Klemens Von Metternich's Views On The French Revolution

680 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Napoleon's legacy summary

Q6. Based on the knowledge that I have learned, I believe that the punishment given to France was both fair and unfair. From France's point of view, I believe that they accepted the punishments given to them. In my opinion, I think that the French got off somewhat easy. If you think about the consequences that could have been given to France, you can infer that it could have been a lot worse for them. Yes, it was devastating to find out that they would be losing a lot of their land; however, they were left with quite a lot. When the Congress of Vienna met they agreed that their main goal was to: have a new European order, one that included collective security and stability for all throughout Europe. The fate of the New France would be decided amongst representative from the Quadruple Alliance; thus being, Austria, Great Britain, Russia, and Prussia. One representative was a foreign minister from Austria, his name was Klemens von Metternich. Metternich had a large voice …show more content…

Metternich firmly believed that the laws and stability of a nation were to remain the same and never change. Metternich had three ideal goals that he wanted to address during the Congress of Vienna. First, Metternich believed that they should prevent future issues by placing boarders around France by using strong countries. Yes, for the people of France this may seem unfair; however, it made sense as to why the Congress would want to take this plan into action. The Congress of Vienna were worried about the legacy that Napoleon had left behind. If all the people of France came together they could possibly reignite the spark Napoleon had left within each other them. Napoleon gave people ideas that it was possible, all you had to do was set your mind to the task in hand. In the eyes of the Congress of Vienna you can understand as to why they would not want to take any chances in something like this happening

Show More
Related

  • Ap Euro Dbq On Napoleon Bonaparte

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    Napoleon just maintains the goals of the French Revolution since he needed to secure and reinforce his own energy. Amid his ascent to power, Napoleon stuck to the goals obediently. In his discourse to his troops, Napoleon said, "We are taking up arms as liberal foes, and we wish just to squash the despots who subjugate [the Italian people]" (Document 1). He instructs them to be deferential of different nations, to give them rights they have the privilege to appreciate. This takes after Locke's illumination thoughts, that everybody has natural rights that can't be taken away.

    Read More

  • American History in the book White Devil

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    To summarize the book into a few paragraphs doesn't due it the justice it deserves. The beginning details of the French and Ind...

    Read More

  • Of Prince Klemens Von Metternich's Political Confessions Of Faith

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    The French people were quick to blame the government for all the misfortune they possess, yet ignored the potential evil or crisis the social body was heading towards within themselves. Because of the rapid sequence of horrific events in the beginning of the French revolution, it prevented the subversive principles to be spread passes the frontiers of France, and the wars of conquest which succeeded them gave to the public mind a direction little favorable to revolutionary principles (2). French men have disgraced the religion by ‘attacking with a steady and systematic animosity, and all it is there that the weapon of ridicule has been used with the most ease and success (2). Metternich was not in support of the French

    Read More

  • French Revolution Dbq Essay

    1455 Words  | 3 Pages

    The French Revolution was a period of political upheaval that occurred in France during the latter half of the 18th century. This revolution marked an end to the system of feudalism and the monarchy in France and a rise to democracy and new Enlightenment ideas. By 1789, when the revolution began, France was in a deep financial crisis due to the debt they had obtained over many years of reckless spending and France was nearly bankrupt. These financial issues fell almost completely on the bottom social class or the Third Estate which made up a majority of the country. Because of this financial trouble the common people were heavily taxed leaving many of them in poverty. In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy

    Read More

  • Reign Of Terror DBQ

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Liberty, equality, and freedom are all essential parts to avoiding anarchy and maintaining tranquility even through the most treacherous of times. The Reign of Terror is well known as the eighteen month long French Revolution (1793-1794). In this period of time, a chief executive Maximilien Robespierre and a new French government executed gigantic numbers of people they thought to be enemies of the revolution; inside and outside of the country. The question is; were these acts of the new French government justified? Not only are the acts that occurred in the Reign of Terror not justified, they were barbaric and inhumane.

    Read More

  • Was The Reign of Terror Justified?

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    A rather ominous name for the unaware; “The Reign of Terror”. An oblivious person could completely bypass the horrifying events related to the French Revolution, had it been named differently. The title for these events is appropriate from my perspective. Those four words could easily interest a curious, ordinary person, and so the history can survive, along with the information transferring to yet another carrier. Of course, everyone can benefit from knowing a few terms that can increase your understanding of the topic. An absolute monarch is a person that has absolute power among his or her people. The Estates General is a representative body drawn from the three ‘estates’ into which society had been theoretically divided. A fraternity is a group of people sharing a common profession or interests. A radical person is a person who advocates thorough or complete political or social reform. The device used to execute most people was the guillotine: a machine with a heavy blade sliding vertically in grooves, used for beheading people. The Reign of Terror is generally defined as a period of remorseless repression or bloodshed, but in particular, it is the period of the Terror during the French Revolution. Conservatives are people that hold to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation. Now that we can speak of our topic with more knowledge of terms typically used for this subject, we can address the pending question. Was The Reign of Terror justified? An outstanding amount of people died for good and bad reasons. Every system was corrupt, there was practically no right and wrong; no order, just rebellion. Several conflicting arguments can be made, but there is a definite decision to make in this situatio...

    Read More

  • Seven Years War

    2264 Words  | 5 Pages

    What would the state of the free world be today if the alliance of the war of the Austrian Succession had not reversed in the Seven Years’ War? Would we speak French, still be “New England”, or perhaps New Spain? The fact is that while we may not know for certain that today’s world would be different, you can rest assured that the Seven Years’ War set the tone in Europe, and more importantly in North America for the next half century.

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Origins of Second World War by A.J.P. Taylor

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.” (p.20-21) As a result of the war, Russia was severely weakened, which greatly upset the balance of power in Europe. Taylor claims that, “What gave France independence as a ...

    Read More

  • Napoleon Betrayed the Revolution

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    The only way of determining whether Napoleon consolidated or betrayed the revolution is to explore his actions such as his military success, dictatorship and social reforms. The difficulty of this analysis is that Napoleon's motives for his actions determine whether he consolidated or betrayed the Revolution. If Napoleon betrayed the revolution, then he betrayed the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity. For it is ideals rather than realities that Napoleon allegedly betrayed. The reality of the French revolution is 8 periods of constant change and succession of policies and leaders, with each new leader and party bringing amendments to the revolution.

    Read More

  • Causes of World War I

    1833 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1815, the Congress of Vienna set forth a political plan for Europe which would create stability among the European nations after Napoleon suffered defeat (Ross 74). ...

    Read More

  • France and World War II

    1399 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...as an autonomous decision that was made so that the safety of the country of France was ensured. France went against the wishes of the people, but always maintained the safety of the people as its main responsibility. War may have always been in the future, but the leaders struggled with their preparations for it.

    Read More

  • The French Revolution: Avoidable Or Inevitable?

    945 Words  | 2 Pages

    The social differences in France were very unreasonable. People openly argued that “social differences should not be defined by law, as they were in the old regimes order” (2). In France, much of the inequality came from the social class system. It led to angry peasants and tons of revolting. This could have been avoided if France maintained equality for all estates, as it would have been rational. In addition, the clergy and nobles were given many rights which “included top jobs in government, the army, the courts, and the Church” (109). This was very biased as they were able to get the highest jobs, not because they earned it, but because of their social stature. Meanwhile, commoners or bourgeoisie, were not granted those jobs even if they had the ability to do them. This caused much of the third estate to become mad which led to uncivilized manner in France. If the government had just given equal rights and granted jobs by merit opposed to social class rankings, there would have been less drama between the estates and everything would have been

    Read More

  • What Is Lefebvre's View Of The French Revolution

    198 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thomas Carlyle and Georges Lefebvre present contradicting views on the French Revolution; however, their views are fundamentally the same. Carlyle and Lefebvre both believe that it is people who create history, it is only the groups of people that they disagree on. Carlyle believes it is the few great people who create history. They are the leaders of countries, activists, religious leaders, and antagonists. The heroes and antiheroes are the ones who will decide how the past will transform into the future. Georges Lefebvre believes it is the general population, the average people that create history. He believes that when these people unite they will overtake a single man, without obstacle. Be that as it may, Lefebvre poses the stronger argument

    Read More

  • The Downfall of Napoleon

    743 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... has been shown in 1792, there were many different individuals and groups which hoped to be strengthened by war. Napoleon had crushed opposition at home by his victories abroad. French foreign policy had become a reflection of the uncertainties of French government, France and the French people had acquired the reputation of being restless and dangerous as they involved the rest of Europe in their quest for a regime that would prove to be permanent and satisfactory. France had always been living dangerously.

    Read More

  • Bismarck Napoleon III and the Outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    The unification of Germany threw all of Europe off its axis. With the formation of this new power there were now five major powers instead of four. This would work to unsettle age-old alliances and confuse the entire European continent for more than twenty years. Not least among the nations swept of their proverbial feet was France. France was a rival with the German alliance long before it merged into one state, but the new stability of a unified Germany made it a much more powerful entity. France scrambled to try and establish a sense of security, immediately demanding compensation in the form of the Rhine’s west bank and Belgium, which Bismarck quickly denied (Howard 40). It became quickly obvious that these two nations would be forced to a flashpoint and soon.

    Read More

More about Klemens Von Metternich's Views On The French Revolution

Open Document