Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lawrence kohlberg theory of moral development
Essay on Jean Piaget theory
Lawrence kohlberg theory of moral development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lawrence kohlberg theory of moral development
Kohlberg's Moral Stages Through understanding the stages of moral development, it is possible to develop or improve an individual's morals or values. Kohlberg's stages of moral development are based on a psychological theory that was originally conceived by Jean Piaget. Kohlberg's theory reviews moral reasoning from the perspective of six developmental stages, where each higher stage responded to moral dilemmas more adequately in comparison to its predecessor. In other words, Kohlberg's theory states that people progress in their moral reasoning moving through six stages that were classified into three levels. This paper aims at explaining Kohlberg's theory of moral stages and reviewing most common critique of his work. Kohlberg based his theory on the findings …show more content…
In accordance with Bee (1994), in addition to moral behavior, it is also important to review individual's habits that were developed over time, such as an individual's perception of situation and necessity for participation, potential costs and benefits for acting in specific way, and competing motive including peer pressure, self interest and other factors. Robisnson (1981) argued that Kohlberg's theory failed to take into account such issues as property rights and the common good of society (as cited in Watson & Skinner, 2012, p. 194). Wade and Travis (2002) criticized Kohlberg's theory for ignorance of three limitations, including discounting of influence of education and culture on moral reasoning (as cited in Watson & Skinner, 2012, p. 194). Moreover, similarly to Bee (1994) scientists identified ignorance of situational aspect of moral reasoning (as cited in Watson & Skinner, 2012, p. 194). The last, third limitation of Kohlberg's theory is related to the inconsistency between moral reasoning and behavior that was not accounted in his
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development is three levels consisting of two stages in each. Kohlberg’s Theory explains how a human’s mind morally develops. Level one is typically common in younger children. The two stages in level one are pre-conventional stages. Stage one is obedience and punishment driven; one will judge an action by the consequences given. Stage two is out of self interest. Level two is mostly common in teenagers. The stages in this level
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development shows the different stages of morality as people change as they get older (McLeod). He had three levels which broke down his stages
Kohlberg’s theory was often criticized for being culturally biased towards individualistic cultures because the third and highest level of morality pertained most to middle-class Americans (168). Erikson’s theory of stage development revolved around accomplishing certain psychological goals to develop onto the next stage of life. Whichever goal was completed, would determine if a person could move on happily or have problems along the way (Myers 170).
moral development. In these stages, Kohlberg concentrates on the reasons why people act the way they do; not the way they think about their actions or what action they take, but the reasoning behind their actions.
In Kohlbergs moral stages five & six people begin to understand morals and social good then moral reasoning. Basic human rights become important as well as principles.
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development demonstrates the theory of what people do and why people do it. Lawrence Kohlberg wrote six theories of moral development, which consist of three levels and two stages in each level. The levels are Pre-Conventional, Conventional, and Postconventional. In the Pre-Conventional level, two stages are
Many people might battle with internal battles on a situation, which would stop them from doing something that they know is wrong. Is it because of guilt, the feeling of having regret? For a child, maybe they are thinking about getting in trouble with their parents or being or punishment. To better understand, Kohlberg established three levels which helps explains individuals that are at six different levels of moral development. Kohlberg Moral Development steps consists of three levels each consisting of two stages. (Williams, C., & Arrigo, B.( 2015,August 10.) The first level is Preconventional Morality (self-focused) with the stages of Punishment and Obedience (perceptions of right and wrong (, and Instrumental Purpose and Exchange. (Advancing
That would affect how children develop moral standards as well. An example of this would be, if a child knew that they were to get rewarded for things similar to potty-training or performing well in school, then they would try to do their best. The child will carry these lessons with them as they grow and mature. In this paper we will be discussing Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, giving insight into what other factors may affect the development of morality, and dissecting parenting, placing emphasis on parenting and its effects that it may have. These can also be changed by environmental factors as well, but both our genetic makeup and the environment we experience will influence our overall development, including our moral development (Srivastava et al., 2013).
They are able of solving problems using reasoning and logic. They can organize facts and events in mature fashion and figure out possible moves and their outcomes. They can also deal with proportions and analogies and reflect on their own thinking. One of the major themes of development is moral development. The most influential research on development was done by Lawrence Kohlberg. It was influenced by Piaget’s cognitive developmental approach. Kohlberg divided Moral development into 6 stages. The first stage is called Preconventional level. During this stage individuals recognize labels of “good” and “bad”, right and wrong, but do not interpret these labels in terms of social standards. The next stage is called Conventional level. During this level individuals make moral judgments based on expectations, whether the expectations are coming from family or society. This level of morality is shown mainly by adolescents and adults. The next level is the post conventional level. During this stage individuals accept and stand by society’s rules and laws but tend to view them in terms of the underlying principles. Individuals may also follow personal ethical principles. This is where they take into account human rights or life and
For my self-assessment, I chose to discuss the Middle Childhood, Adolescence, and Young Adulthood life stages. The theories of human behavior that will be discussed are Erikson’s Psychosocial theory, Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning, and Albert Bandura’s social learning theory. I chose these life stages because they are the stages where I have experienced many events that have shaped me into the person I am today. There are a number of factors that have played a role in my development over a period of time and I will discuss them throughout my paper.
development of individuals. Although Kohlberg based his theory on Piaget’s, his theory focused on moral reasoning.
Kohlberg’s theory of the stages of moral development has gained some popularity despite being controversial. The claim that the levels form a “ladder,” the bottom being the immature child with a pre-conventional level and the top being a post conventional ethical individual. The sequence is unvarying and the subject must begin at the bottom with aspirations to reach the top, possibly doing so. (7) Research confirms that individuals from different cultures actually progress according to Kohlbergs theory, at least to the conventional level. Kohlberg’s stages of moral development continue to provide a foundation for psychology studies of moral reasoning. (6)
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
According to Kohlberg, individuals progress through a series of stages in the evolution of their sense of justice and in the kind of reasoning that they utilize to make moral judgments (Feldman, R., 2013, p. 426). His work modified and expanded from Jean Piaget’s previous work to form a theory of cognitive development that explained how pre-adolescent children develop moral reasoning (Cherry, K., 2014, October 12). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development focuses on children’s ability to distinguish right from wrong based on their perception. His theory claims that individuals progress through the levels morality in a fixed order and
Part One:The criticisms of Kohlberg's moral development stages seem to center around three major points, his research methods, the "regression" of stage four, and finally his goals.The first criticism that I would like to address is that of his research methods. Kohlberg is often criticized for not only his subject selection, but also the methods by which he tries to extricate data from those subjects. His initial study consisted of school boys from a private institution in Chicago. The problem with this is fairly obvious, that this does not represent a significant portion of the population to allow for generalized conclusions. In other words, how can we test some boys from Chicago and ascertain that this is how all people develop worldwide?I believe that the answer to this criticism comes from the theory that it relates to.