Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of martin luther kings speech
Analysis of martin luther kings speech
Martin Luther King speech analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of martin luther kings speech
Individual Oral Presentation Jailed 29 times having narrowly escaped an assassination attempt, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. won the Nobel Peace Prize and the Presidential Medal of Freedom and led more than 200,000 Americans in protest to the Lincoln Memorial not to suppress, but to eradicate racial injustice (Nps.gov, 2015). In contrast, the lynching of over 3,000 (Starr, 2013)and the brutal treatment of thousands of African Americans over 86 years “the Klan” presented a political ideology that embraced neo-fascism, homophobia, anti-Catholicism, racial terrorism and white supremacy (Starr, 2013), (KKK, 2015). The Ku Klux Klan were the ultimate proponents of fanatical prejudice and racial injustice. These two conflicting convictions were the …show more content…
King. Unlike historical allusions which are present in the beginning of the speech, Biblical allusions are spread throughout the entirety of the speech. Although these are countless uses of Biblical terminology employed in the speech, the most common are the Good Samaritan, Moses and the Battle Hymn of the Republic. Dr. King utilized these particular allusions in opposition to the groups that used the Bible to justify their actions of segregation and slavery. For instance, the Good Samaritan is used as a method of reiterating the ignorance of the whites. The Levite asks “If I stop to help this man, what will happen to me?” however, the Good Samaritan asserts "If I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?" This clearly illustrates the mind set in which the white community regards this situation (Kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu, 2015). Dr. King reassures the audience that the most laudable method of creating equality is to reverse the question of the Levite. Exodus 24:15 “Then Moses went up to the mountain, and the cloud covered the mountain. The glory of the LORD rested on Mount Sinai.” This is the basis of the speech “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop”; however, in this case Dr. King goes to the mountaintop and witnesses the glory of the Lord. The death of Moses is a paramount contributor to the message of this speech, because after Moses frees the slaves from Egyptian rule, he passes …show more content…
Kings “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop”; however, the purpose of the techniques has been reversed to align with the ideologies of the Ku Klux Klan. For instance, in the parody the speaker anaphorically states “But I wouldn’t stop there”, but changes the context of the repetition, and instead, refers to the alarming events in recent history such as the rise of the Nazi Regime and the creation of the Ku Klux Klan. The purpose of antithetically and anaphorically representing historical allusions is to reflect on the anti-Semitic and bigoted ideologies of the Klan in comparison to Dr. King’s impartial treatment of all people. For instance in “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” Dr. King discloses an anecdote of his near death experience. The incident occurred in New York City at an autographing event, where an African American women stabbed Dr. King in the chest. A letter was later sent to Dr. King by a little girl at the White Plains High School, which simply said “While it should not matter, I would like to mention that I'm a white girl. I read in the paper of your misfortune and of your suffering. And I read that if you had sneezed, you would have died. And I'm simply writing you to say that I'm so happy that you didn't sneeze." (Kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu,
Martin Luther King Jr. uses many rhetorical devices to make his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” a masterpiece. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the Clergymen in a credible and trustworthy manner, appealing to the logic and reasoning behind his arguments, and to appeal the Clergymen's emotions. King uses other rhetorical devices that support his appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos that add effects to the letter. Other devices he uses include: allusions, parallelism, illness and health contrast, irony, imagery, anaphora, and personification. He creates a complex writing that respectfully, but critically corrects the Clergymen's statements from their letter to King entitled “Public Statement by Eight Alabama Clergymen”.
Recently you have received a letter from Martin Luther King Jr. entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Dr. King’s letter he illustrates the motives and reasoning for the extremist action of the Civil Rights movement throughout the 1960’s. In the course of Dr. King’s letter to you, he uses rhetorical questioning and logistical reasoning, imagery and metaphors, and many other rhetorical devices to broaden your perspectives. I am writing this analysis in hopes you might reconsider the current stance you have taken up regarding the issues at hand.
A few years ago, my mother told me something thought provoking: we had once lived on the same block as the leader of the local Ku Klux Klan chapter. That had been in Charlotte, North Carolina, around 1994. The Ku Klux Klan, according to Blaine Varney in Lynching in the 1890’s, used to “…set out on nightly ‘terror rides’ to harass ‘uppity Negroes’….” They are far more infamous, however, for their “lynching”—nightly “terror rides” that included murder—of African Americans. Varney tells us lynching levels reached their pinnacle in 1892, with 161 recorded murders that year. In modern times, most Americans would agree that the Klan, along with any form of white supremacy, has no place in society—and pointing out its survival is a good way to imply that we, as a people, are still not perfect.
The population of African Americans from 1865 to 1900 had limited social freedom. Social limitations are limitations that relate “…to society and the way people interact with each other,” as defined by the lesson. One example of a social limitation African Americans experienced at the time is the white supremacy terrorist group, the Ku Klux Klan or the KKK. The KKK started as a social club formed by former confederate soldiers, which rapidly became a domestic terrorist organization. The KKK members were white supremacists who’s objective was to ward off African Americans from using their new political power. In an attempts to achieve their objective, Klansmen would burn African American schools, scare and threaten voters, destroy the homes of African Americans and also the homes of whites who supported African American rights. The greatest terror the KKK imposed was that of lynching. Lynching may be defined via the lesson as, “…public hanging for an alleged offense without benefit of trial.” As one can imagine these tactics struck fear into African Americans and the KKK was achiev...
Hooded Americanism: The First Century of the Ku Klux Klan: 1865 to the Present by David Chalmers records the history of the Ku Klux Klan quite bluntly, all the way from its creation following the civil war, to the early 1960’s. The author starts the book quite strongly by discussing in detail many acts of violence and displays of hatred throughout the United States. He makes a point to show that the Klan rode robustly throughout all of the country, not just in the southern states. The first several chapters of the book focus on the Klan’s creation in 1865. He goes on to discuss the attitude of many Americans following the United State’s Civil War and how the war shaped a new nation. The bulk of the book is used to go through many of the states, and express the Klan’s political influence on both the local and state governments. The author starts with Texas and Oklahoma, and goes through the history of the Klan geographically, finishing with New Jersey and Washington. The author stresses that the KKK did not just commit acts of violence towards minorities, but also carried political power. He continues to discuss the impact of the Klan on Civil Rights movements in the 1960’s, and various other important political controversies between the 1920’s and 1970’s. Towards the middle of the book, David M. Chalmers focuses on portraying the feelings of governments and state legislatures, as well as normal citizens towards the Klan. To do this more effectively, the author uses excerpts and quotes from editorials and newspapers, along with several dozen pictures. The conclusion of the book was used mainly as an overview of all of the major incidents and deaths involving the Klan, and how their persistence has allowed them to still exist today despite a lack of resources and support.
King uses numerous biblical allusions to resonate with his clergymen audience and to make them realize that they were condemning a righteous movement. The vivid language in metaphors captures emotion and expands understanding. Mr. King was able to do anything to end the injustice in Birmingham and his commitment was shown in his tone.
This story proves that even though the society’s opinion towards racism has changed dramatically for the better in the past decades, racism still exists and remains a real problem in our society today. It becomes even more important to look back into the past and re-examine the legacies of anti-racism, especially one of the most prominent anti-racist figures in history, Dr. Martin Luther King Junior. He was famous for his activism in the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, and after his death by assasination has become an influential figure in the anti-racism movement.
Dr. King is an emotional, inspiring, and strong speaker. His " I Have A Dream" speech tugs a deep root war of emotions in every American’s heart; therefore, this speech is the perfect display of pathos. Even though pathos overwhelm logo and ethos, they are also very much present in his speech. On August 28, 1963 Dr. King made his way to Washington Mall from the Washington Monument to the Lincoln Memorial to deliver his speech to his fellow Americans. Dr. King commands his speech during an ironic time in American history.
King references Christianity in many of his metaphors and even relates himself to the Apostle Paul (King 2). King uses a plethora of metaphors to describe the discrimination of African-Americans. One such metaphor explains how discrimination is “Like a boil that can never be cured as long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its pus-flowing ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must likewise be exposed.” (King
King also makes a few allusions to the Bible; "Let us not seek to satisfy thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred," is the first allusion to the Bible in his speech.
Third, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. uses Christian references to show the clergymen the values that they have lost during the racism in Birmingham. “In your statement you assert that our actions, even though peaceful, must be condemned because they precipitate violence.” “Isn’t this like condemning Jesus because his unique God-consciousness and never-ceasing devotion to God’s will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion?” Dr. King is telling the Clergymen that judging him for peaceful acts is like judging God for sending Jesus to earth. Although God did send Jesus to Earth to be crucified He did not send Jesus to start riots or wars, Dr. King’s peaceful acts resemble the acts of God.
In his speech, King questions why misery would “constantly haunt the negro? In some distant past, had the forebears done some tragic injury to the nation, and was the curse of punishment upon the black race?” (Paragraph 4). By the use of rhetorical questioning, King creates a vulnerable image for the blacks, because they were innocent victims of wrongdoing. They had done no harm to the whites, so why were they being so abused by them? When King questions and targets the whites, he is also using ethos to appeal to sympathy of the black race. African Americans were like a child being punished by their “parents,” the whites, for committing no misdemeanor. The first American to “shed blood in the revolution which freed his country from British oppression was a black seaman named Crispus Attucks,” yet blacks were still being penalized (Paragraph 5). King looks for sympathy in his audience to comply with the African American race, and to persuade them to believe in his point that blacks were being punished for no reason, only doing what the whites failed to do. Maybe that was why they were being punished— because blacks proved to be able to do what the whites could not. King creates this tone throughout the use of irony, and soft threats. Were the whites intimidated by African Americans, punishing blacks only
From the steps of the Lincoln Memorial more than two score years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King electrified America with his momentous "I Have a Dream" speech. Aimed at the entire nation, King’s main purpose in this speech was to convince his audience to demand racial justice towards the mistreated African Americans and to stand up together for the rights afforded to all under the Constitution. To further convey this purpose more effectively, King cleverly makes use of the rhetorical devices — ethos, pathos and logos — using figurative language such as metaphors and repetition as well as various other techniques e.g. organization, parallel construction and choice of title.
King tells of his faith in Christianity to help win the fight to rights. King says, “Our actions must be guided by the deepest principles of our Christian faith,” this statement shows his faith in the power of Christianity. King wants to use love along-side faith to fight his war. On the other hand, King is also inspired by fellow civil rights activist. He quotes Booker T. Washington with this quote, “Let no man pull you so low as to make you hate him,” Washington’s words to hand in hand with what King believes. Bothe men believe in being peaceful and loving. They believe by being this way, blacks could earn their rights. Within this section King effectively uses loaded language. King says, “We are not wrong in what we are doing. If we are wrong, the Supreme Court of this nation is wrong. If we are wrong, the Constitution of the United States is wrong. If we are wrong, God Almighty is wrong. If we are wrong, Jesus of the Nazareth was merely a Utopian dreamer who never came down to earth,” the entire section is loaded language. King says all of these thing to prove that blacks are not wrong for wanting rights and fighting for those
He felt that all Americans should be equal and that they should forget about injustice and segregation. He wanted America to know what the problems were and wanted to point out the way to resolve these problems. In his speech, King uses different types of rhetorical guidelines. He uses them to show his points in a better and easier way to understand. At the beginning he successfully uses mythos. A myth has a deep explanatory or symbolic resonance for the audience.