Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mexico independence from spain research paper
Mexican independence essay
Mexican independence essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mexico independence from spain research paper
Kathy Szelag
History 241
Due Date: 12/17/15
Final Exam
There are many factors that may have contributed to the Independence of Mexico like creole-peninsular hostility, a growing creole self-consciousness, trade restrictions, the Enlightenment, the precedent of the American Revolution, and the revolutionary ideology of the French Revolution. A historian that was the first professor of Latin American studies in the United Kingdom and the founder of the Institute of Latin American Studies at University College London made an argument regarding this statement. His name was Robert Arthur Humphreys and his argument stated, "The French Revolution in its Napoleonic aspect was the occasion, if not the cause, of the emancipation of Spanish America”
…show more content…
(R. A. Humphreys, p. 382). He is correct because foreign invasion of France in Spain made it possible for the crown to fall apart along with its power over the colonies and instill imperial destruction. The Revolution accelerated the rise of republics and democracies while also becoming the focal point for the development of political ideologies. Citizens of Haiti took a look at these philosophies and overthrew French rule to become an independent Latin American country. In Colonial Latin America, 9th edition, it stated, "This conflict, marked by reprisals and brutality, provided the slaves with an opportunity for a general uprising. Their rebellion began on the rich plantations of the north and then spread across the colony. Within weeks many of the richest plantations were destroyed and hundreds of masters and overseers killed"(Burkholder & Johnson, p. 342). News of the Haitian rebellion spread through out the hemisphere. In fact, many slave owners in regions of Spanish and Portuguese America were afraid that their slaves would react the same way. Spain's involvements in Napoleon's French Revolution led Mexico to make a similar decision and rebel. Spain like Britain under took in the eighteenth century the task of imperial reorganization and reform.
This created new viceroyalties and captaincies-general and natural trade routes were opened up. Humphreys stated, "The natural trade routes of the indies were opened up, where once Cádiz and Seville had enjoyed a monopoly with in a monopoly and the fleets and galleons had divided between the commerce and treasure of Mexico and Peru, step by step the ports of America and the ports of Spain were opened, the age old restrictions on inter-colonial commerce were light ended, and the tariff's and duties hampering trade revised"(R. A. Humphreys, 383). The reasons that these innovations were made were for efficiency in administration and to rehabilitate the colonial trade. It was a strategic plan where in the end there was imperial defense, protection of the empire against foreign factors, and to eliminate competition. In places like Buenos Aires, the economic life was completely altered where the exports, shipping, and even population began to rapidly …show more content…
increase. Mexico grew dissatisfied with the Spanish rule because they began to levied taxes on Catholic Church holding to refill the revenue that was lost by Spain's involvement in the French Revolution. And in 1808 with Napoleon placed his brother Joseph on the throne many upper class creoles resented that. Mexican born creoles and Spanish born peninsular united to gain more control of the Mexican government. That is how the Mexican Independence was categorized into two movements and two different stages. The first involved the upper classes, American-born Spaniards(known as creoles), typified by Father Miguel Hidalgo and his conspirators in 1810. And the second, "was a broad raging revolt of the lower classes in the countryside" (Martin and Wasserman, 141). This rebellion continued throughout south-central Mexico led by another priest known as Father Jose Maria Morelos, after Hidalgo's execution. In the end this provided the ," "Three Guarantees": Independence, the equality of creoles and Spaniards; and continuation of the preeminent role of the Roman Catholic Church" (Martin and Wasserman, 142). New Spain or Mexico took this by example and basically repeated the act. Their revenues began to swell and they started to gain more shipping and exports. Humphrey's mentioned, "At the 18th century closed the people of Spanish America were probably more prosperous than at any time in their history" (R. A. Humphreys, 387). The reason the timing of the French revolution heavily affected the Mexican Independence was because while everything was happening in Spain the colonies had no idea. It took a long amount of time for news to travel back in the eighteenth century so when the news finally got to them they were able to establish a sense of control. Which is when domestic manufacturing became more widespread and by 1800 Mexico City was the leading city in the western hemisphere. Therefore this allowed for intellectual activity in universities and academics. Therefore, the French revolution was the greatest influence of the Mexican Independence movement.
The timing of the invasion of Spain benefitted the colonies. By creating juntas, they were able to find a way to respond to the invasion. There became opportunities and trading opened up, ports opened, prices dropped and most places. The colonies were benefitting from this and the economy was doing well. New Spain in particular took up arms in order to gain some momentum and power in government. New Spain wanted to revolt in order to become the Americas instead of the Spanish. This allowed for the people of New Spain to drift away from the Spanish rule and set up their own
systems.
During the 1800s there were many revolutions that caused fighting and disagreement in Europe and Latin America. Many brave countries stood up to the mother country to fight the vicious battle for independence. One of the many countries fighting for independence was Haiti. Haiti was trying to get independence from France. In 1804 Saint Domingue declared their independence and named the new nation. Another country fighting for the battle of independence was Mexico. Mexico fought hard with Spain to gain their independence. There was a dispute between the mexicans because some did not want to fight against Spain and just stay a part of their nation and government. Miguel Hidalgo made the first public call for Mexican Independence in 1821. In document 5 there is a painting and all the people of Mexico are taking part in the movement for independence no matter what color they are. The people are taking pride in their country and beliefs by holding up signs and following Father Miguel Hidalgo.
From 1806 to 1826 most of the Latin countries under Spanish rule fought for their independence. The reason that caused these countries to have courage to fight for independence was because in 1808 Napoleon was able to invade and conquer Spain. Examples of those countries are Venezuela and Chile. There are similarities in the ways in which these two countries fought for their independence but there are also some differences in how they fought. Some of the leaders who were involved in the Venezuela’s fight for independence were Simon Bolivar, Francisco de Miranda and Antonio José de Sucre. The Venezuelan fight for independence against the Spanish empire began in 1811 and finally ended in 1823. The Venezuelan war was done in different phases, which began with Francisco de Miranda.
“Latin America includes the entire continent of South America, as well as Mexico. Central America, and the Caribbean Islands. Physical geography has played an important role in the economic development of Latin America.” (Doc A and Doc G) Latin America has many unique cultural characteristics, industrial products, agricultural products, and human activity.
One facet of this unique system involved the numerous economic differences between England and the colonies. The English government subscribed to the economic theory of mercantilism, which demanded that the individual subordinate his economic activity to the interests of the state (Text, 49). In order to promote mercantilism in all her colonies, Great Britain passed the Navigation Acts in 1651, which controlled the output of British holdings by subsidizing. Under the Navigation Acts, each holding was assigned a product, and the Crown dictated the quantity to be produced. The West Indies, for example, were assigned sugar production and any other colony exporting sugar would face stiff penalties (Text, 50). This was done in order to ensure the economic prosperity of King Charles II, but it also served to restrict economic freedom. The geographical layout of the American colonies made mercantilism impractical there. The cit...
Our team presentation focused on three Latino gangs, MS-13 (Mara Salvatrucha), the Mexican Mafia and the Los Surenos gang. My part of the presentation was to provide information on the type of crime these three gangs are known to commit. The crimes committed by the MS-13 gang are varied, violent, and take place all over the country. The FBI even put together a task force called the MS-13 National Gang Task Force in December of 2004 to try to put a stop to this gang’s activities. (www.fbi.gov). Los Surenos or Sur-13, originally based in Los Angeles, has also branched out from turf wars with rival gangs to “for profit”, violent crimes across the country. The Mexican Mafia has a similar story to tell as well in regards to gang crimes, which again range from respect crimes, and retaliatory violence to crimes for profit.
The Spanish-American war was the first and biggest step that the United States of America took toward imperialism. It was the war that secured the US as the most powerful country in the world. This war was a benefit to the USA because we gained land, gained respect, and taught a lesson to one of our enemies. In addition to this, the losses that we suffered were almost nothing compared to other conflicts or wars. The Spanish-American war was by no means for the sole purpose of gaining land and respect, the United States freed an oppressed country and took pieces of land that were better off under US control.
Latin America’s independence kicked of with the independence of Haiti. Before the the independence movement that overtook Latin America, Haiti had gained independence twenty years before the movement. The Spanish Empire had been in decline for a period of time after the rise of the English empire and many failed battles on the Spanish (class notes). The French Revolution and the American Revolution had inspired many of the Latin American countries to fight for independence (Chapter 3). They were inspired by the Enlightenment that washed over Europe. Of the inspired, one man stood out and took the movement by heart.
Revolution in Mexico The Mexican independence movement was led by many people including military leader and 11-time president Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. This Independence movement occurred due to the success of the Plan de Iguala in 1821. Santa Anna was a Creole born in Veracruz on February 21, 1794. He joined the Spanish military at a young age but later on decided to fight for the movement of the Mexican independence.
Immediately following the war with Spain, the United States had both the political will to pursue imperial policies and the geopolitical circumstances conducive to doing so. But the way in which these policies would manifest was an open question; was the impulse to actively remake the world in America’s Anglo-Saxon image justified? Hence, there were several models of American imperialism at the turn of the twentieth century. In the Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Samoa, the United States asserted unwavering political control. In Cuba, and later throughout most of the Caribbean basin, the economic and political domination of customarily sovereign governments became the policy. Ultimately, the United States was able to expand its territory
The Wars of Independence in the Americas were spurred on by a myriad of different grievances that the nations had with their mother country. One of these grievances, in specific, are political ones. In relation to the Mexican War for Independence political grievances played a large part in causing the war, with notable exceptions. These political issues were, land ownership, slavery and liberal reforms.
Did you know that the United States took half of Mexico’s country as a reward for winning the Mexican War? After Texas won its independence in 1836 it tried to get annexed to the US however Congressmen didn’t want to anger Mexico who still considered Texas a part of their country so they said no both times. Later in 1844, James K. Polk was elected and everything changed and the Manifest Destiny was ruling. Polk didn’t just want to annex texas but also California. Congress voted for Texas and polk sent troops, with John Slidell into the disputed area of southern texas to Mexico City to try to buy California. However the attempt to buy a huge part of their country angered Mexican government. Polk felt that America’ honor was challenged so when
There were a few main points that led up to the Latin American independence movement. In, 1797 the Britain blockade of Spain took place for two years, which cut off resources and revenues for the country. In doing so, Britain had almost proved to Mexico that they could survive on their own in the New World without Spain. About 10 years later in 1808, Spain was in serious trouble with France and Napoleon Bonaparte had taken over Spain and appointed his brother King of Spain. Spain was in there own sort of disarray at this time so after proving to themselves
Matthew Restall and Kris Lane, Latin America in Colonial Times. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Now days democracy has been establish in every Latin America country except Cuba, which is still a socialist state. It seemed that every other alternative form of government such as Marxism or Leninism has failed and been replaced by democracy. Furthermore it looks like people in Latin American really enjoy democracy and its’ benefits, as they also consider it to be the best form of government. After the failure of authoritarian leaders and the military intervene their lives, Latin American citizens wanted to change their system into a more fair and honest system, democracy. Democracy is usually defined as a system of honesty, equality, freedom of rights, though for Latin America countries it means gains, welfare and patronage. Latin American did not work the democratic system properly as it should be and different obstacles keep the system away from being consolidated. Democracy in Latin America still face serious problems in matters as grinding poverty, huge social gaps, corruption, drug dealing, inefficient governments and most importantly governments who promote and use military. The real question is why democracy actually failed even though democracy is what people want. Paraguay is a case of failure in transition democracy because of the corruption and other things that will be argued in this essay. Paraguay and Ecuador are considered to be the only countries that democratization did not achieve consolidation, in differ from Chilli and Central American.
When Columbus asked the King to fund his trips to the New World, Spain was doing economically well. Spain’s goal was to become rich from trade, the King agreed with Columbus that the New World would be a great investment to get rich from trade. Between the 1500s and 1650, gold and silver were sent to Spain from the new world. Spain started to see promise in the New World. Once America started producing goods, England was gaining more profit. America was diverse economically, from livestock, fish to skilled shipbuilders. Settlers adjusted to the changing environments, created different economies, labor systems, and worshiped in different churches. Immigrants began to come to the New World to prosper with the opportunities of possibly getting rich or even for religious freedom. Up into the Civil War all of theses factors continued to