Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of Australia's Kokoda campaign
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of Australia's Kokoda campaign
The film, Kokoda, is viewed as a useful historical source in its portrayal of Australia’s fight for its nation, during World War II. Although the truth was bended slightly for a more entertainment value due to Hollywood’s style, it was considerably successful in its aims to clearly represents the honesty of the nature of the Kokoda Trail. The motion picture truthfully depicts the inexperienced militia group and their remarkable bravery and and mateship to the end. Next, it accurately features the rough conditions of their surroundings in the ordeal and the dark effects of the undergrowth on the battle. Finally, even though the story is of limited material in its account of the an australian experience, not the overall war, it’s still a faithful …show more content…
film that captures the significance of Australia’s fight for salvation. Firstly, the film truly pays homage to the true aussie spirit in regards to the volunteers for Australia’s side and their worthy strength. The 39th Battalion consisted of people ‘untrained and unequipped’ for the war, expected to melt in the heat of the battle. ‘We are lambs to the slaughter’ (Kokoda Film- 2006). Throughout the supposedly unmanageable climb to keep their country safe and save their own lives, the australian men are wracked with fear as they deal with dysentery, cowardice, leeches, jammed weapons and are confronted by life or death choices on the move. However, it’s their courage, endurance, sacrifices, loyalty and other benevolent values that keep them going through and make a stand till the end. ‘[We] have got to die here. All of us. We have to.’ (Kokoda Film- 2006). The men led by Darko, do what they have to for the love of their country and even despite them needing treatment and break, they go back in the war zone situated at the front line at the battle of Isurava, towards the end. This shows what Australia stood for. Additionally, mateship plays an important part as well as even when danger split them apart or injuries came upon them, they believed in one another like Jack’s belief in Max; that he would recover in the field trip. The degree of companionship was high all around and lives to this very day as an inspiration. And so the movie is exemplified in capturing the attitude of the australians and the intensity of what Australia was up against. Furthermore, the film as a sufficient enough source is backed up as it precisely recounts the mountainous terrain and horror of the vicinity that the australian troops were left to engage with the enemy on.
Literally, in the glorifying opening shot in the mesmerizing Kokoda, there’s a re-enactment of the footage made by the famous photographer, Damien Parer. It consisted of armed australian soldiers ‘...plodding up a steep incline as their feet sank into mud...’ (Kokoda- Film Reviews), signalling from the get go that the film payed much attribute to the experience. Throughout the experience, the rugged terrain and rough climate were shown to be unforgiving and quite treacherous at times, making movement sluggish and definitely exhausting. On top of that, soldiers had to battle the stealth of the Japanese invaders in the jungle and their notorious combat skills. They were accurately displayed to be better trained to some extent than the militiamen, though, the enemy never really was shown to the audience. Nonetheless, this was acceptable as it highlighted the fact that fighting in those circumstances was like playing hide-and-seek. The Japanese soldiers were very well camouflaged with the help of the dank undergrowth, emerging from the shadows. They were ‘...everywhere but hard to spot, appearing like ghosts of light...’ (Kokoda- Film Reviews) reigning down terror on the enemy front. Above all, this evidently illustrates the extremities that the war volunteers encountering in …show more content…
the devastating war, being true to history. Finally, Kokoda is a compelling and vividly detailed type of film that is dependable in illuminating Australia’s proud military history on screen.
In the first place, It’s true that it’s ‘experience-based film’ on the Australian front and because of this, has a restraint on its comprehensive accuracy of the war. It’s wise to remember though that this is simply a true account regarding a young group of ‘chocos’, initially, sent to Papua New Guinea as maintenance personnel and was intentionally not a full account of the overall war. Also, this film was made on a low budget, which made even higher physical demand of the cast and smaller depth of the conflict. As a result, the film is seen as a fine example of a successful history piece, of which low budget filmmaking is at its best, being represented in the film industry. In addition to this, some may say that the level of destruction and subsequent casualties on both fronts experienced in the film didn’t seem realistic enough. Whilst the casualties didn’t seem to be that awfully on both sides of the war, the intensity of it and brutally honest impact was implied and was clearly exceptional in its depiction. It was quite genuine its portrayal of the frightening yet very crucial war for Australia, shown through the impossible task that the young men were faced with. According to the journalist, Sandy George, ‘Kokoda is a testament to the absolute madness and absurdity of the concept of war, and to the horror and nightmarish
nature of the reality of war.’ To sum up, this was about Australia’s struggle to keep the liberation of the country’s lifestyle but moreover, the proper earning of its nationhood as it ‘...was the first and only time we’ve fought against an enemy to prevent the invasion of Australia…’ (Source I- 1992). If the depth and soul of the nation ‘...was founded at Gallipoli it was certainly confirmed in the defence of our homeland here’ (Source I- 1992). Anyways, there’s always going to be a small degree of biased views on films either way as there’s secondary sources. Regardless, the Kokoda Campaign was represented very well in the perspective of those Australian men. Therefore, it surely has the film it deserves in relating to Australia and studying it as a reliable source even if it’s a couple of decades overdue. In conclusion, for a fim published in the 21st century, the historical accuracy of the film is well above board, showing that film can open a wonderful window into history. Firstly, for film truthfully portrays the troops of Australia as untrained and in all respects, captures their mateship and teamwork in the action. Next, the heavy grounds and conditions and then, their adaption to that wilderness was shown throughout. Also, the significance of the battle and vigorous pride of the australians was successfully depicted despite it being a short film based on the perspective of a few australians. Ultimately, this is convincingly a wonder of a film and more than beneficial when using it as studying material as it’s most certainly true to the nature of the event.
Kokoda track campaign was one of the most important battles in WWII. There are several reasons why this battle was so significant. Firstly, Kokoda track campaign stopped the invasion of Australia. Secondly, the Kokoda track campaign lead to the victory of WWII with the defeat of Japan. Lastly, the conditions that all the troops at the Kokoda campaign had to go through was atrocious and against the ally troop’s odds. This battle leads to the development of the nation. It was an important aspect in WW2 because it leads to Japan’s defeat. This is why Kokoda was the most important battle fought by the Australian’s in WWII.
In the biographical film Mabo the Audience is positioned by the filmmakers to see Eddie Koiki Mabo as a hardworking, tenacious and strong man.
The Kokoda Campaign, also known as the Battle that saved Australia, was a series of battles in which the Japanese fought the Australian and Americas for control over Port Moresby. Had the Japanese been successful in taking over Port Moresby, Australia would have been under serious threat. This was a significant event in Australian History because it was the first time the Australian Nation had been threatened by invasion. This was a significant event in Australian History because as it was a time to reflect upon those who put others lives before theirs for the safety of this Country.
Then it was the outback pioneer, battling the bush to build a new nation prior to the First World War. The Anzac legend – bold and ferocious males, unwilling to bow to military discipline, never flinched in battle defined the evolution of the image of Australian masculinity. Professor Manning Clark in his opus A History of Australia imaged the bronzed and noble Anzac as males involved in sex orgies, having violent scuffles, and in Egypt burned belongings of local people, brawled, got drunk and rioted and patronised brothels. Hero and larrikin, ratbag and rebel, the Anzacs ... ...
I was raised on the movie The Sandlot. My my dad played baseball through college and my brother has played since he could hold a bat. My mom, sister, and I also played softball when we were little. One could say that we are a “baseball family.” My dad first introduced this movie to me, and I was attracted to it not only because it is a fun film about baseball, but also because it has an entertaining soundtrack. The music fits well with the storyline and makes you feel like you are playing baseball and hanging out with the boys in the sixties. I also was raised listening to this genre of music and more songs from some of these bands. Throughout this paper, I will critique the main songs in The Sandlot that make it popular, as well as give a short biography of each band.
The Kokoda Battle occurred from the 21st July 1942 to 16th November in 1942, during World War II. It was a campaign which resulted in an aggressive fight between the Japanese and the Allies. I believe that, based on my research, the Kokoda Battle in World War II was a significant battle for Australians to a great extent. I believe this for three reasons: firstly, the battle was culturally significant to Australia: secondly, the battle was strategically significant to Australia: and thirdly, the battle was of military significance to Australia. I will argue that these reasons are three strong reasons.
Good morning members of the Mt Gravatt show society. Did you know that World War Two is known as the most destructive war in history? It killed over 60 million people and had a lot more far-reaching impacts than any other wars. Published in 1988 in Inside Black Australia, an anthology of Aboriginal poetry, “The Black Rat” by a famous author and researcher, Iris Clayton, was a poem inspired by her father, Cecil, who fought in the war. The poem describes the depressing life of an Aboriginal soldier who helped off the German army at Tobruk at the time. The message in the poem is that the Aboriginal soldiers did not receive the benefits that European soldiers received, like farming lands after the war ended. This tells how unjust the European society was in Australia’s history.
...nce as to how the soldiers were directly impacted by the efforts at The Home Front. As a result, the first sub question; ‘Were the soldiers fighting in the Pacific influences also?’ was removed, leaving the following, more controlled set; ‘How did the challenges faced at The Home Front impact the relationships between the Australian people? Are such correlations still recognised today?’ Unlike the sources that were used to answer focus questions one to three, the information relating to the social effect of the war efforts by the Australian public, is all still valid and relevant to today. This is mainly due to the fact that the facets that were demonstrated during this particular time period, such as mateship and determination, continue to be reflected in modern day society and are the characteristics to which Australians are linked to by outsiders.
During this time more steps were taken to develop a legend by giving the troops a form of National Identity and calling them The Anzacs. We know now that it is now a part of Australia’s cultural identity and origin on the battlefield.
The Battle of Long Tan took place on the 18th of August 1966 in a rubber plantation in Phuoc Tuy Province, South Vietnam. The soldiers fought in very tough conditions; “the battle was like no other in that it occurred admits the trees and bushes of a rubber plantation,” (Parks, 2005). The plantation already gloomy was made darker by tropical downpour. Men were being killed by rifle and machine gun bullets, mortars and shrapnel from grenades fired into trees to blast splinters into the sheltering soldiers. The Australians were nearly surrounded, isolated and running out o...
I will also discuss how the young, naive soldiers arrived at war, not knowing what warfare entailed. They were shocked by the conditions and the casualties. I will also discuss the bravery shown by the ANZACS in the most dangerous conditions. I will conclude with my reasons for why the Gallipoli campaign holds such value and importance in Australian history and ideology. Australian men were very keen to get involved in the war because they felt that it was their duty and if they didn’t go to war it would make them look cowardly.
Although, most of it is accounted by the war itself, the suffering of many Australian veterans had much to do with...
Australia is a relatively young country; only becoming a unified nation in 1901 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2012). A young country is no different from a young person; identity is an issue. Questions of who am I and where do I fit in the world are asked, and unfortunately not often answered until a tragedy occurs. National identity is a sense of a nation and its people as a connected whole. This feeling of cohesiveness can be shaped by many events in a nation’s history but none more so than war. War is a stressful, traumatic affair that changes forever, not only the people that go to it but the nation as a whole. Many consider the Great War Australia’s tragedy where we became a nation (Bollard, 2013) with our own modern identity.
Peter Weir’s 1981 film Gallipoli can in every sense of the phrase be called an ‘Australian classic’. The impact and effect this film has had upon the psyche and perspective of several generations of Australians has been significant. Whilst it can be argued that every Australian is aware of the ANZAC legend, and the events that occurred on the Turkish beaches in 1915, Weir’s film encapsulates and embodies a cultural myth which is now propagated as fact and embraced as part of the contemporary Australian identity. The film projects a sense of Australian nationalism that grew out of the 1970’s, and focuses on what it ‘means’ to be an Australian in a post-colonial country. In this way Gallipoli embodies a sense of ‘Australian-ness’ through the depiction of mateship and through the stark contrast of Australia to Britain. A sense of the mythic Australia is further projected through the cinematic portrayal of the outback, and the way in which Australia is presented in isolation from the rest of the world. These features combined create not only a sense of nationalism, but also a mythology stemming from the ANZAC legend as depicted within the film.
What do you think about when watching a film? Do you focus on the characters' good looks or the dialogue? Or do you go behind the scenes and think about what made the film? Maybe, it's even a combination of all three. No matter what comes to mind first, an important part of any good movie will be what you see. A camera and good director or cinematographer is needed to make that possible. Different directors and cinematographers will use different camera techniques to make you focus on what you see. Camera techniques show emphasis in films, because they make you focus more on situations and people. They are especially important in Darren Aronofsky’s Requiem for a Dream.