Kinship As A Mechanism For Social Integrating

1038 Words3 Pages

Kinship as a Mechanism for Social Integrating

It is often demonstrated in many anthropological studies that kinship acts as an

important means for social integrating in a given society. But is it a fair

generalization to say that kinship always functions as a mechanism for social

integration?

Kinship refers to the relationships established through marriage or descent

groups that has been proven in some societies to lead to social integrating, or

the process of interaction with other individuals. When researching the case

studies we have explored, I found that two main events that utilized kinship for

social integrating were death and marriage.

In the Trobriand Islands of Papua New Guinea, in the northern Kiriwina Island,

is where the Trobrianders, studied by Anette Wiener(1988), live. Death in the

Trobrianders is a momentous event full of mourning and economical organization.

The death of someone is a detailed example of how kinship can lead to social

integrating. Wiener explains, " The message of death spreads rapidly to other

villages where the dead person has relatives or friends," showing that death is

not only uses kinship to integrate individuals, but entire villages too. The

Trobrianders are a matrilineal society, meaning that all descent groups and

kinship recognition are passed through the mother. They are organize into dalas,

matrilineal descent groups and kumilas, one of four named matrilineal clans.

During Wiener's fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands, she experienced the death of

an old chief, Uwelasi. The preparation of the burial of a dead person is a

complicated division of responsibilities. These roles of obligation are filled

by those in Uwelasi's dala and his kumila. All these people must come together,

from other villages sometimes, to help with he planning of this event. A large

part of Uwelasi's death was the distribution of his possessions, this involved

the people from his dala assisted by those from his kumila as toliuli (workers)

and those who were related to him through marriage or patrilineally as toliyouwa.

The toliuli and toliyouwa are united through the man's death because of their

cooperation and common responsibilities they share towards Uwelasi as his

kinsmen.

Marriage, in the Trobrianders society is also a means of social integrating.

Marriage can take place out side your v...

... middle of paper ...

...s brothers (agnates), are always in direct

competition for wives making their relationships sometimes awkward and hostile.

Thus an affine (brother in law), who a man is not in competition with can

certainly grow closer over time than one's own agnate. The examples of

fissioning and the ax fight are in direct contradiction with kinship always

being a means of integrating. These two events both involve or are linked to

arguments and separation caused by kinsmen relationships.

There are an infinite number of variables that cause integration among

individuals, groups, villages, or society as a whole; and there can be no

dispute that kinship is an important and frequent one of those variables. The

inconsistency is assuming that kinship always functions as a mechanism for

social integration in society. It is not possible to make generalizations like

'always', when discussing different societies. As we can see from the Yanomamo

and Trobriand Islanders, societies can be very different in their culture,

beliefs and traditions. There is only one safe generalization: All societies are

different, you can always assume what works in one society may not always work

in another.

More about Kinship As A Mechanism For Social Integrating

Open Document