Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
William Shakespeare's Titus andronicus
What is the importance of character development in literature
William Shakespeare's Titus andronicus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: William Shakespeare's Titus andronicus
The two primary uses of language are written word and spoken dialogue. In William Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus, there are ample situations where each is very important. Throughout the play, Shakespeare gives the characters who have the ability to read a clear advantage over those who cannot. Aaron’s treachery is committed as a result of a letter that was superior to the begging of Titus. Titus manages to upset the power balance of Saturninus by simply shooting arrows with authoritative messages into the court in Rome. Lastly, the ravaged Lavinia manages to overcome her gruesome injuries to use written language to expose those truly responsible for her suffering. There are also moments in the life of William Shakespeare that tie into the behavior …show more content…
and choices of his characters. These moments in the play, and in Shakespeare’s own life, make it very clear that Shakespeare views literacy as imperative. In Titus Andronicus, the only true way to gain power is through written language. As the main villain in the play, Aaron easily controls the balance of power for the majority of the plot. It is his evil but clever decision to use the forged letter to set the action of the play into motion. After reading the letter, Saturninus falls into Aaron’s trap, and wholeheartedly believes that Quintus and Martius are responsible for the death of Bassianus. Shakespeare makes it incredibly obvious that the word of the letter is superior to the pleas of Titus. With the success of his plan, Aaron has control over every character firmly in his grasp. This power only leads him to commit worse atrocities, as he explains that “Vengeance is in [his] heart, death in [his] hand / Blood and revenge are hammering in [his] head” (II, iii, 38-39). Aaron is simply fueled by revenge, and feels no guilt or shame about doing all things necessary to avenge those who did him wrong. (Shakespeare 2005)Though the content of the letter is never revealed, it is implied that there is powerful evidence pointing to the guilt of Quintus and Martius. Saturninus serves as both the judge and jury, which Shakespeare uses as a parallel to the British crown. There was plenty of religious upheaval at this point in England, and that upheaval led to countless arrests and executions at the queen’s demand. This reckless nature ties the reckless actions of Saturninus to those of the queen in Shakespeare’s time. Until his undoing in Act V, Aaron’s forged letter and its effect on Saturninus gives him undisputable power. In Act IV, scene iii, Titus uses his own literary prowess in order to counteract the power of Saturninus. Titus and his entourage shoot arrows with messages for the Roman gods into Saturninus’ court, and that does not sit well with the emperor. The messages are sent in the pursuit of justice and “vengeance on the traitor Saturnine,” (IV, iii, 35) but this choice by Titus serves to shift the balance of power back to his corner. Titus is able to force Saturninus into a more defensive state, especially since the emperor can sense that there is growing frustration with his regime in Rome. Titus does not hide his feelings regarding Saturninus as an emperor, as the letter he has delivered to Saturninus gets the messenger executed. There is a comparison that can be drawn between Titus’ treatment at the hand of the government and Shakespeare’s pursuit of gentleman status. Shakespeare only managed to be granted a Coat of Arms much later in his writing career (Callaghan 2013, 73). The similarity stems from both men being required to make themselves known to the government with their writing. This impulsive action by Saturninus serves as another parallel to Shakespeare’s perception of government, and displays a clear shift of power from Saturninus to Titus. Aaron’s plot is finally unraveled in the end thanks to the character most afflicted by it: Lavinia.
After being silenced for the majority of the play, Lavinia finally regains the power she lost as a result of Chiron and Demetrius’ horrible crimes. The two men responsible for her maiming face swift justice, and Lavinia is essentially put out of her misery by her own father. Shakespeare makes it brutally apparent that written word is stronger than speech by stripping Lavinia of her ability to speak. Shakespeare creates this situation to offer redemption to both Titus and Lavinia, who both were greatly wronged throughout the play. Lavinia gains her power by finding the ability to write the names of Chiron and Demetrius, and maintains that power until she meets her demise. Titus himself feels a great sense of revenge, as he proclaims “For worse than Philomel you used my daughter, / And worse than Procne I will be revenged” (V, iii, 200-201). Shakespeare was very progressive in his decision to give Lavinia the ability to write in the play. His own daughter was incapable of writing, which is potentially a side effect of Shakespeare’s busy life (Callaghan 2013, 27). Ultimately, Lavinia’s power is short-lived, but marks one of the very few times in the play where justice is legitimately
served. Through the creation of his characters, William Shakespeare offers a very important commentary on the importance of written language. He uses the corruptive nature of Aaron’s letter to demonstrate how easily someone with power can be swayed by a display of writing ability. Titus is able to regain his dignity as he uses written messages intended for the gods to strike fear into Saturninus. Finally, Lavinia is able to share information on her tormenters with Titus as a result of being able to write. Shakespeare demonstrates very clearly that the ability to write brings power, and that power is what drives the story to its bloody ending.
In Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” Hamlet and Laertes act as dramatic foils, where their similarities are used to highlight their differences. Each character learns that his father has been murdered and each plots his revenge against the murderer. In the first act of the play, the ghost of Hamlet’s father tells him “Let not
Throughout the play, Laertes is as an extremely caring member of his family. His strong emotions for family have an opposing side to it, a shadow that has repressed feelings of anger which cause him to add to the disaster in Denmark. An example that depicts this is when Laertes attempts to request more rites for Ophelia’s funeral. After he is denied, he starts a commotion by calling the priest “churlish”, explaining that Ophelia will be “A ministering angel” while the priest will “liest howling”(5.1.217-218). His compliments to Ophelia shows how much he loved her, while his nasty insults to the priest show his repressed rage. While this is occuring, Hamlet hears Laertes’s mention of Ophelia during the commotion and throws himself into a brawl with Laertes. It is the conflict built up from there that causes Claudius to target Laertes as his next weapon to kill Hamlet with. Laertes’s deep anger for Hamlet makes himself the best candidate for Claudius’s manipulation. Once Laertes’s sides with Claudius, he shows his dark intent by requesting Claudius to not “o'errule me to a peace”(4.7.58). On the day of the duel, Laertes undergoes a confrontation of his shadow while he clashes with Hamlet. His realization of his shadow comes too late into the duel when both Hamlet and Laertes are struck by poison, as this happens he declares that he is “ justly killed with mine own treachery (5.2.337).” In the moments that he is still alive, he dismisses his shadow and ends the circle of murder by announcing the true nature of Claudius. Laertes’s repressed anger guides the play into the duel where many deaths occur including Hamlet’s.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a historic tragedy about the brutal murder of the Roman senator, Julius Caesar. Within the play, Caesar has two close friends—Brutus and Antony. Antony is a loyal friend, supporting Caesar and encouraging him in his climb to kingship; Brutus is a king-fearing traitor who leads the plot to murder Caesar. After Caesar is murdered, both friends make speeches—Brutus to justify his actions and Antony to passive-aggressively disprove his claims. In the speeches, they use three rhetorical literary devices: ethos, the appeal to gain the crowd’s trust; pathos, stirring the crowd’s emotions to influence behavior; and logos, the use of logic to reason with the crowd. By comparing the use of ethos, pathos, and logos in each speech and by
...e story. Indeed, if Hamlet acts quickly, there would be only one act of Hamlet. Laertes, upon hearing of his father’s demise wants swift and fervent justice. Although he is the more impassioned of the two, it is this incisiveness that leads to Laertes’ demise. He allows himself to be manipulated, enamored by the king’s rhetoric. Laertes, suddenly realizing the plot at hand, repents for his killing of Hamlet, true to his character even in the face of death. Hamlet seeks to blame his "madness" for the death of Polonius, and never admits fault for the fate of his schoolmates.
The power that Lavinia has is not like Tamora’s, which is traditionally masculine. Lavinia’s power is in her femininity. She is able to attract the attention of many men, including Demetrius and Chiron, Tamora’s sons. At one point, Chiron is begging Demetrius to let him have Lavinia saying that he will “plead my passions for Lavinia’s love” (2.1.36). It does not matter to these two men that Lavinia is married; she is still just as attractive to them. Lavinia has the power to attract these men to her by her femininity, but she is not able to ward off their attack because her power is limited to being feminine, not being strong and convincing, like
There is much injustice in the play Tartuffe. This injustice as well as the justice that triumphs often comes through the use of language for the purpose of establishing either law or love. Sometimes a character takes on this language by association with other characters, and other times in reaction to the use of this language by other characters. Regardless of the source, language is a common medium for the expression of justice or its opposite. This language is used by characters as a result of the conflict that a male feels as described by Lacan, which more often that not, results in the expression of injustice. The expression of injustice is language-based because the male, by being exposed to language, is thrust into a world of alienation, and has experienced injustice from his first experience with language.
Importance of Language in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet "What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all
William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet strikes many literary chords and themes. It primarily chronicles a quest for revenge, political intrigue and a slow descent into madness. Throughout the play, two men of different rank and intellect; Hamlet and Laertes are portrayed in this play as each other’s foils. Hamlet who has lost his father in the hands of his uncle and Laertes who has lost his father in the hands of Hamlet, seek out similar goals but in very distinct ways. Hamlet and Laertes both go through stages of their carving vengeance to finally fulfill their goals of killing their fathers’ murderers. The readers detect that Hamlet goes in the path of plotting and deceiving to kill Claudius whereas Laertes goes in a more haste and reckless path
Shakespeare's sources for the play are quite clear. He makes it no secret that the rape of Lavinia is analogous to the rape of Philomela in Ovid's Metamorphosis. In this tale, The daughter of the King of Athens, Procne, marries the King of Thrace, Tereus, and the two of them have a son, Itys. After a number of years, Procne desperately wishes to see her sister, Philomela, and sends Tereus back to Athens to bring her to Thrace. When Tereus sees Philomela, he becomes obsessed with her and carries her into the forest, rapes her and cuts out her tongue to prevent her from telling anyone. Upon returning to Thrace, he informs his wife that Philomela is dead. In the meantime, Philomela weaves her story into a cloth and sends it to Procne. Procne becomes so enraged by this knowledge that she and Philomela plot and kill Itys, cook his flesh and serve it to Tereus. He discovers their ploy and tries to kill them, but Philomela is changed into a nightingale, Procne a swallow and Tereus a hoopoe (Bullough, vi. 48-58).
Voltaire, a French Enlightenment writer and historian once said, “To hold a pen is to be at war.” This quote demonstrates how expressing words can have as big of an effect on its witnesses as war does. Although not through written words, Mark Antony, a character from the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, fights a battle through verbal words to gain the support of the plebeians of Rome. After his good friend and previous monarch of Rome, Julius Caesar, was assassinated, Antony is given a chance to eulogize at Caesar’s funeral. During this time, Antony persuades the people of Rome to revenge Caesar and revolt against the conspirators. Antony is able to sway the plebeians to his side by demonstrating ethos, logos, and pathos to gain the trust of the plebeians, give inarguable evidence to them, and inflict feelings such as guilt and anger in the mob.
Playwright, William Shakespeare, in the play Julius Caesar, utilizes many instances of rhetorical devices through the actions and speech of Caesar's right-hand man, Mark Antony. In the given excerpt, Antony demonstrates several of those rhetorical devices such as verbal irony, sarcasm, logos, ethos, and pathos which allows him to sway the plebeians. The central purpose of Mark Antony’s funeral speech is to persuade his audience into believing that Caesar had no ill intentions while manipulating the plebeians into starting a rebellion against their new enemies, Brutus and the conspirators.
The means in which Shakespeare develops the dialogue between his characters allows the reader to hear the words as if they are being spoken to them personally. This helps in understanding the personality of each character. Once a reader develops a feel for each character and who they are, the audience begins to foreshadow and analyze a theme for the story. Shakespeare uses imagery and repetition of events in his dialogue to make the story easy to understand. Overall, diction place an important role in every story whether it be describing a character, developing a plot, or understanding a theme.
Did you know Shakespeare wrote 37 plays? In his plays, poems, or anything else, Shakespeare used figurative language in many ways. In the play Romeo and Juliet, by Shakespeare, figurative language is used to reflect detailed imagery to the reader. Shakespeare, the greatest writer in the English language, created over 20,000 words we still use today. With these words, Shakespeare creates imagery in the mind of the reader. Through Shakespeare’s use of similes and personification throughout Romeo and Juliet he provides creative and masterful use of imagery for the reader.
Along with protecting his sister from the unlawful Hamlet, Laertes tries to protect the family’s reputation. He believes that Hamlet is to out manipulate his daughter and if he doesn’t put an end to it, entire family will be ruined. Other royals will begin to look down the family if the secrets and between Hamlet and Ophelia are ever
His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius. As described earlier, Hamlet is slow to act. Laertes, on the other hand, acts quickly and with precision, wasting no time in acquiring his target and formulating a plan. Robert Palfrey Utter, Jr., puts it best, Hamlet and Laertes both come to the same conclusion that murder must be carried out, but Hamlet reaches that conclusion only “after he has had a few minutes to think it over.” (140) Once Laertes finds out that the man who killed his father was Hamlet he is ready to charge in and kill him as soon as possible. He is only stopped by Claudius, who advises him on a more subtle approach. Straight off the bat it is clear how efficient Laertes is compared to Hamlet. Hamlet wastes a large amount of time scheming up complex ideas on how to get a confession out of Claudius and how to kill him. Laertes on the other hand wastes no time in getting a straight and to the point plan that he can execute immediately. After spending more than half the play watching Hamlet squirm around on the stage getting almost nothing accomplished, the audience would be acutely aware of the stark difference between Hamlet and Laertes even though they share the same motivations. Laertes has his speed but he shares in Hamlets lack of critical thinking when he gets hot headed. He is in such a blind rage that he doesn’t think on what he is agreeing to do with Claudius. Just like Hamlet, his brash actions cost those around him his life. In carrying out the plan, the King, the Queen, Hamlet, and he all die to the poison that was used in the duel. Hamlet was slow and reckless while Laertes was quick and reckless. Wilds sums up the relationship between Hamlet and Laertes perfectly, “Laertes and Hamlet have been foils to each other