La Violencia During World War II Colombia

956 Words2 Pages

This peace agreement endured for nearly fifty years, however the deep-seated animosity between those in favor of a strong central government and those supporting regionally driven political autonomy would simmer for years until reaching a boiling point. One factor that contributed to the increasing divide between the rural peasantry and the government was the economic downturn in the wake of the Great Depression. The increase in urban unemployment as a result of the Great Depression forced Colombians to migrate to the countryside to seek employment on coffee plantations, which was a Colombian economic staple. Eventually the international demands for Colombian coffee increased, and as a result, the plantations’ land values increased as well. …show more content…

The assassination of Liberal leader Jorge Eliecer Gaitán on April 9, 1948 in Bogota ignited this devastating conflict, as the Liberals blamed the Conservative Colombian government for the assassination. The Liberals, including both the urban lower class as well as the socialist leaning poor, reacted immediately in Bogota by attacking the Presidential Palace with the aid of defecting police. Though the violence in the capital was quelled in three days’ time, the anger spread like an uncontrollable wildfire to the rural countryside. In the countryside, the rural peasantry affiliated themselves with leftist ideals and soon engaged in violent resistance. This resistance emerged in the form of AutoDefensas, or politically affiliated self-defense groups. These groups and their varying political affiliations soon became imbedded in the fabric of Colombian society: Indeed, “the Conservative groups were loosely related to the police, at that time typically a local rather than a national force. Liberal groups followed their own urban leadership, while those on the radical margins turned to the Communist Party of Colombia (PCC), founded in 1930. It urged self-defense forces not only to “resist” but to declare their autonomy from the state—in the Marxist lexicon, to liberate their social as well as their political …show more content…

In essence, La Violencia systematically tore the country apart. The civil war, which began as a response to the palpable inequality in Colombia, “failed to remedy the country’s institutional and socioeconomic problems.” Indeed, Vanda Felbab-Brown continues, “after a decade of conflict, the concentration of land in the hands of the wealthy had increased, the peasants remained politically powerless, the same dominant classes retained control, and the exclusionary two-party political system was resuscitated.” La Violencia imparted a legacy of conflict that remains pervasive in the Colombian psyche today. Furthermore, La Violencia served as a catalyst for the initial consolidation of armed Leftist resistance movements—one of which would eventually become the

Open Document