Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Implications of the goal setting theory
Implications of the goal setting theory
Power of motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Implications of the goal setting theory
Did problems exist with Leadership, Power, Motivation, Communication or Perception?
• Leadership is the process of influencing and getting others to understand and agree about something that needs to be done and how to do it. It facilitates individual and collective efforts to accomplish shared goals. It sometimes involves driving through changes and new initiatives (like the proposal for ecommerce in the Case Study), therefore it has to be proactive, problem solving, looking ahead and not being satisfied with things as they are.
• It is possible to identify a range of approaches to leadership as follows depending on the use of authority by leaders and amount of freedom given to subordinates: -
i. An Authoritarian approach; involves a leader
…show more content…
Motivation can be considered to comprise an individual’s effort (how hard he tries), persistence (how long he keeps trying) and the direction (what he is trying to do) of that behaviour. Since it is part of a manager's job to get their work done through others, managers need to understand what motivates people do things so they can influence others to work towards the goals of the organisation.
• Goal-setting theory states that goals can be a major motivational source as when accepted, they can lead to higher performance levels. Goal theory (see Latham & Locke, 1964 and Locke, 1968) proposes that both motivation and performance will be high if individuals are set specific goals which are challenging, but accepted and where feedback is given on performance.
• Goal setting theory is generally accepted as amongst the most valid and useful motivation theories. Locke’s research showed that there was a relationship between how difficult and specific a goal was and people’s performance of a task. He found that specific and difficult goals led to better task performance than vague or easy goals. To motivate, goals must be clear (know what is expected), challenging (the goal
Most recent theories on motivation conclude that people will start certain behaviors under the belief that this behavior will accomplish desired goals or outcomes. With Lewin (1936) and Tolman (1932) leading the charge, the goal-oriented behavior led researchers to want to understand more on the psychological value people attribute to goals, people’s expectations on reaching these goals, and the structures which keep people striving to achieve these goals. After some recent findings on goal-oriented behavior, researchers were able to differentiate different types of goals, whereas before researchers assumed that goals that were valued the same, with the same expectations of achievement, would need the same amount
According to Business Dictionary.com, leadership is defined as the individuals who are the leaders in an organization, regarded collectively. It also can be define as the activity of leading a group of people or an organization or the ability to do this. Leadership involves the establishing of a clear vision, sharing the vision with other so that they will follow willingly, providing the needed information, knowledge, and methods to realize the vision and coordinating and balancing the conflicts interests of all members and stakeholders.
The theory of goal setting was developed by Edward Locke and Gary Latham (1990) and states that there is a direct relationship between the setting of specific high goals and task performance. A higher degree of employee performance is obtained when specific goals are set compared to the performance achieved when employees are simply told to do their best (Latham & Locke, 2007). These findings have helped shape leadership styles and improve employee performance and job satisfaction (Posthuma & Al-Riyami, 2012).
There are lots of definitions and interpretations for the term LEADERSHIP. One is “A relationship through which one person influences the behaviour or actions of other people” (Mullins, L.J. 2002, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 6th Edition, FT Publishing, p904). Another popular definition would be, “the process of influencing an organization or groups within an organization in its efforts towards achieving a goal” (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2005, Exploring Corporate Strategy, 7th Edition, FT Prentice Hall, p.519)
Different leadership styles include: Situational Leadership, which is broken down into directing, coaching, supporting and delegating. Also, autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, strategic leadership, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, laissez-faire leadership, charismatic leadership,
There are many ways in which motivation can be defined. Generally speaking, motivation comprises an individual’s effort, persistence and the direction of that effort. In simple terms, it is the will to perform. (Brooks, I, 2006). Eugene Mckenna thinks that with motivation, people respond to conditions operating within and outside themselves, and go the extra mile at their role. To motivate people, elements such as needs, motives, drives and goals or incentives of individuals have to be looked at.(Mckenna, E, 2000).
Motivation is the reason or purpose behind action, or what causes one to act in a particular manner. Motivation can either be intrinsic or extrinsic in nature, yet it rests solely within the power of the individual actor to be motivated (or not) by intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. Motivation is an extremely important topic of discussion in the larger discourse on leadership. It is important because it provides the basis for human action, or inaction. Leaders must be able to understand what motivates their followers in a hope to use that knowledge to guide them to behave in a certain way that is beneficial for the organization. To do so, it behooves leaders to understand the basic concepts and theories of motivation that abound.
Locke, Edwin A., and Gary P. Latham. "New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory." Current Directions in Psychological Science 15.5 (2006): 265-68. Print.
Leadership is seen as a process by which one individual influences others toward the attainment of group or organizational goals. It is a social influence process, which involves voluntary action on the part of followers and it is always purposeful and goal-oriented. Leadership deals with influence and is not the same as management, which includes planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling.
What is leadership? Leadership is defined as a process by which a individual will influence others to obtain goals. Leaders will guide, direct motivate, or inspire others. Leadership is defined by not only traits but actions as well. Leaders are inspirational, trustworthy and charismatic. Many people may think a manger is leader. Although leadership and management go hand in hand, they are not the same. Everyone has their own beliefs about what characteristics an effective leader should have. To me, communication skills, critical thinking skills, and having a vision are few characteristics of becoming an effective leader. A leader is not only born, but made. Some are born as leaders or some are made to be leaders.
Goal setting is having an aimed objective to be accomplished in specified time. According to Principles of Management, goal setting theory is the power that practically motivates. For example, 1000 blue-collar workers were used in a study in order to show strong evidence about which arrangement best improved performance. Based on this study of goal setting, there was a result of 10% and 25% or more from much research evidence that smart goals are highly helpful and should be timely and realistic.
Many people believe that leadership is simply being the first, biggest or most powerful. Leadership in organizations has a different and more meaningful definition. A leader is someone who sets direction in an effort or task and influences or motivates people to follow that direction. The power point presentation explains leadership is the influence that particular individuals exert on the goal achievement of others in an organizational context.
According to Shockley and Zalabak (2009) "Leadership is a process of guiding individuals, groups, and entire organization in establishing goals and sustaining action to support goals.Leadership is like mapping out where you need to go to win". A Leader is a person who has a strong personality and who has an ability to manage people and work. He is also the person who is able to direct people .Usually a leaders has a lot of attributes that
Intrinsic Motivation is seen as a fundamental and an important element of achievement goal theory. Most theorists of achievement goal and intrinsic motivational theory argue that mastery goals are instrumental of intrinsic motivation and the related mental processes and performance goals create negative effects. Mastery goals promote intrinsic motivation by encouraging the perceptions of challenge, task involvement, generating excitement, and supporting self-determination while performance goals are the opposite. Performance goals are portrayed as undermining intrinsic motivation by instilling perceptions of threat, disrupting task involvement, and creating anxiety and pressure. This was referred to from the work by Elliot & Harackiewicz, done in
Goal setting produces number of benefits, whether it be in personal case or professional life. The basic underlying premise of goal setting explains the relation between goal establishment and our achievement. Apart from achievements, goal setting soothes the anxiety and pressure. Goal setting destigmatize the pressure upon us by demystifying the way out in the future. The habit of goal setting helps to anticipate the things and suggest for the pre-plan. A well-planned structure is obvious to be anxiety and pressure free; same is the case with goals setting. Earlier goal setting was taken just as a medium to anticipate things. People weren’t proactive towards goal setting; they had a concept but they were unware about using them for improve production. From the initial period of study of goal setting, people were more focused on private case. They lacked a proper strategy to set the goals and end up with wrong assumption which further led to disappointing results. The traditional trends seem that there is no room for failure and adjustments in goal setting. When you have zero knowledge on something, everything seems realistic and achievable. The earlier use of goal setting was bound by limited knowledge which intervened in all possible sector, however this could not bring a positive result