Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critically analyze the poem kubla khan
Analysis the poem line by line of kubla khan and tintern abbye
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critically analyze the poem kubla khan
The poem “Kubla Khan” or “A Vision in a Dream”, by Samuel Taylor Coleridge was composed in 1797 and then published in 1816 and is one of Coleridge’s most famous and controversial poems of the romantic period. It is also known as the “Fragmentary Vision” and a copy of the manuscript can be seen on exhibit at the British Museum in London. The poem itself has unusual rhythm and rhyme, simile, and symbolism and has been the subject of controversy and discussion among poets for centuries past.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge was a writer and poet whom greatly influenced other poets. He suffered depression and opiate addiction throughout his life. Coleridge wrote the poem “Kubla Khan”, allegedly after waking from an opiate induced dream. He admitted it was a fragment of a poem because his work got interrupted and he could not finish writing the poem unable to remember the dream entirely.
There has been controversy and criticism over the poem “Kubla Khan” for centuries. Originally, critics in Coleridge’s time did not find the poem even worthy of criticism. According to Poetry Criticism Volume 39, “When first published, many contemporary reviewers regarded the apparent poetic fragment as “nonsense” or “below criticism.” (Gale 119). In later years and through current day, the poem “Kubla Khan” has received much criticism which has made it a popular poem to analyze scholastically. This could be due to the fact that Coleridge’s lifestyle may have influenced the people’s reaction to his work. Notably, Coleridge is now considered a leader of the Romantic poetry movement. As it states in the Poetry Criticism Volume 39, “most critics acknowledge that the juxtaposed images, motifs, and ideas explored in the poem are strongly representative of Romantic ...
... middle of paper ...
...nd readers with many of the same critical problems that confounded its contemporary reviewers. Its textual history remains unclear, Coleridge's prefatory explanation of the poem's production is often considered dubious, and scholars just can't agree on what it 'means' or if it means anything at all. Most readers interpret 'Kubla Khan' as an allegory for the creative process, relying heavily upon a perpetuated Romantic formulation of the redemptive imagination.
Although Samuel Taylor Coleridge suffered a life of debt and opiate addiction due to neurological and rheumatic pain, he produced great literary work that was ground-breaking and the key development of Romantic poetry. He was highly meditative and also an expert critic on Shakespearean literature. Despite his setbacks, Coleridge’s many accomplishments made him an icon to writers and poets throughout history.
Lord Byron, also known as George Gordon, had a highly adventurous, but short- lived life. He was an extraordinary British poet of his time, known mainly for his satires. One of his great major works was “The Destruction of Sennacherib.” Many thought of his work as inferior and immoral, but that didn’t stop his writing (Harris 57). Byron had a challenging childhood and used his views on life and love based on experiences while traveling to write his most popular works, such as “The Destruction of Sennacherib,” which is often not appreciated.
New Criticism attracts many readers to its methodologies by enticing them with clearly laid out steps to follow in order to criticize any work of literature. It dismisses the use of all outside sources, asserting that the only way to truly analyze a poem efficiently is to focus purely on the words in the poem. For this interpretation I followed all the steps necessary in order to properly analyze the poem. I came to a consensus on both the tension, and the resolving of it.
To fully understand this poem, the reader would find it helpful to know what led Coleridge to write it. Coleridge grew up with English essayist Charles Lamb in school and the two were close friends (Merriman.) In their later years, however, the two rarely saw each other as Coleridge lived in the country side and Lamb lived in the city, where he cared for his mentally ill sister (Merriman.) On one of the rare days Lamb went to visit him, Coleridge planed to go on a walk through the scenic area surrounding his house with Lamb and some other friends, but before they left, Coleridge’s wife accidentally dropped boiling milk on his foot and he was unable to participate in the walk (Benzon.) While the others gallivanted across the countryside, Coleridge sat in his garden and wrote this poem.
Toynton, Evelyn. "A DELICIOUS TORMENT: The friendship of Wordsworth and Coleridge." Harper's. 01 Jun. 2007: 88. eLibrary. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (text of 1834)." Poetry Foundation. Poetry
Keats’ “Ode on a Grecian Urn” is often referred to as his best work. Not only that but some even call it one of the greatest Romantic poems ever. The poem shows art as a representation of reality and outpouring of the soul. The last two lines however have been subject to much debate and criticism. Some say that they are a blemish on an otherwise magnificent piece and others argue over how to make sense of them. Whatever the case “Ode on a Grecian Urn” is a fantastic poem and has shown to have significant staying power in modern literature.
...ubla Khan, the imagination is more of a physical, creative force, with more raw power than finesse. With it, works such as a pleasure-dome full of physical paradoxes can be inspired, created, and described, far better than with the words of a critic alone “A sunny pleasure-dome with caves of ice!”. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner has it that the imagination is more of an intangible force, subtle yet with as much power as the imagination in Kubla Khan. It connects the huge array of creatures on the Earth together, and without the imagination, they would, die in the end, one by one.
Mileur, J. 1982. Coleridge and the Art of Immanence. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Although both “Kubla Khan,” by Samuel Coleridge and “Ode on Grecian Urn,” by John Keats are poems originating from the poets’ inspiration from historical figure, the two poems convey different messages through their respective metaphors. While Coleridge emphasizes on the process of creating a Romantic poem, Keats expresses his opinion about art by carefully examining the details of the Grecian urn.
The French revolution influenced tremendously the writings of the romantics during that period. Different poets depicted different issues concerning the revolution such as Napoleon's cruelty, poets escape to nature in getting away of the real world and its problems, victims of war and various other realistic situations which were effects from war. William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge are two of the major figures of the romantic period and their writings had a great impact on people and the anti-revolutionary spirit.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Lectures and Notes on Shakspere and Other English Poets. London : George Bell and Sons, 1904. p. 342-368. http://ds.dial.pipex.com/thomas_larque/ham1-col.htm
William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge spearheaded a philosophical writing movement in England in the late 18th and early 19th century. Although Wordsworth and S.T. Coleridge are often considered the fathers of the English Romantic movement, their collective theologies and philosophies were often criticized but rarely taken serious by the pair of writers due to their illustrious prestige as poets. The combined effort in the Lyrical Ballads catapulted their names into the mainstream of writers in 1798 and with this work; they solidified their place in English literature. Although, most people fail to note that the majority of Coleridge's and Wordsworth's work was him simply bending and breaking particular rules of poetry that were in place during his time and in order to fully understand his work, one must fully understand his views of poetry itself.
“Xanadu” is a wonderful “Paradise” of fantasy, but Coleridge draws the readers back to reality with the word “I.” He immediately transitions from describing visionary objects to explaining his own poetic challenge. The “pleasure-dome” mirrors the poem and Kubla Khan mirrors Coleridge. The poem ultimately becomes a “vision in a dream,” where the reader recognizes the images that Coleridge recreates through imagination.
Historical Criticism is criticism that “considers how military, social, cultural, economic, scientific, intellectual, literary, and every other kind of history helps us to understand the author and the work” (Lynn 142). Simply stated, unlike the previously discussed criticisms, Historical Criticism connects a work to certain times or places, revealing its historical influences. Therefore, the reader is required to perform research in order to learn more about the author’s life, the author’s time period and culture, and the way of reasoning during that time. Accordingly, with a critical eye, the reader should relate the information back to the work which will provide the reader with a richer understanding of the reading as well as with author’s message to the reader (Lynn 29-31). Beyond “close reading”, the reader must research what establishes the foundation of the work. Although, below the foundation of a work there lies an even richer understanding of the
There are intrinsic and extrinsic criticisms of novels, letters, and poems. Each method offers a different perspective on how the readers interpret each piece. Intrinsic criticism is the process of how readers summarize the main points of the piece. Extrinsic criticism is the background information such as: the time period, the author’s biography, and historical references. Any additional data gathered assists with the analysis of the literary text. Emily Dickinson’s poem The Wife will be analyzed by using these two methods of criticism. An intrinsic reading of the poem will be given, insight on whether extrinsic criticism contributes to the reading of the poem or alters its meaning will be disclosed, and lastly a reflection on the relative merits of both criticisms will be provided.