups that members can fall into are in-group and out-group. In-group members are those that share similarities with the leader. Those similarities can be personality, work ethic, common interests, or even alma maters. In-group members often go above and beyond their job description and the leader does more for these members. In-group members will have their opinions and work ideas looked at in higher regard than out-group members. In-group members typically have higher job satisfaction within the group and are less likely to experience turnover. In-group members are often promoted within the organization f...
relationships fosters a positive reputation for the organization and creates trust and loyalty to the
Relationship management is your ability to use your awareness of your own emotions and those of others to manage interactions successfully.
Leadership is not always in the hands of members and it continually meet with dilemmas and difficulties.