Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis for lamb of the slaughter
Characters of lamb to the slaughter
The 10 literary elements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis for lamb of the slaughter
to start a story, certain literary elements, tone, and details must be included. Even if the author has these elements, the story may not be the best it can be. Lamb to the Slaughter starts with a housewife, Mary, waiting for her husband, Patrick, to return from work. When Patrick gets home, he makes her angry, and she kills him. Mary feeds the police the murder weapon so she is not caught. In The Interlopers, two feuding men are caught by a falling tree and are unable to escape. They eventually reunite, but are most likely eaten by wolves before they can escape. In a comparison, Lamb to the Slaughter utilizes these literary elements better than The Interlopers. In a tale of murder and innocence, Roald Dahl writes about betrayal and identity, …show more content…
how it can affect one's way of thinking, and make them do things that they would regret. The main character, Mary, is waiting for her husband, Patrick, to return from work. When he comes home however, Patrick is very moody and suspicious. He delivers unknown bad news to Mary, and in a fit of disbelief and anger, she clobbers him with a leg of lamb. The police come and investigate, but are unable to find anything because Mary fed the lamb to them in the stew. To thoroughly communicate this, Dahl uses writing techniques to aid the story. The two literary elements used by Dahl are irony and figurative language. The title is a pun, because Patrick is unaware Mary is going to kill him, like a lamb to slaughter. The lamb symbolizes innocence and mercy, but it is being used for the exact opposite in the story. Then, the police did not realize the murder weapon is “right under their noses” This made the story interesting for the reader, and they are able to understand it more. To add more detail Dahl uses figurative language such as similes, metaphors, and personification. As shown in this quote "almost as a sunbather feels the sun." This shows Mary loves her husband very much and enjoys the work that she feels when he enters the room like a sunbather to the sun. Personification is used when Mary is being haunted by her husband's death- "The wind whispered in his name and tortured her with his memory." Wind is not alive, so it could not have whispered torture to Mary. The figurative language helps the reader to visualize what happened in the story, and it is more descriptive. The overall tone is somber and dark, as shown by images and sentence structure. An image that Dahl described is when Mary is talking to the police- "First a doctor, then two detectives, one of whom she know by name. Later, a police photographer arrived and took pictures, and a man who knew about fingerprints. There is a great deal of whispering and muttering beside the corpse, and the detectives kept asking her a lot of questions. But they always treated her kindly. She told her story again, this time right from the beginning, when Patrick had come in, and she is sewing, and he is tired, so tired he hadn't wanted to go out for supper. She told how she'd put the meat in the oven-’it's there now, cooking’- and how she'd stopped out to the grocer for vegetables, and come back to find him lying on the floor.” This helped the reader understand the story and made it more interesting. The language used is intelligent, clear, and descriptive- “Occasionally one of the detectives asked her another question. Sometimes Jack Noonan spoke at her gently as he passed by. Her husband, he told her, had been killed by a blow on the back of the head administered with a heavy blunt instrument, almost certainly a large piece of metal.” The story is easier to read and can be understood by a lower reading level because it is very straightforward and candid. In a short story written by H.H. Munro, two families are in an ancient feud that has torn them apart for many years. Georg and Ulrich, the two men, are hunting in the forest. When a tree falls on them, they are stuck without rescue. After the men reconcile, they are most likely eaten by wolves. Munro uses many literary elements to add detail to the story, including imagery, irony, diction, and details. Imagery appears in two places: when Ulrich is searching the forest- "peering through the tree trunks and listening through the whistling and skirling of the wind and the restless beating of the branches for sight and sound of the marauders" and when a tree has just fallen on Ulrich and Georg- " but obviously as helplessly pinioned down as himself. All round them lay a thick strewn wreckage of splintered branches and broken twigs." This image adds urgency to the story. as well as giving the reader hope that the two men might reconcile and become friends once again. Situational irony also appears on paragraph 5 of the story, when both men want to be the hero and announce how they have made up, but instead will most likely be killed by the wolves that came to attack them- ""Who are they?" asked Georg quickly, straining his eyes to see what the other would gladly not have seen. "Wolves." This detail adds a reversal of scheme to the story, as the reader would have never expected the two main characters to be supposedly killed off. The diction and the word choice helped the reader understand what is happening because it is more clear-cut and comprehensive. An example is on pg 1-2 "He strayed away by himself from the watchers whom he had placed in ambush on the crest of the hill, and wandered far down the steep slopes amid the wild tangle of undergrowth." Munro is describing how Gradwitz is searching the forest, looking for Znaeym and his men. However, he did leave out a detail, what happened to Georg and Ulrich and the end of the story; if the wolves attacked them or their men are able to rescue them first. This absence of detail leaves the reader wondering what happened to them, and it ends the story with a cliffhanger. The overall tone of the story is dark and mysterious. Briefly, it becomes hopeful and happy, when Gradwitz and Znaeym become friends again, and they are excited for their men to come so they can share the good news. In a comparison between the literary elements, Lamb to the Slaughter is clearly the superior.
As well as the terms mentioned earlier, Dahl uses sentence structure and images to compose a better story. An example of sentence structure in in paragraph 5- "She took his coat and hung it in the closet. Then she walked over and made the drinks, a strongish one for him, a weak one for herself; and soon she is back again in her chair with the sewing, and he in the other, opposite, holding the tall glass with both hands, rocking it so the ice cubes tinkled against the side." The mix of long and short sentences keep the reader interested, and adds emotion and detail to the story. The shorter sentences made the situation sound more urgent, while long sentences are more relaxed and easygoing. There are also several images described in the story, such as Mary killing Patrick- "she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head. She might just as well have hit him with a steel club. She stepped back a pace, waiting, and the funny thing is that he remained standing there for at least four or five seconds, gently swaying.", and the interaction between Mary and Sam, the store owner- ""Patrick's decided he's tired and doesn't want to eat out tonight," she told him. "We usually go out Thursdays, you know, and now he's caught me without any vegetables in the house." "Then how about meat, Mrs. Maloney?" "No, I've got meat, thanks. I got a nice leg of lamb from the freezer." The level of detail established by Dahl helps the reader to understand the story more. The second story, The Interlopers, is far less thorough in communicating the literary elements used to make a story interesting. For example, the irony did not aid the story in the manner that Lamb to the Slaughter did. Munro did use situational irony when both men wanted to announce the reconciliation but instead are most likely killed by the wolves. The readers
did not expect this, but because of the placement at the end of the story, they did not get to have much reaction to the situation at hand. The imagery is also confusing because of the language used, like when the tree fell on von Gradwitz and Ulrich- “And before the moment of hesitation had given way to action a deed of Nature's own violence overwhelmed them both. A fierce shriek of the storm had been answered by a splitting crash over their heads, and ere they could leap aside a mass of falling beech tree had thundered down on them.” Another example is through sentence structure. The majority of the sentences are long, so while the text is very descriptive, the reader does not get the full emotional effect that sentence structure adds to the story. Those elements could have been improved to form a better story than what is provided, making Lamb to the Slaughter far superior. Even though both authors used the same aspects to write a story, Munro could have greatly improved his usage of these principles. In the comparison, Lamb to the Slaughter clearly utilized the literary elements, tone, and details better than The Interlopers.
The first example of mystery elements in “Lamb to the Slaughter” is dramatic irony. Housewife Mary Maloney is startled by her husband’s bad mood and shocking news, so she turns into a murderer by killing her husband with a frozen lamb leg. She begins cooking the weapon, goes to the store to buy vegetables which creates an alibi. She comes home to call the police who bombard her with questions as she pleads her innocence. Later, at the end of the story, Mary Maloney served the lamb leg she used to kill Patrick to the police officers and they are personally disposing of the weapon and simultaneously trying to find it. This adds suspense because the reader knows that the lamb is the murder weapon but the police do not, leaving the reader unsure if the police will discover the truth about the meal they are eating. The second mystery element that adds suspense in “Lamb to the Slaughter” is inference gaps. At this point in the story, Patrick just returned home from work and is about to explain why he cannot go out to dinner and his depressed mood. After much confusing behavior from Patrick, “And he told her. It didn’t take long, four or five minutes at most, and she sat very still through it all, watching him with a kind of dazed horror”(Dahl 113). This adds suspense because the reader is not directly told what the news is and so their mind is left spinning,
Until the end where the clever detective (who is usually quite an old man, dressed in a smart tweed suit) goes through one by one all of the suspects telling them exactly why they could have committed the murder, but then why they didn't. He then confronts the real murderer who is normally the one everyone least suspects. This all takes place in a large country manor where lots of people would have been busying round but for the murderer, conveniently there are never any witnesses to the crime. The murder is most often well planed out, with a devious reason behind it. The two stories are both very different and mainly the only similarities are that they are both about murders that are done by people that are close family to the victims they murder in there own homes.7 The settings in both of them are very different; in lamb to the slaughter the setting is in a normal home in a small village, where normal family life goes on.
The repetition Roald Dahl uses helps the scare factor in “The Landlady” and “Lamb of Slaughter”. In “Lamb of Slaughter”, Roald Dahl repeats the words “Sit down” and “eat something” in the story. For example, in the text it says, “Anyways, she went on. I’ll get you some bread and cheese.” and “ Sit down, he said. Just for a minute, sit down.”. These words being repeated makes you wonder why he doesn’t want to eat, especially after a long hard day at work. Also, it makes you wonder what he wants to tell her, but it never tells you so it kinda makes you think of what he tells her. In “The Landlady”, Roald Dahl repeats the words “Bed and Breakfast” and how nice it looked. For example, in the text it says, “BED AND BREAKFAST, it said, BED AND
In “Lamb to the Slaughter”, Roald Dahl uses diction, details, and syntax to emphasize the matter-of-fact tone that is consistent throughout the entire story. Diction is a key element of tone that conveys this matter-of-fact tone. For example, Mary Maloney says to herself after killing her husband, “All right… So I’ve killed him” (Dahl 320). This sentence is lacking emotion. It states a pure fact, without going into further detail and captures a turning point in Mary Maloney’s way of thinking. By telling herself “all right,” Mary distances herself from the murder. She is detached from her own story and does not reveal any qualms about murdering her own husband. Similarly, Dahl uses the next sentence to describe Mary’s thoughts by explaining,
In Dahl’s short story and in Jacob’s short story, both depict suspense through tone and description. For example, in the “The Landlady”, the narrator stated, “I stuff all my little pets.” This example reveals suspense by providing the landlady killed and stuffed her pets. Furthermore,
Humans are incredible creatures, being able to reason, and comprehend. This power also allows them to create false appearances. In Roald Dahl’s “Lamb to the Slaughter”, a jealous stricken wife has to lie out of a murder. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, a hunter named Rainsford falls off of his boat, and swims to a private island. Meeting a fellow hunter, it becomes clear that this hunter goes for things other than animals. It becomes hunter running from hunter. Both authors suggest that people's appearances can be deceiving.
Readers are met with a sense of familiarity as they recall a childhood nursery rhyme, “Mary Had A Little Lamb”. By using this Dahl created a link between the story and the reader themselves. The allusion adds a sense of irony as well, because while the nursery rhyme is sweet and innocent, murder is not. Irony can also be found in other parts of the passage. In the text Roald Dahl includes some dialogue from the cops which reads “‘Personally, I think it’s right here on the premises.’
Most human beings are fake even when the person they are fake to are as real as they come. Lamb to the Slaughter by Roald Dahl is about a man who was talking to his wife about breaking up with her but after they talked she was filled with anger so she hit him on the head with a lamb, and ended up killing him. In Lamb to the Slaughter the theme of most human beings are fake is very prevalent throughout the entire story. Mrs Maloney shows this with her relationship with her husband.
The story starts with Watson looking over notes of the cases that he and Holmes have taken in the last eight years; one in particular comes to his mind, and from their Watson tells the story of 'The Speckled Band'. The killer in 'The Speckled Band' is Dr Grimesby Roylott. Roylott is a tall man who was well built. 'Lamb to the Slaughter' is written in a third person perspective, and the story starts with a description of a room, and then breaks into the characters, and follows them though the rest of the story. The killer in 'Lamb to the Slaughter is Mary Maloney, a gentle, petite housewife.
In the two well known stories, “Lamb to the Slaughter” and “The Lady or the Tiger,” both deal with relationships that have gone wrong. The story for “Lamb to the Slaughter,” starts out with Mary Maloney, who is pregnant and sews and waits for her husband to come home everyday. When her husband comes home one day and tells her that he is leaving her, she gets upset and ends up killing him with a frozen lamb leg. By the end of the story she is able to also get away with doing it. As for “The Lady or the Tiger,” this story deals with a King, whose daughter has fallen in love with a man who is not of the same status as she is. When the king finds out of this, he sends him to their version of a court system, which consists of choosing between two doors. One that has a tiger that will kill them and one that has a girl that the man will get to marry. The princess knows which door has each option in it and has the power to tell him which one to choose. Although in the end, the story never actually tells you which one she picks, and leaves it up to you to imagine what she does. Both of these stories have a lot in common, such as dealing with complicated relationships, as well as both of these women end up losing no matter what they choose.
These two stories have many great themes, but the best part is don’t underestimate others. Finally the last distinction, in “Lamb to Slaughter” it says “A few minutes later she got up and went to the phone. She knew the number of the police station, and when the man at the other end answered, she cried to him, "Quick! Come on in and get quick!
Lamb to the Slaughter, by Roald Dahl, instantly grabs a reader’s attention with its grotesque title, ensuing someone’s downfall or failure. The saying “lamb to the slaughter,” usually refers to an innocent person who is ignorantly led to his or her failure. This particular short story describes a betrayal in which how a woman brutally kills her husband after he tells her that he wants a divorce. She then persuades the policemen who rush to the scene to consume the evidence. This action and Patrick’s actions show the theme of betrayal throughout the story which Roald Dahl portrays through the use of point of view, symbolism and black humor.
In ’Lamb to the Slaughter’ the main point to the story is to find out
Lamb to the slaughter by Ronald Dahl expresses a secret meaning; I believe this is how a flawless housewife could do such a crime and the manner she gets away with it. In my essay I talk about the theme through three elements such as: the setting, symbolism and characterization. Ronald Dahl gives a lot of detail into his writing to make sure the reader catches every glimpse of a perfect life, but ever so lightly unexpectedly changes your view on the characters. In addition the author’s ability to make the antagonist in such a way you ultimately make him out to be the villain. Who is to blame? Is Mary crazy? Is Patrick to blame? These questions were made for the purpose of Dahl’s twisted way of forcing you to understanding these characters.
Betrayal is something people experience in everyday life whether it's major or minor, and sometimes we don't expect it to come from certain people in our lives. In the story “The Possibility of Evil” by Shirley Jackson, and “Lamb to the Slaughter”, by Roald Dahl explains different types of betrayal. Ms.Strangeworth in “The Possibility of Evil” showed betrayal to her community by pretending to care for them and acted as if she really wanted the best for them, but she really didn't. In “Lamb to the Slaughter” Patrick showed betrayal to Mary, his pregnant wife, by leaving her at the worst time possible. Although Patrick betrayed her first Mary betrayed him the worst way possible by killing him. In these two stories both Mary and Ms.Strangeworth