Laertes And Hamlet Foil Essay

684 Words2 Pages

The foil is a person whose traits, by differences and similarities, help to emphasize and enhances the qualities and actions of the protagonist. Many characters, such as King Claudius, Fortinbras, and Laertes, in William Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” qualify as foils for Hamlet, the protagonist. However, Laertes is the most appropriate foil for Hamlet. Laertes’ similarities and differences with Hamlet along with his actions and traits allow him to be an effective foil for Hamlet.
Readers often see Laertes and Hamlet as complete opposites, but they are not as different as they may seem. Both Laertes and Hamlet take a life of another character in the play. Laertes takes Hamlet’s life while he is being used by Claudius …show more content…

Laertes “anoints his sword” with poison so “if I [Laertes] gall him [Hamlet] slightly. It may be death” (IV, vii, 149-151). In the duel between Laertes and Hamlet, this plan works when Laertes cuts Hamlet and he slowly starts to die. Hamlet takes a life when he accidentally kills Polonius, Laertes’ father. Hamlet thinks the person behind a tapestry in the Queen’s bedroom is Claudius, the person he wants to kill, so Hamlet sticks his sword straight through it stabbing and killing Polonius. Hamlet also takes the lives of Ophelia, Claudius, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and Laertes. Another factor in Hamlet taking lives is his obsession with revenge. Hamlet becomes obsessed with revenge when he is introduced to a ghost who tells him “I am thy father’s spirit/ revenge his [Hamlet‘s father] foul and most unnatural murder” (I, v, 10-26), and Hamlet declares to “sweep to my …show more content…

Hamlet desires to think situations and the consequences of his actions through completely, causing his delay in getting revenge for the death of his father. Hamlet shows readers just how thoroughly he think about consequences when he states “to be or not to be - that is the question: whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and, by opposing, end them” (III, i, 57-61). Laertes, on the other hand, does not think anything of or care about the consequences of his actions. Laertes proves his careless attitude when he says “to hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation” (IV, v, 136-138). He only wants revenge for the death of his father quickly so his father’s killer will not live while his father is dead. This shows another difference between Hamlet and Laertes; Laertes is more angry and passionate about the murder than

Open Document