Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of family and kinship
The concept of kinship
The concept of kinship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Significance of family and kinship
In the book Ancestral Line: The Maisin of Papua New Guinea and The Fate of The Rainforest by John Barker a concept that connects this book to what have been learned in class is the idea of kinship. I will be discussing what kinship and it’s two main components are, and how they relate to the book.
Kinship is studied primarily in social and cultural anthropology. While there is no concise definition for what kinship means in the field of anthropology it can generally be thought of as the relationships within a society that are usually based off of blood or marriage. These two things in some way shape or form are recognized in nearly every society. Links of kinship form off the basis of property rights, division of labor, and political organization
…show more content…
(Hinrichsen). In anthropology, people’s blood relations tell a lot about what is important in a society. People trace their descent and identity based on their ancestry. That ancestry can be traced through either unilineal, matrilineal, patrilineal and double decent or bilateral kinship (Hinrichsen). How family is determined also says a lot about a society. It makes a big difference whither or not a society is oriented around the the families of orientation or the families of procreation. Who a society considers apart of the family is also telling of that society. The second main aspect of kinship, marriage, is important because a society determines what marriages are acceptable. Different society view marriage differently so for some marriage can be an economic or religious union. In most cases it is semi permanent, and in some religions it is seen as everlasting. In any case there are usually rights and obligations acknowledged between spouses. The idea of marriage or a marriage like structure is nearly universal. Marriage can solve many common problems in a society such as how to share work and resources, how to care for children and how to control the population. There are different marital practices such as endogamy and exogamy. There are also several different forms of marriage: monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, and group marriages (Hinrichsen). What the norms are in a society in terms or kinship give insight to the values and traditions that culture may have. Families and marriage make up the main focus of kinship. What they mean and represent are always changing with the times and have grown to include and represent different things to different people. While not every culture may call it marriage, family, or kinship these ideas have been seen throughout nearly all cultures for many years and prove to be important to maintaining a society. The book, Ancestral Lines, is the story of John Barker's experience studying the Maisin of of Papua New Guinea. In his book, Barker discusses many anthropological topics. He informs us the core values the of the Maisin with include reciprocity in action, ancestral traditions and locations. Due to these core values, the Maisin are dedicated to their traditional way of life and try their hardest to conserve it, along with their land (Barker). The Maisin have long battled with falling victim to canonization, modernization, and westernization. Through all of these things they still try to maintain their own societal values and incorporate new and more modern concepts into their society on their own terms rather than it being solely forced upon them by outside forces. In this book, the topic of Kinship is introduced in Chapter Three: The Social Design. In this chapter Barker talks about how the Maisin socialize children into gender roles, the different kinship groups they acknowledge and what role they play, and the alliances formed through marriage (Barker). In this case I am more focused on the latter two saw they exemplify the anthropological understanding of kinship. According to Barker, Maison families resemble western families in the sense that they acknowledged mothers, father, brothers and sisters, but they differed mainly in that extended families were labeled with the same identifiers as immediate family. In this society they practiced “patrilineal descent, in which ancestry is traced through a series of male links … although many of the societies east of the Masin practice matrilineal systems in which descent is traced through female links,” (Barker 89-90). They have decent groups which are comprised of lineage groups and clans.
Liniages groups are usually smaller and unnamed. Through lineage, they pass down property, tools, hunting equipment, drums and other items. If a man doesn’t have sons to pass these things down to then they are given to the sons of their brother. Clans are larger, named, and seen as permanent. Clans are comprised of all the descendants of at least two lineages. Elders in a clan can link the present day members of the clan back to the founding ancestors of the clan. This can become complicated so it is typical for people to the accept the clan that their father belonged to as their own …show more content…
(Barker). Lineages and clans are the basis of what families look like in this culture. How connected they are through these groups determines their interactions and how much they depend on one another. In these culture it is acknowledged that there is a difference in distance relatives and immediate relatives, but they are not labeled as such (Barker). The next part of kinship, marriage, is is also talked about in the book. Barker informs us that in the Maisin culture: A person’s success in life depends on his or her ability to meet both responsibilities to close kin and to create and maintain bonds with more distant relatives and strangers. The most important of these bonds is marriage. As in many cultures, the Maisin regard marriage not merely as a union between two individuals but as an alliance between households, extended families, and clans This is not to say that love an affection are not involved. The rich oral traditions related by elders over the evening fires incluse many romantic stories of courtship. (Barker 97) This description gives a fair insight into what kinship and marriage mean in the Maisin culture.
He is basically saying that the way they treat their kin and the union of clans are of the utmost importance. Being successful in those two thing was equivalent to being successful at life which. This is a stark contrast to the values of western cultures where career success and material objects are seen as the number one indication of success in life. To the Maisin, to have succeeded in life is to have a success in both major aspects of kinship. It is also important to note that while marriage has other implications, that the happiness of those involved in the marriage is also
important. The author tells us that in old times the Maisin practice what is called sister exchange. This means that two clans would come to an agreement to provide the other with a wife. This later broadened to include a husbands as well. This agreement was typically made while the children were young, but it was important because the clans are exogamous, meaning the members are required to marry outside of their own clan. Such agreements kept clans in harmony because it was seen as a fair agreement that each clan would get what they give, in this case a husband or a bride (Barker). Barker also notes that even though this was the custom in those times, it didn’t always work out that way. Sometimes the betrothed would fall refuse to marry, in love with someone else, and in some cases elope. This is all problematic because it causes a somewhat breach of contract. Those involved in breaking their marital contract would often times just never return home because their actions may have triggered brutality amongst the clans that were in agreement (Barker). In conclusion, kinship relates directly to blood lines and marriage specifically. Kinship, to some degree is important to every culture, but in cultures like the Maisin it is especially important because it offer a way for the community to expand and share resources, amongst other things. The ways in which the Maisin have integrated kinship into their society are extensive and complex, but it has proven to withstand the test of time. Like in any society there are cultural norms, and unspoken rules that are understop but nevertheless at the heart of their society is genuinely caring for one another. This idea presents itself in many ways and the Maisin have managed to adapted their beliefs in a sense to keep up with the times.
In John Barker’s Ancestral Lines, the author analyzes the Maisin people and their culture centered around customs passed from previous generations, as well as global issues that impact their way of living. As a result of Barker’s research, readers are able to understand how third world people can exist in an rapid increasing integrated system of globalization and relate it not only to their own society, but others like the Maisin; how a small group of indigenous people, who are accustomed to a modest regimen of labor, social exceptions, and traditions, can stand up to a hegemonic power and the changes that the world brings. During his time with these people the author was able to document many culture practices, while utilizing a variety of
In the novel Waterlily by Ella Cara Deloria, kinship plays a key role in the depiction of Dakota society in the novel. Throughout the novel, kinship is instrumental in the development of community ties and familial relations throughout Dakota society. With her depiction of kinship roles and obligations, Deloria argues that kinship brings honor and interconnectedness between the members of society. Through her portrayal of Waterlily’s communities ties, her view of kinship practices is strengthened through her illustration of the Dakota civilization’s view that kinship practices help extend graciousness throughout their community and create bonds that last throughout generations.
People study history because they wish to strengthen human connections. The same can be drawn about the pursuit of genealogy. Whether it be connections to nobility, to a specific ethnic group or a specific event in history, there are diverse motivations to study genealogy According to Francois Weil, “Genealogy provides a powerful lens to understand personal and collective identities.” In essence Weil’s Family Trees: A History of Genealogy in America is a study of American identity over a span of four centuries through a discussion of genealogy and family history.
The practice of matrilineality in the Americas did not imply matriarchy but served as a means of reckoning kinship. Matrilineal ties helped link extended families into clans and this ensured their
He is explaining how a wife’s life is that of her husband. No matter what condition or temperament her husband comes home in, she must tend to his every need no questions asked. This is a very unfair way for women to live their lives seeing as she has hardly anything in her life that is her own.
The Hopi stress group cooperation. The tribe is organized around a clan system. In a clan system, all the members consider themselves relatives. The clans form a social glue that has held the Hopi villages together. Clan membership provides a singular Hopi identity.
One of the first tasks that Raybeck takes on in the ethnography is documenting kinship. He later describes the usefulness of the genealogies he created, but the process of creating them was quite difficult. He says that the Kelantanese often use “Arabic naming conventions” (Raybeck, 1996, p.62), making a task that seems relatively simple, quite complex. Combine that with a high divorce rate and the number of relatives sky rockets. But through his interviews on kinship he discovered that most Kelantanese had a “detailed and accurate knowledge of very extensive kin networks” (Raybeck, 1996, p. 62). This helped him to make the discovery of the level of importance placed on family and village support. Raybeck credits much of his success to this ethnography to his key informants. One that he often praises is his neighbor Hussein. When Raybeck was first conducting his interviews he had to learn the difference in politeness in Kelantanese culture. Hussein had to subtly remind him that Raybeck (1996) must “behave like a hen, not a rooster” (p. 60). His key informant helped to set him on the right path to gaining the information for his research question, but also taught him a key aspect of culture that, until then, he was failing in as a participant
Sibling relationships relates to brothers sisters and in a lot of families in this era step-brothers and step-sisters. Family is hopefully the other members of each side of the parent’s family who are involved with the child at some point, in some families this is a very strong relationship due to religion or beliefs and in others distance or other reasons may mean that family are not around as much. Friendships, these hopefully are being built even as babies if babies are taken to groups to socialise and learn how to be with other babies and children. Emotional relationships are the ones that affect the child the most so if a parent shouts for one reason or another the child will feel upset as they do not like a person they care about raising their voice. Acquaintances can be anyone from the health visitor to the post person if they are a regular person who is seen every so often, my son has to see the bin men on a Friday morning and watch them empty our bins and say thank you.
Native Americans established primary relationships either through a clan system, descent from a common ancestor, or through a friendship system, much like tribal societies in other parts of the world. In the Choctaw nation, " Moieties were subdivided into several nontotemic, exogamous, matrilineal 'kindred' clans, called iksa." (Faiman-Silva, 1997, p.8) The Cheyenne tirbe also traced their ancestry through the woman's lineage. Moore (1996, p. 154) shows this when he says "Such marriages, where the groomcomes to live in the bride's band, are called 'matrilocal'." Leacock (1971, p. 21) reveals that "...prevailing opinion is that hunting societies would be patrilocal.... Matrilineality, it is assumed, followed the emergence of agriculture...." Leacock (p. 21) then stated that she had found the Montagnais-Naskapi, a hunting society, had been matrilocal until Europeans stepped in. "The Tanoan Pueblos kinship system is bilateral. The household either is of the nuclear type or is extended to include relatives of one or both parents...." (Dozier, 1971, p. 237)
The political economy of kinship in Paleolithic societies are different than the political economy in today’s society. This is because of three distinct differences on how things in the kinships are dealt with. They are how we deal Power or who is king of the castle. Marriage Customs such as divorce and when it is ok to get married. The last is child-bearing like how the child was raised and what children did growing up. Nisa is a !Kung woman in Paleolithic society that I will use to compare here political economy of kinship to mine.
Since these traditions have become apparent through centuries they are customary and have a tendency to lack individualism, as the group among which a person lives is seen as more important over the individual. In many parts of the world today, you can examine such cultures and see the ways that individuals offer themselves to family and community life.
The Inuits valued their families and each member looked out for each other. Kinship typically included three past generations from the paternal as well as maternal sides. These generations were extremely close. The doings of one member were felt as the accountability of the whole group. Small feuds often resulted between different families.
In the novel, “The Heir,” there were many situations that caught my attention. A problem from the story was that, Baden, a member of the Selection, had a fight with Eadlyn, a princess. So, how the problem started was that, Baden basically asked Eadlyn out. Eadlyn was friendly to Baden for about an hour and then, she walked away, as if nothing happened. The next day, Baden showed up at Eadlyn’s front door, explaining to her how he wanted to leave the palace and how he felt when Eadlyn “shot him down” the night before. To elaborate, that was when they got into a fight. Eadlyn tried to explain herself to Baden, about how she was extremely busy and she never really said “no” when Baden asked her out. After a while later, Eadlyn decided to give
So when discussing unilineal groups and nonlineal groups, something that one has to keep in mind is what cultures each descends from. Unilineal groups consist of lineages, clans, phratries, and moieties. Lineages are a form of lineal descent from an ancestor, ancestry, or pedigree. An example of lineage are people who have the same relatives from 100 years ago. Clans are a close-knit and interrelated families, and an example of this can be found in families in the Scottish Highlands. Phratries are a kinship group constituting an intermediate division in the primitive’s structure of the Hellenic tribe or phyle. Moieties consists of one of two units into which a tribe or community is divided on the basis of unilineal descent.
A family might include anyone related by blood or by adoption such as: step parents, grandparents acting as parents, and even brothers and sisters sharing the same household. However, worldwide “the family is regarded as the most ba...